Re: Immediate general protection errors on Tyan board

2005-09-04 Thread Parag Warudkar
Bob Richmond wrote: Immediately upon boot on this system, most userland programs will segfault, including mount. This causes the system to come up in a bizarre state with the root filesystem mounted read-only, and nothing runs without segfault. There have been numerous similar posts about thi

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 05.09.2005 [12:02:29 +0530], Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:48:13PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > Admittedly, I don't think SMP ARM has been around all that long? > > Maybe the existing code just has not been extended. > > Yeah, maybe ARM never cared for SMP. But

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sander
Willy Tarreau wrote (ao): > So you're both half-right from your point of view. But you're both half-wrong > too : no, people can't always choose, and no, people who don't choose their > laptop are not impacted by development kernels. So let's turn the page and > wait for a stable kernel. If the co

Immediate general protection errors on Tyan board

2005-09-04 Thread Bob Richmond
Immediately upon boot on this system, most userland programs will segfault, including mount. This causes the system to come up in a bizarre state with the root filesystem mounted read-only, and nothing runs without segfault. There have been numerous similar posts about this problem, but they al

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread Pekka Enberg
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > +void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_glock *gl) > > +{ > > + glock_hold(gl); > > +} > > > > eh why? On 9/5/05, David Teigland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You removed the comment stating exactly why, see below. If that's not a

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Srivatsa Vaddagiri
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:48:13PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > Admittedly, I don't think SMP ARM has been around all that long? Maybe > the existing code just has not been extended. Yeah, maybe ARM never cared for SMP. But we do care :) > I'm not sure on this. It's going to be NULL for ot

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Pekka Enberg
On 9/5/05, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Except that someone has to maintain the patch, because with the speed the > kernel is changing, a patch against 2.6.14 will not work on 2.6.15. Indeed. It has to be maintained in tree as well and I don't see any justification for making mainlin

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread Theodore Ts'o
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:33:44PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > - read-only mount > > - "specatator" mount (like ro but no journal allocated for the mount, > > no fencing needed for failed node that was mounted as specatator) > > I'd call it "real-read-only", and yes, that's very usef

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread David Teigland
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > +static unsigned int handle_roll(atomic_t *a) > +{ > + int x = atomic_read(a); > + if (x < 0) { > + atomic_set(a, 0); > + return 0; > + } > + return (unsigned int)x; > +} > > this is just p

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sean
On Mon, September 5, 2005 2:04 am, Willy Tarreau said: > They don't mind. Those people install Checkpoint on Linux. A product of > which previous releases were even incompatible with security updates ! Heh.. well all the power to them. Still no reason for an open source developer to waste one se

R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Giampaolo, > > Should read: ...even if the ATMSAR actually lacks of AAL1, AAL2 > and AAL3/4 [where AAL3/4 is obsolete] capabilities... > > Just wanted to make it more precise according to the ATM > standards, this was the only intention of my "patch". You're right. Sorry about that. Thanks,

Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Zoran Stojsavljevic
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Also, I believe that adsl will carry much more services then just AAL5 for internet connection in the future. Even if the ATMSAR actually lacks of AAL1 and AAL2/3 capabilities, adding them in a single, specialized module is much easier than swimming in a usb+atm mid

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 01:31:29AM -0400, Sean wrote: > On Mon, September 5, 2005 1:01 am, Willy Tarreau said: > > > But how do you think Linux has penetrated the enterprise market ??? > > We all have put dual boots on every windows machine we had access to, > > eventhough this was clearly forbidd

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 05.09.2005 [11:02:25 +0530], Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:26:16PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > > I'd be really surprised if any architecture couldn't use what ARM has > > today - in other words, this is the only kernel-side interface: > > Russel, > I went thr' th

Re: 2.6.11.11 and rsync oops (SATA related?)

2005-09-04 Thread Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Parag Warudkar wrote: Jesper Juhl wrote: It seems you forgot to include the data. Nothing inline in the email, nor any attachments. Sorry for that, I really forgot to include the attachments at first, then send the mail, then canceled it (on gmane.org), then send another mail with the atta

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread David Teigland
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > +void gfs2_glock_hold(struct gfs2_glock *gl) > +{ > + glock_hold(gl); > +} > > eh why? You removed the comment stating exactly why, see below. If that's not a accepted technique in the kernel, say so and I'll be happy to ch

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Srivatsa Vaddagiri
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:26:16PM +0100, Russell King wrote: > I'd be really surprised if any architecture couldn't use what ARM has > today - in other words, this is the only kernel-side interface: Russel, I went thr' the ARM implementation and have some remarks (mostly from a SMP perspe

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sean
On Mon, September 5, 2005 1:01 am, Willy Tarreau said: > But how do you think Linux has penetrated the enterprise market ??? > We all have put dual boots on every windows machine we had access to, > eventhough this was clearly forbidden. And after repeatedly showing > to the staff that you saved t

Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] remove some unused IDE stuff

2005-09-04 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Adrian, Adrian Bunk wrote: This patch removes some dead IDE-related #define's and "static inline" functions. Please double-check it since I've only tested it with grep and didn't try compilation. Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I think the include/asm-m68knommu/ide.h sho

Re: 2.6.11.11 and rsync oops (SATA related?)

2005-09-04 Thread Parag Warudkar
Jesper Juhl wrote: It seems you forgot to include the data. Nothing inline in the email, nor any attachments. I could see the attachments and inline dmesg - probably your mail server is at it. Parag - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:47:03AM -0400, Sean wrote: > On Mon, September 5, 2005 12:36 am, Willy Tarreau said: > > > Well, to be fair, most laptop users today are in companies which provide > > them with the model the staff has chosen for all the employees. And > > employees > > try to install Li

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi Dave, On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:26:41AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: (...) > A lot of users look at it as nirvana. I've seen users report bugs against > ancient kernels, that are extremely likely to be fixed in later kernels, > yet they're unwilling to move to a newer kernel due to them being tied

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sean
On Mon, September 5, 2005 12:36 am, Willy Tarreau said: > Well, to be fair, most laptop users today are in companies which provide > them with the model the staff has chosen for all the employees. And > employees > try to install Linux on them anyway. That's how you end up with things > like > ndi

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Mon, Sep 05, 2005 at 12:12:56AM -0400, Sean wrote: > On Mon, September 5, 2005 12:03 am, Alex Davis said: > > > > What if you don't have a choice? When someone comes to me with their > > laptop > > containing a built-in wireless card not natively supported by Linux, am I > > supposed to tel

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:41:58PM -0700, Alex Davis wrote: > It will never be 'appropriate' if the system doesn't somehow work on Joe's > hardware. We currently have something that works. "works". As someone who gets to read a lot of bug reports from end-users, this thing is far from perfect

Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread David Teigland
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 10:41:40PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Joel Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > What happens when we want to add some new primitive which has no > > > posix-file analog? > > > > The point of dlmfs is not to express every primitive that the > > DLM has. dlm

Re: x86-cache-pollution-aware-__copy_from_user_ll.patch added to -mm tree

2005-09-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:42:18 -0700 > It seems a strange thing to check though. Do we really need it? Other platforms already do, it's a very good sanity check. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a me

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sean
On Mon, September 5, 2005 12:03 am, Alex Davis said: > > What if you don't have a choice? When someone comes to me with their > laptop > containing a built-in wireless card not natively supported by Linux, am I > supposed to tell them "go buy a Linux-supported card" when there's a way > I can make

Re: x86-cache-pollution-aware-__copy_from_user_ll.patch added to -mm tree

2005-09-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: x86-cache-pollution-aware-__copy_from_user_ll.patch added to -mm tree Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 16:23:33 -0400 > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from, >

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Alex Davis
--- Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, September 4, 2005 11:41 pm, Alex Davis said: > > > It will never be 'appropriate' if the system doesn't somehow work on Joe's > > hardware. We currently have something that works. In my opinion it's > > pointless to take that away. The manufacturers

[PATCHSET] 2.6.13-git3-bird1

2005-09-04 Thread viro
While way overdue, "fixes and sparse annotations" tree is finally going public. This version is basically a starting point - there will be much more stuff to merge. Right now it builds with allmodconfig[1] on the following set: alpha (UP and SMP), amd64 (UP and SMP), arm (RPC,

[patch] i386 seccomp fix for auditing/ptrace

2005-09-04 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
Hello, This is the same issue as ppc64 before, when returning to userland we shouldn't re-compute the seccomp check or the task could be killed during sigreturn when orig_eax is overwritten by the sigreturn syscall. This was found by Roland. This was harmless from a security standpoint, but some

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Kyle Moffett
On Sep 4, 2005, at 23:41:58, Alex Davis wrote: --- Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's not a philosophical issue, it's what Linux _is_: an open source operating system! That's what the developers are working on; not your half-baked vision. Um, ever hear of 'compromise'?? All I'm saying is let

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sean
On Sun, September 4, 2005 11:41 pm, Alex Davis said: > It will never be 'appropriate' if the system doesn't somehow work on Joe's > hardware. We currently have something that works. In my opinion it's > pointless to take that away. The manufacturers will still stone-wall us > regardless of ndiswra

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Alex Davis
--- Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, September 4, 2005 10:29 pm, Alex Davis said: > > > Linux isn't just used by kernel developers. It's that attitude that > > helps insure Linux will always have a small userbase. Lack of numbers > > just gives the manufacturers another reason not to c

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread David Teigland
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:28:21PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 05:44:03PM +0800, David Teigland wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 01:35:23PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > > > + gfs2_assert(gl->gl_sbd, atomic_read(&gl->gl_count) > 0,); > > > > > what is gfs2_assert() ab

Re: x86-cache-pollution-aware-__copy_from_user_ll.patch added to -mm tree

2005-09-04 Thread Hiro Yoshioka
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from, > > unsigned long n) > > > { > > > BUG_ON((long) n < 0);

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-04 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:08:22PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote: > On 9/4/05, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Do you get anything from alt-sysrq-T? > > no i havent used that im usally in x when its freezing > x wont even switch to console would it still give me anything then? Well, you c

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-04 Thread Bret Towe
On 9/4/05, J. Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:51:08PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote: > > On 9/4/05, Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 9/4/05, Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > > > > [...] > > > > > after mo

Re: Old ipw2200 code in 2.6.13-git3 and 2.6.13-mm1

2005-09-04 Thread Ryan Anderson
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 08:48:28PM -0700, Miles Lane wrote: [snip] > Can we please get the latest IPW2200 code into the development kernels soon? Seconded. I haven't rebuilt the 1.0.6 code against the 2.6.13-git kernels, but my 2.6.13-rc4 build with 1.0.6 ipw2200 in it seems much more stable an

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Con Kolivas
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005 06:37 am, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > On 04.09.2005 [21:26:16 +0100], Russell King wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:10:54PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > > I've got a few ideas that I think might help push Con's patch > > > coalescing efforts in an arch-independent

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sean
On Sun, September 4, 2005 10:29 pm, Alex Davis said: > Linux isn't just used by kernel developers. It's that attitude that > helps insure Linux will always have a small userbase. Lack of numbers > just gives the manufacturers another reason not to care about us. Joe > User doesn't care about our p

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Alex Davis
--- Sean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, September 4, 2005 10:00 pm, Alex Davis said: > > Dave Jones wrote: > >>- NDISwrapper / driverloader. > >> (Shock, horror - no-one cares). > > > > Shock, horror. Someone DOES care: everyone who uses ndiswrapper or > > driverloader, whether they know

[PATCH] ipw2200: Missing kmalloc check

2005-09-04 Thread Panagiotis Issaris
The ipw2200 driver code in current GIT contains a kmalloc() followed by a memset() without handling a possible memory allocation failure. Signed-off-by: Panagiotis Issaris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- drivers/net/wireless/ipw2200.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) 8e288

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sean
On Sun, September 4, 2005 10:00 pm, Alex Davis said: > Dave Jones wrote: >>- NDISwrapper / driverloader. >> (Shock, horror - no-one cares). > > Shock, horror. Someone DOES care: everyone who uses ndiswrapper or > driverloader, whether they know it or not. Are you proposing that > we punish the end

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Alex Davis
Dave Jones wrote: >- NDISwrapper / driverloader. > (Shock, horror - no-one cares). Shock, horror. Someone DOES care: everyone who uses ndiswrapper or driverloader, whether they know it or not. Are you proposing that we punish the end-users because of the obstinence of the hardware manufacturers?

Re: [Pcihpd-discuss] Re: ACPI problem with PCI Express Native Hot-plug driver

2005-09-04 Thread Rajat Jain
> > Hello, > Would you be willing to test the mainline kernel (2.6.13) to see if you > have the same problem with the most recent version of the driver? And > attach the logs again please. > > Thanks, > Kristen > > Thanks, for the inputs. I will test it with 2.6.13 and get back. Rajat - To u

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread dean gaudet
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Adrian Bunk wrote: > How do you put pressure on hardware manufacturers for getting them to > release the specs? > > If they are able to write "supported by Linux" on their products anyway > because there's a driver that runs under NdisWrapper? that's specious... they can pu

Re: Brand-new notebook useless with Linux...

2005-09-04 Thread Alejandro Bonilla Beeche
On Sat, 2005-09-03 at 18:58 -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote: > I just bought a new notebook. Here is the output from lspci using the latest > pci.ids file from sourceforge: > > 00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS480 Host Bridge (rev 01) > 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc: Unknown devic

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 06:30:29PM -0700, Alex Davis wrote: > >The NdisWrapper FAQ already tells you that you need a patch for some of > >the binary-only Windows drivers that require more than 8kB stacks. > > > >And the fact that NdisWrapper is mostly working hinders the development > >of open so

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Alex Davis
>The NdisWrapper FAQ already tells you that you need a patch for some of >the binary-only Windows drivers that require more than 8kB stacks. > >And the fact that NdisWrapper is mostly working hinders the development >of open source drivers for this hardware. If the hardware manufacturer won't gi

Re: RAID1 ramdisk patch

2005-09-04 Thread Neil Brown
On Monday September 5, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi all, > > I have written a small patch for use with a HDD-backed ramdisk in the md > raid1 driver. The raid1 driver usually does read balancing on the disks, > but I feel that if it encounters a single ram disk in the array that > should be th

RAID1 ramdisk patch

2005-09-04 Thread Wilco Baan Hofman
Hi all, I have written a small patch for use with a HDD-backed ramdisk in the md raid1 driver. The raid1 driver usually does read balancing on the disks, but I feel that if it encounters a single ram disk in the array that should be the preferred read disk. The application of this would be for

Re: [DVB patch 51/54] ttpci: av7110: RC5+ remote control support

2005-09-04 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > > > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: [DVB patch 51/54] ttpci: av7110: RC5+ remote control support

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > -#define UP_TIMEOUT (HZ/4) > > > > +#define UP_TIMEOUT (HZ*7/25) >

2.6.11.11 and rsync oops (SATA related?)

2005-09-04 Thread Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Hi, there. Long time no posting - didn't have kernel problems for long time :-) That is why I am still running 2.6.11.11 (2.6.12 elsewhere). Will move to 2.6.13 soon. Yesterday just bought a new SATAII drive (Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 ST3300831AS) and while trying to rsync some data from the old d

Re: [DVB patch 54/54] ttusb-budget: use time_after_eq()

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > -static int numpkt = 0, lastj, numts, numstuff, numsec, numinvalid;

Re: [DVB patch 54/54] ttusb-budget: use time_after_eq()

2005-09-04 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > -static int numpkt = 0, lastj, numts, numstuff, numsec, numinvalid; > > > +static int numpkt = 0, numts, numstuff, numsec

Re: [DVB patch 51/54] ttpci: av7110: RC5+ remote control support

2005-09-04 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_ir.c > > > 2005-09-04 22:03:40.0 +0200 > > > +++ linux-2.6.

2.6.11.11 and rsync oops (SATA related?)

2005-09-04 Thread Kalin KOZHUHAROV
Hi, there. Long time no posting - didn't have kernel problems for long time :-) That is why I am still running 2.6.11.11 (2.6.12 elsewhere). Will move to 2.6.13 soon. Yesterday just bought a new SATAII drive (Seagate Barracuda 7200.8 ST3300831AS) and while trying to rsync some data from the old d

Re: 2.6.11.11 and rsync oops (SATA related?)

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 9/5/05, Kalin KOZHUHAROV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, there. > Long time no posting - didn't have kernel problems for long time :-) > > That is why I am still running 2.6.11.11 (2.6.12 elsewhere). Will move > to 2.6.13 soon. > > Yesterday just bought a new SATAII drive (Seagate Barracuda 7

Re: [DVB patch 51/54] ttpci: av7110: RC5+ remote control support

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_ir.c 2005-09-04 > > 22:03:40.0 +0200 > > +++ linux-2.6.13-git4/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_ir.c 2005-09-04 > > 22

Re: 2.6.13 locks my machine within 1h, 2.6.12.5 works fine (PREEMPT?)

2005-09-04 Thread Jonathan Brown
I get the exact same thing. Here is my config: # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version: 2.6.13 # Mon Aug 29 20:06:23 2005 # CONFIG_X86=y CONFIG_MMU=y CONFIG_UID16=y CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y # # Code maturity level options # CONFIG_EXPERIME

Re: [DVB patch 23/54] usb: add TwinhanDTV StarBox support

2005-09-04 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Add driver for the TwinhanDTV StarBox and clones. > > Thanks to Ralph Metzler for his initial work on this box and thanks to Twinhan > for their support. > --- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:

Re: [DVB patch 54/54] ttusb-budget: use time_after_eq()

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 Nish Aravamudan wrote: > On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > -static int numpkt = 0, lastj, numts, numstuff, numsec, numinvalid; > > +static int numpkt = 0, numts, numstuff, numsec, numinvalid; > > +static unsigned long lastj; > > > > static voi

[PATCH] disable_local_APIC() is only available when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is defined

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
`disable_local_APIC' is only available when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is defined : arch/i386/kernel/crash.c: In function `crash_nmi_callback': arch/i386/kernel/crash.c:153: warning: implicit declaration of function `disable_local_APIC' arch/i386/kernel/crash.c: In function `nmi_shootdown_cpus': arch

Re: [DVB patch 14/54] frontend: s5h1420: fixes

2005-09-04 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Misc. fixes. > --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/s5h1420.c > 2005-09-04 22:24:24.0 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.13-git4/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/s5h1420.c

RE: Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13

2005-09-04 Thread Matt LaPlante
I did a direct serial connection and boy was that a lot easier. Anyway, without further adeu, the crash: # Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 50c86502 printing eip: c01bd216 *pde = Oops: [#1] PREEMPT Modules linked in: aes_i586 es

Re: [PATCH] disable_local_APIC() is only available when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is defined

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 9/5/05, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > `disable_local_APIC' is only available when CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC is defined : > > arch/i386/kernel/crash.c: In function `crash_nmi_callback': > arch/i386/kernel/crash.c:153: warning: implicit declaration of function > `disable_local_APIC' >

[DVB patch 30/54] usb: white space cleanup

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> white space cleanup Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/vp7045.c |5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.ori

[DVB patch 37/54] dst: fix symbol rate setting

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Make the Symbolrate setting card specific. Signed-off-by: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/dst.c | 30 +++--- 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 dele

[DVB patch 16/54] frontend: tda1004x: fix SNR reading

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix SNR reading Signed-off-by: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/frontends/tda1004x.c |3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/d

[DVB patch 36/54] Nebula DigiTV nxt6000 fix

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Stuart Auchterlonie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix bug in Nebula DigiTV frontend detection for nxt6000. Signed-off-by: Stuart Auchterlonie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/dvb-bt8xx.c |4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+),

[DVB patch 21/54] frontend: stv0297: QAM128 tuning improvement

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> while investigating the QAM_128-issue with the stv0297-driver for the Cablestar (which is not the same as the one in dvb-kernel CVS, yet), I fixed it, not by increasing the timeout, but by disabling the corner-detection for QAM_128 and higher. This patc

[DVB patch 50/54] av7110: conditionally disable workaround for broken firmware

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Oliver Endriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Disable COM_IF_LOCK workaround for firmware > 0x261f. Signed-off-by: Oliver Endriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_hw.c |6 -- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions

[DVB patch 07/54] core: dvb_demux: remove unsused descramble callbacks

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Removed unused descramble_mac_address and descramble_section_payload callbacks. Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/demux.h | 11 --- dr

[DVB patch 44/54] cinergyT2: remote control fixes

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
IR RC fixes: - EVIOCSKEYCODE is not supported by this driver, fix potential crash when it is used by not setting rc_input_dev->keycodesize - fix key repeat handling (hopefully) - reduce default poll internal to 50msec (necessary for key repeat handling) Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL

[DVB patch 18/54] frontend: cx24110: DiSEqC fix

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Fix DiSEqC switching (one bug fix suggested by Peter Hettkamp, and one experimentally determined msleep(30) suggested by Adam Szalkowski). Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/frontends/cx24110.c |5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -

[DVB patch 54/54] ttusb-budget: use time_after_eq()

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Marcelo Feitoza Parisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Use of the time_after_eq() macro, defined at linux/jiffies.h, which deal with wrapping correctly and are nicer to read. Signed-off-by: Marcelo Feitoza Parisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Domen Puncer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johanne

[DVB patch 09/54] core: dvb_demux: use INIT_LIST_HEAD

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Use INIT_LIST_HEAD for frontend_list. Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_demux.c |6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[DVB patch 33/54] bt8xx: endianness fix

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Endianness fix for risc DMA start address setting. (reported by Stefan Haubenthal/Peter Hettkamp) Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/bt878.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/bt

[DVB patch 43/54] dst: Updated Documentation

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Updated Documentation Signed-off-by: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Documentation/dvb/bt8xx.txt | 95 ++-- 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

[DVB patch 13/54] frontend: stv0299: pass i2c bus to pll callback

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Pass a pointer to the i2c bus to the pll callbacks (stv0299 only). It was not possible to tell which i2c bus should be used if an adapter has multiple frontends on multiple i2c buses. Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by

[DVB patch 04/54] core: glue code for DMX_GET_CAPS and DMX_SET_SOURCE

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Glue code for DMX_GET_CAPS and DMX_SET_SOURCE ioctls. Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/demux.h |5 + drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dmxdev.c |

Re: [DVB patch 54/54] ttusb-budget: use time_after_eq()

2005-09-04 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Marcelo Feitoza Parisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Use of the time_after_eq() macro, defined at linux/jiffies.h, which deal > with wrapping correctly and are nicer to read. > > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Feitoza Parisi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[DVB patch 26/54] usb: dtt200u: copy frontend_ops before modifying

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Ye Jianjun (Joey) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix: copy frontend_ops before modifying Signed-off-by: Ye Jianjun (Joey) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dtt200u-fe.c |4 +++-

[DVB patch 49/54] av7110: disable superflous firmware handshake

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Disable superflous firmware handshake. Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_hw.c |2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_hw.c 2005-09-04 22:03:40.0 +0200 +++ linux-2.6.13-git4

[DVB patch 05/54] core: dvb_demux: fix continuity counter error handling

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't return immediately from dvb_dmx_swfilter_section_packet() if CC is not ok. Otherwise a new feed drops all packets until the first packet with CC=0 arrives. Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <

[DVB patch 32/54] remove noisy debug print

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
comment out noisy dprintk in dst_get_signal() (why are errors only visible with debug on? this needs to be cleaned up so we can disable debug by default) Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/dst.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

[DVB patch 42/54] dst: ci doc update

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Updated documentation Signed-off-by: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Documentation/dvb/ci.txt |9 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/Documentation

[DVB patch 52/54] ttpci: add PCI ids for old Siemens/TT DVB-C card

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Karl Herz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add PCI-ids of Siemens-DVB-C card with Technotrend manufacturer id. Signed-off-by: Karl Herz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110.c | 26 ++ 1 file changed, 14 inse

[DVB patch 12/54] frontend: mt352: fix signal strength reading

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Barry Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix two problems with the signal strength value in the mt352.c frontend: 1. the 4 most significant bits are zeroed - shift and mask wrong way round 2. need to align the 12 bits from the registers at the top of the 16 bit returned value - otherwise the range

[DVB patch 08/54] core: dvb_demux: remove more unused cruft

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Removed more unused variables and constants. Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/demux.h |7 --- drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dmxdev.c|

[DVB patch 53/54] saa7146: i2c vs. sysfs fix

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Philipp Matthias Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Integrate saa7146_i2c adapter into device model: Moves entries from /sys/device/platform to /sys/device/pci*. Signed-off-by: Philipp Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/common/saa7146_i2c.c

[DVB patch 45/54] av7110: Siemens DVB-C analog video input support

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: thomas schorpp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add support for analog video inputs (CVBS and Y/C) of the analog module for the Siemens DVB-C card. Signed-off-by: thomas schorpp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/av7110_v4l.c | 74 +

[DVB patch 20/54] frontend: cx24110: clean up timeout handling.

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Clean up timeout handling. Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/frontends/cx24110.c | 14 +- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/drivers/media/dvb/frontends/cx24110.c 2005-09-04 22:28:10.0 +

[DVB patch 51/54] ttpci: av7110: RC5+ remote control support

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Oliver Endriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Improved remote control support for av7110-based cards: o extended rc5 protocol, firmware >= 0x2620 required o key-up timer slightly adjusted o completely moved remote control code to av7110_ir.c o support for multiple ir receivers o for now, all av7110 car

[DVB patch 27/54] usb: dtt200u: add proper device names

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Added names for clones of the DVB-T stick. Whitespace cleanups. Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dtt200u.c | 17 - 1 file changed, 8

[DVB patch 28/54] usb: core: change dvb_usb_device_init() API

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Change the init call to optionally return the new dvb_usb_device directly. Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/a800.c |2 +- drivers/media/dv

[DVB patch 47/54] budget-av: fixes for CI interface

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fixes for CI interface. Signed-off-by: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget-av.c |4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.

  1   2   3   >