Re: [PATCH] ip autoconfig with modules, kernel 2.4

2001-05-11 Thread Brian J. Murrell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 07:38:33PM +0100, Russell King wrote: As long as you can get the root server IP and path from the DHCP client, I can do that. :-) then you mount it in a directory, and use pivot_root() to change to that directory. Cool. See the Changing the root device of

Re: 2.4.4 kernel freeze for unknown reason

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
I have been monitoring the memory usage constantly with the gnome memory usage meter and noticed that as swap grows it is never freed back up. I can kill off most of the large applications, such as The swap handling in 2.4 is somewhat hosed at the moment. If I turn swap off all together or

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Albert D. Cahalan
Hans Reiser writes: Tell us what to code for, and so long as it doesn't involve looking up files by their 32 bit inode numbers we'll probably be happy to code to it. The Neil Brown stuff is already coded for though. Next time around, when you update the on-disk format, how about allowing

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac7

2001-05-11 Thread Wayne . Brown
I always make mrproper after applying your patches, and I still got exactly the same problem with nfs that Marek found. There were no errors or warnings during the compile of the objects in the fs/nfs directory or the linking of nfs.o. Wayne Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/11/2001

Re: 2.4.2 - Locked keyboard

2001-05-11 Thread Chipzz
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: 2.4.2 - Locked keyboard I changed the keyboard and looked at the keyboard plugs unsucessful= ly. Could this be related to a kernel bug or an userspace issue??? How = can I debug it? I

PROBLEM: 2.4.4ac7 oops, locks in init on boot

2001-05-11 Thread Gordon Sadler
The ongoing saga of newer via chipsets and AMD CPU's. Please CC replies as I'm I read here via nntp. Please see my previous PROBLEM reports for hardware info. I compiled and boot 2.4.4ac7, got as far as init. Multiple oops's scrolled off the screen before I could see them. Attached is the final

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac7

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
I always make mrproper after applying your patches, and I still got exactly the same problem with nfs that Marek found. There were no errors or warnings during the compile of the objects in the fs/nfs directory or the linking of nfs.o. Curious : my build has #define __ver_filemap_fdatasync

[PATCH] new version of singlecopy pipe

2001-05-11 Thread Manfred Spraul
I've attached a new version of the patch. The patch is now split into 2 parts: * add copy_user_to_user() into kernel/ptrace.c. Most code is shared between access_process_vm() and copy_user_to_user(). * use the new function for singlecopy pipe. Please test it. The kernel space part should be

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac7

2001-05-11 Thread Wayne . Brown
My modules/filemap.ver has the same in it as yours. Wayne Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 05/11/2001 01:52:18 PM To: Wayne Brown/Corporate/Altec@Altec cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alan Cox), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marek P tlicki), [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac7 I

User-mode Linux ported to ppc

2001-05-11 Thread Chris Emerson
User-mode Linux is now booting on PPC Linux - it can boot with a Debian root floppy image with init=/bin/sh and poke around. It mostly works, although there are still a few problems. The current patch is available from http://www.tartarus.org/~chris/user-mode-linux/, made against recent UML CVS

Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.4ac7 oops, locks in init on boot

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
If anyone has any further suggestions/patches to run 2.4.x with K7 chosen optimizations, I'm open to testing. 'Buy an AMD chipset box..' Seriously at this point I am out of ideas. The prefetch to far effect explained the old athlon locks (step 1) people reported on all chipsets. It didnt

Re: Latest on Athlon Via KT133A chipset solution?

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
Is there a possibility to get debugging messages or register dumps without a second PC? Or is there a possibility to an unbuffered log write? e.g. write Not much. You can avoid running syslogk. The one unbuffered log source is the screen in text mode if not running it via syslogk - To

Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:04:10PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: I think with the growing acceptance of ReiserFS in the Linux community, it is tiresome to have to apply a patch again and again just to get working NFS. 2.2 NFS horrors all over again. The zero copy patches were basically self

Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
Does NFS server support for one of the included FSes not belong in the kernel? or is it that a better way is possible and this ugly one should not be included? If the latter, has anyone told Hans how to do it 'right' so he can assign someone to the task? The patch Andi forwarded me for NFS

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac7

2001-05-11 Thread Danny ter Haar
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], is the EXTRAVERSION set properly in Makefile? I use the http://www.bzim= age.org intermediate diff (chosen ~40K to ~2M) from ac6 nd I still have 2.4.4-ac6 login prompt (and Makefile says: EXTRAVERSION =3D -ac6). From the original patch (agains vanilla 2.4.4) diff

Re: Latest on Athlon Via KT133A chipset solution?

2001-05-11 Thread Christian Bornträger
Give the current -ac a spin and tell me if it works/doesnt and if not how it fails I will test it on Sunday evening, when I get back access to my Athlon. Again I am not sure if I had the same problem related to the compiler-optimizations. My problems (system freeze) started with 2.4.3-ac7. So

Loopback TCP timer bug?

2001-05-11 Thread Brad Pepers
I've got a problem where a client and server stop talking to each other after around 32 minutes. The server is sending a packet to the client every minute with 4 bytes but the client is in a GUI loop and isn't receiving them. They should just build up in the Recv-Q for the client but after

Re: [reiserfs-dev] Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3

2001-05-11 Thread Chris Mason
On Friday, May 11, 2001 12:07:08 PM -0700 Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Albert D. Cahalan wrote: Hans Reiser writes: Tell us what to code for, and so long as it doesn't involve looking up files by their 32 bit inode numbers we'll probably be happy to code to it. The Neil

Re: test -please disregard

2001-05-11 Thread Matthew Kirkwood
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Matti Aarnio wrote: *) systems include vger itself (it has died this week alone 4-5 times), Yikes! That's not a very good advertisement. Anything that the Linux-using public should know about? Matthew. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: [PATCH] SMP race in ext2 - metadata corruption.

2001-05-11 Thread Alexander Viro
On Mon, 7 May 2001, Pavel Machek wrote: OTOH with current way if you make mistake in kernel, fsck will not automatically inherit it; therefore fsck is likely to work even if kernel ext2 is b0rken [and that's fairly important] ... and by the same logics you should make fsck implement its own

Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.4ac7 oops, locks in init on boot

2001-05-11 Thread Joseph Carter
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:02:22PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: If anyone has any further suggestions/patches to run 2.4.x with K7 chosen optimizations, I'm open to testing. 'Buy an AMD chipset box..' Seriously at this point I am out of ideas. The prefetch to far effect explained the old

Re: Latest on Athlon Via KT133A chipset solution?

2001-05-11 Thread Jeremy
Just tested the -ac7 with K7 optimizations on. I see the same behavior of oopsing right after boot: [...] Freeing unused kernel memory: 216k freed Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address [...] Just fine when I go back down to k6-3, et al, optimizations.

Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.4ac7 oops, locks in init on boot

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
I'm considering it, but for AGP weirdness reasons. Have the USB bugs been worked out? I am highly dependant on USB. Only one stepping of the AMD chip had the USB funnies. AMD released the info needed to work around it and its now in the tree. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: Athlon possible fixes

2001-05-11 Thread Jussi Laako
Christian Bornträger wrote: Can you try and mail me if the Kernel 2.4.3 (without any ac patch) is stable with your system even if you use autotune? Downgrade to this kernel works fine for me. Ahmm, 2.4.3 doesn't work. Gives some IDE DMA timeouts on boot. Kernel was compiled with

Linux 2.4.4-ac8 now with added correct EXTRAVERSION

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/linux/alan/2.4-ac/ Intermediate diffs are available from http://www.bzimage.org ** ** Please note change of ftp site. ftp.kernel.org switched to using ECN and ** it seems NTL's cablemodem folks have problem

Re: [PATCH][CFT] (updated) ext2 directories in pagecache

2001-05-11 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Friday 11 May 2001 18:34, Andreas Dilger wrote: Al writes: On Fri, 11 May 2001, Andreas Dilger wrote: I've tested again, now with kdb, and the system loops in ext2_find_entry() or ext2_add_link(), because there is a directory with a zero rec_len. While the actual cause of this

Re: Athlon possible fixes

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
Ahmm, 2.4.3 doesn't work. Gives some IDE DMA timeouts on boot. Kernel w= as compiled with Pentium-MMX processor setting, but I don't know if that's enough to disable the Athlon code parts (autodetected at runtime?). That sounds totally unrelated to any Athlon optimisations So only working

Patch for 2.4.4-ac7

2001-05-11 Thread H . J . Lu
This should fix http://boudicca.tux.org/hypermail/linux-kernel/this-week/0901.html H.J. --- linux-2.4.4-ac7/mm/filemap.c.module Fri May 11 13:32:20 2001 +++ linux-2.4.4-ac7/mm/filemap.cFri May 11 13:33:03 2001 @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ * most normal filesystems (but you don't /have/ to

Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer

2001-05-11 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:51:25AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: What's a lot more important is that the mail standards say that this stuff should not be interpreted by the receivers as needing wrapping, so irregardless of good or bad design it's just plain illegal. If you want to

Re: bandwidth

2001-05-11 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:35:05AM -, mirabilos wrote: What you have todo is to learn how to configure your mailer to display headers you want. Not the displaying annoys me, it's the traffic. The headers usually are less than multiple quoted sigs, though. Headers serve a technical

Re: Athlon possible fixes

2001-05-11 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 01:51:59PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: There really needs to be a hardware fix... this doesn't stop some application having it's owne optimised code from breaking on some hardware (think games and similation software perhaps). prefetch is virtually addresses. An

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac8 now with added correct EXTRAVERSION

2001-05-11 Thread Mads Martin Jørgensen
* Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] [May 11. 2001 13:18]: 2.4.4-ac8 o Tulip driver updates(Jeff Garzik) Networking stopped working with this kernel. I have the following NIC: 02:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Lite-On Communications Inc LNE100TX (rev 20) Subsystem:

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac8 now with added correct EXTRAVERSION

2001-05-11 Thread Wayne . Brown
This fixed the problem with unresolved symbols in nfs.o. Wayne - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

Re: Not a typewriter

2001-05-11 Thread Hacksaw
If clarity is the most important consideration, then other things should be changed as well. For instance, the command we use to search for text strings in files should be called textsearch. That's a lot more clear than grep. Well, I can't disagree. Unix's biggest turn off was the stupid

Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.4ac7 oops, locks in init on boot

2001-05-11 Thread Joseph Carter
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 09:03:30PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: I'm considering it, but for AGP weirdness reasons. Have the USB bugs been worked out? I am highly dependant on USB. Only one stepping of the AMD chip had the USB funnies. AMD released the info needed to work around it and its now

Oops in 2.4.4-ac6, ksymoops output included

2001-05-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I got this oops while running 2.4.4-ac6 and trying to open a file to edit with vi. I have had this happen before while I was opening a text file but I suspect that it is just coincidence. I have included the ksymoops output for the oops and also my kernel configuration. If there are any

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac8 now with added correct EXTRAVERSION

2001-05-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Mads Martin Jørgensen wrote: * Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] [May 11. 2001 13:18]: 2.4.4-ac8 o Tulip driver updates(Jeff Garzik) Networking stopped working with this kernel. I have the following NIC: Can you define TULIP_DEBUG to 4 in

Re: Size of /proc/kcore growing over time ?

2001-05-11 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 05.11 Martin.Knoblauch wrote: I ask, because I thought the size of kproc could be used to determine the amount of physical memory. If this assumption is wrong, is there another way to achive the goal? #include sys/sysinfo.h // for get_phys_pages() #include unistd.h // for

How can I help with VIA MVP3 problems?

2001-05-11 Thread udgaard
I am not on this list but has followed it on Kernel Traffic. Incidentally I have a VIA MVP3 (82C59?) motherboard with an AMD K6-2 3D CPU and I haven't been too happy with the performance of 2.4.* kernels, and it includes every release of Linus' and AC's test kernels, when comparing to 2.2.16 (my

Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Lundell
At 1:32 PM -0300 2001-05-11, Ralf Baechle wrote: On Thu, May 03, 2001 at 12:51:25AM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: Kai Henningsen wrote: What's a lot more important is that the mail standards say that this stuff should not be interpreted by the receivers as needing wrapping, so

Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer

2001-05-11 Thread Steven Willoughby
I'm curious, though: I haven't found the mail standards that forbid receivers to wrap long lines. Certainly many mail clients do it. What's the relevant RFC? RFC 2822, 2.1.1. Thanks. It's not quite a standard yet, but it's true, it does limit lines to 998 characters. Sort of a

Re: Not a typewriter

2001-05-11 Thread Wayne . Brown
On 05/11/2001 at 04:43:13 PM Hacksaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Well, I can't disagree. Unix's biggest turn off was the stupid command names. It's a big reason why Unixoid systems aren't more commonplace. I only learned it because I was stuck at a desk with a Wyse terminal. Otherwise I

Re: How can I help with VIA MVP3 problems?

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
Supposedly there are some problems with the VIA chipsets, but apparently it has been better before so I wonder why it is worse now and what the plans are regarding any improvement? Until the past few -ac releases we accidentally turned off things on the older VIA chipsets (with a performance

PATCH: Enable IP PNP for 2.4.4-ac8

2001-05-11 Thread H . J . Lu
2.4.4-ac8 disables IP auto config by default even if CONFIG_IP_PNP is defined. Here is a patch. H.J. --- --- linux-2.4.4-ac8/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c.autoFri May 11 14:02:32 2001 +++ linux-2.4.4-ac8/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c Fri May 11 15:26:25 2001 @@ -100,7 +100,11 @@ */ int ic_set_manually

OOPS on 2.4.4-ac4

2001-05-11 Thread Ingo Renner
Hello, I have the following Hardware installed: Epox EP-8KTA2 with Athlon 800 onboard sound enabled with kernel driver cat /proc/pci PCI devices found: Bus 0, device 0, function 0: Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] (rev 2). Master Capable. Latency=8.

RE: Not a typewriter

2001-05-11 Thread Bingner Sam J. Contractor RSIS
I had an experience pretty close... but I never saw anything wrong with man... I have ALWAYS LOVED man it's the perfect help system IMO, and info is infuriating to me... There should be a but more documentation some places sure, but nothing is going to completely remedy that... because

2.4.4-ac8 doesn't work with Lite-On 82c168 PNIC rev 32

2001-05-11 Thread H . J . Lu
The tulip driver in 2.4.4-ac8 doesn't work with Lite-On 82c168 PNIC rev 32 in the NetGear FA310TX REV-D2. It sends BOOTP request and times out. H.J. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH] new version of singlecopy pipe

2001-05-11 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 05.11 Manfred Spraul wrote: Please test it. The kernel space part should be ok, but I know that the patch can cause deadlocks with buggy user space apps. I tried your patch on 2.4.4-ac8, and something strange happens. Untarring linux-2.4.4 takes a little time, disk light flashes, but

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac8 now with added correct EXTRAVERSION

2001-05-11 Thread andersg
Somewhere between ac5 and ac8 ipc broke, noticed that fakeroot stopped working, getting a function not implemented in msgget: [pid 9812] msgget(667493921, IPC_CREAT|0x180|0600) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented) ac5 works, ac8 does not.. downloading ac6 and 7 now to see exactly where it

Re: [PATCH] new version of singlecopy pipe

2001-05-11 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 05.12 J . A . Magallon wrote: On 05.11 Manfred Spraul wrote: Please test it. The kernel space part should be ok, but I know that the patch can cause deadlocks with buggy user space apps. I tried your patch on 2.4.4-ac8, and something strange happens. Untarring linux-2.4.4

Re: OOPS on 2.4.4-ac4

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
computer during this time.=20 So I don't know if this has to do with the new networkcard, the new NVIDIA Driver 0.9-769 I installed yesterday with XFree 4.3 or something else. The = --- Module Size Used by via82cxxx_audio16800 2 (autoclean) soundcore

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac8 now with added correct EXTRAVERSION

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
Somewhere between ac5 and ac8 ipc broke, noticed that fakeroot stopped working, getting a function not implemented in msgget: [pid 9812] msgget(667493921, IPC_CREAT|0x180|0600) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented) Looks you you compiled without SYS5 ipc support - To unsubscribe from

[PATCH] drivers/char/serial.c bug in ST16C654 detection

2001-05-11 Thread Val Henson
This fixes a bug in the autoconfig_startech_uarts function in serial.c. The problem is that 0's are written to the baud rate registers in order to detect an XR16C850 or XR16C854. This makes the Exar ST16C654 go kablooey. Saving and restoring the baud rate registers after the test fixes it.

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac8 now with added correct EXTRAVERSION

2001-05-11 Thread andersg
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 01:22:42AM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: Somewhere between ac5 and ac8 ipc broke, noticed that fakeroot stopped working, getting a function not implemented in msgget: [pid 9812] msgget(667493921, IPC_CREAT|0x180|0600) = -1 ENOSYS (Function not implemented) Looks you

Re: OOPS on 2.4.4-ac4

2001-05-11 Thread Ingo Renner
On 12-May-01 Alan Cox wrote: computer during this time.=20 So I don't know if this has to do with the new networkcard, the new NVIDIA Driver 0.9-769 I installed yesterday with XFree 4.3 or something else. The = --- Module Size Used by via82cxxx_audio

Re: OOPS on 2.4.4-ac4

2001-05-11 Thread Alan Cox
Ok, I will remove vmware and switch from the nvidia driver the nv driver from XFree 4.3. Maybe I get the oops again. Let me know if you do. I've got some other dmfe reports I'm looking at so its quite possible that is the trigger, but this time I'll be able to know its not giant binary stuff

Re: 2.4.4-ac8 doesn't work with Lite-On 82c168 PNIC rev 32

2001-05-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Does this patch, against ac8, help with the PNIC problem? -- Jeff Garzik | Game called on account of naked chick Building 1024| MandrakeSoft | Index: drivers/net/tulip/media.c === RCS file:

Re: 2.4.4-ac8 doesn't work with Lite-On 82c168 PNIC rev 32

2001-05-11 Thread Jeff Garzik
Here's another patch to try, for PNIC. Feedback welcome. -- Jeff Garzik | Game called on account of naked chick Building 1024| MandrakeSoft | diff -ur 2.4/drivers/net/tulip/media.c build-2.4/drivers/net/tulip/media.c --- 2.4/drivers/net/tulip/media.c Fri May 11 22:12:51 2001

Chat rooms for linux kernel developers

2001-05-11 Thread Jaswinder Singh
Dear linux kernel mailing list , Is there is any chat (IRC) for linux kernel developers . Thank you , Best Regards, Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

Configuring shared memory

2001-05-11 Thread Sriram V
Hi, Can somebody please tell me how to configure the amount of shared memory that a 2.2.x kernel allocates? Kindly copy to my e-mail address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). Thanks, Sriram _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN

[PATCH] PCI ID Fixups for Intel 82801BA BAM

2001-05-11 Thread T. C. Raymond
Below is a quick patch to fix the PCI ID's for the 82801BA and add ID's for the mobile version, the 82801BAM. The DID's are from Intel developer docs, I don't remember the URL. It's easy to find. Fixes the unknown IDE controller problem for Dell Inspiron 8000 and one of the newer Sony

Re: USB broken in 2.4.4? Serial Ricochet works, USB performancesucks.

2001-05-11 Thread clameter
On Thu, 10 May 2001, Drew Bertola wrote: The Richochet USB stuff uses generic serial I/O. No special driver. And it works fine under Win/ME. Have you run a regular PPP connection over the ACM driver with an MTU of 1500? Joey Hess had a problem similar to what you described, though he

Re: User-mode Linux ported to ppc

2001-05-11 Thread Jeff Dike
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: User-mode Linux is now booting on PPC Linux - it can boot with a Debian root floppy image with init=/bin/sh and poke around. It mostly works, although there are still a few problems. First off, I'd like to thank Chris for volunteering to undertake the first port of

Re: PROBLEM: 2.4.4ac7 oops, locks in init on boot

2001-05-11 Thread Tom Diehl
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: If anyone has any further suggestions/patches to run 2.4.x with K7 chosen optimizations, I'm open to testing. 'Buy an AMD chipset box..' Seriously at this point I am out of ideas. The prefetch to far effect explained the old athlon locks (step 1)

Re: test -please disregard

2001-05-11 Thread Jakob Østergaard
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:39:28PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote: ... Unfortunately I don't have a clue as to why it has been failing, but the kernel is a bit old... Linux vger.redhat.com 2.2.12-20 #1 Mon Sep 27 10:40:35 EDT 1999 i686 unknown On a not very loaded dual classic P133:

Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer

2001-05-11 Thread Ralf Baechle
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 03:49:05PM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: If you want to support wrapping with plain text, investigate format=flowed. Yes, I did that. I'm curious, though: I haven't found the mail standards that forbid receivers to wrap long lines. Certainly many mail

Re: Not a typewriter

2001-05-11 Thread John Alvord
On Fri, 11 May 2001 11:07:45 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/10/2001 at 06:20:34 PM Hacksaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My point is that someone who sees the typewriter message and doesn't understand it will have to dig a bit to find out what it means. Finding it almost certainly will

Re: [PATCH] adding PCI bus information to SCSI layer

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Lundell
At 11:20 PM -0300 2001-05-11, Ralf Baechle wrote: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 03:49:05PM -0700, Jonathan Lundell wrote: It's 998 plus a CR/LF sequence which is 1000 bytes, not exactly an odd number. And it's the official successor of RFC 822 which was an official STD. What I meant by strange was

Re: Oops in 2.4.4-ac6, ksymoops output included

2001-05-11 Thread Keith Owens
On Fri, 11 May 2001 17:52:24 -0400 (EDT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ksymoops 2.4.1 on i686 2.4.4-ac6. Options used Warning (read_object): no symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.4-ac6/build/drivers/pnp/pnp.o ksymoops should not be reading objects from /build/. It looks like you are

ENOIOCTLCMD?

2001-05-11 Thread Jonathan Lundell
Can somebody explain the use of ENOIOCTLCMD? There are order of 170 uses in the kernel, but I don't see any guidelines for that use (nor what prevents it from being seen by user programs). Thanks. errno.h: /* Should never be seen by user programs */ #define ERESTARTSYS512 #define

Re: Chat rooms for linux kernel developers

2001-05-11 Thread William Stearns
Good day, Jaswinder, On Fri, 11 May 2001, Jaswinder Singh wrote: Is there is any chat (IRC) for linux kernel developers . See irc.linpeople.org, channel #kernelnewbies . Cheers, - Bill ---

Re: 2.4.4 kernel freeze for unknown reason

2001-05-11 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Alan Cox wrote: I have been monitoring the memory usage constantly with the gnome memory usage meter and noticed that as swap grows it is never freed back up. I can kill off most of the large applications, such as I've seen this mentioned a few times now and am

Re: LVM 1.0 release decision

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Andrea Arcangeli writes: I just switched to the =beta4 lvm IOP for all 64bit archs. The previous one (the 2.4 mainline one) isn't feasible on the archs with 32bit userspace and 64bit kernel (it uses long). The IOP didn't changed btw, only the structures changed silenty. They can be

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Petr Vandrovec writes: When I was updating VMware's vmnet, I decided to use #ifdef skb_shinfo No, don't use that, use MAX_SKB_FRAGS like the drivers do. I guarentee to preserve that, whereas I reserve the right to change the skb_shinfo implementation however I like. Later, David S.

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 11 May 01 at 12:03, Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:56:35AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: I guess it would be possible to add a HAVE_ZEROCOPY to skbuff.h to make it a bit easier for single source drivers. --- include/linux/skbuff.h-oWed May 9 12:36:44 2001 +++

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:21:59PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: When I was updating VMware's vmnet, I decided to use #ifdef skb_shinfo Yes I forgot that RedHat already shipped it :-( This gives you maximal backward compatibility, as all public zerocopy patches contain this macro. Only

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread Rogier Wolff
Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:21:59PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: When I was updating VMware's vmnet, I decided to use #ifdef skb_shinfo Yes I forgot that RedHat already shipped it :-( This gives you maximal backward compatibility, as all public zerocopy patches

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:39:29PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: But it's always been said that source code compatiblity would be maintained. I'm a bit pissed that people just go about changing public source-level interfaces. 2.4.4 is basically like 2.5.0 as far as networking is concerned, it

Re: [PATCH] 2.4.4 linearize UDP RPC requests using GFP_KERNEL...

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Trond Myklebust writes: IMHO allocating the buffer using GFP_ATOMIC is a mistake. As I said we're in a thread context, so sleeping in GFP_KERNEL is safe. In addition, the cost of dropping the request if we can't allocate the buffer is heavy in that the client has to wait for a timeout,

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Rogier Wolff writes: It seems that in 2.4.4 suddenly the function skb_cow no longer returns the modified skb, but it retuns and integer for succes/failure. This means that for networking modules requiring this function, there is no source code compatibilty between 2.4.3 and 2.4.4.

Re: [PATCH] new version of singlecopy pipe

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
J . A . Magallon writes: I tried your patch on 2.4.4-ac8, and something strange happens. Untarring linux-2.4.4 takes a little time, disk light flashes, but no files appear on the disk (just 'Makefile', as you will see below). Doing a separate gunzip - tar xf works fine: What platform?

Re: LVM 1.0 release decision

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Andrea Arcangeli writes: you _must_ know very well what the mainteinance of that code means ;). Which is why I added the facility by which such ioctl conversions can be registered at runtime by the subsystem/driver itself. BTW, it would be nice if somebody would take care of unifying the

Re: PATCH: Enable IP PNP for 2.4.4-ac8

2001-05-11 Thread H . J . Lu
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:28:05PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: H . J . Lu writes: 2.4.4-ac8 disables IP auto config by default even if CONFIG_IP_PNP is defined. Here is a patch. It doesn't make any sense to enable this unless parameters are given to the kernel via the kernel

Re: LVM 1.0 release decision

2001-05-11 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 06:29:27PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: I think that's a bad decision, but it is your's. Let me put it this way: after I get the first real life request from an user with an useful case where a 32bit app needs to run the lvm ioctl it will be truly easy to change my mind

Re: LVM 1.0 release decision

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Andrea Arcangeli writes: Related side note: for the x86-64 kernel we won't support the emulation of the lvm ioctl from the 32bit executables to avoid the pointer conversion an mainteinance pain enterely, at least in the early stage the x86-64 lvmtools will have to be compiled elf64. I

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 02:56:35AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: Rogier Wolff writes: It seems that in 2.4.4 suddenly the function skb_cow no longer returns the modified skb, but it retuns and integer for succes/failure. This means that for networking modules requiring this

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Andi Kleen writes: 2.4.4 is basically like 2.5.0 as far as networking is concerned, it includes major fundamental changes to the stack. Andi, please. Get over it. That code is 6 months old. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: LVM 1.0 release decision

2001-05-11 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:12:55PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: They can be converted, [..] of course, and part of that code will be still necessary also with the =beta4 lvm interface to still convert the pointers of the userspace data structures but my point was we probably want to avoid that

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Rogier Wolff writes: But it's always been said that source code compatiblity would be maintained. when possible, we've made no such total souce level compat. guarentee. And more such changes are coming, for example the quota bugs can't be fixed without breaking source level compat. for the

Re: PATCH: Enable IP PNP for 2.4.4-ac8

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
H . J . Lu writes: 2.4.4-ac8 disables IP auto config by default even if CONFIG_IP_PNP is defined. Here is a patch. It doesn't make any sense to enable this unless parameters are given to the kernel via the kernel command line or from firmware settings. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Andi Kleen writes: I guess it would be possible to add a HAVE_ZEROCOPY to skbuff.h to make it a bit easier for single source drivers. Try MAX_SKB_FRAG, the drivers use that already. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe

Re: Source code compatibility in Stable series????

2001-05-11 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 11 May 01 at 12:32, Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:21:59PM +, Petr Vandrovec wrote: When I was updating VMware's vmnet, I decided to use #ifdef skb_shinfo Yes I forgot that RedHat already shipped it :-( Not only that RedHat shipped it, but thousands of people used

testing new vger

2001-05-11 Thread David S. Miller
Ignore this post please, thanks. Later, David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at

<    1   2   3   4