On Wednesday 02 May 2007 02:50:11 Olivier Galibert wrote:
On i945, a mmconfig range hitting the f000- zone conflicts
with the APIC registers and others. Consider it invalid.
On E7520, values and f000 for the window register are defined
invalid in the documentation.
Added
I've been pulling my hair out for the past several hours trying to
debug a program in wine. I'm currently on kernel 2.6.20.8. The
problem was that I was not getting any broadcasts to 255.255.255.255
on a UDP socket bound to 192.168.0.8 with SO_BROADCAST enabled.
I was fiddling around a bit,
Convert the subdirectory crypto to UTF-8. The files changed are
crypto/fcrypt.c and crypto/api.c.
Signed-off-by: John Anthony Kazos Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks. Could you fix up include/linux/crypto.h as well?
Sure, will do. Since I've gotten almost no feedback about these patches
What does that break, or was it already broken and this fixes it?
I think neither. This function is only called at early bootup,
(start_secondary() ), and most of its callees have interrupts off anyway.
But maybe we do lose something. Andi, do you have a word on this?
We need to enable them
At Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:09:29 -0700 (PDT),
Giridhar Pemmasani wrote:
--- Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 09:55:18AM -0700, Giridhar Pemmasani wrote:
When snd-maestro3 (ESS Maestro 3 driver) is enabled, kernel 2.6.21 fails
to
boot - it seems to stop at
John Anthony Kazos Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Were you able to successfully apply the patch attached in octet-stream
encoding?)
Yes it worked fine.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmVHI~} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Home Page:
Hi Wu
Since you work on readahead, could you please find the reason following program
triggers a problem in splice() syscall ?
Description :
I tried to use splice(SPLICE_F_NONBLOCK) in a non blocking environnement, in an
attempt to implement cheap AIO, and zero-copy splice() feature.
I
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 10:57:14PM -0400, Ting Yang wrote:
Based on my understanding, adopting something like EEVDF in CFS should
not be very difficult given their similarities, although I do not have
any idea on how this impacts the load balancing for SMP. Does this worth
a try?
Sorry
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:51:40AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Thanks for the report. I can reproduce it.
Bisection shows that x86_64-mm-paravirt-initial-pagetable.patch caused
this.
I didn't check whether the patch actually permits us to read kernel
memory. Probably it does. Probably we'd
* Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With -v7 I would run the n/n+1 test. Basically on a system with n
cpus, I would run n+1 tasks and see how their load is distributed. I
usually find that the last two tasks would get stuck on one CPU on the
system and would get half the cpu time as
Regarding features that are overdue for removal according to
feature-removal-schedule.txt:
I remember that at least one person used to watch for due dates for
feature removal, wrote the removing patches, and sent them to the
appropriate lists and maintainers. This either got rid of
On Wed, 2 May 2007 05:55:28 -0400
Dylan Taft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been pulling my hair out for the past several hours trying to
debug a program in wine. I'm currently on kernel 2.6.20.8. The
problem was that I was not getting any broadcasts to 255.255.255.255
on a UDP socket bound
Hi!
Especially the PCI video_state trick finally got me a working resume
on
2.6.19-ck2 r128 Rage Mobility M4 AGP *WITH*(!) fully enabled and
working
(and keeping working!) DRI (3D).
Can we get whitelist entry for suspend.sf.net? s2ram from there can do
all
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 23:03, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Stefan Roese wrote:
I'm in the stage of integrating some ADC and DAC drivers for the AMCC
405EZ PPC and looking for the correct location to place these drivers in
the Linux source tree. The drivers are basically
* Ting Yang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My name is Ting Yang, a graduate student from UMASS. I am currently
studying the linux scheduler and virtual memory manager to solve some
page swapping problems. I am very excited with the new scheduler CFS.
After I read through your code, I think
SO_BROADCAST controls sending, not receiving.
This definition comes from the BSD sockets API, even
Stevens TCP/IP Illustrated Volume 2, page 437, figure
15.4 clearly states that SO_BROADCAST means socket
can send broadcast messages. It says nothing about
receiving and the BSD implementation
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 10:31:10AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 14:17 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will merge the rustyvisor.
IMHO the user code still doesn't belong into Documentation.
Also it needs another review round I
John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
[I wrote]
BTW, of course it doesn't suffice to say we can't remove it yet after
the due day. There need to be well-founded reasons for another
deferral.
[...]
So when this sort of thing comes up, why can't somebody put together a
trivial patch to update
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 06:28:22 David Rientjes wrote:
In the case of !CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT !CONFIG_PCI_MMCONFIG, type is
unreferened.
The patch didn't compile on i386 defconfig. Fixed now but please
compile test future patches.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:23:33PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
Hi All,
An update of the uClinux (MMU-less) code against 2.6.21.
A lot of cleanups, and a few bug fixes.
Any chance you could split this into a few patches and send
upstream? m68knommu has
* Mike Galbraith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 23:22 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
- interactivity: precise load calculation and load smoothing
This seems to help quite a bit.
great :)
(5 second top sample)
2636 root 15 -5 19148 15m 5324 R 73 1.5 1:42.29 0
It is currently used as an instrumentation infrastructure for the LTTng
tracer at IBM, Google, Autodesk, Sony, MontaVista and deployed in
WindRiver products. The SystemTAP project also plan to use this type of
infrastructure to trace sites hard to instrument. The Linux Kernel
Markers has the
On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 09:34 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Well, here's my powerpc patch to do the direct call that I sent out
a few weeks ago. It not just speed up the pagefault path a lot,
but also is a major code cleanup. Andi and Anton didn't like it
because they have ambition for
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 17:45:52 Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Andi Kleen wrote:
vfat implements compat handlers for these ioctls, but when they
were executed on other file systems the kernel would still complain
about an unknown compat ioctl. Just declare them as compatible
and let them be
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:45:06PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
I thought about using a direct call for s390 as well. The advantage of a
direct call is that it avoids the overhead of a notifier call even if
kprobes is running. The disadvantage is that there cannot be a second
consumer of
Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] 30.04.07 17:50
From: Zachary Amsden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In situations where page table updates need only be made locally, and there is
no cross-processor A/D bit races involved, we need not use the heavyweight
xchg instruction to atomically fetch and clear page table
On Wed, 2 May 2007, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
stefan richter wrote:
We have to try to avoid this waste of resources when we put
features into feature-removal-schedule.txt. That's what I meant
with the hard part in the other post.
BTW, of course it doesn't suffice to say we can't
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With -v7 I would run the n/n+1 test. Basically on a system with n
cpus, I would run n+1 tasks and see how their load is distributed. I
usually find that the last two tasks would get stuck on one CPU on the
system and would get half
Hi!
Looking at the topology_init() code, I observe that the meaning of
the cpuX/ directory entries in /sys/devices/system/cpu/ might be
different for different architectures.
Looks like, in case of i386, ia64, m32, mips etc, the cpuX directory entries
represent the present cpus.
However, in
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:52:36AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 02:50:11 Olivier Galibert wrote:
On i945, a mmconfig range hitting the f000- zone conflicts
with the APIC registers and others. Consider it invalid.
On E7520, values and f000 for the
I always wondered why the xchg is necessary here at all. If the process of
tearing down a page table entry has started, other users of the mapped
linear address are broken anyway - why is it necessary to still monitor the
effect they may have on the A/D bits, unless this is a transient tear
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em Ter, 2007-05-01 ??s 16:16 -0700, Trent Piepho escreveu:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
With this configuration, dvb-bt8xx hangs during initialization,
generating an OOPS, if you have a board with DST (modprobe dvb-bt8xx
* Balbir Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem is with comparing a s64 values with (s64)ULONG_MAX, which
evaluates to -1. Then we check if exec_delta64 and fair_delta64 are
greater than (s64)ULONG_MAX (-1), if so we assign (s64)ULONG_MAX to
the respective values.
ah, indeed ...
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Conceivably we could address this in the filesystem without mucking other
things up. But I'd have thought the simplest damage-control would be to
detect this pattern in samba and to then use glibc's fallocate().
The advantage of detecting it in kernel
This patch moves struct utrace into struct task_struct directly instead of
being referenced by a pointer from task_struct. The main reason is utrace code
leaving stale -utrace pointer and freeing struct utrace itself. This
manifests as crashes in __rcu_process_callbacks() and other nasties.
As
Christian Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Global cache is easy to understand - file system / inode caches. What
exactly is buffers, though?
http://www.halobates.de/memorywaste.pdf and http://www.halobates.de/memory.pdf
give some overview of in kernel memory users.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe
Satyam Sharma wrote:
Yes, I saw that, but you could change it just as well. In any case,
this will only make fs/sysfs/bin.c similar to what is being done in
fs/sysfs/file.c. We allocate the buffer page backing the attribute's
data in fill_read_buffer() and fill_write_buffer() using
Hi Robin,
Robin Getz wrote:
On Wed 2 May 2007 01:23, Greg Ungerer pondered:
Hi All,
An update of the uClinux (MMU-less) code against 2.6.21.
A lot of cleanups, and a few bug fixes.
Ahead is more changes to finalize platform device support
for the new style ColdFire serial driver, and
Hi Dipankar, Rusty,
I seem to have found a race between RCU and rmmod. What I see appears to be
an RCU destructor function that has a call pending but lives in a module, gets
deleted before the RCU callback is processed:
RIP: 0010:[880329b7] [880329b7]
RSP:
On Wednesday May 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, John Anthony Kazos Jr. wrote:
argh. the whole point of this discussion is to come to a *consensus*
on what should be in that feature removal file. there is no point in
creating and submitting patches, either to update that
David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not lining up with the code following the if statement is also
a plus. Because it clearly delineates the conditions from the code.
But the condition doesn't line up with the code:
Exactly. The condition
Michel Lespinasse [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
running with report_lost_ticks, I see the following:
May 1 12:58:57 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip
_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x8/0x9)
May 1 12:58:59 server kernel: time.c: Lost 24 timer tick(s)! rip
On May 2 2007 15:32, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
--- a/include/linux/utrace.h
+++ b/include/linux/utrace.h
@@ -50,11 +50,30 @@ #include linux/sched.h
struct linux_binprm;
struct pt_regs;
-struct utrace;
+struct task_struct;
struct utrace_signal;
struct utrace_regset;
struct utrace_regset_view;
On Tue, 1 May 2007 17:24:54 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Josh Triplett wrote:
Do you know whether the current version of GCC generates poor code for
pointer
subtraction?
You _cannot_ generate good code.
When you subtract two
build scripts: fixdep blows segfault on string CONFIG_MODULE seen
The string CONFIG_MODULE appearing anywhere in a source file causes
fixdep to segfault. This string appeared in the wild in the current
mISDN sources (I think they meant CONFIG_MODULES). But it shouldn't
segfault (esp as
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:50:24PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
Hi Dipankar, Rusty,
I seem to have found a race between RCU and rmmod. What I see appears to be
an RCU destructor function that has a call pending but lives in a module, gets
deleted before the RCU callback is processed:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 2 May 2007 04:10:03 -0700 (PDT)
Von: Trent Piepho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: Mauro Carvalho Chehab [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Manu Abraham [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [linux-dvb] Re: DST/BT878 module
Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But the condition doesn't line up with the code:
Exactly. The condition not lining up with the following code helps
code helps separate the two.
Sorry about that: I realised you were agreeing with me about 5s after I sent
the message.
However
Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
#define __page_to_pfn(page) ((unsigned long)((page) - mem_map) + \
ARCH_PFN_OFFSET)
looks like the other two variants of __page_to_pfn also use similar
arithmatic.
No way around this. The only way to turn a page
On Monday 30 April 2007 18:05, Michael Gerdau wrote:
i list,
meanwhile I've redone my numbercrunching tests with the following kernels:
2.6.21.1 (mainline)
2.6.21-sd046
2.6.21-cfs-v6
running on a dualcore x86_64.
[I will run the same test with 2.6.21.1-cfs-v7 over the next
On 5/2/07, Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:10:00AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 02 May 2007 09:01:22 +0200 Tilman Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am 30.04.2007 21:46 schrieb Andrew Morton:
Not really - everything's tangled up. A bisection search on the
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 04:27:11PM -0400, Kristian H??gsberg wrote:
Hi Linus,
As you may know, we've been working on a new FireWire stack over on
linux1394-devel. The main driver behind this work is to get a small,
maintainable and supportable FireWire stack, with
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:35:32AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Does this patch help?
So far so good :-)
Thank you very much.
Index: linux/mm/vmalloc.c
===
--- linux.orig/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ linux/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -431,7 +431,7 @@
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/firewire/fw-iso.c | 163 +
drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.c | 889 ++
drivers/firewire/fw-transaction.h | 505 +
3 files changed, 1557 insertions(+)
Index:
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/firewire/fw-cdev.c| 954 ++
include/linux/firewire-cdev.h | 268 +
2 files changed, 1222 insertions(+)
Index: linux_juju/include/linux/firewire-cdev.h
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/firewire/fw-sbp2.c | 1165 +
1 file changed, 1165 insertions(+)
Index: linux_juju/drivers/firewire/fw-sbp2.c
===
--- /dev/null
+++
Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/Makefile |1
drivers/firewire/Kconfig | 60 ++
drivers/firewire/Makefile | 10 ++
drivers/ieee1394/Kconfig |2 +
4 files changed, 73 insertions(+)
Index:
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On 5/1/07, Davi Arnaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The pollable futex approach is far superior (send and receive events from
userspace or kernel) to eventfd and fixes (supercedes) FUTEX_FD at the same
time.
[...]
You have to explain in detail how these interfaces are
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good compilers even in the 1990's would defer the divide and try and
propogate it out as a multiply the other side for constants, and they'll
also use shifts when possible.
gcc has an algorithm that tends to generate a near perfect shift/add etc.
code
On Tue, May 01, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
drivers/firewire/Kconfig | 60 ++
NACK.
Upgrade the current drivers/ieee1394/ with the new code, and keep all
existing module names.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Tuesday 01 May 2007 04:50, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:10:39 +1100
Con Kolivas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Staircase Deadline cpu scheduler policy
I'll be dropping this from -mm now. I don't think we're learning anything
more by having it in there and I generally want to
Andi Kleen wrote:
What does that break, or was it already broken and this fixes it?
I think neither. This function is only called at early bootup,
(start_secondary() ), and most of its callees have interrupts off anyway.
But maybe we do lose something. Andi, do you have a word on this?
We
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
Unfortunately, this community is not founded on the concept of
'wiki'. It is founded on the concept of 'email'. That is were most
discussions happen.
So if you want to start a discussion (and your topic certainly seems
relevant) I suspect you will get
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 17:30 +0530, Dipankar Sarma wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:50:24PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
Hi Dipankar, Rusty,
I seem to have found a race between RCU and rmmod. What I see appears to be
an RCU destructor function that has a call pending but lives in a
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:39:35 +0900,
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the known regrssions are fixed. I think I've got all the
attr-owner but haven't verified with cross compiling yet, just
allyesconfig on x86-64 and i386. I'll try to setup some cross compile
environments tomorrow and
Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On 5/1/07, Davi Arnaut [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The pollable futex approach is far superior (send and receive events from
userspace or kernel) to eventfd and fixes (supercedes) FUTEX_FD at the same
time.
[...]
snip
- more complicated case: I have to wait for
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Hugh Dickins wrote:
Yes, to me it does. If it could be defaulted to on throughout the
-rcs, on every architecture, then I'd say that's finishing work;
and we'd be safe knowing we could go back to slab in a hurry if
Olaf Hering wrote:
On Tue, May 01, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
drivers/firewire/Kconfig | 60 ++
NACK.
Upgrade the current drivers/ieee1394/ with the new code,
Last time I believe I was the only one who asked whether to put it into
drivers/ieee1394 instead of another directory.
On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 10:25:59PM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 10:47:02AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
For FA_ALLOCATE, it's supposed to change the file size if we
allocate past EOF, right?
I would argue no. Use truncate for that.
The patch I posted for ext4
re: [PATCH] highres/dyntick: prevent xtime lock contention
|mark I have a new notebook (Dell Inspiron 9400) with Core2-Duo T7400 @ 2.1Ghz.
|mark When either/both of CONFIG_NO_HZ, CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS is used,
|mark the 2.6.21 kernel hangs on startup just after printing one/both of these:
|mark
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
Given the current state and the current rate of development I'd expect slub
to have reached the level of completion which you're describing around -rc2
or -rc3. I think we'd be pretty safe making that assumption.
Its developer does show signs of
Hi,
I am wondering if 2.4.x/2.6.x kernel is scalable enough to run on
8-CPU hardware. Do we have any scalability comparison data between
2.4/2.6 kernels and beyond 4-CPU?
If yes, is the scalablity is near linear?
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks
Rajib
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Ingo Molnar wrote:
i'm pleased to announce release -v8 of the CFS scheduler patchset. (The
main goal of CFS is to implement desktop scheduling with as high
quality as technically possible.)
The CFS patch against v2.6.21.1 (or against v2.6.20.10) can be
downloaded from the usual place:
Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2007 22:39:35 +0900,
Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the known regrssions are fixed. I think I've got all the
attr-owner but haven't verified with cross compiling yet, just
allyesconfig on x86-64 and i386. I'll try to setup some cross compile
On Tue, May 1, 2007 11:22 pm, Ingo Molnar wrote:
As usual, any sort of feedback, bugreport, fix and suggestion is more
than welcome,
Hi,
The sys_sched_yield_to() is not callable from userspace on i386 because it
is not part of the syscall table (arch/i386/kernel/syscall_table.S). This
causes
Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Neil Brown wrote:
Unfortunately, this community is not founded on the concept of
'wiki'. It is founded on the concept of 'email'. That is were most
discussions happen.
So if you want to start a discussion (and your topic certainly seems
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
Yes, but IIRC I put that in because there was another check in
SLES9 that I actually couldn't put in, but used this one instead
because it also caught the bug we saw.
...
This was actually a rare corruption that is also in 2.6.21, and
as few rmap
Remove the obsolete if [ ] construct from the video console Kconfig
file.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
not sure who should have been CCed on this one.
diff --git a/drivers/video/console/Kconfig b/drivers/video/console/Kconfig
index aa3935d..63b85bf 100644
---
Trent Piepho wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Simon Arlott wrote:
On 30/04/07 22:17, Markus Rechberger wrote:
From my side I do not see any problem with that patch, if someone else
has a problem with it please state out the reason.
I have no problem with the patch since it has nothing to do with my
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:25:53PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote:
Is there a maintainer for this drivers/mfd directory?
rmk
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA
Hello Dmitry,
Wednesday, May 2, 2007, 12:17:33 AM, you wrote:
Hello Paul,
Paul Sokolovsky wrote:
ASIC-related code (I mean core) forms additional platform layer, so I
suggest
adding ASIC helpers to generic platform code i.e. drivers/platform.c, but
ASIC drivers to drivers/asic/ directory.
On Wednesday 02 May 2007, Stefan Richter wrote:
Olaf Hering wrote:
On Tue, May 01, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
drivers/firewire/Kconfig | 60 ++
NACK.
Upgrade the current drivers/ieee1394/ with the new code,
Last time I believe I was the only one who asked whether to put it into
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:51:41AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007 09:42:45 +0100 Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 04:20:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
macintosh-mediabay-convert-to-kthread-api.patch
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
Hugh Dickins wrote:
But I was quite disappointed when
mm-fix-fault-vs-invalidate-race-for-linear-mappings-fix.patch
appeared, putting double unmap_mapping_range calls in. Certainly
you were wrong to take the one out, but a pity to end up with
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Phillip Susi wrote:
I seem to remember seeing some patches go by at some point that allowed one of
the rom type embeded system filesystems to directly execute binaries out of
the original rom memory rather than copying them to ram first, then executing
from there. I was
Adapt to new skb header access functions.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Klein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
index c7a5614..7211648 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ehea/ehea_main.c
@@ -1803,10 +1803,10 @@ static
Chris Wright wrote:
* Greg KH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And is this really a problem? The whole goal of the -stable tree was to
accomidate the users who relied on kernel.org kernels, and wanted
bugfixes and security updates. It was not for new features or new
hardware support.
If people
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 08:02:07PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Yep, I was going to mention your scripts but you beat me to it.
I'll be glad to help maintain such animals if wanted.
wanted ;)
At least, it would be interesting to
I didn't hear back, so I went ahead and did a patch. This patch
collects the bits from the LSR (and the MSR, which had the same
problem in one place) for later use.
Subject: Serial 8250: Handle saving the clear-on-read bits from the LSR and MSR
Reading the LSR clears the break, parity, frame
Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Tuesday, May 01, 2007, Jesse Barnes wrote:
I'm testing it now on my 965...
Bah... nevermind Robert, I see you're doing this already in
pci_mmcfg_reject_broken. I'm about to reboot test now.
Ok, I've tested a bit on my 965 (after re-adding my old patch to support
it)
On 2007.05.02 15:04:44 +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Tue, 1 May 2007, Phillip Susi wrote:
I seem to remember seeing some patches go by at some point that
allowed one of the rom type embeded system filesystems to directly
execute binaries out of the original rom memory rather than copying
Hi all,
Lguest is a simple hypervisor which runs Linux under Linux, without
needing VT hardware.
Two people asked if I had a version of lguest which worked on
other-than-bleeding-edge-mm kernels, so I did a backport of the latest
version to 2.6.21.
Dean Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 01:51:41AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
There's probably a few more patches falling into this category, these
were just the first one the stick into my eye.
Yes, I think I'll probably drop all of them - I've completely lost
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 12:01:56PM -0400, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Sorry
for detecting this 2 year old regression so late.
2.6.13 or later is bad.
2.6.12 is good,
git bisect worked fine and points to the attached patch.
The patch is pretty small. The problem
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 12:22:24AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Rusty Russell wrote:
That sounds exactly right to me! If the author says it's optional, it
might be discarded. If they say it's needed, it won't be. At least,
when I'm coding and gcc warns me
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, David R. Litwin wrote:
[..]
I'm just found something new in filtered folder by ZFS word in RSS feed
from blogs.sun.com and on firs look it may be some continuation of this
thread:
http://blogs.sun.com/darren/entry/zfs_under_gplv2_already_exists
I'm not check completly
This changes are expected to simplify further improves of this driver,
We will need to add information if the driver is xbox360 device or not.
Second option was to simply add u8 is_360, but what if we'll need to know
if device is a wheel? Or if the device can have keyboard (or headset) attached.
The USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL will allow to match one interface
protocol of vendor specific device.
This macro is used in patch adding support for xbox360 to xpad.c
Signed-off-by: Jan Kratochvil [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/usb.h | 15 +++
1 files changed, 15
Xbox 360 gamepad is slightly different then the previous model so it has
its own version of process_packet method.
Detection of this new device relies on USB_DEVICE_INTERFACE_PROTOCOL macro.
This device got vendor specific subclass so it can't be matched with
USB_INTERFACE_INFO and we need only
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 04:55:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
many ... are marked __attribute__ ((unused)) is not true:
$ grep -r __attribute_used__ * | wc -l
60
$
Sorry, my fault - I confused used and unused.
...
Unused static non-inline functions are the only functions resulting in
701 - 800 of 1184 matches
Mail list logo
