Remove the unused @ra_max from thrashing_recovery_readahead().
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
mm/readahead.c |8 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm2.orig/mm/readahead.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm2/mm/readahead.c
@@ -1567,9 +1567
Remove readahead_ratio from the growth_limit computing in state based method.
It simplifies the size ramp up rules to:
ahead_window_size = request_size +
current_window_size * 2 +
readahead_max / 16;
The first two sizes are apparent
Merge two similar page_cache_readahead_adaptive() calls into one.
No behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
mm/filemap.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm2.orig/mm/filemap.c
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc3-mm2/
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 16:59 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:40 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > > Right. And maybe it's a good idea to make sure that this feature is
> > > actually supported by kexec-tools before adding code
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This communicates with the machine control software via a registry
> residing in a controlling virtual machine. This allows dynamic
> creation, destruction and modification of virtual device
> configurations (network devices, block devices and
Philip Langdale wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> index c87ce56..74ebd97 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/core.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,24 @@ static u32 mmc_select_voltage(struct mmc
>
The idea with the new structure is to keep a
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * virtual block device (blockfront)
> * virtual network device (netfront)
note, these drivers should be submitted through the proper block drivers
and network drivers review process - not via the x86_64 tree.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe fr
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 11:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 17:50:14 +0100 Folkert van Heusden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > ...
> > [ 1756.728209] BUG: workqueue leaked lock or atomic: nfsd4/0x/3577
> > [ 1756.728271] last function: laundromat_main+0x0/0x69 [n
Jan Beulich wrote:
So I guess the right thing to do is relocate the dynamic stuff via
PT_DYNAMIC, and relocate the symtab if its present.
Symtab should also be deduced from program headers.
Learning more all the time..
I'm actually surprised this got re-implemented from scratch, whe
Philip Langdale wrote:
> Consolidate the list of available voltages.
>
> Up until now, a separate set of defines has been
> used for host->vdd than that used for the OCR
> voltage mask values. Having two sets of defines
> allows them to get out of sync and the current
> sets are already inconsisten
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > touching the 'timer tick' is the wrong approach. 'stolen time' only
> > matters to the /scheduler tick/. So extend the hypervisor interface to
> > allow the injection of 'virtual' scheduler tick events: via the use of a
Pavel Pisa wrote:
> this should go to 2.6.21, I have hold this for some
> months and I have discussed it in the thread
> "Re: CRC Errors with SD cards in 4bits mode (on i.MXl)"
> You have been CCed. This is not solution for seen data CRC
> problem, but solves problems with recognition of cards
> wh
On Sun, Mar 11, 2007 at 03:53:12PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> This patchset updates the kvm userspace interface to what I hope will
> be the long-term stable interface. Provisions are included for extending
> the interface later. The patches address performance and cleanliness
> concerns.
Search
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: Simplify smp_call_function*() by using common implementation
>
> smp_call_function and smp_call_function_single are almost complete
> duplicates of the same logic. This patch combines them by
> implementing them in terms of the more
--- Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there any way you can use 'git bisect' to try to track down the root
> > cause of this?
>
> Chris, If 2.6.19 works for you, could you please do a git bisect for
> this bug? See the following URL for
John Stoffel wrote:
> Would this explain why recent version of GDM don't find the keyboard
> properly when you boot with a kernel command line of:
>
>kernel ... console=tty0 console=ttyS1,96008N1
>
> until you stop and restart GDM?
No. If you explicitly specify the console on the kernel com
>>> Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 16.03.07 06:10 >>>
>Zachary Amsden wrote:
>> Well testing that is not so fun. I installed SUSE Pro 9.0, and
>> strings on ld.so contains the magic at_sysinfo assert! But it doesn't
>> install TLS libraries, so I'll have to install them by hand.
>>
>> In
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 20:10 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm pleased to present these patches which improve linux futex performance
> and
> scalability, on both UP, SMP and NUMA configs.
>
> I had this idea last year but I was not understood, probably because I gave
> not enough explana
On 3/16/07, Ian Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 11:40 +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Right. And maybe it's a good idea to make sure that this feature is
> actually supported by kexec-tools before adding code to the kernel?
I sent patches to the fastboot list at the same ti
401 - 419 of 419 matches
Mail list logo
