On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:49 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
i fully support the notion you articulate, that whether bin-only modules
are part of a derivative work of the kernel or whether they are
independent works is not an automatic thing at all. The answer is: it
depends, talk to your lawyer.
On Friday 15 June 2007 03:49, Rob Landley wrote:
(Right now, nobody EXCEPT the FSF has the right to sue somebody to
enforce the license terms on something like gcc. Do you find that a
comforting thought?)
Have you ever signed a copyright transfer agreement to the FSF? Obviously
not, because
Hi!
I also don't care about the details of how it gets
implemented, but when the AA people have a working
implementation, and the SELinux people are strongly
opposed to the concept, I don't see any advantage in
Actually, SELinux people 'liked' the concept -- they are willing to
extend
Hi everyone,
I added a drive to a linux software RAID-5 last night. Now that worked
fine... until I changed the partition table.
Disk /dev/md_d5: 2499.9 GB, 240978560 bytes
2 heads, 4 sectors/track, 610349360 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 8 * 512 = 4096 bytes
Device Boot Start
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 19:56 +, Pavel Machek wrote:
noapic/nolapic will not help with video issue. try s2ram from
suspend.sf.net.
Also there is (unashamed plug)
http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/quirk/
Richard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
* Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, since the signing is an automated process it cannot
generate a new work - at least, not under the laws of the US - so
the signature itself cannot have a copyright at all.
[...]
I do not suggest that copyright subsists in the signature
On Friday 15 June 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
You're relying on compat_[us]64 being only used in structures which are
already packed. If someone uses them in a non-packed struct, they won't
decrease the alignment. I think it would be more effective to specify
it as:
On 6/15/07, Bernd Paysan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007 13:49, Paulo Marques wrote:
No, it is not any version. It is the license specified in COPYING and
nothing else.
COPYING says in section 9 that there may be other versions, and if you as
author don't specify the version,
Ingo Molnar writes:
* Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, since the signing is an automated process it cannot
generate a new work - at least, not under the laws of the US - so
the signature itself cannot have a copyright at all.
[...]
I do not suggest that copyright
* David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If even linking was considered 'mere aggregation on a volume of a
storage or distribution medium', then when would the 'But when you
distribute those same sections as part of a whole...' bit _ever_
apply? It _explicitly_ talks of sections which
Hi!
We limit the maximum length of any string data (such as
domainname and pathnames) to TOMOYO_MAX_PATHNAME_LEN
(which is 4000) bytes to fit within a single page.
Userland programs can obtain the amount of RAM
currently
used by TOMOYO from /proc interface.
Same NACK for this as for
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:54 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
For the parts used by the processors in question yes people have done
that work so using the types without unaligned.
I still think we could use a 'get_maybe_but_probably_not_unaligned()',
although it could have a better name.
People now use
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:14:04PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Fri, 15 June 2007 13:03:57 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 08:46:04PM +0200, Jörn Engel ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
--- /dev/null 2007-03-13 19:15:28.862769062 +0100
+++
For the parts used by the processors in question yes
That means? They're expected to run only a subset of the network stack?
Is that expressed in Kconfig? Is it documented that the rest is dangerous?
Have you audited every other line of code for every other kind of bug ?
people have
15 Haz 2007 Cum tarihinde, S.Çağlar Onur şunları yazmıştı:
15 Haz 2007 Cum tarihinde, Eric W. Biederman şunları yazmıştı:
Sight unseen I'm guessing that you have a kexec aware distro that is
doing something in the runlevel change scripts and thus unloading the
kernel. What do:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* David Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If even linking was considered 'mere aggregation on a volume of a
storage or distribution medium', then when would the 'But when you
distribute those same sections as part of a whole...' bit
O GPL itself does not. But the author(s) may when they specify any
later version, dual GPL/BSD, etc. In this case (IMHO) distributor
in fact relicenses the code and may reduce license to sipmply BSD or
simply GPL, or GPL v3 from now on. To restore license you would
need to go upstream and get
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:31 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
One common problem with 32 bit system call and ioctl emulation
is the different alignment rules between i386 and 64 bit machines.
A number of drivers work around this by marking the compat
structures as 'attribute((packed))', which is not
On 6/15/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
O GPL itself does not. But the author(s) may when they specify any
later version, dual GPL/BSD, etc. In this case (IMHO) distributor
in fact relicenses the code and may reduce license to sipmply BSD or
simply GPL, or GPL v3 from now on. To restore
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 14:40 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
That is broken on all non-x86 architectures,
It cannot be broken, it just might be somewhat slower
It is because there is already code out there that expects the padding
(32 bits userland code that is).
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this
Paul Clements wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Second, AFAIK nbd hasn't working in a while. I haven't tried it in
ages, but was told it wouldn't work with smp and I kind of lost
interest. If Neil thinks it should work in 2.6.21 or later I'll test
it, since I have a machine which wants a fresh
On 6/15/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, you do receive the license from the person or entity you received
the program. You have an _option_ to go to the original author and get
copy of original code with original license (or maybe other license).
You receive the licence from the
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:33:51AM -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
Incorrect. Read section 9 of the GPLv2. It's pretty clear that the any later
version clause is optional. Whats more is that since the modern linux kernel
*IS* a composite work composed of Linus' original code with changes
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 15:27 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Hopefully everybody who deploys these systems knows this. It seems
like a open death trap to me, especially since the consequences
are so severe: remote packet of death, could be a recall for
a network conntected embedded device that
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:39 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
plain text document attachment (ps3-stable)
Preallocate 256 KiB of bootmem memory for the PS3 FLASH ROM storage driver.
I still very much dislike the #ifdef xxx_MODULE in main
On Monday, 4. June 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
From: Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Use a hibernation and suspend notifier to disable the user mode helper
before a hibernation/suspend and enable it after the operation.
Hi Rafael,
I have a couple of questions, regarding this patch ...
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 10:14:44AM +0200, Bernd Paysan wrote:
Linus isn't in the positition to
change that unless he does a substantial change to the file, and also adds
a comment that this file is now GPLv2 only.
Which would only have effect on
Christian Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where is the inherent limit? The partitioning software, or partitioning
all by itself?
DOS style partitioning don't support more than 2TB. You either need
to use EFI partitions (e.g. using parted) or LVM. Since parted's
user interface is not good
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:42:23PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
That's what I thought as well at first, since this is how the gcc
documentation seems to describe it. However, recent version of gcc
complain about this:
gcc-4.1 -Wall -O2 test.c -c
test.c:1: warning: 'packed' attribute
On Friday 15 June 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Hi Andrey,
If you have a chance, can you try the attached two patches? The
smsc-preconfig patch makes the HP nx5000 work, and the smsc-quirk
patch makes the nw8000/nc8000 work, too.
I've heard rumors that Windows does basically the same thing as
On Friday 15 June 2007, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Here's a program which illustrates the source of confusion:
#include stdio.h
#include stddef.h
typedef unsigned long long __attribute__((aligned(4))) compat_u64;
struct foo {
int y;
unsigned long long
On 15/06/07, Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le Ven 15 juin 2007 12:53, Jesper Juhl a écrit :
On 15/06/07, Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
by your argument, the user has some right to modify the
software, on
that piece of hardware it bought which had free software on
On Thu, Jun 14 2007, Dave Young wrote:
Hi,
Fix the cdrom_sysctl_info possible buffer overwrite bug. Somd
codingstyle fixes are included as well.
How about something like this? The current code is actually racy,
because there's no protection against adding/removing a cdrom while it
runs.
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:39 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
plain text document attachment (ps3-stable)
Preallocate 256 KiB of bootmem memory for the PS3 FLASH ROM storage driver.
I still very much dislike the #ifdef xxx_MODULE in main kernel code.
At the end of the day, is it realistic to
And debug simulators that can be made to trap such accesses, and in most
cases processors which fault such an access (so you find it) but don't
provide enough information to restart.
The testing isn't that hard for a given embedded system and having done
work Linux does not need other
Nick Piggin wrote:
Carsten Otte wrote:
The current xip stack relies on having struct page behind the memory
segment. This causes few impact on memory management, but occupies
some more memory. The cramfs patch chose to modify copy on write in
order to deal with vmas that don't have struct
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 04:46:13PM +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:
i'd still like to hear back from Kirill co whether this framework is
flexible enough for their work (OpenVZ, etc.) too.
My IMHO is that so far the proposed group scheduler doesn't look
ready/suitable.
David, please test this. Jens, does it look okay?
Phew!
Works for me.
I applied it to 2.6.22-rc4 (along with
sata_promise_use_TF_interface_for_polling_NODATA_commands.patch) hibernate and
resume worked.
Thanks for digging it out Tejun (and everyone else!) :)
David
-
To unsubscribe from
I am trying to move my Game server from windows to Linux.
Is this a good idea?
How much better performance i will get?
Can i fine tune the 2.6.20 kernel to get better performance?
What all areas i can do this fine tuning?
what other things i can do to get better performance?
-
To unsubscribe
1) What is tat?
2) How can I get some?
3) Where do I go to trade it in?
4) is it legal to consume it in my country?
5) should I have a designed driver when I do?
--
|_|0|_|
|_|_|0|
|0|0|0|
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
Bernd Paysan wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007 13:49, Paulo Marques wrote:
I've contributed some code for the kernel (unlike yourself, AFAICT), and
believe me, I did so under GPL v2. The COPYING file is pretty much self
explanatory, so I didn't need to add any explicit license statement to
my code.
* Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not suggest that copyright subsists in the signature or in the
signing key. Whether it does is irrelevant to the signing key
being part of the source code (when the signature is needed for the
binary to work properly).
it is very much
Selective Ptraced Signal Support - A proposed enhancement
This is a proposal for a ptrace enhancement that adds two new ptrace(2)
commands that let a debugger view and modify the set of signals that
are being ptraced.
By default all signals are ptraced as before. However, a debugger
may now
But COPYING *is* the entire text and starts with:
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
so there is no confusion about the version.
The version of the COPYING file (and the licence document), not of the
licence on the code.
Wrong.
Why
On Friday 15 June 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:39 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Add a Disk Storage Driver for the PS3:
- Implemented as a block device driver with a dynamic major
- Disk names (and partitions) are of the format ps3d%c(%u)
- Uses software
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:03:55PM +0200, Bernd Paysan wrote:
I've contributed some code for the kernel (unlike yourself, AFAICT), and
believe me, I did so under GPL v2. The COPYING file is pretty much self
explanatory, so I didn't need to add any explicit license statement to
my code.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 19:42:50 +0530
Nobin Mathew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to move my Game server from windows to Linux.
Is this a good idea?
How much better performance i will get?
How long is a piece of string. Given you don't give any hardware info,
any info on the applications
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:39 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Add a Disk Storage Driver for the PS3:
- Implemented as a block device driver with a dynamic major
- Disk names (and partitions) are of the format ps3d%c(%u)
- Uses software scatter-gather with a 64 KiB bounce buffer as the
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/elf_boot.h | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
===
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/elf_boot.h
@@ -0,0
This series updates the boot protocol to 2.07 and uses it to implement
paravirtual booting. This allows the bootloader to tell the kernel
what kind of hardware/pseudo-hardware environment it's coming up under,
and the kernel can use the appropriate boot sequence code.
Specifically:
- Update the
This patch cleans up image generation in several ways:
- Firstly, it removes tools/build, and uses binutils to do all the
final construction of the bzImage. This removes a chunk of code
and makes the image generation more flexible, since we can compute
various numbers rather than be
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/linkage.h |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
===
--- a/include/linux/linkage.h
+++ b/include/linux/linkage.h
@@ -34,6 +34,12 @@
name:
#endif
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 12:43 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
--- linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c.orig2007-06-14
15:55:26.0 +0400
+++ linux-2.6.22-rc4-fixed/fs/quota.c 2007-06-14 19:50:13.0 +0400
...
+#if
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/elf.h | 24 +++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
===
--- a/include/linux/elf.h
+++ b/include/linux/elf.h
@@ -1,9 +1,10 @@
Proposed updates for version 2.07 of the boot protocol. This includes:
load_flags.KEEP_SEGMENTS- flag to request/inhibit segment reloads
hardware_subarch- what subarchitecture we're booting under
hardware_subarch_data - per-architecture data
The intention of these changes is to make
This patch makes .note segments always allocated; that is, they are
loaded as part of the binary and appear in the :data segment. This is
not always necessary, but certain users - such as vsyscalls and notes
in boot images - require the notes to be allocated. Rather than
having two ways of
This patch uses the updated boot protocol to do paravirtualized boot.
If the boot version is = 2.07, then it will do two things:
1. Check the bootparams loadflags to see if we should reload the
segment registers and clear interrupts. This is appropriate
for normal native boot and some
This patch makes the payload of the bzImage file an ELF file. In
other words, the bzImage is structured as follows:
- boot sector
- 16bit setup code
- ELF header
- decompressor
- compressed kernel
A bootloader may find the start of the ELF file by looking at the
setup_size entry in the
Boot a Xen kernel using the boot protocol. There are two parts to this:
1. Add Xen-specific notes to the bzImage's internal ELF file, so that
the Xen domain builder knows what to do with it. This is simply a
matter of adding a new notes-xen.S to the image. The notes depend
on the
Le Ven 15 juin 2007 15:41, Jesper Juhl a écrit :
On 15/06/07, Nicolas Mailhot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll note I was answering to a message about what the GPL
intended,
not the strict literal reading of the GPLv2 words.
And what the GPL authors intended is obvious from the fact it all
Ask the hypervisor how much space it needs reserved, since 32-on-64
doesn't need any space, and it may change in future.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/i386/xen/enlighten.c | 13 -
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On 6/15/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But COPYING *is* the entire text and starts with:
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
so there is no confusion about the version.
The version of the COPYING file (and the licence document),
Hi Andi,
Andi Kleen wrote:
Christian Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Where is the inherent limit? The partitioning software, or partitioning
all by itself?
DOS style partitioning don't support more than 2TB. You either need
to use EFI partitions (e.g. using parted) or LVM. Since parted's
Hi,
Andrew, I promised it [1], here goes. Patched against Linus' git-tree.
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/3/22/226
This patch replaces some obscure code-paths in fs/block_dev.c with more
readable versions.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c
On 6/15/07, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Linus,
Please pull from the repository and branch at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/avi/kvm.git for-linus
to get a fix for a fairly critical bug which allows, under certain conditions,
guest fpu state to find its way into the
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:39 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Add a Disk Storage Driver for the PS3:
- Implemented as a block device driver with a dynamic major
- Disk names (and partitions) are of the format ps3d%c(%u)
- Uses software
And the basics are: people who write the code decide the license to
give it. And that's just it.
Yo, then fucking do it! Write it in the files you contribute! If you don't,
you haven't! You decide, not Linus Torvalds. Make it clear you have
decided.
And people who write kernel code are
Alan Cox wrote:
But COPYING *is* the entire text and starts with:
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
so there is no confusion about the version.
The version of the COPYING file (and the licence document), not of the
licence on the code.
On 6/15/07, jidong xiao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
typedef unsigned long long u64;
u64 *dma_mask;
Then how to use printk() to print out a dma_mask variable?
In regular printf(), this would be specified by the format %llu. Try that?
Vegard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
And, as I've taken the time to explain to you, lacking any clear
statement, written at the exact same time as the license, a
statement of
intent or spirit cannot have any real legal weight when the text of a
license is finally decided upon.
Fortunately the Law recognizes humans are not
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 15:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 14:37:33 -0700 (PDT) Christoph Lameter [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
We want the 100% case.
Yes that is what we intend to do. Universal support for larger blocksize.
Hi,
I am not sure if this patch is a fix or a hiding (or leads to more trouble at
all), so, could PLEASE anyone with knowledge about the code see over it?
Thanks :)
shrink_page_list() should not pass a private page to add_to_swap().
Is it a bug if the page is private when reaching this point? I
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:05:57PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Just found a brown paperbag bug in the resume patch logic. Sigh, I was
staring at that code for month without noticing.
Andrew,
can you please test
On Friday 15 June 2007 07:44:41 am Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
Hi Andrey,
If you have a chance, can you try the attached two patches? The
smsc-preconfig patch makes the HP nx5000 work, and the smsc-quirk
patch makes the nw8000/nc8000 work, too.
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Carlo Wood wrote:
Therefore, it seems pretty weird to me that LONG before version 3
was written and released, someone purposely would choose to freeze
their software at version 2. Why make it impossible to use this
safe-guard?
Because what you call safe-guard is just
[Re-sending with the right subject]
by your argument, the user has some right to modify the
software, on
that piece of hardware it bought which had free software on it,
correct?
Yes. This means the hardware distributor who put the software in
there must not place roadblocks that impede the
For example,
typedef unsigned long long u64;
u64 *dma_mask;
Then how to use printk() to print out a dma_mask variable?
Regards
Jason Xiao
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On 15/06/07, Dmitry Torokhov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/15/07, Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But COPYING *is* the entire text and starts with:
GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE
Version 2, June 1991
so there is no confusion about the version.
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 11:53:55AM +0530, Arun Raghavan wrote:
Hello,
I ran into some compilations problems with UML on the 2.6.22-rc4 kernel.
The problem turns up because paravirt.h is included in a couple of
headers in asm-i386 without being protected by a #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT.
I've
Ingo Molnar writes:
* Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do not suggest that copyright subsists in the signature or in the
signing key. Whether it does is irrelevant to the signing key
being part of the source code (when the signature is needed for the
binary to work
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 10:29 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On 6/15/07, Richard Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 13:29 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
in response to an event, but I'm thinking in a resume hook we should
probably do acpi_evaluate_integer(handle, _LID, NULL,
Tejun Heo wrote:
SCSI marks internal commands with REQ_PREEMPT and push it at the front
of the request queue using blk_execute_rq(). When entering suspended
or frozen state, SCSI devices are quiesced using
scsi_device_quiesce(). In quiesced state, only REQ_PREEMPT requests
are processed. This
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:19:23PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
GPL itself does not. But the author(s) may when they specify any
later version, dual GPL/BSD, etc. In this case (IMHO) distributor
in fact relicenses the code and may reduce license to sipmply BSD or
simply GPL, or GPL v3 from now
hi,
i was just looking at the new madvise_need_mmap_write() call...can we
avoid an extra case statement and function call as follows?
thanks,
-Jason
Signed-off-by: Jason Baron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -287,9 +287,10
On Friday 15 June 2007, Vasily Tarasov wrote:
I just noticed that we can not avoid the addition of packed attribute.
Look, for example:
struct if_dqblk {
__u64 dqb_bhardlimit;
__u64 dqb_bsoftlimit;
__u64 dqb_curspace;
__u64 dqb_ihardlimit;
__u64
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:05:57 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:59:49 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm, how's 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 doing on the Vaio?
People would have heard if it was busted ;)
Add asm-um/paravirt.h so that i386 headers that get pulled into UML
don't cause build failures when they want asm/paravirt.h.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
include/asm-um/paravirt.h |6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
Index: linux-2.6.21-mm/include/asm-um/paravirt.h
Thanks all.
Is this right?
dev-dev.dma_mask = bus-controller-dma_mask;
printk(KERN_ERR hey,jason,see,dma_mask is
%llu\n,*(dev-dev.dma_mask));
On 6/15/07, Randy Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 17:04:00 +0200 Vegard Nossum wrote:
On 6/15/07, jidong xiao [EMAIL
* Michael Poole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I.e. you cannot just cleverly define source code to include
something unrelated and then pretend that it's all in one work. And
that's exactly what the GPLv3 does: it creatively defines the
hardware's key into the 'source code' of the software
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 06:33:51AM -0400, Daniel Hazelton wrote:
Incorrect. Read section 9 of the GPLv2. It's pretty clear that the any
later
version clause is optional. Whats more is that since the modern linux
kernel
*IS* a composite work
Mihai Donțu wrote:
On Friday 15 June 2007 17:35, you wrote:
E.g. I have a laptop Toshiba M45-S355 (with ReiserFS) and don't have
experience to choose what I can remove from kernel (or compile as
module/built-in).
Well, here are some steps:
1. boot an Ubuntu livecd
2. lspci lsmod and
On 06/15/2007 10:56 AM, Michael Poole wrote:
The GPL cares about the key
used to generate an integral part of the executable form of the GPLed
work.
GLPv2 doesn't: why do you think the digital signature is an integral
part of the executable? It can be a totally separate blob, distributed
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
noapic/nolapic will not help with video issue. try s2ram from
suspend.sf.net.
I already tried s2ram, no improvement so far.
Regards, Olaf.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
From: Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get UML to use the generic bug support rather than arch specific one.
If I insert an artificial bug right before loading init, I get this:
Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel mode signal 4
EIP: 0023:[0819d501] CPU: 0 Not tainted ESP: 002b:f7fd4fbc EFLAGS:
These two are for 2.6.22.
The first switches to the generic BUG support and adds a related build
fix. The second is a build fix for configurations which pull in i386
headers which want paravirt.h.
Jeff
--
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To
On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 03:22:55PM -0700, Natalie Protasevich wrote:
[..]
Seems it would be cleaner to figure out some way to build es7000.c for
if CONFIG_X86_ES7000 is set? Or just move them here all the time?
---
linux-2.6.22-rc4-git4/include/asm-i386/mach-es7000/mach_mpparse.h~i386-e
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Bernd Paysan wrote:
Ah no, it's their fault. The GPLv2 always was clear that there will be some
future releases of the GPL, and that you should keep upgrading possible.
No. It is clear that you have the *option* of keep upgrading, but it is
also equally clear that
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Alexandre Oliva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do they have to provide a ROM burner if the ROM is socketed rather
than soldered into place?
Of course not. They just can't impose restrictions on your obtaining
a ROM burner and doing the work yourself.
do you realize that
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 08:23 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 14:05:57 +0200 Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 20:08 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 22:59:49 +0200 Rafael J. Wysocki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hmm, how's 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 doing
On 13/06/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 02:40:06PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 12/06/07, Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
congestion_wait_interruptible() is no longer used.
Remind me again why it is that we add all these #if 0 blocks instead
of
801 - 900 of 1293 matches
Mail list logo
