> -Messaggio originale-
> Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] conto di
> Francois Romieu
> Inviato: domenica 4 settembre 2005 14.01
> A: Giampaolo Tomassoni
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: Re: [Linux-ATM-General] [ATMSAR] Request for review -
On Sunday 04 September 2005 12:12, Harald Welte wrote:
> cmx_llseek
just use
return nonseekable_open(inode, filp);
as your last statement in cmx_open() instead of
return 0;
to really disable any file pointer positioning (e.g. pwrite/pread too).
Addtionally cmx_llseek() is impl
On Friday 02 September 2005 09:08, Alex Davis wrote:
> ndiswrapper and driverloader will not work reliably with 4k stacks.
> This is because of the Windoze drivers they use, to which, obviously,
> they do not have the source. Since quite a few laptops have built-in
> wireless cards by companies who
On 02:50 Sun 04 Sep , Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Audio ("unknown codec")
>
> snd-ati-atiixp ought to drive it - if it doesn't, that's probably a bug.
>
> > Modem ("no codec available")
>
> It's a winmodem. What were you expecting?
snd-atiixp-mode
Hi,
Attached is a backport of the latest forcedeth version to 2.4. It
includes lots of changes, among them:
- a critical bugfix for nv_open(): ifdown/ifup cycles resulted in an
incomplete initialization that causes hangs after a few MB network traffic.
- jumbo frame support
- far better ethtoo
>> Well, those options lines are just wrong so I am not at all surprised
>> that it failed.
>>
>> It should be:
>> options snd-card-0 snd-intel8x0
>> options snd-intel8x0 index=0
>>
>> So, dragoran, what options lines do you have?
>>
>> James
>>
>>
Thanks James!
but I think those are the correct
>> Well, those options lines are just wrong so I am not at all surprised
>> that it failed.
>>
>> It should be:
>> options snd-card-0 snd-intel8x0
>> options snd-intel8x0 index=0
>>
>> So, dragoran, what options lines do you have?
>>
>> James
>>
>>
Thanks James!
but I think those are the correct
Hi!
This patch removes duplicate directory scanning code from fs/fat/dir.c. The
two functions that share identical code are fat_readdirx() and
fat_search_long(). This patch also renames fat_readdirx to __fat_readdir().
Tested on User-mode Linux with a small 16 MB vfat partition.
Signed-off-by: P
2005/9/4, Lee Revell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > 4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
> > initially caused are now sorted out.
> >
> > Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
>
> ndiswrapper
Ju
Giampaolo Tomassoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> However, I'm still hearing for your comments about the usefulness of an
> ATMSAR layer.
Afaik all but one pci ADSL modems are out of tree drivers and include various
level of proprietary code. If Duncan is not interested in changing its code,
the u
After replacing the kernel on a fresh FC4 install with a stock 2.6.13
(using gcc 3.2) and my own config it appears that the clock is going too
fast: it gains at least an hour every 12 hours or so. FC4 kernel (rpm:
kernel-2.6.11-1.1369_FC4) seems ok
I tried the following from another system with re
On Saturday 03 September 2005 15:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the following small cleanups:
> - make two needlessly global functions static
> - every file should #include the header files containing the prototypes
> of it's global functions
While this is a nice cleanup, does any
On Friday 02 September 2005 22:17, Jeff Dike wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 09:37:28PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> > Also look, on the "set_pte" theme, at the attached patch.
> + WARN_ON(!pte_young(*pte) || pte_write(*pte) && !pte_dirty(*pte));
> This one has been firing on me, and I dec
> 05:02.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g]
> 802.11g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 02)
Give 'ndiswrapper' a try. Works pretty well for me.
Folkert van Heusden
--
Try MultiTail! Multiple windows with logfiles, filtered with regular
expressions, colored output,
Bret Towe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> after moving some files on the server to a new location then trying to
> add the files
> to xmms playlist i found the following in dmesg after xmms froze
> wonder how many more items i can find...
The system includes some binary only stuff. Please contact yo
James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Niko Nitsche wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:4
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:25:58AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> From: John Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> This adds low-level suspend/resume support to locomo.c.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Shouldn't this be signed off by John himself? Not applied.
--
Russell King
Linu
dragoran wrote:
Niko Nitsche wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello062178124144 kernel: snd
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 06:58:00PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> I just bought a new notebook. Here is the output from lspci using the latest
> pci.ids file from sourceforge:
I'd suggest researching before buying.
--
http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software
http://
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 08:30:43AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Do not access children in struct device directly, use
> device_for_each_child helper instead. It fixes compilation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Given up waiting for John/Richard to okay this, applied anyway.
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 03:55:42AM -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.13/2.6.13-mm1/
>
I got:
<7>Dead loop on netdevice eth0, fix it urgently!
When using netconsole and printing out some information from kernel to
console.
The box
Hi,
I've noticed that 8250_hp300 is buggy wrt the ordering of hardware
initialisation to the visibility of devices to user space. Namely,
8250_hp300 does the following:
line = serial8250_register_port(&port);
...
/* Enable board-interrupts */
out_8(d->resource.start + DIO
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:23:47PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> "extern inline" doesn't make sense.
Thanks, I put this in.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom
Niko Nitsche wrote:
dragoran wrote:
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello062178124144 kernel: snd_emu10k1: Unknown
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 02:18:36AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> take-and-drop-lock -d domainxxx -l lock1 -e "do stuff"
Ahh, but then you have to have lots of scripts somewhere in
path, or do massive inline scripts. especially if you want to take
another lock in there somewhere.
Joel Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I can't see how that works easily. I'm not worried about a
> tarball (eventually Red Hat and SuSE and Debian would have it). I'm
> thinking about this shell:
>
> exec 7 do stuff
> exec 7
> If someone kills the shell while stu
Hi,
On Sep 04 at 02:50:07, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Chuck Ebbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > SMBus
>
> Is there anything on there that you actually want to talk to?
Smart batteries are accesed thru the SMBus. If you want to know
battery information, like the charge, you need to talk to the
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 01:18:05AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > I thought I stated this in my other email. We're not intending
> > to extend dlmfs.
>
> Famous last words ;)
Heh, of course :-)
> I don't buy the general "fs is nice because we can script it" argument,
> really. You
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:32:34AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> Chase Venters wrote:
> >> Is there another way to do this? If the password is crypted, I need a
> >> passphrase or something other to decrypt it again. Not really a solution
> >> of the problem.
> >>
> >> Therefore, it would be bes
On Sunday 04 September 2005 03:53, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> This one certainly goes into the Bizarro file.
>
> Just out of curiosity -- when you use the powered hub, does the drive work
> even if you remove that delay completely?
I haven't tested that. I will, next time I need the drive, which will p
Hi Andreas,
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 09:32:34AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
> > Can I ask why you want to hide the database password from root?
>
> It's easy: for security reasons. There could always be some bugs in some
> software, which makes it possible for some other user, to gain root
> pr
Mark Fasheh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:23:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > What would be an acceptable replacement? I admit that O_NONBLOCK ->
> > > trylock
> > > is a bit unfortunate, but really it just needs a bit to express that -
> > > nobody over here care
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Peter Münster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Chris Wright wrote:
> >
> > > * Peter Münster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > with 2.6.12.4 no problem. But with a newer version, I get a black screen
> > > > and no more network acce
Hello.
I am running FC4 and compiled a vanilla linux 2.6.13.
After booting the kernel I see an error messages that says that it was
unable to load snd-emu10k1 (see dmesg).
In dmesg I got this:
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello062178124144 kernel: snd_emu10k1: Unknown parameter `'
Sep 4 10:09:47 chello0621
Matt LaPlante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> network connectivity on my router. Upon further inspection I noticed the
> packet had actually caused a kernel panic (visible only on the monitor, now
> also unresponsive).
Thanks for the report. I'll try to track it down.
If you could jot down the i
On Sun, 2005-09-04 at 09:36 +0200, Stefan Smietanowski wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> >>4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
> >>initially caused are n
Joel Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:28:28AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > If there is already a richer interface into all this code (such as a
> > syscall one) and it's feasible to migrate the open() tricksies to that API
> > in the future if it all comes unstuck
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Filter incoming data, looking for ICMP messages:
>>
>> tcpdump -f "ip proto \icmp"
>>
>> Well, that catches nothing.
We aren't handling the reading of specific fields like the IP protocol
field correctly. This patch should make it work again.
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:23:43AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > What would be an acceptable replacement? I admit that O_NONBLOCK -> trylock
> > is a bit unfortunate, but really it just needs a bit to express that -
> > nobody over here cares what it's called.
>
> The whole idea of reinterpretin
On 9/4/05, Paul Misner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 03 September 2005 5:58 pm, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> > I just bought a new notebook. Here is the output from lspci using the
> > latest pci.ids file from sourceforge:
> >
> ...
> > controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 12:28:28AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> If there is already a richer interface into all this code (such as a
> syscall one) and it's feasible to migrate the open() tricksies to that API
> in the future if it all comes unstuck then OK.
> That's why I asked (thus far unsucces
Chase Venters wrote:
>> Is there another way to do this? If the password is crypted, I need a
>> passphrase or something other to decrypt it again. Not really a solution
>> of the problem.
>>
>> Therefore, it would be best, to hide it by preventing stracing of the
>> application to all users and ro
Hi Nish,
thanks for your comments.
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 03:13:43PM -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 9/3/05, Chase Venters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Below you can find a driver for the Omnikey CardMan 4040 PCMCIA
> > > Smartcard Reader.
> >
> > #define CCID_DRIVER_BULK_DEFAULT_TIMEOU
Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the only user is their tools I would say let it go ahead and be cute, even
> sickeningly so. It is not supposed to be a general dlm api, at least that
> is
> my understanding. It is just supposed to be an interface for their tools.
> Of co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-09-02 at 02:39 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
>>4Kb kernel stacks are the future on i386, and it seems the problems it
>>initially caused are now sorted out.
>>
>>Does anyone knows about any currently unsolved problems?
>
Mark Fasheh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 09:46:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Actually I think it's rather sick. Taking O_NONBLOCK and making it a
> > lock-manager trylock because they're kinda-sorta-similar-sounding? Spare
> > me. O_NONBLOCK means "open this file
Thanks for your comments, Alexey.
I've now incorprorated all of the requested changes and am testing the
driver. If everything is still fine, I'll repost later today.
--
- Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://gnumonks.org/
===
201 - 247 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
