PATCH: linux_vga_console (Was: Unable to open an initial console)

2001-05-27 Thread Doru Petrescu
So, Here is what actualy happened: The problem was that I was unable to open /dev/console or /dev/vcsXX or /dev/ttyXX Nothing changed in the configuration, except that I upgraded the kernel. After some digging I realized that it has nothing to do with the KERNEL version or the fact it is a SMP

RE: Kernel 2.4.x TODO

2001-05-27 Thread Sasi Peter
> Check out the kernel janitor project at > http://bazar.conectiva.com.br/~acme/TODO (original) Is this information up2date? If it is, sad to see we have this many bugs... -- SaPE - Peter, Sasi - mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://sape.iq.rulez.org/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the li

Dual Athlon Performance

2001-05-27 Thread Antwerpen, Oliver
Moin, I have a DualAthlon System here (2xAthlon 1.2GHz, 256MB RAM, icp-vortex 6513RS/128MB, 3*9.1GB/10k HD, Dual 3com980 NIC) which runs really fine with kernel 2.4.4 and as far as I can see now with 2.4.5. Now I am interested in comparing this system's performance to others. Can someone here giv

Re: 2.4.5: USB audio crash again; now with info

2001-05-27 Thread Jakob Borg
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 07:46:54AM +0200, Jakob Borg wrote: > system is a dual P2 400, details to be found in the attached dmesg and > .config. Hrm. Attached here; sorry. //jb May 28 07:13:01 narayan kernel: klogd 1.4.1#2, log source = /proc/kmsg started. May 28 07:13:01 narayan kernel: Inspe

2.4.5: USB audio crash again; now with info

2001-05-27 Thread Jakob Borg
Hey; 2.4.5 again seems to have the same bug that was introduced in 2.4.4, that the systems locks up completely when accessing and USB audio device. The system is a dual P2 400, details to be found in the attached dmesg and .config. The device in question is "device 3" after the kernel has enumera

Re: [Linux-ntfs] Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: ANN: NTFS new release available (1.1.15)

2001-05-27 Thread Yuri Per
Martin von Loewis wrote: >That would not work: NT would split individual runs across extends >(i.e. split them in the middle). Did I misunderstand, or do you have a >solution for that as well. > Are you sure that it's true? My NTFS resizer interprets parts of runlist stored in different FILE rec

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac2

2001-05-27 Thread Tom Vier
actually, it happens on ext2, also. it was fun trying to switch back to 2.2 after converting raid devs for 2.4 and trashing my emergency boot disk. i was finally able to restore from tape by mounting -o sync. there was still some minor corruption caught by fsck, though. the new sym53c875 driver s

File read.

2001-05-27 Thread Anil Kumar
hi, How do i read file within the kernel modules. I hope we can't use the FS open... calls within kernel. thanks - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.h

[PATCH]initrd unmount problem

2001-05-27 Thread Go Taniguchi
Hi, It seems that ioctl_by_bdev() in fs/block_dev.c has a problem. When initrd is unmounted it can cause OOPS. This problem occurs in recent ac patches. May be vanilla too. change_root() in fs/super.c calls ioctl_by_bdev() in fs/block_dev.c which does not set inode_fake.i_bdev. But ioctl of ram

Re: Console display in portrait mode with unusual dpi resolution

2001-05-27 Thread Andreas Dilger
O Wyss writes: > [Running flatscreen in portrait mode] > > The portrait mode software starts working just about before the logon > screen is shown. All the BIOS and system messages are shown in landscape > mode. From the nature of a software solution I guess this can't be > changed neither of Wind

Abysmal RECV network performance

2001-05-27 Thread John William
Can someone please help me troubleshoot this problem - I am getting abysmal (see numbers below) network performance on my system, but the poor performance seems limited to receiving data. Transmission is OK. The computer in question is a dual Pentium 90 machine. The machine has RedHat 7.0 (ker

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac2

2001-05-27 Thread Fabio Riccardi
Ok, things are fast again now! :)) Performance is back to that of 2.4.2-ac26, and stability is a lot better. Under heavy FS pressure 2.4.5-ac2 is about 5-10% faster than vanilla 2.4.5, the aa1,2 kernels have the same performance of vanilla 2.4.5. Which one of your changes affected performance so

Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac2

2001-05-27 Thread Tom Vier
i haven't had any reiserfs crashes on my alpha, but restoring a backup of a debian installation to a reiserfs partition doesn't quite work. untarring a linux kernel tarball to the fs works, does work though. i get these kernel messages: May 27 23:28:47 zero kernel: is_leaf: free space seems wrong

Re: IDE Performance lack !

2001-05-27 Thread Jaswinder Singh
"Miquel van Smoorenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are you sure it is idle. It might be running something from cron- > say 'updatedb' or similar. That will cause a lot of disk i/o, > and _ofcourse_ performance will be bad then - the machine is > doing a lot of other things. > I am the only

Re: Hard lockup switching to X from vc; Matrox G400 AGP

2001-05-27 Thread Rafael Herrera
I experienced lost of the signal when switching from X to the console when booting with vga=ext or some of the graphic modes. It was reported here that the problem was the Matrox drivers. Recently, with kernel 2.4.4+ and XFree 4.0.3 (@1280x1024/head)+ Matrox drivers (http://matrox.com/mga/support

Re: Matrox G400 Dualhead

2001-05-27 Thread Rafael Herrera
It would help if you reported which version of kernel and XF86 you are using. I had problems using the framebuffer in the console awhile back. Currently, running 2.4.4+ and XFree86 4.0.3 + Matrox's drivers (http://matrox.com/mga/support/drivers/files/linux_06.cfm) give me no problem. I don't run

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

2001-05-27 Thread Greg Banks
Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > What is the companion chip in DMIDA ? HD64465. > IrDA and USB are working properly in linux ? No. IrDA seems easy, just haven't got around to it. USB is a major pain on the HD64465 because of the way it deals with "host" memory. I had a driver which initialised

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

2001-05-27 Thread Jaswinder Singh
"Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Manufacturer = DataMyte, a division of Rockwell. > Machine = DataMyte Industrial Digital Assistant 4000 > (aka DMIDA, www.dmida.com) > What is the companion chip in DMIDA ? IrDA and USB are working properly in linux ? Thank you, Be

License Clarification [X15 beta 1 - source release]

2001-05-27 Thread Fabio Riccardi
Some people pointed out that I misused the term "Open Source" wrt our Source License. Our license doesn't meet the required criteria of the OSI since we restrict the usage of our sources for personal use only. As was already pointed out in my previous message people will have to buy a license for

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

2001-05-27 Thread Jaswinder Singh
"Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > Alan Cox wrote: > > > > Including open source drivers for their touchscreen ? > > I believe so, but I only write the stuff. We'll know for > sure when somebody actually buys one ;-) > Please send a copy to all of us ;) Jaswinder. -- These are my

Re: CPU Dedicated Interrupts

2001-05-27 Thread Jaswinder Singh
> What is the easiest way to tell a CPU to ignore certain interrupts from > module? > Is there an IRQ mask for each processor? Is that symbol exported? > I also what to know this :) Please help us . Thank you. Jaswinder. -- These are my opinions not 3Di. - To unsubscribe from this list: s

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

2001-05-27 Thread Greg Banks
Alan Cox wrote: > > > Their co-operation came not from a spirit of enlightment but > > because this was a commercial venture to port Linux to the box > > to replace WinCE. You can buy these with Linux now. > > Including open source drivers for their touchscreen ? I believe so, but I only w

Re: [PATCH] fs/devfs/base.c

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Gooch
Akash Jain writes: > hello, > > in fs/devfs/base.c, > the struct devfsd_notify_struct is approx 1056 bytes, allocating it > on a stack of 8k seems unreasonable. here we simply move it to the > heap, i don't think it is a _must_ be on stack type thing I absolutely don't want this patch applied.

Problems Configurating NFS

2001-05-27 Thread antonpoon
I am trying to config my RedHat7.0 computer to run NFS server, I have edited the exports file, and turned on portmap and NFS, but there were some problems as follows, how can I fix it? Starting system logger: [ OK ] Starting kernel logger: [ OK ] Starting portmapper: [ OK ] Starting NFS file lo

Re: Fwd: Copyright infringement in linux/drivers/usb/serial/keys

2001-05-27 Thread Hugh Blemings
Hi Greg, On 25-May-2001 Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:34:04PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote: >> This message sparked a long thread on the debian-legal mailing list, >> which is long since dead. I am personally very curious about whether >> this has been resolved upstream. I consider it

RE: Problems with ac12 kernels and up

2001-05-27 Thread John Chris Wren
>> I looked at the root_mountflags usage and it looks ok, so I put it in >> the "figure out later" pile. >> >> Haven't yet verified if this 'ac' only problem > >Think I have it sussed. Time for -ac2 I took down my Jerry Garcia poster, and put up an Alan Cox poster. 2.4.5-ac2 boots like a cham

Re: Hard lockup switching to X from vc; Matrox G400 AGP

2001-05-27 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, thanks for confirming this. But if it's Matrox's code (we are talking about the mga_hal_drv.o module for X, correct?) then the ball is in their court. Has anyone reported this to them so that they can fix it? Cheers, Chris > On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 12:24:50AM +0200, Ben Twijnstra wrote: > >

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> Their co-operation came not from a spirit of enlightment but > because this was a commercial venture to port Linux to the box > to replace WinCE. You can buy these with Linux now. Including open source drivers for their touchscreen ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscrib

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > FWIW the documentation seems to imply that the option is necessary only > when directly booting from SRM, i.e.. no bootloader is involved at all. Err, well, you can't have _no_ bootloader. > It uses the example of MILO's presence or

Linux 2.4.5-ac2

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/ Intermediate diffs are available from http://www.bzimage.org In terms of going through the code audit almost all the sound drivers still need fixing to lock against format changes during a r

[patch][rfc]: highmem block support

2001-05-27 Thread Jens Axboe
Hi, Given the recent talk about highmem deadlocking x86 machines, I decided to backport my 2.5 stuff to be somewhat non-intrusive and apply to recent 2.4 kernel. It enables x86 machines to do I/O on highmem pages, typically this means up to 4GB. There are two parts: - zone-dma32-4. Add extra me

Re: vm in 2.4.5

2001-05-27 Thread J . A . Magallon
On 05.26 Rik van Riel wrote: > On Sat, 26 May 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote: > > > It does not begin to use swap in a growing fashion, it just appears > > full in a moment. > > It gets _allocated_ in a moment, but things don't actually get > swapped out. This isn't a problem. > > The real probl

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Jeff Garzik
Richard Henderson wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails. > > Mine doesn't. > > > I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the > > srm-as-bootloader kernel config option. > > That is th

Re: [PATCH] Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Henderson
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails. Mine doesn't. > I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the > srm-as-bootloader kernel config option. That is the error. r~ - To unsubscribe from this

cross compile alpha make bootpfile fails

2001-05-27 Thread Duane Ellis
Cross compiling kernel (any recent version) on any non-64bit host (ie: x86) to ALPHA the "make bootpfile" step fails. The problem is localized to arch/alpha/boot/tools/objstrip.c Various 'elf' structure members are 64 bit, not 32bit and the wrong version of the structure is being choosen. (To b

2.4.5 alpha rawhide interrupt fix

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Henderson
PALcode will ack the interrupt in the normal interrupt return path, but 2.4 re-enables interrupts before that. This means we re-enable interrupts without the hardware being acked, which results in nasty interrupt storms. Fixed thus. r~ --- linux/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_rawhide.c.orig Sun May

Matrox G400 Dualhead

2001-05-27 Thread mythos
I have a serious problem when usind the second head of my Matrox with the matroxfb driver.If I login to /dev/tty0 (fb0) and then to /dev/tty6(fb1) and make fb1 to scroll,if I switch back to /dev/tty0 and make fb0 to scroll while fb1 is still scrolling I get a segmentation fault.Also sometimes I ge

Re: [Linux-ntfs] Re: [Linux-NTFS-Dev] Re: ANN: NTFS new release available (1.1.15)

2001-05-27 Thread Anton Altaparmakov
At 13:53 27/05/2001, Martin von Loewis wrote: > > Yes and no. They will be uncompressed but not when opening the inode. It > > will be "uncompress required extent's run list on demand". > >Are you sure this can work? No. >Initially, I thought I could use the attribute list to only uncompress the

Re: Hard lockup switching to X from vc; Matrox G400 AGP

2001-05-27 Thread Ben Twijnstra
Hi Chris, Seen the same behaviour; you're not alone. I'm running XF86 4.0.3 with a G400. My guess is that mga_drv goes into some local loop while trying to restore the display. mga_drv at that moment has I/O privileges and if it hangs, Linux hangs too. Grtz, Ben - To unsubscribe from this

Re: BUG?: 2.4.5 breaks reiserfs (kernel BUG)

2001-05-27 Thread Alexander Viro
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Bjerkeset, Svein Olav wrote: > Hi, > > Today I downloaded kernel 2.4.5 and compiled it. The kernel worked fine > until > I tried to halt the computer. When trying to unmount the reiserfs > filesystems, > the system freezes with the following output: > > journal_begin call

Re: Inconsistent "#ifdef __KERNEL__" on different architectures

2001-05-27 Thread Philip Blundell
>--- include/asm-arm/atomic.h.old Sun May 27 22:30:58 2001 >+++ include/asm-arm/atomic.h Sun May 27 22:58:20 2001 >@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > * 13-04-1997 RMK Made functions atomic! > * 07-12-1997 RMK Upgraded for v2.1. > * 26-08-1998 PJB Added #ifdef __KERN

Re: IDE Performance lack !

2001-05-27 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <00c701c0e6d8$2b28ea40$4aa6b3d0@Toshiba>, Jaswinder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I am not able to understand why Linux read and/or write harddisk after some >time (after few hours ) , harddisk read/write leds keep on glowing for few >minutes , even though nobody working on it and m

Re: Problems with ac12 kernels and up

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> I looked at the root_mountflags usage and it looks ok, so I put it in > the "figure out later" pile. > > Haven't yet verified if this 'ac' only problem Think I have it sussed. Time for -ac2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message t

Re: Hard lockup switching to X from vc; Matrox G400 AGP

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> out the Matrox-supplied mga_drv.o and mga_hal_drv.o modules and > replace them with the ones from the standard X 4.03 distribution, but > these are userspace objects and shouldn't be capable of bringing the > kernel down. (Like I said, the machine can't even be pinged.) Not really. The matrox c

Re: Overkeen CDROM disk-change messages

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> What's "magicdev"? I am not running GNOME or KDE. In fact, I wasn't > even running X at the time but had xmcd putting its display on another > machine over the local network. Then I guess it was xmcd continually opening/failing - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-k

Re: Problems with ac12 kernels and up

2001-05-27 Thread Jeff Garzik
Alan Cox wrote: > > > Checking root filesystem. /dev/hde13 is mounted. > > Cannot continue, aboorting. > > *** An error occurred during the file system check. > > *** Dropping you to a shell; the system will reboot > > *** when you leave the shell. > > That means the file system was mounted read

Hard lockup switching to X from vc; Matrox G400 AGP

2001-05-27 Thread Chris Rankin
REF: Linux 2.4.5, 2.4.4, 2.4.3 (and probably earlier); devfs; SMP (dual PIII); < 1GB main memory Hi, Has anyone noticed their Linux box lock up hard (as in cannot even be pinged from the local network) when switching from a text vc to a vc running X? This has happened for me even

Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)

2001-05-27 Thread Marko Kreen
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:45:17PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote: > On Sunday 27 May 2001 15:32, Edgar Toernig wrote: > > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > I'm not claiming there isn't breakage somewhere, > > > > you break UNIX fundamentals. But I'm quite relieved now because I'm > > pretty sure that s

Re: Inconsistent "#ifdef __KERNEL__" on different architectures

2001-05-27 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:07:38PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I do also explicitely send this mail to the people that seem to be > responsible for the pieces of code I touch. > > I'm not sure whether the compete removal of the "#ifdef __KERNEL__"'s is > too rude but there are already other archi

Re: 2.4.5-ac1 won't boot with 4GB bigmem option

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> > mm: critical shortage of bounce buffers. > > Indeed this message has been pestering me in all the recent .4-acx kernels when > the machine is under heavy FS pressure. > > In these kernels I observe a significative (5-10%) performance degradation as > soon as the FS cache fills up all the av

Re: 2.4.5-ac1 won't boot with 4GB bigmem option

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> I compiled and booted the 2.4.5-ac1 kernel with the CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y option > and got an oops in __alloc_pages() (called by alloc_bounce() called by > schedule()). Everything works fine if I turn the 4GB mode off. > Machine is a Dell Precision with 2 Xeons and 2GB of RAM. > > 2.4.5 works fi

Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.5-B0

2001-05-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
On 27 May 2001, Andi Kleen wrote: > I think the right way to fix it is to do a final atomic check for > softirqs when the kernel is exited. To be atomic this check neededs to > be done with interrupts off until the kernel exited. [...] check out my first softirq patch, it does exactly this. (bu

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Magnus Naeslund\(f\)
From: "Andrea Arcangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right. > > > > The reason I needed that patch is

Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.5-B0

2001-05-27 Thread Andi Kleen
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > the attached softirq-2.4.5-B0 patch fixes this problem by calling > > do_softirq() from local_bh_enable() [if the bh count is 0, to avoid > > recursion]. > > Yikes! I do not like this fix. > > I'd rather local_bh_enable() not become a more

initrd oops [was Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac1]

2001-05-27 Thread Ville Herva
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 07:26:50PM +0300, you [Ville Herva] claimed: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:58:25PM +0100, you [Alan Cox] claimed: > > > > o Free the initial ramdisk correctly > > Who made this fix, or who can I contact? > > I have a reproducible oops on 2.4.4ac17 (see > http://marc.the

Re: Inconsistent "#ifdef __KERNEL__" on different architectures

2001-05-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > while looking for the reason of a build failure of the ALSA libraries on > > ARM [1] I discovered the following strange thing: > > > > On some architectures a function is inside an "#ifdef __KERNEL__" in the > > header file a

Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug, fix, 2.4.5

2001-05-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Yes the stock kernel. yep you are right. i had this fixed too at a certain point, there is one subtle issue: under certain circumstances tasklets re-activate the tasklet softirq(s) from within the softirq handler, which leads to infinite loops if

Re: 2.4.5-ac1 won't boot with 4GB bigmem option

2001-05-27 Thread Fabio Riccardi
Same here, I have a dual 1GHz PIII with 4G, I don't get an oops but an infinite loop of: > mm: critical shortage of bounce buffers. Indeed this message has been pestering me in all the recent .4-acx kernels when the machine is under heavy FS pressure. In these kernels I observe a significative

Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup)

2001-05-27 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Sunday 27 May 2001 15:32, Edgar Toernig wrote: > Daniel Phillips wrote: > > It won't, the open for "." is handled in the VFS, not the > > filesystem - it will open the directory. (Without needing to be > > told it's a directory via O_DIRECTORY.) If you do open("magicdev") > > you'll get the d

[PATCH] add restore_flags to error path in irttp.c (245ac1)

2001-05-27 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch makes irttp_read_proc restore_flags() in error cases too. Applies against 245ac1. --- linux-245-ac1-clean/net/irda/irttp.cSun May 27 22:15:34 2001 +++ linux-245-ac1/net/irda/irttp.c Sun May 27 22:37:59 2001 @@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@ self = (struct tsap_c

Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug, fix, 2.4.5

2001-05-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:09:29PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > "live lock". What do you hope to avoid by pushing softirq processing > into a scheduled task? I think doing that is a stupid idea. NOTE: I'm not pushing anything out of the atomic context, I'm using ksoftirqd only to cure the ca

Re: Overkeen CDROM disk-change messages

2001-05-27 Thread Harald Dunkel
Maybe thats related to the problems with my CDROM drives (SCSI or IDE SCSI emulation). I cannot mount any CD with 2.4.5. kern.log says: May 26 15:31:17 bilbo kernel: Detected scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 2, lun 0 May 26 15:31:17 bilbo kernel: Detected scsi CD-ROM sr1 at scsi0, channel

Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.5-A1

2001-05-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > i took at look at your ksoftirq stuff yesterday, and i think it's > completely unnecessery and adds serious overhead to softirq handling. The > whole point of softirqs is to have maximum scalability and no > serialization. Why did you

2.4.5-ac1 won't boot with 4GB bigmem option

2001-05-27 Thread Ben Twijnstra
Hi, I compiled and booted the 2.4.5-ac1 kernel with the CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y option and got an oops in __alloc_pages() (called by alloc_bounce() called by schedule()). Everything works fine if I turn the 4GB mode off. Machine is a Dell Precision with 2 Xeons and 2GB of RAM. 2.4.5 works fine wit

[PATCH] Fix interrupt flag bug(s) in irtty.c (244-ac18)

2001-05-27 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch fixes an interrupt flag bug in irtty.c as per the stanford team's report way back. Applies against 224-ac18. --- linux-244-ac18-clean/drivers/net/irda/irtty.c Sat May 19 20:59:17 2001 +++ linux-244-ac18/drivers/net/irda/irtty.c Sun May 27 21:56:14 2001 @@ -971,

Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug, fix, 2.4.5

2001-05-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 09:05:50PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > On Sun, 27 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > I mean everything is fine until the same softirq is marked active > > again under do_softirq, in such case neither the do_softirq in do_IRQ > > will run it (because we are in the c

[PATCH] Add missing restore_flags to sm_wss.c (244-ac18)

2001-05-27 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Hi. The following patch adds a missing restore_flags as per the stanford team's report way back. Applies against 244ac18. --- linux-244-ac18-clean/drivers/net/hamradio/soundmodem/sm_wss.c Wed Jul 19 01:55:19 2000 +++ linux-244-ac18/drivers/net/hamradio/soundmodem/sm_wss.c Sun May 27

Overkeen CDROM disk-change messages

2001-05-27 Thread Chris Rankin
Hi, It looks like my CDROM driver had a busy night last night ... ;-). This was with Linux 2.4.5, dual Pentium III, devfs, < 1GB memory. There was no CDROM in the drive, but I had kept the CD player running anyway. Cheers, Chris May 27 02:10:03 twopit kernel: hdc: ATAPI 32X CD-ROM CD-R/RW drive,

[PATCH] missing rio_spin_unlock_irqrestore in rioroute.c (244ac18)

2001-05-27 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Forgot l-k when sending this off.. - Forwarded message from Rasmus Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Hi. The following patch fixes a missing rio_spin_unlock_irqrestore in drivers/char/rio/rioroute.c as per the stanford team's report a way back. It applies against 244ac18. --- linux-244-

[PATCH] fix for buggy variable reuse in riotable.c (244ac18)

2001-05-27 Thread Rasmus Andersen
Forgot l-k when sending this off... - Forwarded message from Rasmus Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Hi. The following patch fixes a buggy variable reuse i drivers/char/ rio/riotable.c (244-ac18) as reported by the stanford team way back. --- linux-244-ac18-clean/drivers/char/rio/riotab

Re: 2.4.5 does not link on Ruffian (alpha)

2001-05-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right. > > The reason I needed that patch is that I was not using 2.4.5aa1 but a > corrupted tree (

Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.5-B0

2001-05-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Sun, 27 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > Hooray, some sanity in this thread finally :-) [ finally i had some sleep after a really long debugging session :-| ] > > the attached softirq-2.4.5-B0 patch fixes this problem by calling > > do_softirq() from local_bh_enable() [if the bh count

Re: Inconsistent "#ifdef __KERNEL__" on different architectures

2001-05-27 Thread Abramo Bagnara
Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Hi, > > while looking for the reason of a build failure of the ALSA libraries on > ARM [1] I discovered the following strange thing: > > On some architectures a function is inside an "#ifdef __KERNEL__" in the > header file and on others not. Is there a reason for this or

Re: [patch] softirq-2.4.5-B0

2001-05-27 Thread David S. Miller
Ingo Molnar writes: > the bug/misbehavior causing bad latencies turned out to be the following: > if a hardirq triggers a softirq, but syscall-level code on the same CPU > disabled local bhs via local_bh_disable(), then we 'miss' the execution of > the softirq, until the next IRQ. (or next di

Console display in portrait mode with unusual dpi resolution

2001-05-27 Thread Otto Wyss
Overview: At business I just got a brand new EIZO 18" LCD display L675 to test its usability for working in portrait mode to show a full A4 page. These test were done on Windows NT4 but I'd really like to know how well Linux would have done. I'm going to describe all the obstacles I encountered on

Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug, fix, 2.4.5

2001-05-27 Thread Ingo Molnar
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I mean everything is fine until the same softirq is marked active > again under do_softirq, in such case neither the do_softirq in do_IRQ > will run it (because we are in the critical section and we hold the > per-cpu locks), nor we will run it agai

RE: problems with ac12 kernels and up

2001-05-27 Thread John Chris Wren
>> http://jcwren.com/linux/ac18.txt - ac18 dmesg dump >> http://jcwren.com/linux/build.txt - sequence I'm using to build >> >> The apparent interleaved garbage closer to the bottom is exactly what came >> out on the console. (Is linking to the dumps perferred over including it in >> the mail, or

Re: 2.4.4-ac17-2.4.5-ac1 oops in swapper process

2001-05-27 Thread Ville Herva
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 02:18:57PM -0400, you [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] claimed: > All, > > I have been getting a oops ever since 2.4.4-ac17 right after the kernel loads > the sym53c895 driver. I hand copied part of the oops before rebooting. This > happens in every kernel since 2.4.4-ac17. I have ch

2.4.4-ac17-2.4.5-ac1 oops in swapper process

2001-05-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All, I have been getting a oops ever since 2.4.4-ac17 right after the kernel loads the sym53c895 driver. I hand copied part of the oops before rebooting. This happens in every kernel since 2.4.4-ac17. I have changed my compiler from gcc-2.96 to egcs-1.12, thinking that the Mandrake gcc was ba

RE: Problems with ac12 kernels and up

2001-05-27 Thread John Chris Wren
> >> Checking root filesystem. /dev/hde13 is mounted. >> Cannot continue, aboorting. >> *** An error occurred during the file system check. >> *** Dropping you to a shell; the system will reboot >> *** when you leave the shell. > >That means the file system was mounted read/write at boot time. Tha

Re: IDE Performance lack !

2001-05-27 Thread Jaswinder Singh
From: "Jakob Østergaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > > The answer for both of you is: > > hdparm -d1 /dev/hd{whatever} > > Without DMA enabled, performance is going to suck. 1.9 MB/sec is actually pretty > good without DMA ;) > i think DMA or PCI is not my solution , atleast :) Thank you,

usb-ohci module from 2.4.5 kernel refuses to load on alpha, usb-ohci in a monolithic kernel refuses to recognize devices

2001-05-27 Thread Pieter Barrezeele
Hello, I'm having the following problem, when trying to load usb-ohci as a module: firmin:/usr/src/linux/drivers/usb# modprobe usb-ohci /lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/usb/usb-ohci.o: init_module: No such device Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module para

Re: IDE Performance lack !

2001-05-27 Thread Jaswinder Singh
"Chris Wedgwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > When ever i copy big data (around 400 to 700 MB ) from one > partion to another my machine do not response at all (i can not > work on another shell) during data transfer

Re: IDE Performance lack !

2001-05-27 Thread francois . cami
> The answer for both of you is: > > hdparm -d1 /dev/hd{whatever} > > Without DMA enabled, performance is going to suck. 1.9 MB/sec is actually pretty > good without DMA ;) I agree. I get around 4MB/s without and 35.75MB/s with... hdparm -c3 -d1 -m16 /dev/hda on a KT133 (A7V) and 45GB IB

Re: VIA IDE no go with 2.4.5-ac1

2001-05-27 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 08:28:14PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote: > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Vanilla 2.4.5 boots ok, but 2.4.5-ac1 finishes kernel initialisation and > > > starts to print "hda: lost interrupt", I guess this is related to VIA IDE > > > updat

Re: 2.4.5 + ReiserFS + SMP + umount = oops

2001-05-27 Thread Ed Tomlinson
Hi, This was reported on the reiserfs list yesterday. Seems that the cleanup applied late in 2.4.5-pre affected the locking of the umount process. This was posted to fix the problem. Ed Tomlinson --- "Vladimir V. Saveliev" wrote: > > Hi > > Gergely Tamas wrote: > > >

Re: Linux 2.4.4-ac17

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> Yes.. seems the caches need some size limits. ramfs will lock you in > a heart beat if you hit oom. (i made a typo during iozone run.. oops:) ramnfs has resource limits in -ac for a reason. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [E

Re: Inconsistent "#ifdef __KERNEL__" on different architectures

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> On some architectures a function is inside an "#ifdef __KERNEL__" in the > header file and on others not. Is there a reason for this or is this > inconsistency simply a bug? Its probably a bug - primarily it depends if the function is useful when exported to non kernel code - To unsubscribe fro

insl/outsl in parport_pc and !CONFIG_PCI

2001-05-27 Thread Richard Zidlicky
Hi, How is that supposed to work on systems without PCI? For now I have defined #define insl(port,buf,len) isa_insb(port,buf,(len)<<2) #define outsl(port,buf,len) isa_outsb(port,buf,(len)<<2) in asm-m68k/parport.h. Bye Richard - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe li

Re: Please help me fill in the blanks.

2001-05-27 Thread Cesar Da Silva
Thank you Jeff for your very helpfull answer. --- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > Cesar Da Silva wrote: > > * Alternative I/O Pathing > > be less vague What I mean with the above (my defenition) is: [Alternative I/O Pathing allows the operating system to re-route the I/O of devices,

Re: Please help me fill in the blanks.

2001-05-27 Thread Cesar Da Silva
--- Ville Herva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > > > * Dynamic Memory Resilience > > > > RAM fault tolerance? There was a patch a long > time ago which detected > > bad ram, and would mark those memory clusters as > unuseable at boot. > > However that is clearly not dynamic. > > If you are refer

Inconsistent "#ifdef __KERNEL__" on different architectures

2001-05-27 Thread Adrian Bunk
Hi, while looking for the reason of a build failure of the ALSA libraries on ARM [1] I discovered the following strange thing: On some architectures a function is inside an "#ifdef __KERNEL__" in the header file and on others not. Is there a reason for this or is this inconsistency simply a bug?

Re: Please help me fill in the blanks.

2001-05-27 Thread Ville Herva
> > * Dynamic Memory Resilience > > RAM fault tolerance? There was a patch a long time ago which detected > bad ram, and would mark those memory clusters as unuseable at boot. > However that is clearly not dynamic. If you are referring to Badram patch by Rick van Rein (http://rick.vanrein.org/

BUG?: 2.4.5 breaks reiserfs (kernel BUG)

2001-05-27 Thread Bjerkeset, Svein Olav
Hi, Today I downloaded kernel 2.4.5 and compiled it. The kernel worked fine until I tried to halt the computer. When trying to unmount the reiserfs filesystems, the system freezes with the following output: journal_begin called without kernel lock held kernel BUG at journal.c:423! inva

Re: 2.4.5-ac1 hard disk corruption... acpi responsible?

2001-05-27 Thread Alan Cox
> Today I moved to 2.4.5-ac1, the only different thing > than normal was I enabled ACPI instead of APM. Bad idea. The kernel ACPI is not the most debugged, the ACPI in many BIOSes is complete garbage and there isnt a lot you can do to debug them either. APM is a definite better choice, at leas

Re: [patch] severe softirq handling performance bug, fix, 2.4.5

2001-05-27 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:59:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > the two error cases are: > > #1 hard-IRQ interrupts user-space code, activates softirq, and returns to > user-space code Before returning to userspace do_IRQ just runs do_softirq by hand from C code. > #2 hard-IRQ interrupts t

Re: [kbuild-devel] Configure.help entries wanted

2001-05-27 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > I have some code which could become the basis for such a thing. > > > It's a touch panel driver for the DMIDA but it also has a device- > > > independent layer which does supersampling, scaling, provides > > > raw and cooked Linux Input interfaces, and a /proc interface to > > > allow

Re: IDE Performance lack !

2001-05-27 Thread Jakob Østergaard
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Jaswinder Singh wrote: > > > > RedHat 7.1 - IDE IBM 41.1 GIG > > Update to 2.4.5 -> noticed, that hdparm -t /dev/hda went down from 10 > > MByte/sec to 1.9 MByte/sec > > Any special Options, beside ide-scsi driver activated .. > > > > Anybody noticed the s

Re: VIA IDE no go with 2.4.5-ac1

2001-05-27 Thread Oleg Drokin
Hello! On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > Vanilla 2.4.5 boots ok, but 2.4.5-ac1 finishes kernel initialisation and > > starts to print "hda: lost interrupt", I guess this is related to VIA IDE > > updates in AC kernels. Config for vanilla and AC kernel is the same

[OOPS] Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac1

2001-05-27 Thread Ville Herva
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:58:25PM +0100, you [Alan Cox] claimed: > > o Free the initial ramdisk correctly Who made this fix, or who can I contact? I have a reproducible oops on 2.4.4ac17 (see http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=99079948404775&w=2 for details) that seems to be re

  1   2   >