On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 07:46:54AM +0200, Jakob Borg wrote:
> system is a dual P2 400, details to be found in the attached dmesg and
> .config.
Hrm. Attached here; sorry.
//jb
May 28 07:13:01 narayan kernel: klogd 1.4.1#2, log source = /proc/kmsg started.
May 28 07:13:01 narayan kernel:
Hey;
2.4.5 again seems to have the same bug that was introduced in 2.4.4, that
the systems locks up completely when accessing and USB audio device. The
system is a dual P2 400, details to be found in the attached dmesg and
.config. The device in question is "device 3" after the kernel has
Martin von Loewis wrote:
>That would not work: NT would split individual runs across extends
>(i.e. split them in the middle). Did I misunderstand, or do you have a
>solution for that as well.
>
Are you sure that it's true? My NTFS resizer interprets parts of runlist
stored in different FILE
actually, it happens on ext2, also. it was fun trying to switch back to 2.2
after converting raid devs for 2.4 and trashing my emergency boot disk. i
was finally able to restore from tape by mounting -o sync. there was still
some minor corruption caught by fsck, though.
the new sym53c875 driver
hi,
How do i read file within the kernel modules. I hope we can't use the FS
open... calls within kernel.
thanks
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hi,
It seems that ioctl_by_bdev() in fs/block_dev.c has a problem.
When initrd is unmounted it can cause OOPS.
This problem occurs in recent ac patches.
May be vanilla too.
change_root() in fs/super.c calls ioctl_by_bdev() in
fs/block_dev.c which does not set inode_fake.i_bdev.
But ioctl of
O Wyss writes:
> [Running flatscreen in portrait mode]
>
> The portrait mode software starts working just about before the logon
> screen is shown. All the BIOS and system messages are shown in landscape
> mode. From the nature of a software solution I guess this can't be
> changed neither of
Can someone please help me troubleshoot this problem - I am getting abysmal
(see numbers below) network performance on my system, but the poor
performance seems limited to receiving data. Transmission is OK.
The computer in question is a dual Pentium 90 machine. The machine has
RedHat 7.0
Ok, things are fast again now! :))
Performance is back to that of 2.4.2-ac26, and stability is a lot better. Under
heavy FS pressure 2.4.5-ac2 is about 5-10% faster than vanilla 2.4.5, the aa1,2
kernels have the same performance of vanilla 2.4.5.
Which one of your changes affected performance
i haven't had any reiserfs crashes on my alpha, but restoring a backup of a
debian installation to a reiserfs partition doesn't quite work. untarring a
linux kernel tarball to the fs works, does work though. i get these kernel
messages:
May 27 23:28:47 zero kernel: is_leaf: free space seems
"Miquel van Smoorenburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are you sure it is idle. It might be running something from cron-
> say 'updatedb' or similar. That will cause a lot of disk i/o,
> and _ofcourse_ performance will be bad then - the machine is
> doing a lot of other things.
>
I am the only
I experienced lost of the signal when switching from X to the console
when booting with vga=ext or some of the graphic modes. It was reported
here that the problem was the Matrox drivers.
Recently, with kernel 2.4.4+ and XFree 4.0.3 (@1280x1024/head)+ Matrox
drivers
It would help if you reported which version of kernel and XF86 you are
using. I had problems using the framebuffer in the console awhile back.
Currently, running 2.4.4+ and XFree86 4.0.3 + Matrox's drivers
(http://matrox.com/mga/support/drivers/files/linux_06.cfm) give me no
problem.
I don't
Jaswinder Singh wrote:
>
> What is the companion chip in DMIDA ?
HD64465.
> IrDA and USB are working properly in linux ?
No. IrDA seems easy, just haven't got around to it.
USB is a major pain on the HD64465 because of the way it
deals with "host" memory. I had a driver which
"Greg Banks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Manufacturer = DataMyte, a division of Rockwell.
> Machine = DataMyte Industrial Digital Assistant 4000
> (aka DMIDA, www.dmida.com)
>
What is the companion chip in DMIDA ?
IrDA and USB are working properly in linux ?
Thank you,
Some people pointed out that I misused the term "Open Source" wrt our Source
License.
Our license doesn't meet the required criteria of the OSI since we restrict
the usage of our sources for personal use only. As was already pointed out in
my previous message people will have to buy a license
> What is the easiest way to tell a CPU to ignore certain interrupts from
> module?
> Is there an IRQ mask for each processor? Is that symbol exported?
>
I also what to know this :)
Please help us .
Thank you.
Jaswinder.
--
These are my opinions not 3Di.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Akash Jain writes:
> hello,
>
> in fs/devfs/base.c,
> the struct devfsd_notify_struct is approx 1056 bytes, allocating it
> on a stack of 8k seems unreasonable. here we simply move it to the
> heap, i don't think it is a _must_ be on stack type thing
I absolutely don't want this patch applied.
I am trying to config my RedHat7.0 computer to run NFS server, I have edited the
exports file, and turned on portmap and NFS, but there were some problems as follows,
how can I fix it?
Starting system logger: [ OK ]
Starting kernel logger: [ OK ]
Starting portmapper: [ OK ]
Starting NFS file
Hi Greg,
On 25-May-2001 Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 09:34:04PM -0700, Aaron Lehmann wrote:
>> This message sparked a long thread on the debian-legal mailing list,
>> which is long since dead. I am personally very curious about whether
>> this has been resolved upstream. I consider
>> I looked at the root_mountflags usage and it looks ok, so I put it in
>> the "figure out later" pile.
>>
>> Haven't yet verified if this 'ac' only problem
>
>Think I have it sussed. Time for -ac2
I took down my Jerry Garcia poster, and put up an Alan Cox poster.
2.4.5-ac2 boots like a
Hi, thanks for confirming this. But if it's Matrox's code (we are
talking about the mga_hal_drv.o module for X, correct?) then the ball
is in their court. Has anyone reported this to them so that they can
fix it?
Cheers,
Chris
> On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 12:24:50AM +0200, Ben Twijnstra wrote:
>
> Their co-operation came not from a spirit of enlightment but
> because this was a commercial venture to port Linux to the box
> to replace WinCE. You can buy these with Linux now.
Including open source drivers for their touchscreen ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 07:54:17PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> FWIW the documentation seems to imply that the option is necessary only
> when directly booting from SRM, i.e.. no bootloader is involved at all.
Err, well, you can't have _no_ bootloader.
> It uses the example of MILO's presence
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
Intermediate diffs are available from
http://www.bzimage.org
In terms of going through the code audit almost all the sound drivers still
need fixing to lock against format changes during a
Hi,
Given the recent talk about highmem deadlocking x86 machines, I decided
to backport my 2.5 stuff to be somewhat non-intrusive and apply to
recent 2.4 kernel. It enables x86 machines to do I/O on highmem pages,
typically this means up to 4GB.
There are two parts:
- zone-dma32-4. Add extra
On 05.26 Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Sat, 26 May 2001, J . A . Magallon wrote:
>
> > It does not begin to use swap in a growing fashion, it just appears
> > full in a moment.
>
> It gets _allocated_ in a moment, but things don't actually get
> swapped out. This isn't a problem.
>
> The real
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails.
>
> Mine doesn't.
>
> > I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the
> > srm-as-bootloader kernel config option.
>
> That is
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 06:48:30PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> When built with CONFIG_ALPHA_NAUTILUS, my UP1000's IDE totally fails.
Mine doesn't.
> I am booting w/ aboot 0.7a from SRM, -without- the
> srm-as-bootloader kernel config option.
That is the error.
r~
-
To unsubscribe from this
Cross compiling kernel (any recent version) on any non-64bit host (ie:
x86) to
ALPHA the "make bootpfile" step fails. The problem is localized
to arch/alpha/boot/tools/objstrip.c
Various 'elf' structure members are 64 bit, not 32bit and the wrong
version of
the structure is being choosen. (To
PALcode will ack the interrupt in the normal interrupt return path,
but 2.4 re-enables interrupts before that. This means we re-enable
interrupts without the hardware being acked, which results in nasty
interrupt storms.
Fixed thus.
r~
--- linux/arch/alpha/kernel/sys_rawhide.c.orig Sun May
I have a serious problem when usind the second head of my Matrox with the
matroxfb driver.If I login to /dev/tty0 (fb0) and then to /dev/tty6(fb1)
and make fb1 to scroll,if I switch back to /dev/tty0 and make fb0 to
scroll while fb1 is still scrolling I get a segmentation fault.Also
sometimes I
At 13:53 27/05/2001, Martin von Loewis wrote:
> > Yes and no. They will be uncompressed but not when opening the inode. It
> > will be "uncompress required extent's run list on demand".
>
>Are you sure this can work?
No.
>Initially, I thought I could use the attribute list to only uncompress
Hi Chris,
Seen the same behaviour; you're not alone. I'm running XF86 4.0.3 with a G400. My
guess is that mga_drv goes into some local loop while trying to restore the display.
mga_drv at that moment has I/O privileges and if it hangs, Linux hangs too.
Grtz,
Ben
-
To unsubscribe from this
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Bjerkeset, Svein Olav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Today I downloaded kernel 2.4.5 and compiled it. The kernel worked fine
> until
> I tried to halt the computer. When trying to unmount the reiserfs
> filesystems,
> the system freezes with the following output:
>
> journal_begin
>--- include/asm-arm/atomic.h.old Sun May 27 22:30:58 2001
>+++ include/asm-arm/atomic.h Sun May 27 22:58:20 2001
>@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> * 13-04-1997 RMK Made functions atomic!
> * 07-12-1997 RMK Upgraded for v2.1.
> * 26-08-1998 PJB Added #ifdef
In article <00c701c0e6d8$2b28ea40$4aa6b3d0@Toshiba>,
Jaswinder Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I am not able to understand why Linux read and/or write harddisk after some
>time (after few hours ) , harddisk read/write leds keep on glowing for few
>minutes , even though nobody working on it and
> I looked at the root_mountflags usage and it looks ok, so I put it in
> the "figure out later" pile.
>
> Haven't yet verified if this 'ac' only problem
Think I have it sussed. Time for -ac2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
> out the Matrox-supplied mga_drv.o and mga_hal_drv.o modules and
> replace them with the ones from the standard X 4.03 distribution, but
> these are userspace objects and shouldn't be capable of bringing the
> kernel down. (Like I said, the machine can't even be pinged.)
Not really. The matrox
> What's "magicdev"? I am not running GNOME or KDE. In fact, I wasn't
> even running X at the time but had xmcd putting its display on another
> machine over the local network.
Then I guess it was xmcd continually opening/failing
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > Checking root filesystem. /dev/hde13 is mounted.
> > Cannot continue, aboorting.
> > *** An error occurred during the file system check.
> > *** Dropping you to a shell; the system will reboot
> > *** when you leave the shell.
>
> That means the file system was mounted
REF: Linux 2.4.5, 2.4.4, 2.4.3 (and probably earlier);
devfs;
SMP (dual PIII);
< 1GB main memory
Hi,
Has anyone noticed their Linux box lock up hard (as in cannot even be
pinged from the local network) when switching from a text vc to a vc
running X? This has happened for me even
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 10:45:17PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On Sunday 27 May 2001 15:32, Edgar Toernig wrote:
> > Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > I'm not claiming there isn't breakage somewhere,
> >
> > you break UNIX fundamentals. But I'm quite relieved now because I'm
> > pretty sure that
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 11:07:38PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I do also explicitely send this mail to the people that seem to be
> responsible for the pieces of code I touch.
>
> I'm not sure whether the compete removal of the "#ifdef __KERNEL__"'s is
> too rude but there are already other
> > mm: critical shortage of bounce buffers.
>
> Indeed this message has been pestering me in all the recent .4-acx kernels when
> the machine is under heavy FS pressure.
>
> In these kernels I observe a significative (5-10%) performance degradation as
> soon as the FS cache fills up all the
> I compiled and booted the 2.4.5-ac1 kernel with the CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y option
> and got an oops in __alloc_pages() (called by alloc_bounce() called by
> schedule()). Everything works fine if I turn the 4GB mode off.
> Machine is a Dell Precision with 2 Xeons and 2GB of RAM.
>
> 2.4.5 works
On 27 May 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I think the right way to fix it is to do a final atomic check for
> softirqs when the kernel is exited. To be atomic this check neededs to
> be done with interrupts off until the kernel exited. [...]
check out my first softirq patch, it does exactly this.
From: "Andrea Arcangeli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right.
> >
> > The reason I needed that patch is
"David S. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > the attached softirq-2.4.5-B0 patch fixes this problem by calling
> > do_softirq() from local_bh_enable() [if the bh count is 0, to avoid
> > recursion].
>
> Yikes! I do not like this fix.
>
> I'd rather local_bh_enable() not become a more
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 07:26:50PM +0300, you [Ville Herva] claimed:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:58:25PM +0100, you [Alan Cox] claimed:
> >
> > o Free the initial ramdisk correctly
>
> Who made this fix, or who can I contact?
>
> I have a reproducible oops on 2.4.4ac17 (see
>
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Abramo Bagnara wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > while looking for the reason of a build failure of the ALSA libraries on
> > ARM [1] I discovered the following strange thing:
> >
> > On some architectures a function is inside an "#ifdef __KERNEL__" in the
> > header file
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Yes the stock kernel.
yep you are right.
i had this fixed too at a certain point, there is one subtle issue: under
certain circumstances tasklets re-activate the tasklet softirq(s) from
within the softirq handler, which leads to infinite loops if
Same here, I have a dual 1GHz PIII with 4G, I don't get an oops but an infinite
loop of:
> mm: critical shortage of bounce buffers.
Indeed this message has been pestering me in all the recent .4-acx kernels when
the machine is under heavy FS pressure.
In these kernels I observe a
On Sunday 27 May 2001 15:32, Edgar Toernig wrote:
> Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > It won't, the open for "." is handled in the VFS, not the
> > filesystem - it will open the directory. (Without needing to be
> > told it's a directory via O_DIRECTORY.) If you do open("magicdev")
> > you'll get the
Hi.
The following patch makes irttp_read_proc restore_flags()
in error cases too. Applies against 245ac1.
--- linux-245-ac1-clean/net/irda/irttp.cSun May 27 22:15:34 2001
+++ linux-245-ac1/net/irda/irttp.c Sun May 27 22:37:59 2001
@@ -1598,7 +1598,7 @@
self = (struct
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 12:09:29PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> "live lock". What do you hope to avoid by pushing softirq processing
> into a scheduled task? I think doing that is a stupid idea.
NOTE: I'm not pushing anything out of the atomic context, I'm using
ksoftirqd only to cure the
Maybe thats related to the problems with my CDROM drives (SCSI or
IDE SCSI emulation). I cannot mount any CD with 2.4.5. kern.log says:
May 26 15:31:17 bilbo kernel: Detected scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 2, lun 0
May 26 15:31:17 bilbo kernel: Detected scsi CD-ROM sr1 at scsi0,
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 09:08:51PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i took at look at your ksoftirq stuff yesterday, and i think it's
> completely unnecessery and adds serious overhead to softirq handling. The
> whole point of softirqs is to have maximum scalability and no
> serialization. Why did you
Hi,
I compiled and booted the 2.4.5-ac1 kernel with the CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y option
and got an oops in __alloc_pages() (called by alloc_bounce() called by
schedule()). Everything works fine if I turn the 4GB mode off.
Machine is a Dell Precision with 2 Xeons and 2GB of RAM.
2.4.5 works fine
Hi.
The following patch fixes an interrupt flag bug in irtty.c
as per the stanford team's report way back. Applies against
224-ac18.
--- linux-244-ac18-clean/drivers/net/irda/irtty.c Sat May 19 20:59:17 2001
+++ linux-244-ac18/drivers/net/irda/irtty.c Sun May 27 21:56:14 2001
@@
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 09:05:50PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> On Sun, 27 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > I mean everything is fine until the same softirq is marked active
> > again under do_softirq, in such case neither the do_softirq in do_IRQ
> > will run it (because we are in the
Hi.
The following patch adds a missing restore_flags as per the
stanford team's report way back. Applies against 244ac18.
--- linux-244-ac18-clean/drivers/net/hamradio/soundmodem/sm_wss.c Wed Jul 19
01:55:19 2000
+++ linux-244-ac18/drivers/net/hamradio/soundmodem/sm_wss.c Sun May 27
Hi,
It looks like my CDROM driver had a busy night last night
... ;-). This was with Linux 2.4.5, dual Pentium III, devfs, < 1GB
memory. There was no CDROM in the drive, but I had kept the CD player
running anyway.
Cheers,
Chris
May 27 02:10:03 twopit kernel: hdc: ATAPI 32X CD-ROM CD-R/RW
Forgot l-k when sending this off..
- Forwarded message from Rasmus Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Hi.
The following patch fixes a missing rio_spin_unlock_irqrestore
in drivers/char/rio/rioroute.c as per the stanford team's
report a way back. It applies against 244ac18.
---
Forgot l-k when sending this off...
- Forwarded message from Rasmus Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Hi.
The following patch fixes a buggy variable reuse i drivers/char/
rio/riotable.c (244-ac18) as reported by the stanford team way
back.
---
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 06:41:23PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:49:24AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > caused me to write the posted patch to get all compilations right.
>
> The reason I needed that patch is that I was not using 2.4.5aa1 but a
> corrupted tree
On Sun, 27 May 2001, David S. Miller wrote:
> Hooray, some sanity in this thread finally :-)
[ finally i had some sleep after a really long debugging session :-| ]
> > the attached softirq-2.4.5-B0 patch fixes this problem by calling
> > do_softirq() from local_bh_enable() [if the bh count
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> while looking for the reason of a build failure of the ALSA libraries on
> ARM [1] I discovered the following strange thing:
>
> On some architectures a function is inside an "#ifdef __KERNEL__" in the
> header file and on others not. Is there a reason for this
Ingo Molnar writes:
> the bug/misbehavior causing bad latencies turned out to be the following:
> if a hardirq triggers a softirq, but syscall-level code on the same CPU
> disabled local bhs via local_bh_disable(), then we 'miss' the execution of
> the softirq, until the next IRQ. (or next
Overview: At business I just got a brand new EIZO 18" LCD display L675
to test its usability for working in portrait mode to show a full A4
page. These test were done on Windows NT4 but I'd really like to know
how well Linux would have done. I'm going to describe all the obstacles
I encountered
On Sun, 27 May 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> I mean everything is fine until the same softirq is marked active
> again under do_softirq, in such case neither the do_softirq in do_IRQ
> will run it (because we are in the critical section and we hold the
> per-cpu locks), nor we will run it
>> http://jcwren.com/linux/ac18.txt - ac18 dmesg dump
>> http://jcwren.com/linux/build.txt - sequence I'm using to build
>>
>> The apparent interleaved garbage closer to the bottom is exactly what
came
>> out on the console. (Is linking to the dumps perferred over including it
in
>> the mail, or
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 02:18:57PM -0400, you [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] claimed:
> All,
>
> I have been getting a oops ever since 2.4.4-ac17 right after the kernel loads
> the sym53c895 driver. I hand copied part of the oops before rebooting. This
> happens in every kernel since 2.4.4-ac17. I have
All,
I have been getting a oops ever since 2.4.4-ac17 right after the kernel loads
the sym53c895 driver. I hand copied part of the oops before rebooting. This
happens in every kernel since 2.4.4-ac17. I have changed my compiler from
gcc-2.96 to egcs-1.12, thinking that the Mandrake gcc was
>
>> Checking root filesystem. /dev/hde13 is mounted.
>> Cannot continue, aboorting.
>> *** An error occurred during the file system check.
>> *** Dropping you to a shell; the system will reboot
>> *** when you leave the shell.
>
>That means the file system was mounted read/write at boot time.
From: "Jakob Østergaard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
>
> The answer for both of you is:
>
> hdparm -d1 /dev/hd{whatever}
>
> Without DMA enabled, performance is going to suck. 1.9 MB/sec is actually
pretty
> good without DMA ;)
>
i think DMA or PCI is not my solution , atleast :)
Thank
Hello,
I'm having the following problem, when trying to load usb-ohci as a module:
firmin:/usr/src/linux/drivers/usb# modprobe usb-ohci
/lib/modules/2.4.5/kernel/drivers/usb/usb-ohci.o: init_module: No such device
Hint: insmod errors can be caused by incorrect module
"Chris Wedgwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
>
> When ever i copy big data (around 400 to 700 MB ) from one
> partion to another my machine do not response at all (i can not
> work on another shell) during data
> The answer for both of you is:
>
> hdparm -d1 /dev/hd{whatever}
>
> Without DMA enabled, performance is going to suck. 1.9 MB/sec is actually pretty
> good without DMA ;)
I agree.
I get around 4MB/s without and 35.75MB/s with...
hdparm -c3 -d1 -m16 /dev/hda
on a KT133 (A7V) and 45GB
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 08:28:14PM +0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Vanilla 2.4.5 boots ok, but 2.4.5-ac1 finishes kernel initialisation and
> > > starts to print "hda: lost interrupt", I guess this is related to VIA IDE
> > >
Hi,
This was reported on the reiserfs list yesterday. Seems that the cleanup
applied late in 2.4.5-pre affected the locking of the umount process. This
was posted to fix the problem.
Ed Tomlinson
---
"Vladimir V. Saveliev" wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Gergely Tamas wrote:
> >
>
> Yes.. seems the caches need some size limits. ramfs will lock you in
> a heart beat if you hit oom. (i made a typo during iozone run.. oops:)
ramnfs has resource limits in -ac for a reason.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
> On some architectures a function is inside an "#ifdef __KERNEL__" in the
> header file and on others not. Is there a reason for this or is this
> inconsistency simply a bug?
Its probably a bug - primarily it depends if the function is useful when
exported to non kernel code
-
To unsubscribe
Hi,
How is that supposed to work on systems without PCI? For now I have
defined
#define insl(port,buf,len) isa_insb(port,buf,(len)<<2)
#define outsl(port,buf,len) isa_outsb(port,buf,(len)<<2)
in asm-m68k/parport.h.
Bye
Richard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Thank you Jeff for your very helpfull answer.
--- Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: >
Cesar Da Silva wrote:
> > * Alternative I/O Pathing
>
> be less vague
What I mean with the above (my defenition) is:
[Alternative I/O Pathing allows the operating system
to re-route the I/O of devices,
--- Ville Herva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
skrev: > > > * Dynamic Memory Resilience
> >
> > RAM fault tolerance? There was a patch a long
> time ago which detected
> > bad ram, and would mark those memory clusters as
> unuseable at boot.
> > However that is clearly not dynamic.
>
> If you are
Hi,
while looking for the reason of a build failure of the ALSA libraries on
ARM [1] I discovered the following strange thing:
On some architectures a function is inside an "#ifdef __KERNEL__" in the
header file and on others not. Is there a reason for this or is this
inconsistency simply a
Hi,
Today I downloaded kernel 2.4.5 and compiled it. The kernel worked fine
until
I tried to halt the computer. When trying to unmount the reiserfs
filesystems,
the system freezes with the following output:
journal_begin called without kernel lock held
kernel BUG at journal.c:423!
> Today I moved to 2.4.5-ac1, the only different thing
> than normal was I enabled ACPI instead of APM.
Bad idea. The kernel ACPI is not the most debugged, the ACPI in many BIOSes
is complete garbage and there isnt a lot you can do to debug them either.
APM is a definite better choice, at
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:59:28PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> the two error cases are:
>
> #1 hard-IRQ interrupts user-space code, activates softirq, and returns to
> user-space code
Before returning to userspace do_IRQ just runs do_softirq by hand from C
code.
> #2 hard-IRQ interrupts
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 05:16:42PM -0700, Jaswinder Singh wrote:
> >
> > RedHat 7.1 - IDE IBM 41.1 GIG
> > Update to 2.4.5 -> noticed, that hdparm -t /dev/hda went down from 10
> > MByte/sec to 1.9 MByte/sec
> > Any special Options, beside ide-scsi driver activated ..
> >
> > Anybody noticed the
Hello!
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 05:18:20PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Vanilla 2.4.5 boots ok, but 2.4.5-ac1 finishes kernel initialisation and
> > starts to print "hda: lost interrupt", I guess this is related to VIA IDE
> > updates in AC kernels. Config for vanilla and AC kernel is the
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:58:25PM +0100, you [Alan Cox] claimed:
>
> o Free the initial ramdisk correctly
Who made this fix, or who can I contact?
I have a reproducible oops on 2.4.4ac17 (see
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=99079948404775=2 for
details) that seems to be
On Sun, May 27, 2001 at 04:32:09AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Ok, then I will add define_bool CONFIG_NO_PAGE_VIRTUAL y to sparc and
typo: won't
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
> Vanilla 2.4.5 boots ok, but 2.4.5-ac1 finishes kernel initialisation and
> starts to print "hda: lost interrupt", I guess this is related to VIA IDE
> updates in AC kernels. Config for vanilla and AC kernel is the same.
> Here are the kernel logs from 2.4.5 and 2.4.5-ac1 (collected with
> I have written a patch for buz.c for 2.4.5, it should be solution, but i
> don't know it really works, I don't have such hardware available.
It doesnt work. The entire buz driver is totally broken and to be discarded
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> I found this error using xgcc with metal as an error checker. It seems to
> be a simple case of not freeing allocatd memory on an error path.
> -john martin
Already fixed in -ac
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 10:15:48PM -0700, Phil Oester wrote:
> Works for me. Running cerberus on a machine w/2gb RAM - deadlocks on 2.4.5
> vanilla, keeps running on 2.4.5aa1.
great. That was the interesting test to try.
Andrea
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
--- Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev: > On
Sun, 27 May 2001, [iso-8859-1] Cesar Da Silva
> wrote:
>
> > I am doing a thesis about comparing the Linux
> kernel
> > against HP-UX, AIX, Tru64 UNIX, and Solaris (as
> you
> > probably alredy know).
> > I'm stuck now (and the thesis has to bee
[Oh, and please don't let UUCP addresses get out]
On Sat, 26 May 2001, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> Am I right ?
No. And not only that, you also snipped the part of my
email which explains what is happening.
Rik
--
Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
