On 8/18/05, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps those application authors should provide a management interface
> to do so within the soft limit range at least. Its not clear to me that
> growing the fd array on a process is even safe. Some programs do size
> arrays at startup after
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a patch to move the pi_lock out of the "fast path". Thus, only
> threads that need to do PI will need to take it.
ok, looks good, applied it. I've renamed p->rt_lock to p->pi_lock. The
patch gave a 10% wall-clock improvement in hackbench
Hi,
I do nightly backups on tape. Every 3 to 4 weeks a process is stuck in
D state while accessing the drive:
12398 ?D 0:00 /usr/sbin/amcheck -ms daily
There are no messages in the log. Only a reboot can remove this process.
lsscsi --long
[0:0:0:0]tapeTANDBERG TDC 4222
applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > One downside would be an increase in mutex structure size though.
>
> If I do need to add an additional lock to the mutex, I would abstract
> it all, so that the old global pi_lock can be used if configured.
> This way, a UP or a low memory 2x
applied
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
jerome lacoste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am on a Dell Inspiron 8100 laptop with 512 M and 1G disk cache. I
> usually have at least 4 big applications running simultaneously: a
> Java IDE, firefox, firefox and X. All that under the Gnome desktop.
>
> I've sometimes seen periods where my
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13-rc6/2.6.13-rc6-mm2/
- Various updates. Nothing terribly noteworthy.
- This kernel still spits a bunch of scheduling-while-atomic warnings from
the scsi code. Please ignore.
Changes since 2.6.13-rc6-mm1:
linus.patch
> i tried to boot 2.6.13-rc5-git4 and 2.6.13-rc6-git13 both with the same
> result: my 3com (3c59x driver on 3com 905c) card not working.
> Here is what I saw in the logs.
> Notice the regularity of the log barfs. They continue the same every
10secs.
I'm currently using 2.6.13-rc6-git13 with the
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 21:32 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> God, I think a thesis can be made out of this. Well, let me start
> coding, since I'm one of those that write code better than I design.
> I'm a Spiral type of guy, not a Waterfall one ;-)
> Code crap, write about it, recode it as
Thomas Zehetbauer wrote:
Now I can either enable the 'SB Live Analog/Digital Output Jack' switch
and use the SPDIF connector to my DD5.1 surround system OR mute this
control and access/unmute the rear/center/LFE channels. Using analog
cabling is not an option as the DTT2500 has no connector for
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005 02:20:07 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> How about you describe what you actually changed and why so that not
> every reviewer has to look up all the bits in the manual?
The patch had a bug anyway, so here's another try. *** Replace
the previous patch with this one. ***
i386
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 03:13:44PM +0800, David Teigland wrote:
> The nodemanager RFC I sent a month ago
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel=112166723919347=2
>
> amounts to half of dlm/config.c (everything under comms/ above) moved into
> a separate kernel module. That would be
On 8/23/05, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> config DLM
> tristate "Distributed Lock Manager (DLM)"
> + depends on SYSFS
> depends on IPV6 || IPV6=n
> select IP_SCTP
> select CONFIGFS_FS
Thanks, you added this once before but it got clobbered
by your
This version contains the following changes:
1. upgrade the staircase scheduler to version 11.6,
2. major reorganization of the spa_no_frills and zaphod code to clean up
the mechanism by which they share code. This includes the definition of
a simple interface which can be used to extend
On 8/22/05, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > This is a take 2 of posix file attribute support on VFAT.
> >
> > Sorry, but this is far too scary. Please just use one of the sane
> > filesystems linux supports.
>
> Unfortunately, it makes sense. If you have compact flash
Hi,
It's widely seen a MCE non-fatal error reported after resume. It seems
MCE resume is lacked under ia32. This patch tries to fix the gap.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.13-rc6-root/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/mcheck/k7.c |2 +-
I have not been able to get the memory hole turned off at the 16M mark
Going through some of the Documentation files, I noticed that I can specify
a ram map with the mem boot option. I know the mem=768M hasn't worked, so
what about trying the memory map option? Could that be a solution to my
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 17:51 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 20:26 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> >
> > How would you add to a lock with just holding a lock for a task? When
> > you are grabbing a lock, you must first grab a raw lock associated to
> > the lock being
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 02:41:07PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>...
> I think the below is simpler.
Looks good.
> Takashi
>...
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a
Hi John
>From: john stultz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 18:52 -0700, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
>> The main user of this new inteface is to allow system calls to get
>> time specified in an absolute form (as most of POSIX states) and thus
>> avoid extra time conversion work.
On Sun, 21 Aug 2005, Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Steven French wrote:
> |
> | We are close, but not quite ready to disable smbfs.
>
> Steve,
>
> I have been itching to work on some kernel code.
> If you need someone just to keep things
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > - Is there any sane reason for the dependency on EMBEDDED?
>> >
>>
>> I believe this was introduced because large servers can have huge amount
>> of memory (running into Tera Bytes) and saving all that memory might not be
>> practical. Hence it was
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 20:26 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> How would you add to a lock with just holding a lock for a task? When
> you are grabbing a lock, you must first grab a raw lock associated to
> the lock being grabbed. Although, I'm starting to look into this idea,
> and I'm going to
As it stands, etags doesn't find labels in the IA64 or i386 assembler source
code, because they're disguised inside a preprocessor macro.
I propose the attached fix, which adds a regular expression to enable
labels disguised by ENTRY() and GLOBAL_ENTRY() macros.
There's a similar problem for
Quoting Chris Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> * Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > You want to build these modules always and always modular?
> >
> > No matter whether the security subsystem is built modular or static?
> >
> > No matter whether the user has enabled or completely disabled
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:19 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 15:44 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 20:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > any ideas how to get rid of pi_lock altogether?
> >
> > I've toyed with the idea of adding another raw_spin_lock
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005 19:43:57 -0400
Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch fixes a problem with incorrect floating-point exception
> signal delivery on i386 kernels. In some cases, an error code of zero
> is delivered instead of the correct code, as the output from my test
>
On Tue, 2005-08-23 at 08:08 +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> There's a similar report in Kernel Bugzilla
>
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4812
>
> I was wondering what's the likelihood of tty->driver_data being NULL in
> vt_ioctl but never had the time to do further exploration.
There's a similar report in Kernel Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4812
I was wondering what's the likelihood of tty->driver_data being NULL in
vt_ioctl but never had the time to do further exploration. Your patch
should fix that bug too.
Tony
Steven Rostedt wrote:
While
Hi,
I am desperately trying to get surround sound working here. I have
- Creative Labs SB Live! 5.1 (emu10k1) card
- digital/SPDIF/coaxial connection
- Cambridge SoundWorks DTT2500
- linux-2.6.12.5
- alsa-lib-1.0.9rf-2
Digital and analog sound basically works. I can play music on the front
[PATCH] driver core: fix bus_rescan_devices() race.
bus_rescan_devices_helper() does not hold the dev->sem when it checks for
!dev->driver. device_attach() holds the sem, but calls again
device_bind_driver()
even when dev->driver is set (which means device is already bound to a driver).
what
>I think there is a type error when port genelink driver to 2.6..
>With this error, a linux host will panic when it link with a windows
>host.
>
>See the following patch.
>
Looks right to me; thanks! Would you happen to know if this
GL620a chip is still manufactured?
If this
WHOA Gents!
Let me get some popcorn to watch this p-contest.
The way you guys are sniping at each other sounds like the good-old days,
when everyone railed me and the subsystem and ended up railing back
Guess nothing was learned from the 6+ years of flamage.
I have mellowed out with age ...
This patch fixes a problem with incorrect floating-point exception
signal delivery on i386 kernels. In some cases, an error code of zero
is delivered instead of the correct code, as the output from my test
program shows:
Before patch:
$ ./fpsig
handler: signum = 8, errno = 0, code = 0
>Ah, thanks. Presumably it'll be considerably longer with %d's and %s's in
>there. But still, ~10 usecs is good resolution for I/O operations.
The variation in times from one call to the next seems to be
greater than the time to evaluate 4 "%d" arguments.
So we are back to how to get a
Hi.
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 18:15, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Update suspend documentation. Warnings were a bit overstated, and did
> not point out important stuff.
>
> ---
> commit 790df7223ac29afec81e7201adc879973311f27e
> tree 97fa2017f8f5aded0c44cfc75ba4903fbdb7f0a4
> parent
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Howard Chu:
> That's not the complete story. BerkeleyDB provides a
> db_env_set_func_yield() hook to tell it what yield function it
> should use when its internal locking routines need such a function.
> If you don't set a specific hook, it just uses sleep(). The
>
"Terry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The kernel appears to compile perfectly, installs fine, but after reboot it
> is only reporting 16M of RAM. I have tried with and without the mem=768M
I've seen this happen with BIOSes of your vintage when there's a
"memory hole at 16M" turned on--the kernel
Gopalakrishnan Raman wrote:
Hi
I'm using 2.6.11.7 and debugging why my ESP tunnel mode does
not work between two 2.6 machines one of which is behind a NAT.
I'm using tcpdump to capture NAT-T packets on one of the hosts
and using espdecrypt (http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~flemej/freebsd/espdecrypt/)
to
On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Dave Airlie wrote:
>
> Can we revert the PCI assign resources patch?
I'd rather not revert the whole PCI assign thing, because it's good.
But disabling the ROM assignment might be a good idea. Almost nobody ever
really wants to assign the ROM anyway, and there are cards
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You want to build these modules always and always modular?
>
> No matter whether the security subsystem is built modular or static?
>
> No matter whether the user has enabled or completely disabled the
> security subsystem?
The modules are just for
Hi.
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 19:00, Pavel Machek wrote:
> @@ -1207,7 +1208,6 @@ static int check_sig(void)
>*/
> error = bio_write_page(0, _header);
> } else {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "swsusp: Suspend partition has wrong
> signature?\n");
>
> Export machine_power_off() on ppc64, as the pcwd watchdog driver needs it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> --- linux-2.6.12/arch/ppc64/kernel/setup.c~ 2005-08-09 17:37:36.0
> -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.12/arch/ppc64/kernel/setup.c2005-08-09 17:37:53.0
Hi,
It seems to me this mail does not go out.
So resending it.
> On 8/18/05, Hiro Yoshioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) using stack to save/restore MMX registers
>
> It seems to me that it has some regression.
> I'd like to rollback it and use kernel_fpu_begin() and kernel_fpu_end().
The
--- James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 10:27 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> > Is this the only use _you_ could find for a *radix tree*? ;-)
> > Since of course sd.c uses it just as an enumeration, according to
> > you this must be the only use? :-)
>
> And Dicto
I am confused. I am beginning to see shades of the devfs problems coming up
again. sysfs is built to be world readable by everyone who has it
mounted in their namespace. Writable files in sysfs I have never
understood.
Given that we now have files which do not conform to one uniform
policy
Jon Escombe wrote:
Here is a first attempt at a patch to return register data from the
libata passthrough HDIO ioctl handlers, I needed this as the ATA
'unload immediate' command returns the success in the lbal register.
This patch applies on top of 2.6.12 and Jeffs
Florian Weimer wrote:
* Andi Kleen:
Has anybody contacted the Sleepycat people with a description of the
problem yet?
Berkeley DB does not call sched_yield, but OpenLDAP does in some
wrapper code around the Berkeley DB backend.
That's not the complete story. BerkeleyDB provides a
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> But we can not check for p->sighand == NULL, as sighand is released
> after exit_itimers() so we are still deadlock prone. So I think
> __exit_sighand() should be called before exit_itimers(). Then we can do
>
> retry:
> if (unlikely(!p->sighand))
>
i have released the 2.6.13-rc6-rt10 tree, which can be downloaded from
the usual place:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/
this is a fixes-only release. Changes since 2.6.13-rc6-rt9:
- fix/improve the timer PI logic (Thomas Gleixner)
- fix tty race (Steven Rostedt)
- fix
On 8/22/05, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ??
> Usually when I hear stand-alone program I think of program that runs
> without the need of a kernel. You have an environment in that context?
Without the need of a kernel? Perhaps I did not explain myself
correctly... I meant a user
* Karsten Wiese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> diff -up arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c.rt9 arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
> --- arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c.rt9 2005-08-19 12:28:42.0 +0200
> +++ arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c 2005-08-19 12:29:30.0 +0200
> @@ -1758,8 +1758,8 @@ void
* Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 08:01 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > i have released the 2.6.13-rc6-rt9 tree, which can be downloaded from
> > the usual place:
>
> I reworked the code for dynamically setting the priority of the
> hrtimer
Wieland Gmeiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> (This resembles the behaviour of the ptrace system call.)
ptrace does not solve this problem because?
If you can do this now without a syscall why do you need
a syscall to optimize this code path?
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Thu, 2005-07-28 at 18:52 -0700, Inaky Perez-Gonzalez wrote:
> The main user of this new inteface is to allow system calls to get
> time specified in an absolute form (as most of POSIX states) and thus
> avoid extra time conversion work.
>
> There was a short thread about it, available at
Gopalakrishnan Raman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is that packet_rcv() calls skb_clone() which is the
> right thing to do in all cases except when the data portion of the
> incoming skb is being modified in place. I replaced it with a pskb_copy()
> in the case when the packet is likely
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:45:59PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Sun, 21 August 2005 00:28:08 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >
> > gcc kindly pointed me at jffs_create() with this warning :
> >
> > fs/jffs/inode-v23.c:1279: warning: `inode' might be used uninitialized
> > in this function
>
>
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Quite contrary it makes the system more snappy and the overall test
> > latencies go down.
>
> we can undo that flag - it's indeed only a couple of cycles worth of
> optimization, which wont count for most workloads. I've applied your
> patch, but
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:01:57PM -0500, Steven French wrote:
>...
> I don't mind fixing any major smbfs bugs that are found as needed, the code
> is not hard to follow, but I would rather focus on the three current cifs
> priorities:
>...
It sounds as if you would be a great choice as new smbfs
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's the port from the latest git to solve this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
thanks, applied.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff Garzik wrote:
I finally got around to creating something that has been missing since
BitKeeper disappeared, and something that Andrew has been wanting
from me for a while: an amalgamation of all the libata-dev branches
that I maintain internally.
You are
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> @@ -1427,7 +1434,18 @@ send_group_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigq
> int ret = 0;
>
> BUG_ON(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC));
> - read_lock(_lock);
> +retry:
> + if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_EXITING))
> + return -1;
> +
I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steven French wrote:
|
| We are close, but not quite ready to disable smbfs.
Steve,
I have been itching to work on some kernel code.
If you need someone just to keep things afloat,
I'd been happy to look into it. There would be some
start up time
Not sure if I have provided enough info, or to much info, but here it goes:
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
Not Detecting all the memory installed in the system.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I have Linux Kernel 2.4.31 running on a Compaq 5000R server with 2 PPro 200
>
>
> I have found that the crash and the balnking may be different problems.
> It seems that any kernel with a _working_ drm sooner or later will cause
> a hang on the radeon display, possibly but not necessarily freezing the
> machine for a while or forever. This happens more often if I
Hi!
> The line-wrapping in most of the include/asm/pgtable.h pte test/set
> macros looks horrible in my 80 column terminal. The following "test the
> waters" patch is how I would like to see them laid out. I realize that
> the braces don't adhere to CodingStyle but the advantage is (when taking
Guillermo López Alejos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8/22/05, Eric W. Biederman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ??
>> Usually when I hear stand-alone program I think of program that runs
>> without the need of a kernel. You have an environment in that context?
>
> Without the need of a kernel?
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm getting the following compile errors:
>
> <-- snip -->
>
> ...
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `pi_init':
> : multiple definition of `pi_init'
> kernel/built-in.o:(.bss+0x80f0): first defined here
> Note: pi_init is
>How fast is printk? I haven't looked.
>
>ie: if you do back-to-back printk's, what's the timestamp increment?
On ia64 it looks like about 4-5 usec increment for back-to-back
printk (with no serial console configured, and dmesg -n to turn
off messages to the VGA console).
-Tony
-
To unsubscribe
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 10:39 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >
> > @@ -1427,7 +1434,18 @@ send_group_sigqueue(int sig, struct sigq
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > BUG_ON(!(q->flags & SIGQUEUE_PREALLOC));
> > - read_lock(_lock);
> > +retry:
> > + if
hoi :)
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 08:32:42PM +0200, Stephane Wirtel wrote:
> Martin, your patch works for the htmldocs target, but not for the
> pdfdocs, I think there is a bug in a latex package. I don't know which
> one, but it's the same error.
yes, some pdfdocs are broken and I haven't found
Since all remaining smp_tune_scheduling()'s are now empty (except for
the useless setting of function-local variables), we can completely
remove them.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c | 31 ---
Pavel Machek napsal(a):
+ * but it wil probably only crash.
... it will ... :)
*
* (*) suspend/resume support is needed to make it safe.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hi!
I think there is a type error when port genelink driver to 2.6..
With this error, a linux host will panic when it link with a windows
host.
See the following patch.
diff -pruNX linux-2.6-curr/Documentation/dontdiff
linux-2.6-curr/drivers/usb/net/usbnet.c
Hi,
It seems to me this mail does not go out.
So resending it.
> On 8/18/05, Hiro Yoshioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) using stack to save/restore MMX registers
>
> It seems to me that it has some regression.
> I'd like to rollback it and use kernel_fpu_begin() and kernel_fpu_end().
The
Meelis Roos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm currently running 2.6.13-rc6+git as of today and whan I tell my computer
> to
> reboot, it starts a reboot as sual and when it reached kernel telling
> "Rebooting" the computer halts instead. I noticed it just with an earlier
> post-rc6 snapshot and
Le Sunday 21 August 2005 a 13:08, Jesper Juhl ecrivait:
> On 8/21/05, Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:28:08AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > gcc kindly pointed me at jffs_create() with this warning :
> > >
> > > fs/jffs/inode-v23.c:1279: warning: `inode'
On 8/22/05, Coywolf Qi Hunt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:17:59PM +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
> > On 1/23/05, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
[snip]
> > > + printk(KERN_NOTICE);
> > > printk(linux_banner);
> >
> > Why not merge it to the same
Hi.
Unfortunately, it seems that current kernels (including vanilla -rc
kernels) don't compile correctly on ppc if I have APM emulation enabled,
but PMU disabled (only CUDA enabled).
Here is what I get from a compilation try:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 22:26 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Since Urban Widmark was not active for some time, and I didn't have any
> > success trying to reach him, it seems we need a new maintainer for the
> > smb filesystem in the Linux kernel.
> >
>
Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, it seems that current kernels (including vanilla -rc
> kernels) don't compile correctly on ppc if I have APM emulation enabled,
> but PMU disabled (only CUDA enabled).
>
> Here is what I get from a compilation try:
>
> - - - - - - -
On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 17:33 -0700, Luben Tuikov wrote:
> No preallocation is done from IRQ context. Do not spread FUD.
> It seems to me that you're unaware how IDR works and unaware how
> the driver works.
Argumentum ad Hominem now ... we'll get them all eventually.
Since you won't post the
"Brian D. McGrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Good morning,
>
> Using FC3 or FC4 with the 2.6.9 or later kernel, we're looking for a way
> to bind a thread (or an entire process) to a designated CPU. We're
> using dual processor systems as well as P4 with HT and Xeons so all of
> our boxes
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I googled a little and found where this may have already happened in
> the main line kernel:
>
> http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2005/Aug/1603.html
>
> So here's my proposal:
>
> Instead of checking for tty->count == 1 in con_open,
Update suspend documentation. Warnings were a bit overstated, and did
not point out important stuff.
---
commit 790df7223ac29afec81e7201adc879973311f27e
tree 97fa2017f8f5aded0c44cfc75ba4903fbdb7f0a4
parent 63393fcbf056a6fd68142a49ed4e1258560dce2c
author <[EMAIL PROTECTED](none)> Mon, 22 Aug 2005
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 01:17:59PM +0800, Coywolf Qi Hunt wrote:
> On 1/23/05, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This patch modifies a few of the printk() loglevels used in init/main.c in
> > an attempt to make them a bit more appropriate.
> >
> > The default loglevel is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >How fast is printk? I haven't looked.
> >
> >ie: if you do back-to-back printk's, what's the timestamp increment?
>
> On ia64 it looks like about 4-5 usec increment for back-to-back
> printk (with no serial console configured, and dmesg -n to turn
> off messages to
Drop printing during normal boot (when no image exists in swap), print
message when drivers fail, fix error paths and consolidate
near-identical functions in disk.c (and functions with just one statement).
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
commit
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 11:52:09AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > This patch adds two stackable test LSMs which only define
> > inode_init_security(). Any file created while these modules are
> > loaded should have the xattrs
Fix process freezer: thaw processes if something goes wrong and do not
spin in schedule().
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
commit 5d655d6e10c2a7ab291ee24b467fb167828f508a
tree 8dfa9668e66e7006de7f0107698356718beb1e37
parent 847ddd5de8a88b2d47e759bc94186a77140bc673
author
* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 09:00 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-08-19 at 02:39 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > I haven't thought of a good way yet to solve the race condition with
> > dependent sleeper. (Except by turning off
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:46:57PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Since Urban Widmark was not active for some time, and I didn't have any
> > success trying to reach him, it seems we need a new maintainer for the
> > smb filesystem in the Linux
> On 8/18/05, Hiro Yoshioka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) using stack to save/restore MMX registers
>
> It seems to me that it has some regression.
> I'd like to rollback it and use kernel_fpu_begin() and kernel_fpu_end().
The following is a current version of cache aware copy_from_user_ll.
* Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It doesn't compile with CONFIG_DECNET_ROUTER=y:
thanks, applied.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
* Karsten Wiese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> This helps at least on Ingo's and my [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and shouldn't bite anybody else.
> Please add to -mm for later inclusion into mainline.
> Signed-off-by: Karsten Wiese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tested-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 12:53:10AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> config CRASH_DUMP
> bool "kernel crash dumps (EXPERIMENTAL)"
> depends on EMBEDDED
> depends on EXPERIMENTAL
> depends on HIGHMEM
> help
> Generate crash dump after being started by kexec.
>
> Two
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 09:56:45PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
> The parameter value should IMHO be a pointer to a struct {
> unsigned long long maxspeed; // (with 0 being the magic max. value?)
> int facility; /* 0=general speed, 2=general read, 4=read data,
> 6=read audio,
James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Since you won't post the usage code, just answer this: how does what
> you're doing with idr differ from its originally designed consumer: the
> posix timers which also do the idr_remove() in IRQ context?
erp. posix_timers has its own irq-safe
On 21.08.2005 [18:12:35 -0300], Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:42:36PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> > On 8/8/05, Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > (A believe Marcelo would like to see this in 2.6.13, but I'll let him
> > > fight over that ;)
> > >
> > >
1 - 100 of 502 matches
Mail list logo
