On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:41:13 -0400 (EDT),
Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
>
> > > Try disabling CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND. It makes lots of USB bugs go away
> >
> > I'll give it a shot. For the record, I wasn't trying to perform a
> > suspend at
Hi All,
Sorry for my poor english.
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:58 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
[...]
> I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of the
> 21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available.
Great! Thanks a lot for effort!
I'm doing the same thing and i don't
8259 problem seems to be done with the attached patch, IDE hung seems
to be the dma setting problem.
Thanks all for your advise, comments. I have learned a lot. now I
continue to trace down the IDE problem.
Mao
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Songmao Tian wrote:
Huh?
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:16:50PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
> > Well, if you see the modes proposed using above flags :
> >
> > #define FA_ALLOCATE 0
> > #define FA_DEALLOCATE FA_FL_DEALLOC
> > #define FA_RESV_SPACE
Hi Tim,
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 15:37 -0700, Tim Pepper wrote:
> On 7/9/07, Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Use the read-ahead code to provide hints to page reclaim.
> >
> > This patch has the potential to solve the streaming-IO trashes my
> > desktop problem.
> >
> > It tries to
The SYSENTER instruction jumps to a pre-programmed address at
privilege level 0. We must not allow execution of guest code at that
privilege level, so disable sysenter when we enter the guest (and
re-enable it on return). This fixes current case where guest
userspace can crash host.
This
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:47:52 +0200,
Stefan Richter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch does nothing for all subsystems which do
>
> device_initialize();
> dev->parent = pd;
> device_add();
>
> Let's avoid to add infrastructure which does nothing, or only does
> something by
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Huang, Ying wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 17:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
This sounds awesome. Am I correct in expecting that ultimately the
existing hibernation implementation just goes away and we reuse (and hence
strengthen) the existing kexec (and kdump?)
Change the m68knommu irq handling to use the generic irq framework.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
arch/m68knommu/Kconfig |4
arch/m68knommu/kernel/Makefile |4
arch/m68knommu/kernel/asm-offsets.c|5
arch/m68knommu/kernel/irq.c
Trying to compile modular AHCI on ppc (prep):
MODPOST 648 modules
ERROR: "ahci_port_resume" [drivers/ata/ahci.ko] undefined!
--
Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 14:03, Chris Mason wrote:
> This patch aims to demonstrate one way to replace buffer heads with a
> few extent trees...
Hi Chris,
Quite terse commentary on algorithms and data structures, but I suppose
that is not a problem because Jon has a whole week to reverse engineer
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > >
> > > P.S. Thanks to Steven Rostedt for logdev which is proving invaluable in
> > >cases like this.
> > >
>
> Great to hear!!!
>
>
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:50:11 +0200 Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > - if (commit_transaction->t_checkpoint_list == NULL) {
> > > + if (commit_transaction->t_checkpoint_list == NULL &&
> > > + commit_transaction->t_checkpoint_io_list == NULL) {
> > >
On Wed, Jul 11 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 07/09/2007 02:14 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > it seems we've accidentally lost one JBD fix (probably it was my mistake
> > when rediffing some checkpointing changes) as Kirill has noted. A
> > transaction
> > can currently be
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:30:31 +
"Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Boot a kernel A
> 2. Work under kernel A
> 3. Kexec another kernel B in kernel A
> 4. Work under kernel B
> 5. Jump from kernel B to
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 17:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> This sounds awesome. Am I correct in expecting that ultimately the
> existing hibernation implementation just goes away and we reuse (and hence
> strengthen) the existing kexec (and kdump?) infrastructure?
> And that we get hibernation
Stas Sergeev wrote:
Hi.
William Tambe wrote:
I understand your concern. But since I am working on a dynamic memory
management code that I wish to use with other projects that I have, I
didn't find appropriate to use shm_open.
Could you please provide a detailed list of the
problems you
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:08:36PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Jesper Juhl wrote:
> >One of the big problem spots was XFS, but that got some stack usage
> >fixes recently, and the 4K stack option has been around for quite a
> >while now, so people really should have gotten around to
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:06:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > The following patch fixes this by re-enabling the RT overload detection
> > for the CFS. It may not be the right solution, maybe it should be
> >
Hi, Dan,
Thanks! I get it.
It's so lucky we have the same target.
When your patch could be accepted?
Cheers,
Wei.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Williams
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 12:57 AM
> To: Zhang Wei-r63237
> Cc:
> Does this mean that performing the same link twice *will* produce an
> identical result?
Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
On Wed, Jul 11 2007, James Morris wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, James Morris wrote:
>
> > Revalidate read/write permissions for splice(2) and vmslice(2), in case
> > security policy has changed since the files were opened.
>
> This patch clashes with changes which came in via Jens (who I'll
Jesper Juhl wrote:
One of the big problem spots was XFS, but that got some stack usage
fixes recently, and the 4K stack option has been around for quite a
while now, so people really should have gotten around to fixing any
code that can't handle it. Are there still any big problem areas
On Wed, Jul 11 2007, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> The current code that sets the read position in subbuf_splice_actor may
> give erroneous results if the buffer size isn't a power of 2. This
> patch fixes the problem.
Thanks Tom, I just added this for my upstream branch, if you submit it
directly first,
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:50:40AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 05:38:48 -0700,
> Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Sorry for taking so long to respond, I've been offline for a month]
>
> > Can you resend me the new patch, I seem to have lost it in this thread
> > :(
>
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 10:50:40AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 05:38:48 -0700,
Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Sorry for taking so long to respond, I've been offline for a month]
Can you resend me the new patch, I seem to have lost it in this thread
:(
Andrew has
On Wed, Jul 11 2007, Tom Zanussi wrote:
The current code that sets the read position in subbuf_splice_actor may
give erroneous results if the buffer size isn't a power of 2. This
patch fixes the problem.
Thanks Tom, I just added this for my upstream branch, if you submit it
directly first,
Jesper Juhl wrote:
One of the big problem spots was XFS, but that got some stack usage
fixes recently, and the 4K stack option has been around for quite a
while now, so people really should have gotten around to fixing any
code that can't handle it. Are there still any big problem areas
On Wed, Jul 11 2007, James Morris wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, James Morris wrote:
Revalidate read/write permissions for splice(2) and vmslice(2), in case
security policy has changed since the files were opened.
This patch clashes with changes which came in via Jens (who I'll submit
the
Does this mean that performing the same link twice *will* produce an
identical result?
Yes.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:06:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
The following patch fixes this by re-enabling the RT overload detection
for the CFS. It may not be the right solution, maybe it should be
incorporated
Hi, Dan,
Thanks! I get it.
It's so lucky we have the same target.
When your patch could be accepted?
Cheers,
Wei.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Williams
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 12:57 AM
To: Zhang Wei-r63237
Cc: [EMAIL
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 11:08:36PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Jesper Juhl wrote:
One of the big problem spots was XFS, but that got some stack usage
fixes recently, and the 4K stack option has been around for quite a
while now, so people really should have gotten around to fixing any
Stas Sergeev wrote:
Hi.
William Tambe wrote:
I understand your concern. But since I am working on a dynamic memory
management code that I wish to use with other projects that I have, I
didn't find appropriate to use shm_open.
Could you please provide a detailed list of the
problems you
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 17:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
This sounds awesome. Am I correct in expecting that ultimately the
existing hibernation implementation just goes away and we reuse (and hence
strengthen) the existing kexec (and kdump?) infrastructure?
And that we get hibernation support
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 15:30:31 +
Huang, Ying [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Boot a kernel A
2. Work under kernel A
3. Kexec another kernel B in kernel A
4. Work under kernel B
5. Jump from kernel B to kernel A
On Wed, Jul 11 2007, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
On 07/09/2007 02:14 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
Hi Andrew,
it seems we've accidentally lost one JBD fix (probably it was my mistake
when rediffing some checkpointing changes) as Kirill has noted. A
transaction
can currently be released when there
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 08:50:11 +0200 Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- if (commit_transaction-t_checkpoint_list == NULL) {
+ if (commit_transaction-t_checkpoint_list == NULL
+ commit_transaction-t_checkpoint_io_list == NULL) {
__journal_drop_transaction(journal,
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
P.S. Thanks to Steven Rostedt for logdev which is proving invaluable in
cases like this.
Great to hear!!!
I'll be uploading a
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 14:03, Chris Mason wrote:
This patch aims to demonstrate one way to replace buffer heads with a
few extent trees...
Hi Chris,
Quite terse commentary on algorithms and data structures, but I suppose
that is not a problem because Jon has a whole week to reverse engineer
Trying to compile modular AHCI on ppc (prep):
MODPOST 648 modules
ERROR: ahci_port_resume [drivers/ata/ahci.ko] undefined!
--
Meelis Roos ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
Change the m68knommu irq handling to use the generic irq framework.
Signed-off-by: Greg Ungerer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/m68knommu/Kconfig |4
arch/m68knommu/kernel/Makefile |4
arch/m68knommu/kernel/asm-offsets.c|5
arch/m68knommu/kernel/irq.c
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Huang, Ying wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 17:22 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
This sounds awesome. Am I correct in expecting that ultimately the
existing hibernation implementation just goes away and we reuse (and hence
strengthen) the existing kexec (and kdump?)
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 07:47:52 +0200,
Stefan Richter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The patch does nothing for all subsystems which do
device_initialize(dev);
dev-parent = pd;
device_add(dev);
Let's avoid to add infrastructure which does nothing, or only does
something by
The SYSENTER instruction jumps to a pre-programmed address at
privilege level 0. We must not allow execution of guest code at that
privilege level, so disable sysenter when we enter the guest (and
re-enable it on return). This fixes current case where guest
userspace can crash host.
This
Hi Tim,
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 15:37 -0700, Tim Pepper wrote:
On 7/9/07, Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use the read-ahead code to provide hints to page reclaim.
This patch has the potential to solve the streaming-IO trashes my
desktop problem.
It tries to aggressively
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:16:50PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
Well, if you see the modes proposed using above flags :
#define FA_ALLOCATE 0
#define FA_DEALLOCATE FA_FL_DEALLOC
#define FA_RESV_SPACE
8259 problem seems to be done with the attached patch, IDE hung seems
to be the dma setting problem.
Thanks all for your advise, comments. I have learned a lot. now I
continue to trace down the IDE problem.
Mao
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Songmao Tian wrote:
Huh?
Hi All,
Sorry for my poor english.
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:58 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
[...]
I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of the
21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available.
Great! Thanks a lot for effort!
I'm doing the same thing and i don't
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 17:41:13 -0400 (EDT),
Alan Stern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Try disabling CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND. It makes lots of USB bugs go away
I'll give it a shot. For the record, I wasn't trying to perform a
suspend at this time (or
My computer (Ubuntu Feisty) would not boot correctly a few days
ago: it seemed to get into a loop with the following printed about
every 7 seconds (all laboriously copied in longhand, since it wasn't
logged!):
ata1.01: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
ata1.01: (BMDMA stat 0x65)
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 00:58:20 +
Alex Maclean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hw is a Dell Inspiron 1501, AMD Turion TL52 based.
drop me a note if you need dmesg or other info.
eax ineax ebx ecx edx
0001 68747541 444d4163 69746e65
0001 00040f82
Meelis Roos wrote:
Trying to compile modular AHCI on ppc (prep):
MODPOST 648 modules
ERROR: ahci_port_resume [drivers/ata/ahci.ko] undefined!
Do you have CONFIG_PM disabled?
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
Rusty Russell wrote:
The SYSENTER instruction jumps to a pre-programmed address at
privilege level 0. We must not allow execution of guest code at that
privilege level, so disable sysenter when we enter the guest (and
re-enable it on return). This fixes current case where guest
userspace
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/drivers/block/umem.c b/drivers/block/umem.c
index 6f5d620..62c9d08 100644
--- a/drivers/block/umem.c
+++ b/drivers/block/umem.c
@@ -105,12 +105,6 @@ struct cardinfo {
unsigned long csr_base;
unsigned char
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 12:49 +0200, Michal Januszewski wrote:
My apologies for the delayed response. I had problems with my ISP.
uvesafb is a generic driver for VBE2+ compliant video cards; an enhanced
version of vesafb and a direct successor of vesafb-tng [1].
uvesafb uses a userspace
On Jul 11 2007 16:53, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 16:40:29 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
OK, thanks. So I ended up with the below as a probably-2.6.23 thing:
...
+AFLAGS+= $(call as-option,
Tejun,
I tried 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 + your latest patch, and it failed to boot.
Unfortunately, the machine limped along and am unable to capture
the initial BUG or OOPS. I'll try to get a serial connection set up for
debugging tomorrow, but I am very busy with other stuff. It would be
great if you
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 12:58:13PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 10:03:12AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:16:50PM +0530, Amit K. Arora wrote:
Well, if you see the modes proposed using above flags :
#define FA_ALLOCATE 0
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 13:13 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
Looks interesting... but I was feeling strange dejavu reading
this... and that's because you pasted the changelog twice :-).
Sorry, I should have re-checked the mail before sending out.
How fast can kexec boot secondary kernel?
Adam,
I'm having some difficulty understanding why failure to probe for a resource
(in the given case, a DMA channel, but the issue is perhaps more generic) must
always result in failure of the probing of the requesting device. In any case,
the driver is required to call request_dma(), and in
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 10:47 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Rusty Russell wrote:
But what kind of daredevil coder would propose such a thing?)
Ah, so this is why you want -next in preempt hooks. Well, my plan for
this sort of thing (for kvm has the same issues with the *STAR family of
msrs) is
On Jul 12 2007 01:26, Denis Vlasenko wrote:
Neither of your patches had signed-off-by:s. Would prefer that they were
included please, given that we're adding stuff from someone's website.
Sorry. Consider this added to both patches:
Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes. Denys
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 12:50 +0200, Michal Januszewski wrote:
If the refresh rate hasn't been explicitly specified, fd_find_mode
currently returns the first mode with the requested resolution. Change
it so that it returns a mode with the requested resolution and the
highest refresh rate.
On Sat, 2007-06-23 at 11:04 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:50:46 +0200 Michal Januszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
If the refresh rate hasn't been explicitly specified, fd_find_mode
currently returns the first mode with the requested resolution. Change
it so that it
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 14:27 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
Zhang, Yanmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
replace them;
2) Delete lock. The change to the protected data has no nested cases.
In addition, the result is for performance data collection, so it’s
unnecessary to add such lock.
Not sure
arch/h8300/kernel/ints.c is unused.
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/arch/h8300/kernel/ints.c b/arch/h8300/kernel/ints.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 3e4f479..000
--- a/arch/h8300/kernel/ints.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,256 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *
Hi all,
a problem report to something giving me a real headache:
[1.] Kernel hangs when initializing ohci-controller
[2.] The version 2.6.22 of the linux kernel hangs when initializing the
integrated ohci controller of the nvidia MCP51 chipset (pci device ids
vendor:product == 10de:26d). I have
Removes the proc_fs interface from the ACPI button driver.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Kretzschmar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |8 -
drivers/acpi/button.c | 195 -
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 201
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 10:58 +0200, Henne wrote:
Removes the proc_fs interface from the ACPI button driver.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Kretzschmar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
you forgot to say why.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 22:48 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
The kexec jump is implemented in the framework of software suspend. In
fact, the kexec based hibernation can be seen as just implementing the
image writing and reading method of software suspend with a kexeced
Linux kernel.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:17:31AM +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:45 +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
Andi, please consider applying for 2.6.23. Applies on top of the
Calgary update I just sent out (Calgary: more updates for 2.6.23).
This patch introduces struct
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 12:10 +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 09:17:31AM +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:45 +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
Andi, please consider applying for 2.6.23. Applies on top of the
Calgary update I just sent out (Calgary:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 05:13:05PM +0800, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I very much start to dislike the untyped sysdata... I much
rather have separate fields for the different uses (like a IOMMU
field) that aren't going to share ever. Possibly even typed, but
for IOMMU that may be
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 00:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kexec jump is the first step, maybe the simplest step. There are
many other issues to be resolved, at least the following ones.
1. Separate device suspend from device hibernate.
Maybe my usage of terminology has some
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 09:32 +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
[*] Does someone have an alternative for
/proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/{state,info}?
I'm working on it. Should have proto by the end of week.
If you are using the power_supply class (i hope you are ;-) then a HAL
from freedesktop git
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that routine went away.
On Fri, 2007-07-06 at 16:53 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Yes, got it, but forgot to reply to myself. But thanks for your confirmation
of my understanding.
:)
I believe both patches are nice.
Is there anything I should be doing now to get these patches in?
johannes
signature.asc
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 10:58 +0200, Henne wrote:
Removes the proc_fs interface from the ACPI button driver.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Kretzschmar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
you forgot to say why.
First, because refering to
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 06:07:59PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
+ gfp = ~GFP_DMA;
The canonical form for this masking, even on arches without HIGHMEM,
appears to be:
gfp = ~(__GFP_DMA | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
But I guess that won't make any actual difference.
As far as I can see, none of
Well, the ACPI sysfs conversion is not finished yet
and some user space tools still use the ACPI procfs.
The schedule of removing ACPI procfs I/F will be changed to Jan 08.
I'm about to send a patch to update it.
I'm not sure if the button sysfs I/F is already finished.
We'd better make a double
This looks good, patch applied and I'll get this into the
2.6.23 merge window.
Once this sits around for a while and we feel super-confident
with it we can consider a backport into -stable.
OK. Thanks for the review.
Miklos
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hi, Jan-Bernd.
I have couple of comments over implementation besides one you saw
previous time.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:21:34PM +0200, Jan-Bernd Themann ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
+static int lro_tcp_ip_check(struct sk_buff *skb, struct iphdr *iph,
+ struct tcphdr
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:37:36PM -0700, Mike Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
--- linux.orig/include/linux/netlink.h2007-07-11 21:37:31.0
+0100
+++ linux/include/linux/netlink.h 2007-07-11 21:37:50.0 +0100
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#define NETLINK_DNRTMSG
Hi Satyam,
struct netconsole_target {
struct list_headlist;
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC
+ struct config_item item;
+ int enabled;
+#endif
struct netpoll np;
};
If CONFIG_NETCONSOLE_DYNAMIC is unset, we can't
Richard Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 09:32 +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
[*] Does someone have an alternative for
/proc/acpi/battery/BAT1/{state,info}?
I'm working on it. Should have proto by the end of week.
If you are using the power_supply class (i hope you are ;-) then a HAL
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007, Huang, Ying wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 00:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The kexec jump is the first step, maybe the simplest step. There are
many other issues to be resolved, at least the following ones.
1. Separate device suspend from device hibernate.
Maybe
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 07:14 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 20:58 -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
Note also that we find that the resulting kernel does not boot on some
T60p thinkpads without acpi=off. We are still investigating the root
cause here.
Try nohpet for
From: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACPI sysfs conversion is not finished yet and
some user space tools still depend on the ACPI procfs I/F.
The ACPI_PROCFS removal schedule is changed to Jan 08.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |2 +-
From: Evgeniy Polyakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:10:29 +0400
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 04:37:36PM -0700, Mike Anderson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
--- linux.orig/include/linux/netlink.h 2007-07-11 21:37:31.0
+0100
+++ linux/include/linux/netlink.h
dean gaudet wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
As before, this patch is against 2.6.22 with no other patches needed nor
applied.
In this revision, interrupt handling was improved quite a bit,
particularly for EDMA. The WARNING in mv_get_crpb_status() goes away,
because that
Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 09:58:18PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 11:40:33PM +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2007 at 06:09:48PM +0200, Adel Gadllah wrote:
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/kernel.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/kernel.h
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 17:46 +0800, Zhang, Rui wrote:
I'm not sure if the button sysfs I/F is already finished.
We'd better make a double check. :)
We need a button sysfs interface? What's wrong with just using input?
Richard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On 07/12/2007 01:43 AM, Greg KH wrote:
Patches for grammer are always accepted :)
--- a 2007-07-12 12:36:42.0 +0200
+++ b 2007-07-12 12:36:48.0 +0200
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Patches for grammer are always accepted :)
+Patches for grammar are always accepted :)
Rene.
-
To
John,
I see the same change in behaviour on my newish Pentium D 940.
Here's what I posted this Monday to the clocksource tsc unstable
thread, mistakenly thinking it belonged there:
quote
Now that you mention it - I am seeing something similar with
kernel 2.6.22 on an Intel Pentium D 940 dual
Rusty Russell wrote:
Remove export of __put_task_struct, and usage in lguest
lguest takes a reference count of tasks for two reasons. The first is
bogus: the /dev/lguest close callback will be called before the task
is destroyed anyway, so no need to take a reference on open.
What about
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 00:58 +, Gregory Haskins wrote:
Hi Ingo, Thomas, and the greater linux-rt community,
I just wanted to let you guys know that our team has a port of the
21.5-rt20 patch for the 2.6.22 kernel available.
Ok, we have incorporated some of the feedback from you
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 10:12:56AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
I need really large filesystems that contain both small and large files to
work more efficiently on small boxes where we can't throw endless amounts of
RAM and CPUs at the problem. Hence things like 64k page size are just not an
The next version of checkpatch.pl (0.08) should have support for a
number of the missed sylistics you mention. Will let them soak for a
bit to ensure we're not majorly regressing anything else.
-apw
ERROR: braces {} are not necessary for single statements
#4: FILE: Z11.c:1:
+if
I'm agnostic on the change... As long as we get a message somewhere
when the failure is meaningful, I'm fine with this change. I didn't
like setting mwi by the driver anyway - it should have already been
done by the platform.
-- james s
Randy Dunlap wrote:
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
401 - 500 of 850 matches
Mail list logo
