[DVB patch 48/54] budget-av: enable frontend on KNC1 Plus cards

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Enable frontend on KNC plus cards. Signed-off-by: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/ttpci/budget-av.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/dri

[DVB patch 35/54] bt8xx: Nebula DigiTV mt352 support

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add support for Nebula DigiTV PCI cards with the MT352 frontend. Signed-off-by: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/dvb-bt8xx.c | 141 +++- 1 fil

[DVB patch 17/54] frontend: ves1820: improve tuning

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Reset acgconf register after tuning to improve locking, as suggested by Marco Schluessler. Minor cleanups in ves1820_init(). Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/frontends/ves1820.c | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- l

[DVB patch 29/54] usb: digitv: support for nxt6000 demod

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Svante Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add support for the NXT6000-based digitv-box. Add .get_tune_settings callback for the NXT6000 to have a min_tune_delay of 500ms. Signed-off-by: Svante Olofsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johann

[DVB patch 41/54] dst: fix DVB-C tuning

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix BUG in DVB-C frequency setting. Thanks to Peng Cao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/dst.c |1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) --- li

[DVB patch 15/54] frontend: stv0299: support reading both BER and UCBLOCKS

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Allow the stv0299 to read the BER and UCBLOCKS. Signed-off-by: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stv0299.c | 13 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8

Re: [DVB patch 51/54] ttpci: av7110: RC5+ remote control support

2005-09-04 Thread Nish Aravamudan
On 9/4/05, Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Oliver Endriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Improved remote control support for av7110-based cards: > o extended rc5 protocol, firmware >= 0x2620 required > o key-up timer slightly adjusted > o completely moved remote control code to av7

[DVB patch 14/54] frontend: s5h1420: fixes

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Misc. fixes. Signed-off-by: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/frontends/s5h1420.c | 162 +++--- drivers/media/dvb/frontends/s5h1420.h |3 dr

[DVB patch 40/54] dst: identify boards

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Identify board properly: Add functions to retrieve MAC Address, FW details, Card type and Vendor Information. Signed-off-by: Manu Abraham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/dst.c| 89

[DVB patch 06/54] core: dvb_demux: remove unused cruft

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Removed some useless functions and variables. Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/demux.h | 13 --- drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_demux

[DVB patch 11/54] core: CI timeout fix

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Patch from Dominique Dumont to get the SCM Red Viaccess CAM working with the budget-ci. Signed-off-by: Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dri

[DVB patch 34/54] bt8xx: cleanup

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Indentation fixes and remove unnecessary braces. Signed-off-by: David Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/dvb-bt8xx.c | 229 ++-- 1 file changed, 116 i

[DVB patch 23/54] usb: add TwinhanDTV StarBox support

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add driver for the TwinhanDTV StarBox and clones. Thanks to Ralph Metzler for his initial work on this box and thanks to Twinhan for their support. Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTE

[DVB patch 46/54] budget-ci: add support for TT DVB-C CI card

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add support for TT DVB-C CI card. Signed-off-by: Andrew de Quincey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/b2c2/flexcop-fe-tuner.c | 97 +++ drivers/media/dvb/frontends/stv0297.c |

[DVB patch 25/54] usb: removed empty module_init/exit calls

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Removed empty module_init/exit calls. Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dvb-usb-init.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) --- lin

[DVB patch 19/54] frontend: cx24110: another DiSEqC fix

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Adam Szalkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix DiSEqC problems. Signed-off-by: Adam Szalkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/frontends/cx24110.c | 13 - 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- linux-2.6.13-

[DVB patch 00/54] DVB update

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Hi Andrew, here's another DVB update, mostly small fixes and improvements. Patches have been prepared against 2.6.13-git4 and IMHO could go straight into Linus' tree, but have been tested to apply cleanly against 2.6.13-mm1. The dvb-bt8xx-dst-doc-update.patch depends on dvb-clarify-description-te

[DVB patch 31/54] usb: cxusb: fixes for new firmware

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This patch changes two things: 1) a firmware update made by the vendor, which has to be done in Windows for now, changes the DVB-data-pipe from isochronous to bulk: it fixes the data distortions (and thus the video-distortions) in DVB-T mode; there is n

[DVB patch 10/54] core: dvb_demux formatting fixes

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Formatting fixes (Lindent + some handwork). Signed-off-by: Andreas Oberritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-core/dvb_demux.c | 469 - drivers/media/dv

[DVB patch 24/54] usb: dibusb: Kworld Xpert DVB-T USB2.0 support

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Add USB IDs of the Kworld Xpert DVB-T USB2.0 (clone of the ADStech box). Thanks to Marcus Hagn for testing. Signed-off-by: Patrick Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/dvb-usb/dibusb-mb

[DVB patch 03/54] avoid building empty built-in.o

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Don't build empty built-in.o when DVB/V4L is not configured. Thanks to Sam Ravnborg and Keith Owens. Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/Makefile |5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- linux-2.6.13-git4.orig/drivers/media/Makefile

[DVB patch 02/54] remove version.h dependencies

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
From: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Remove all #include and all references to LINUX_VERSION_CODE and KERNEL_VERSION. Based on patch by Olaf Hering. Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/common/saa7146_fops.c |

[DVB patch 01/54] email address update

2005-09-04 Thread Johannes Stezenbach
Update email address of Peter Hettkamp. Signed-off-by: Johannes Stezenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/bt878.c |2 +- drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/bt878.h |2 +- drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/dvb-bt8xx.h |2 +- drivers/media/dvb/frontends/cx24110.c |2 +- drive

Re: quiet-non-x86-option-rom-warnings.patch added to -mm tree

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 9/4/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The patch titled > > quiet non-x86 option ROM warnings > > has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is [...] > > From: Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Quiet an incorrect warning in aty128fb and radeonfb about the PCI ROM

Re: Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 9/5/05, Matt LaPlante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-kernel- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesper Juhl > > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 2:49 PM > > To: Matt LaPlante > > Cc: Herbert Xu; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

2.6, devfs, SMP, SATA

2005-09-04 Thread Howard Chu
Yesterday I replaced the Winchester 3000+ in my Asus A8v-Deluxe with an AMD X2 3800+. I had been running a 2.6.12.3 kernel without SMP support. After installing the new CPU I booted up with no trouble and reconfigured/recompiled with SMP support. However, upon installing this kernel, I was unab

RE: Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13

2005-09-04 Thread Matt LaPlante
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-kernel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jesper Juhl > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 2:49 PM > To: Matt LaPlante > Cc: Herbert Xu; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13 > > >

Re: threads questions

2005-09-04 Thread Alex Riesen
On 9/4/05, Petter Shappen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As we all know the kernel maintain a data struct for the > process(PCB),and also for the thread.Because of the latter's smaller > than the former's,thread switching is faster than the process not really. They just share some bits (like: addres

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread Joel Becker
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:33:44PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > - read-only mount > > - "specatator" mount (like ro but no journal allocated for the mount, > > no fencing needed for failed node that was mounted as specatator) > > I'd call it "real-read-only", and yes, that's very usefull > mou

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Genesys USB 2.0 enclosures

2005-09-04 Thread Grant Coady
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:04:46 -0700, Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: >> On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote: >> >> > I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing >> > the >> > delay seems to fix

Re: [PATCH] New: Omnikey CardMan 4040 PCMCIA Driver

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 9/4/05, Horst von Brand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/4/05, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > > > > > Below you can find a driver for the Omnikey CardMan 4

Re: Brand-new notebook useless with Linux...

2005-09-04 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 02:25:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > SD/MMC > > > > Ditto. > > > > There are Secure Digital drivers in -mm. I'm sure Pierre would like a > tester.. Not for the TI part, as far as I know. The only specs available

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Horst von Brand
Bas Westerbaan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes you are. You're asking for 4KSTACKS config option to maintained > > and it is not something you get for free. Besides, if it is indeed > > ripped out of mainline kernel, you can always keep it a separate patch > > for ndiswrapper. > Though 4K stack

Re: forbid to strace a program

2005-09-04 Thread Horst von Brand
Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1> Alex Riesen wrote: > > On 9/3/05, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hello! > >> Is it possible to prevent a program to be straced on x86? > >> What do I have to do, eg., to prevent a perl-program to be straced? Look at the contortions s

Re: [PATCH] New: Omnikey CardMan 4040 PCMCIA Driver

2005-09-04 Thread Horst von Brand
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/4/05, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:12:18PM +0200, Harald Welte wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > Below you can find a driver for the Omnikey CardMan 4040 PCMCIA > > > Smartcard Reader. > > > > Sorry, the patch was m

2.6.13 locks my machine within 1h, 2.6.12.5 works fine (PREEMPT?)

2005-09-04 Thread Norbert Kiesel
Hi, I had 2.6.13 lock my machine three times within a hour each after upgrading to 2.6.13 (last time within 5 minutes). The machine was running 2.6.12.5 (and earlier releases) without any problems, so I'd suspect it's not a hardware issue. Problem is that I don't find any trace of this lockup an

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-04 Thread J. Bruce Fields
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:51:08PM -0700, Bret Towe wrote: > On 9/4/05, Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 9/4/05, Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > > > [...] > > > > after moving some files on the server to a new location then trying to > >

Re: x86-cache-pollution-aware-__copy_from_user_ll.patch added to -mm tree

2005-09-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from, > unsigned long n) > > { > > BUG_ON((long) n < 0); > > Ehh? It's unsigned. This will never be true. It's cast

Re: 2.6.13-mm1

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 9/4/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'm wondering if it would be too much trouble to have a mm-drops list > > similar to the mm-commits list. > > Well I was sending drop messages to mm-commits, but lots of people went > "Waah, why d

Re: 2.6.13-mm1

2005-09-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm wondering if it would be too much trouble to have a mm-drops list > similar to the mm-commits list. Well I was sending drop messages to mm-commits, but lots of people went "Waah, why did you drop my patch?". A few hours after they'd been cc'ed as th

Re: Brand-new notebook useless with Linux...

2005-09-04 Thread Andrew Morton
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > SD/MMC > > Ditto. > There are Secure Digital drivers in -mm. I'm sure Pierre would like a tester.. > > Additionally, the system clock runs at 2x normal speed with PowerNow > enabled. > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927 Hol

Re: 2.6.13-mm1

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 9/3/05, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:34:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > > > it seems you dropped > > > > schedule-obsolete-

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Russell King
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:37:55PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > That looks great! So I guess I'm just suggesting moving this from > include/asm-arch/mach/time.h to arch-independent headers? Perhaps > timer.h is the best place for now, as it already contains the > next_timer_interrupt() proto

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Genesys USB 2.0 enclosures

2005-09-04 Thread Matthew Dharm
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:53:19PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Sat, 3 Sep 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote: > > > I've posted in the past about problems with these enclosures - increasing > > the > > delay seems to fix it, albeit temporarily. The further you go in using the > > disk in such an enclos

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-04 Thread Bret Towe
On 9/4/05, Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/4/05, Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > > [...] > > > after moving some files on the server to a new location then trying to > > > add the files > > > to xmms playlist i found the following in dmes

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 04.09.2005 [21:26:16 +0100], Russell King wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:10:54PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > I've got a few ideas that I think might help push Con's patch coalescing > > efforts in an arch-independent fashion. > > Note that ARM contains cleanups on top of Tony's o

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 10:13:10PM +0200, Bas Westerbaan wrote: > > > Though 4K stacks are used a lot, they probably aren't used on all > > > configurations yet. Other situations may arise where 8K stacks may be > > > preferred. It is too early to kill 8K stacks imho. > > > > Please name situ

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 04.09.2005 [21:26:16 +0100], Russell King wrote: > On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:10:54PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > I've got a few ideas that I think might help push Con's patch coalescing > > efforts in an arch-independent fashion. > > Note that ARM contains cleanups on top of Tony's o

Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > - read-only mount > - "specatator" mount (like ro but no journal allocated for the mount, > no fencing needed for failed node that was mounted as specatator) I'd call it "real-read-only", and yes, that's very usefull mount. Could we get it for ext3, too?

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Russell King
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:10:54PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > I've got a few ideas that I think might help push Con's patch coalescing > efforts in an arch-independent fashion. Note that ARM contains cleanups on top of Tony's original work, on which the x86 version is based. Basically, T

Re: x86-cache-pollution-aware-__copy_from_user_ll.patch added to -mm tree

2005-09-04 Thread Dave Jones
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:16:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned > long n) > { > BUG_ON((long) n < 0); Ehh? It's unsigned. This will never be true. > +unsigned long > +__copy_from_user_ll_nocache(void *to, c

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Bas Westerbaan
> > Though 4K stacks are used a lot, they probably aren't used on all > > configurations yet. Other situations may arise where 8K stacks may be > > preferred. It is too early to kill 8K stacks imho. > > Please name situations where 8K stacks may be preferred that do not > involve binary-only modul

Re: [PATCH 1/3] dynticks - implement no idle hz for x86

2005-09-04 Thread Nishanth Aravamudan
On 03.09.2005 [18:14:48 +1000], Con Kolivas wrote: > On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 18:06, Russell King wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 06:01:08PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > On Sat, 3 Sep 2005 17:58, Russell King wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 04:13:10PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote: > > > > > Noon

Re: 2.6.13-mm1

2005-09-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 01:06:32PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:34:10PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Andrew, > > > > > > > > it seems you dropped > > > > sched

Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread Daniel Phillips
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:28, Andrew Morton wrote: > If there is already a richer interface into all this code (such as a > syscall one) and it's feasible to migrate the open() tricksies to that API > in the future if it all comes unstuck then OK. That's why I asked (thus > far unsuccessfully

Re: nfs4 client bug

2005-09-04 Thread Bret Towe
On 9/4/05, Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > [...] > > after moving some files on the server to a new location then trying to > > add the files > > to xmms playlist i found the following in dmesg after xmms froze > > wonder how many more items i can find

R: R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11 > > ...omissis... > > The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp > function in the kernel space instead of in the device. > And as company don't wan

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 04:23:04AM -0400, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:36 +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Lee Revell wrote: > > > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > > >>4Kb kernel stacks are

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:12:33PM +0200, Bas Westerbaan wrote: > > Yes you are. You're asking for 4KSTACKS config option to maintained > > and it is not something you get for free. Besides, if it is indeed > > ripped out of mainline kernel, you can always keep it a separate patch > > for ndiswrapp

R: R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: matthieu castet [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 21.11 > > ...omissis... > > The problem is that lot's of new devices implement part of their dsp > function in the kernel space instead of in the device. > And as company don't wan

Re: [uml-devel] Re: [RFC] [patch 0/18] remap_file_pages protection support (for UML), try 3

2005-09-04 Thread Blaisorblade
On Friday 02 September 2005 23:02, Hugh Dickins wrote: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Blaisorblade wrote: > > * The first 2 patches modify the PTE encoding macros and start preparing > > the VM for the new situation (i.e. VMA which have variable protections, > > which are called VM_NONUNIFORM. I dropped th

Re: R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread matthieu castet
Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: -Messaggio originale- Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33 A: Giampaolo Tomassoni Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1 .

Re: R: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 04 September 2005 19:36, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: [snip] > > This may be true for AAL5 support, which is the way by which data is > actually transferred between ADSL DSLAMs and CPE equipment. > > This may not be generally true, however: most providers are already > delivering internet+v

Re: Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13

2005-09-04 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 9/4/05, Matt LaPlante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-kernel- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herbert Xu > > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:24 AM > > To: Matt LaPlante > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re:

R: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Francois Romieu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 17.33 > A: Giampaolo Tomassoni > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Oggetto: Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1 > > ...omissis..

R: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Giampaolo Tomassoni
> -Messaggio originale- > Da: Alistair John Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 18.21 > > ...omissis... > > Just out of curiosity, is there ANY reason why this has to be done in the > kernel? The PPPoATM module for pppd implements (via linux-atm) a >

Re: [Linux-cluster] Re: GFS, what's remaining

2005-09-04 Thread Hua Zhong
>takelock domainxxx lock1 >do sutff >droplock domainxxx lock1 > > When someone kills the shell, the lock is leaked, becuase droplock isn't > called. Why not open the lock resource (or the lock space) instead of individual locks as file? It then looks like this: open lock

Re: gcc coredump with 2.6.12+ kernels

2005-09-04 Thread Johnny Stenback
Hello again, Got some more info that may be of value here. After I saw gcc coredump on me with 2.6.13 I tried halting my system and I saw a kernel panic while shutting down. The stack trace it showed me was: flush_tlb_mm+201 exit_mmap+249 mmput+49 do_exit+434 sys_reboot+264 __grou

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Robert Hancock
Guillaume Chazarain wrote: Just a thought : why couldn't ndiswrapper set apart some piece of memory and use it as the stack by changing the esp register before executing windows code. Like http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.ndiswrapper.general/4737 It's dirty, I know, but after all th

Re: Kernel 2.6.13 breaks libpcap (and tcpdump).

2005-09-04 Thread Patrick McHardy
Patrick McHardy wrote: Herbert Xu wrote: We aren't handling the reading of specific fields like the IP protocol field correctly. This patch should make it work again. I can't spot the problem, could you give me a hint? Never mind, I got it, we never fall through to the second switch state

Re: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Grzegorz Kulewski
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alistair John Strachan wrote: On Sunday 04 September 2005 17:41, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote: On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alistair John Strachan wrote: On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:05, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Dears, thanks to Jiri Slaby who found a bug in the AAL0 handling of th

Re: ALSA, snd_intel8x0m and kexec() don't work together (2.6.13-rc3-git4 and 2.6.13-rc3-git3)

2005-09-04 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > * Ralf Hildebrandt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The one message strinking me as odd during the boot-process is: > > Jul 21 19:50:01 kasbah kernel: AC'97 warm reset still in progress? > > [0x] > > More details: If I unload the sounddriver: > > # rm

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Bas Westerbaan
> Yes you are. You're asking for 4KSTACKS config option to maintained > and it is not something you get for free. Besides, if it is indeed > ripped out of mainline kernel, you can always keep it a separate patch > for ndiswrapper. Though 4K stacks are used a lot, they probably aren't used on all c

[patch] Bring the Vaio's RA826G HDA (82801) to life ...

2005-09-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
Add the subsystem PCI devid to the list (on top of 2.6.13). - Davide Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi diff -Nru linux-2.6.13/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c linux-2.6.13.mod/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c --- linux-2.6.13/sound/pci/hda/patch_realtek.c 2005-09-03 15:59:25.0 -0700 +++

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Stefan Smietanowski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Alex Davis wrote: > >>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers". > > > > ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care". > > While ndiswrapper might not be c

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Pekka Enberg
On 9/4/05, Paul Misner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No one is asking you to 'care' about our problems running a notebook with a > closed source driver under ndiswrapper. Yes you are. You're asking for 4KSTACKS config option to maintained and it is not something you get for free. Besides, if it i

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Stefan Smietanowski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alex Davis wrote: >>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers". > > ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care". While ndiswrapper might not be closed source, I would not call the windows driver it loads open sou

Re: Kernel 2.6.13 breaks libpcap (and tcpdump).

2005-09-04 Thread Patrick McHardy
Herbert Xu wrote: We aren't handling the reading of specific fields like the IP protocol field correctly. This patch should make it work again. I can't spot the problem, could you give me a hint? I tried to move this logic into the new load_pointer function but it all came out messy so I sim

Re: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Jiri Slaby
Giampaolo Tomassoni napsal(a): I attach a fixed version of the atmsar patch as a diff against the 2.6.13 kernel tree. static inline void dump_skb (char * prefix, unsigned int vc, struct sk_buff * skb) { what's this? 81+ chars on line { on a newline, please ' * ' --> ' *' spin_lock_irqsav

Re: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 04 September 2005 17:41, Grzegorz Kulewski wrote: > On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alistair John Strachan wrote: > > On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:05, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > >> Dears, > >> > >> thanks to Jiri Slaby who found a bug in the AAL0 handling of the ATMSAR > >> module. > >> > >> I at

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Paul Misner
On Sunday 04 September 2005 7:49 am, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > On Friday 02 September 2005 09:08, Alex Davis wrote: > > ndiswrapper and driverloader will not work reliably with 4k stacks. > > This is because of the Windoze drivers they use, to which, obviously, > > they do not have the source. Since

Re: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Grzegorz Kulewski
On Sun, 4 Sep 2005, Alistair John Strachan wrote: On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:05, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: Dears, thanks to Jiri Slaby who found a bug in the AAL0 handling of the ATMSAR module. I attach a fixed version of the atmsar patch as a diff against the 2.6.13 kernel tree. [snip

RE: Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13

2005-09-04 Thread Matt LaPlante
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:linux-kernel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herbert Xu > Sent: Sunday, September 04, 2005 4:24 AM > To: Matt LaPlante > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Potential IPSec DoS/Kernel Panic with 2.6.13 > > Matt LaPlante <

Re: 2.6.13-mm1: hangs during boot ...

2005-09-04 Thread James Bottomley
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 01:24 +1200, Reuben Farrelly wrote: > I am seeing it fill up my messages log as it is logging 1 or so messages each > minute. I've emailed the SCSI maintainer James Bottomley twice about it but > had no response either time. OK, can you try this ... it should confirm the t

Re: Brand-new notebook useless with Linux...

2005-09-04 Thread Chuck Ebbert
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sun, 4 Sep 2005 at 02:50:07 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Additionally, the system clock runs at 2x normal speed with PowerNow > > enabled. > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3927 Well that's the most bizarre tale of timer interrupt routing I

Re: [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Alistair John Strachan
On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:05, Giampaolo Tomassoni wrote: > Dears, > > thanks to Jiri Slaby who found a bug in the AAL0 handling of the ATMSAR > module. > > I attach a fixed version of the atmsar patch as a diff against the 2.6.13 > kernel tree. > [snip] Just out of curiosity, is there ANY rea

Re: empty patch-2.6.13-git? patches on ftp.kernel.org

2005-09-04 Thread David Woodhouse
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 17:31 +0200, Jan Dittmer wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > >>Ahh. Please change that to > >> > >>rm -rf tmp-empty-tree > >>mkdir tmp-empty-tree > >>cd tmp-empty-tree > >>git-init-

Re: ide-floppy - software eject not working with LS-120 drive

2005-09-04 Thread Ondrej Zary
Denis Vlasenko wrote: On Friday 02 September 2005 23:47, Ondrej Zary wrote: Hello, I've bought "new" LS-120 drive and found that software eject does not work with 2.6.13 kernel: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# eject /dev/hdc eject: unable to eject, last error: Invalid argument The drive spins up and af

Re: R: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review - update #1

2005-09-04 Thread Francois Romieu
Giampaolo Tomassoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Well, the idea is that more pci devices may appear, as adsl-enabled > embedded systems will begin to appear in the market. > > Also, I believe that adsl will carry much more services then just AAL5 for > internet connection in the future. I'd be h

Re: empty patch-2.6.13-git? patches on ftp.kernel.org

2005-09-04 Thread Jan Dittmer
David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > >>Ahh. Please change that to >> >>rm -rf tmp-empty-tree >>mkdir tmp-empty-tree >>cd tmp-empty-tree >>git-init-db >> >>because otherwise you'll almost certainly hit something else lat

Re: Brand-new notebook useless with Linux...

2005-09-04 Thread Daniel Goller
for my V2311US with Broadcom 4318 these drivers worked with ndiswrapper: ftp://ftp.support.acer-euro.com/notebook/ferrari_4000/driver/winxp64bit/80211g.zip while these did not: http://www.broadcom.com/products/Wireless-LAN/802.11-Wireless-LAN-Solutions/BCM94318 PCIID: 14e4:4318 the ati-drivers 8

re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Alex Davis
>Please don't tell me to "care for closed-source drivers". ndiswrapper is NOT closed source. And I'm not asking you to "care". >I don't want the pain of debugging crashes on the machines which run unknown >code >in kernel space. I'm not asking you to debug crashes. I'm simply requesting that the

Re: 2.6.13-mm1: PCMCIA problem

2005-09-04 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! > > > One more piece of information. This is the one that loops: > > > > > > echo 30 > /sys/class/firmware/timeout > > > > Try echo -n ... > > Or revert gregkh-driver-sysfs-strip_leading_trailing_whitespace.patch. > Obviously if you write 30\n and the write returns 2 then the shell wil

Re: 2.6.13 SMP on Athlon X2: nanosleep returning waay to soon, clock_gettime(CLOCK_REALTIME...) proceeding too fast

2005-09-04 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:39:15PM +0200, Frank van Maarseveen wrote: > After replacing the kernel on a fresh FC4 install with a stock 2.6.13 > (using gcc 3.2) and my own config it appears that the clock is going too > fast: it gains at least an hour every 12 hours or so. FC4 kernel (rpm: > kernel-

Re: Brand-new notebook useless with Linux...

2005-09-04 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 11:10:12AM +0200, David Gómez wrote: > Smart batteries are accesed thru the SMBus. If you want to know > battery information, like the charge, you need to talk to the SMBus. Smart batteries are i2c devices, but you talk to them via the embedded controller rather than via

Re: [PATCH] quiet non-x86 option ROM warnings

2005-09-04 Thread Andreas Schwab
Olaf Hering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - printk(KERN_ERR "radeonfb (%s): Invalid ROM signature %x should > be" > + printk(KERN_DEBUG "radeonfb (%s): Invalid ROM signature %x > should be" > "0xaa55\n", pci_name(rinfo->pdev), BIOS_IN16(0)); While yo

[PATCH] vm: swap prefetch-1

2005-09-04 Thread Con Kolivas
Thanks to those who tested the swap prefetch code in its first public iteration. Here is a respin of the code which improves its behaviour to be virtually unnoticable, and fix a couple of bugs that showed up. Changes: This version is suspend aware Swap prefetches are limited to SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On Sunday 04 September 2005 08:49, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > On Friday 02 September 2005 09:08, Alex Davis wrote: > > ndiswrapper and driverloader will not work reliably with 4k stacks. > > This is because of the Windoze drivers they use, to which, obviously, > > they do not have the source. Since qu

Re: [PATCH] quiet non-x86 option ROM warnings

2005-09-04 Thread Olaf Hering
On Tue, Feb 15, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Both the r128 and radeon drivers complain if they don't find an x86 option > ROM > on the device they're talking to. This would be fine, except that the > message is incorrect--not all option ROMs are required to be x86 based. This > small patch just re

Re: RFC: i386: kill !4KSTACKS

2005-09-04 Thread Sander
Adrian Bunk wrote (ao): > 4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it > initially caused are now sorted out. > > Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems? > > I'd like to: > - get a patch into on of the next -mm kernels that unconditionally > enables 4

<    1   2   3   >