On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:12:21AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 06:09:00AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Some architectures have a too different ptrace so we have to exclude > > them. They continue to keep their implementations. For sh64 I had to > > add a sh64_ptrace wrapper because it does some initialization on the > > first call. For um I removed an ifdefed SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL block, > > but SUBARCH_PTRACE_SPECIAL isn't defined anywhere in the tree. > > Umm, it might be a good idea to actually send the current patch instead > of the old one. I really should write this text from scratch instead > of copying it :) > > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > sh and sh64 bits look fine, thanks.
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgpPSx6aOkQR3.pgp
Description: PGP signature
