On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:31 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
Con's interactivity benchmark looks quite promising for finding
scheduler related interactivity regressions.
I doubt that _any_ of the regressions that are user-visible are
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:15 -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
OK, I will, but I first of all need to learn how to tell if benchmarks
are better or worse.
Con's interactivity benchmark looks quite promising for finding
scheduler related interactivity regressions. It
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
Con's interactivity benchmark looks quite promising for finding
scheduler related interactivity regressions.
I doubt that _any_ of the regressions that are user-visible are
scheduler-related. They all tend to be disk IO
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 11:05:59PM -0400, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] (at Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:54:27 -0400), Harald
Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] says:
--- a/include/linux/netlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
#define NETLINK_IP6_FW
On Friday 22 July 2005 19:28, Pavel Machek wrote:
This adds support for touchscreen on Sharp Zaurus sl-5500. Vojtech,
please apply,
I have couple more commnets...
+static int ucb1x00_thread(void *_ts)
+{
+ struct ucb1x00_ts *ts = _ts;
+ struct task_struct *tsk = current;
+ int
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 09:15:14PM -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:07 -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
I will get flames for this, but my laptop boots faster and sometimes
responds faster in 2.4.27 than in 2.6.12. Sorry, but this is the fact
Michael Harris wrote:
[2.] The problem occurs in a forking server similar in function to
inetd. The server employs a very simple SIGCHLD handler that loops on
wait(2), until all zombie processes have been collected. For no
immediately apparent reason, the parent process behaves as if it no
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hi Linus,
Please pull from:
rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-2.6.git/
for a single patch that removes some recently added
debugging console messages.
thanks!
-Len
ec.c | 17 +++--
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
commit
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guys,
ARM folk have recently pointed out a problem with sys_times().
When the kernel boots, we set jiffies to -5 minutes. This causes
sys_times() to return a negative number, which increments through
zero.
However, some negative numbers are used to
Dick Johnson wrote: {
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 08:27 -0300, Vinicius wrote:
[...]
I have a server with 2 Pentium 4 HT processors and 32 GB of RAM,
this server runs lots of applications that consume lots of memory to.
When I stop this applications, the kernel doesn't free memory (the
Adrian Bunk wrote: {
On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 07:55:48PM +0100, christos gentsis wrote:
i would like to ask if it possible to change the optimization of the
kernel from -O2 to -O3 :D, how can i do that? if i change it to the
top level Makefile does it change to all the Makefiles?
And since
Lee Revell wrote: {
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 21:15 -0500, Alejandro Bonilla wrote:
OK, I will, but I first of all need to learn how to tell if benchmarks
are better or worse.
Con's interactivity benchmark looks quite promising for finding scheduler
related interactivity regressions.
}
Scheduler
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 20:23 -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
actually, let me also say that CKRM is on a continuum that includes
current (global) /proc tuning for various subsystems, ulimits, and
at the other end, Xen/VMM's. it's conceivable that CKRM could wind up
being useful and fast
401 - 414 of 414 matches
Mail list logo
