Re: e1000, sshd, and the infamous Corrupted MAC on input

2005-02-02 Thread Matt Mackall
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 10:44:14PM -0500, Ethan Weinstein wrote: Hey all, I've been having quite a time with the e1000 driver running at gigabit speeds. Running it at 100Fdx has never been a problem, which I've done done for a long time. Last week I picked up a gigabit switch, and that's

Re: [PATCH] add local bio pool support and modify dm

2005-02-02 Thread Jens Axboe
On Wed, Feb 02 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: Dave Olien [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +extern inline void zero_fill_bio(struct bio *bio) +{ + unsigned long flags; + struct bio_vec *bv; + int i; + + bio_for_each_segment(bv, bio, i) { + char *data = bvec_kmap_irq(bv,

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Reserving backup region for kexec based crashdumps.

2005-02-02 Thread Hirokazu Takahashi
Hi Vivek and Eric, IMHO, why don't we swap not only the contents of the top 640K but also kernel working memory for kdump kernel? I guess this approach has some good points. 1.Preallocating reserved area is not mandatory at boot time. And the reserved area can be distributed in small pieces

Re: Touchpad problems with 2.6.11-rc2

2005-02-02 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 17:27, Peter Osterlund wrote: On Wed, 2 Feb 2005, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 13:52:03 -0800 (PST), Peter Osterlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if (mousedev-touch) { + size = dev-absmax[ABS_X] - dev-absmin[ABS_X]; +

Re: [Fastboot] [PATCH] Reserving backup region for kexec based crashdumps.

2005-02-02 Thread Itsuro Oda
Hi, On 02 Feb 2005 08:24:03 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric W. Biederman) wrote: So the kernel+initrd that captures a crash dump will live and execute in a reserved area of memory. It needs to know which memory regions are valid, and it needs to know small things like the final register

<    2   3   4   5   6   7