On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:53:15PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There is no need to include linux/init.h twice
Thanks, looks good. Will be pushed for 2.6.24.
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> I wonder why we don't have type safe object allocators a-la new() in
> C++ or g_new() in glib?
>
> fooptr = k_new(struct foo, GFP_KERNEL);
>
> is nicer and more descriptive than
>
> fooptr = kmalloc(sizeof(*fooptr), GFP_KERNEL);
>
> and more
Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:27:39 +0900
> Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
>
>> Is it safe to use ALPM on a device which only claims to support DIPM?
>
> Yes - I doubled checked this with the AHCI people - and of course you
>
Rather than sign direct radix-tree pointers with a special bit, sign
the indirect one that hangs off the root. This means that, given a
lookup_slot operation, the invalid result will be differentiated from
the valid (previously, valid results could have the bit either set or
clear).
This does
On Mittwoch, 1. August 2007, Josef Sipek wrote:
> Alright not the greatest of examples, there is something to be said about
> symmetry, so...let me try again :)
...
> Oops! There's a whiteout in /b that hides the directory in /c -- rename(2)
> shouldn't make directory subtrees disappear.
>
> There
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:36:07AM -0400, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> Breakpoint 4, 0x00040200 in ?? ()
>> 1: x/i ($cs << 4) + $eip 0x40300: lea(%si),%dx
>> (gdb) c
>> Continuing.
>> if i do delete here, it loads the second stage of grub and
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 21:03:50 -0600 Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:26:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Why on earth is that using GFP_ATOMIC? This function later goes on to
> > create procfs files and such things.
>
> Seems fairly common in driver
Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday August 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This is pretty confusing. In all other places, bi_size -> #sector
>> conversion is done by rounding down but only in blk_rq_bio_prep() it's
>> being rounded up.
>>
>> Is my following reasoning correct?
>>
>> It was okay till
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:17:51PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Roman Zippel wrote:
> >
> > I'm not so sure about that. sched_clock() has to be fast, so many archs
> > may want to continue to use jiffies. As soon as one does that one can also
> > save a lot of
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:55:02 +0200
> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:54:00 +0200
> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:32:04 +0200
> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 23:31:02 +0200
> Signed-off-by: Mariusz Kozlowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
From: Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:58:53 +0200
> Hi,
>
> There is no need to include linux/init.h twice
...
> Signed-off-by: Michal Piotrowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch applied, thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
Matt Sealey writes the following:
>
>Yeah please do a fixup for the boot wrapper.
>
>Or, if you have trouble, go into the firmware and type "nvedit", add
>these lines;
>
>" /isa/8042" find-device
>" 8042" encode-string device-type
>
>(then ctrl-c to exit and nvstore to run it on next reboot. Try
On 8/2/07, Mel Gorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On (01/08/07 22:52), Torsten Kaiser didst pronounce:
> > Next try with 2.6.23-rc1-mm2 and SPARSEMEM:
> > Probably the same exception, but this time with Call Trace:
> > [0.00] Bootmem setup node 0 -8000
> > [
Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> > > So it seems to me that either it is something x86_64 specific or
> > > initramfs-specific. Will try to reproduce it.
> > My guess would be the former, rather than the latter. I haven't had a
> > chance to reproduce it
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 05:16:59AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:04:10PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > Callers (especially "store" functions for sysfs or configfs attributes)
> > > that want to convert an input string
I am having a problem with the touchpad and pointer stick on my HP compaq
nc6000 laptop. It only happens when using ACPI.
Both pointing devices work for a while, but eventually start to 'stick'. The
cursor won't move for about a second, and then it jerks all over the screen,
clicking.
This
Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 09:54 +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 21:17 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
Sorry if this has been hashed out before, but could you point me towards
the gentoo bugzilla entry? I'm trying to understand how
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>
> I wonder why we don't have type safe object allocators a-la new() in
> C++ or g_new() in glib?
>
> fooptr = k_new(struct foo, GFP_KERNEL);
I would object to this if only because of the horrible name.
C++ is not a good language to take ideas
On Wednesday August 1, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In any case, why does something so complicated need to be a macro, why
> not a function instead?
There needs to be a macro so you can put a statement after it to be
executed "for each ..."
But you are right that it doesn't all need to be in the
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 04:40:18PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday 31 July 2007 07:41, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > > I haven't given this idea testing yet, but I just wanted to get some
> > > opinions on it first. NUMA placement still
Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, Stefan Richter wrote:
>> Revert commit 0555659d63c285ceb7ead3115532e1b71b0f27a7 from 2.6.22-rc1.
> This change fixes the oops, and I can access the drive again.
Did it oops always or only sometimes?
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== =--- ---=-
On Thursday August 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:16:55PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > ll_merge_requests_fn can update bi_hw_*_size in one case where we end
> > up not merging. This is wrong.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> As this is a
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fixes WARN_ON() on bitfiels ops for all architectures that have
> been left out in 8d4fbcfbe0a4bfc73e7f0297c59ae514e1f1436f.
Well, considering ...
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> But I
On Thursday August 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> This is pretty confusing. In all other places, bi_size -> #sector
> conversion is done by rounding down but only in blk_rq_bio_prep() it's
> being rounded up.
>
> Is my following reasoning correct?
>
> It was okay till now because unaligned
On Thursday August 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Neil Brown wrote:
> >
> > If you confirm that 027 isn't applying, I'll track down what happened.
>
> You're right. I don't have patch 27. Looking Ummm... It's not in
> my LKML folder either. Can you resend it?
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> tejun
From: Robin Getz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Allows debugfs helper functions to have a hex output, rather than just decimal
Signed-off-by: Robin Getz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/debugfs/file.c | 36
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
Index: fs/debugfs/file.c
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 09:54 +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 21:17 -0400, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > Zwane Mwaikambo wrote:
> > > Sorry if this has been hashed out before, but could you point me towards
> > > the gentoo bugzilla entry? I'm trying to understand how your setup
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 12:18:38AM +0200, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Fixes WARN_ON() on bitfiels ops for all architectures that have
> been left out in 8d4fbcfbe0a4bfc73e7f0297c59ae514e1f1436f.
>
> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Herbert Xu
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:26:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Why on earth is that using GFP_ATOMIC? This function later goes on to
> create procfs files and such things.
Seems fairly common in driver initialisation code. I removed three
instances of this in the advansys driver.
> y'know,
Neil Brown wrote:
> On Thursday August 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hmmm... Patches don't apply beyond this one. I'm applying against
>> clean 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 grabbed using ketchup.
>>
>
> So do you mean 027 doesn't apply, or that 028 doesn't apply next?
>
> It is possible that you missed 027.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:13:46PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Jan Blunck wrote:
>
> > Introduce white-out support to tmpfs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> > include/linux/shmem_fs.h |1
> > mm/shmem.c | 54
> >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:31:26PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> >
> > lmbench 3 lat_ctx context switching time with 2 processes bound to a
> > single core increases by between 25%-35% on my Core2 system (didn't do
> > enough runs to get more
On 7/31/07, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Almost all of the Reiser3
> code runs under the BKL, and the only other major kernel infrastructure
> that has BKL dependencies is the TTY code.
Also NFS:
$ grep -rIi lock_kernel kernel-source/linux-2.6.17/fs/nfs/ | wc -l
94
Lee
-
To
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> lmbench 3 lat_ctx context switching time with 2 processes bound to a
> single core increases by between 25%-35% on my Core2 system (didn't do
> enough runs to get more significance, but it is around 30%). The problem
> bisected to the main CFS commit.
Hi Rokas,
[ Your mailer does not maintain the Cc: list. That's not good
when posting to LKML. Adding back Jan Engelhardt to Cc: ]
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Rokas Masiulis wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:51:06PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> > [...]
> > echo t >/proc/sysrq-trigger
>
> # cat
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Roman Zippel wrote:
>
> I'm not so sure about that. sched_clock() has to be fast, so many archs
> may want to continue to use jiffies. As soon as one does that one can also
> save a lot of computational overhead by using 32bit instead of 64bit.
> The question is then how
Hi,
I didn't follow all of the scheduler debates and flamewars, so apologies
if this was already covered. Anyway.
lmbench 3 lat_ctx context switching time with 2 processes bound to a
single core increases by between 25%-35% on my Core2 system (didn't do
enough runs to get more significance, but
> IA64
>
> Subject : Regression in serial console on ia64 after 2.6.22
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-ia64=118483645914066=2
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Caused-By : Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> commit
I get this compile error on 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 on i386. Config file
attached (this basic config file worked on 2.6.22-rc6-mm1)
lx26-23-rc1-mm1/mm/sparse.c: In function 'sparse_init':
lx26-23-rc1-mm1/mm/sparse.c:482: error: implicit declaration of function
'sparse_early_usemap_alloc'
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 11:59:21AM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:05:00PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 12:14:36PM +0200, Gabriel C wrote:
> > >> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > >>> On 28-07-2007 20:42, Gabriel C wrote:
> >
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:45:16PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> The following strange behavior can be observed:
>
> 1. large file is written
> 2. after 30 seconds, nr_dirty goes down by 1024
> 3. then for some time (< 30 sec) nothing happens (disk idle)
> 4. then nr_dirty again goes down by
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 08:52 -0700, Nish Aravamudan wrote:
> On 7/31/07, Zan Lynx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 15:02 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 15:44:21 -0600 Zan Lynx wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was playing with huge pages and libhugetlbfs. Small
Heya !
In my page table accessor spring cleaning, one of my targets is
flush_tlb_page(). At this stage, it's only called by generic code in one
place (in addition to the asm-generic bits that use it to implement
missing accessors, but I'm taking care of those spearately) :
In handle_pte_fault(),
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 03:52:11PM -0700, Martin Bligh wrote:
>
> >And so forth. Initial forks will balance. If the children refuse to
> >die, forks will continue to balance. If the parent starts seeing short
> >lived children, fork()s will eventually start to stay local.
>
> Fork without
> the VGA video. If your box has VSA2 then VSA2 firmware has some kind of
> hooks to allow a native sound driver to take over and to reroute the
> interrupts without SB emulation. I don't have the docs for VSA2 but the
> horribly big natsemi provided audio driver does show how to do it.
>
I
On Thu, 02 Aug 2007 01:59:54 +0200 Gabriel C wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel Craciunescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
>
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm/MAINTAINERS.orig 2007-08-02 01:51:40.0
> +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm/MAINTAINERS 2007-08-02 01:52:17.0 +0200
> @@ -672,7
On 8/1/07, Mohamed Bamakhrama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi *,
> I have a question regarding profiling the Linux kernel code during
> runtime (by "profile", I mean the usage of each function/module within
> the kernel itself). I googled and found many "system-wide" profiler
> such as sysprof,
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:15:08PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> sd children list walking in sysfs_lookup() and sd renaming in
>> sysfs_rename_dir() were left out during i_mutex -> sysfs_mutex
>> conversion. Fix them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:29:00PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:15:08PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > sd children list walking in sysfs_lookup() and sd renaming in
> > sysfs_rename_dir() were left out during i_mutex -> sysfs_mutex
> > conversion. Fix them.
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 02:06:27AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > @@ -52,7 +53,34 @@ futex_atomic_op_inuser (int encoded_op,
> > > static inline int
> > > futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(int __user *uaddr, int oldval, int newval)
> > > {
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> > > return -ENOSYS;
>
On Thursday August 2, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmmm... Patches don't apply beyond this one. I'm applying against
> clean 2.6.23-rc1-mm1 grabbed using ketchup.
>
So do you mean 027 doesn't apply, or that 028 doesn't apply next?
It is possible that you missed 027. It originally has 3
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 15:02:51 -0400
Lee Schermerhorn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [But, maybe reordering the zonelists is not such a good idea
> when ZONE_MOVABLE is populated?]
>
It's case-by-case I think. In zone order with ZONE_MOVABLE case,
user's page cache will not use ZONE_NORMAL until
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:31:46 -0700
> "Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
>> drivers/built-in.o: In function `__cpufreq_governor':
>> cpufreq.c:(.text+0xaf178): undefined reference to `cpufreq_gov_performance'
>> cpufreq.c:(.text+0xaf18a):
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:15:08PM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> sd children list walking in sysfs_lookup() and sd renaming in
> sysfs_rename_dir() were left out during i_mutex -> sysfs_mutex
> conversion. Fix them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ok, to apply this, it messes with
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 01:55:33 +0200
Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings & Salutations,
>
> The Coverity checker spotted two potential memory leaks in
> drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c::mpt_attach().
>
> There are two returns that may leak the storage allocated for
> 'ioc'
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:04:10PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > Callers (especially "store" functions for sysfs or configfs attributes)
> > > that want to convert an input string to a number may
On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 01:49:02 +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:00:21AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
>
> > @@ -52,7 +53,34 @@ futex_atomic_op_inuser (int encoded_op,
> > static inline int
> > futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(int __user *uaddr, int oldval, int newval)
>
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Craciunescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
--- linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm/MAINTAINERS.orig2007-08-02 01:51:40.0
+0200
+++ linux-2.6.23-rc1-mm/MAINTAINERS 2007-08-02 01:52:17.0 +0200
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ S: Maintained
AUDIT SUBSYSTEM
P: David Woodhouse
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 07:02:14PM -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> First, did you confirm this behavior? Can you please explain that? How
> could they possibly interact with one another?
It's obvious when looking at the source code that both modules you are
trying to use are buggy, and the sum
Greetings & Salutations,
The Coverity checker spotted two potential memory leaks in
drivers/message/fusion/mptbase.c::mpt_attach().
There are two returns that may leak the storage allocated for
'ioc' (sizeof(MPT_ADAPTER) bytes).
A simple fix would be to simply add two kfree() calls before
the
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 16:31:46 -0700
"Miles Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LD .tmp_vmlinux1
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `__cpufreq_governor':
> cpufreq.c:(.text+0xaf178): undefined reference to `cpufreq_gov_performance'
> cpufreq.c:(.text+0xaf18a): undefined reference to
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 02:22 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> No.
>
> > However, IIUC the point of flush_workqueue() is a barrier only relative
> > to your own submissions, correct?. E.g. to make sure *your* requests
> > are finished, not necessarily the entire queue.
>
> No,
You sure are a
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:36:39 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> + do_gettimeofday();
> + elapsed_csecs64 = timeval_to_ns() - timeval_to_ns();
> + do_div(elapsed_csecs64, NSEC_PER_SEC / 100);
> + elapsed_csecs = elapsed_csecs64;
I'd have thought that we had
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 01:00:21AM +0200, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> @@ -52,7 +53,34 @@ futex_atomic_op_inuser (int encoded_op,
> static inline int
> futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic(int __user *uaddr, int oldval, int newval)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> return -ENOSYS;
> +#else
Since the
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 23:32:48 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +/*
> + * Used to notify try_to_freeze_tasks() that the refrigerator has been
> entered
> + * by a task.
> + */
> +static int refrigerator_called;
this is rather icky.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 10:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 01:46 +0200, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> >
> > > could perhaps be filesystem related, i have my maildir(extremely
> > > large) on reiserfs, and /home on xfs. what my mail
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007 13:06:23 -0700
"Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +/* Computes the padding size required, to make the
> + * the start address naturally aligned on its size
> + */
> +static int
> +iova_get_pad_size(int size, unsigned int limit_pfn)
> +{
> + unsigned int
On (01/08/07 22:52), Torsten Kaiser didst pronounce:
> On 8/1/07, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 16:30:08 -0400
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > As an aside, it looks like bits of dynticks-for-x86_64 are in
> > > there.
> > > In particular,
Hi Alexey,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:04:10PM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Callers (especially "store" functions for sysfs or configfs attributes)
> > that want to convert an input string to a number may often also want to
> > check for simple
I think users should be able to set max_user_freq values for rtc and
hpet during kernel configuration. The default value is set to 1024
with this patch.
The default value of 64 is really too small for modern multimedia apps.
Besides, this patch fixes link on intel hpet spec.
Signed-off-by:
Hi,
Currently scripts/ver_linux prints "Binutils" or other random
information for the version number in the "binutils" output line
on some distributions. This patch corrects that.
When I initially submitted a patch to correct that, I was not aware
that the output from "ld -v" could differ as
On Wed, Aug 01, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Revert commit 0555659d63c285ceb7ead3115532e1b71b0f27a7 from 2.6.22-rc1.
> The dma_set_mask call somehow failed on a PowerMac G5, PPC64:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/1/344
This change fixes the oops, and I can access the drive again.
-
To unsubscribe from
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 09:24:34PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Adrian,
>
> You said earlier you're looking at smaller allnoconfig kernels.
> One thing I noticed recently that realtime pi futexes are always
> enabled and that pulls in a lot of other code (like the plists)
>
> Userland needs to
First, did you confirm this behavior? Can you please explain that?
How could they possibly interact with one another?
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:21:29PM -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
I'm making an assumption that depmod is somehow to blame and have logged
this as a kernel bug,
[Resend. I messed up the To: line the first time]
As has been reported recently by Lennert Buytenhek, robust futexes
are broken on ARM:
>If you're also running into glibc's tst-robust1 test suite test
>locking up your ARM machine, you're probably running into the fact
>that asm-arm/futex.h
On Thursday 02 August 2007 00:14:48 Theodore Tso wrote:
> Do you mean deprecate a.out interpreters?
No, just a.out interpreters for ELF binaries.
> I could imagine that there might be some people running some very old
> statically linked programs from a decade or so ago, but I agree they
> are
This topic seems to come up periodically every since we first introduced
the NUMA scheduler, and every time we decide it's a bad idea. What's
changed? What workloads does this improve (aside from some artificial
benchmark like stream)?
To repeat the conclusions of last time ... the primary
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Aug 2007, Christopher Hoover wrote:
> Satyam Sharma infradead.org> writes:
> > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:33:35AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > > Currently the RFC says to you that you should open the serial port:
> > >
>
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:33 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ok, good! Could you try the updated debug patch below? I've done two
> changes: made '1' the default, and added the
> /proc/sys/kernel/sched_yield_granularity_ns tunable. (available if
> CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y)
>
> Could you try to change
Looks like the same problem with spinlock unfairness we've seen
elsewhere: it seems to be looping here? Or is everyone stuck
just waiting for writeout?
lock_timer_base():
for (;;) {
tvec_base_t *prelock_base = timer->base;
base =
Satyam Sharma infradead.org> writes:
> On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Rodolfo Giometti wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:33:35AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Currently the RFC says to you that you should open the serial port:
> >
> > fd = open("/dev/ttyS0", ...);
>
> No, it does *NOT*. All
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:21:29PM -0400, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> I'm making an assumption that depmod is somehow to blame and have logged
> this as a kernel bug, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8829
depmod is working fine.
It's the interaction between your two patches that breaks
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:06:57PM -0400, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> I've added a few rules I could think of right now. What should be
> added as well is a rule for 64-bit parameters on 32-bit platforms. I
> leave this to the s390 people who have the biggest restrictions when
> it comes to this.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:52:58PM -0400, Robin Getz wrote:
> Greg:
>
> For those of us who forget that when bits 21 and bit 31 in a hardware
> register exposed with debugfs, I should see 2149580800 when I cat it (vs
> 0x8020), any objections to providing a hex output interface to the
>
On 08/01, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 01:34 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 08/01, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 00:50 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > > On 08/01, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > It's translating priorities through the
From: Heiko Carstens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fixes WARN_ON() on bitfiels ops for all architectures that have
been left out in 8d4fbcfbe0a4bfc73e7f0297c59ae514e1f1436f.
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Paul Mundt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen
On Wed, 01 Aug 2007 04:44:32 +0200
Frank Benkstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Benkstein wrote:
> > I wonder why there are different permissions needed for VT_PROCESS
> > (access to the current virtual console) and VT_LOCKSWITCH
> > (CAP_SYS_TTY_CONFIG).
>
> To be more direct:
>
>
Do you mean deprecate a.out interpreters?
I could imagine that there might be some people running some very old
statically linked programs from a decade or so ago, but I agree they
are pretty small in number. Is the fs/binfmt_aout.c causing problems?
It's only 562 lines of code...
Signed-off-by: Andrew Vasquez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Andrew Patterson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 15:36 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > <6>QLogic
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dave Kleikamp writes:
> On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 15:33 -0400, Josef Sipek wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:10:31PM -0500, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 14:44 -0400, Josef Sipek wrote:
> > > > Now what? How do you rename? Do you rename in the
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 11:40 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
> > > And, from a standpoint of ONGOING, long-term innovation: what matters
> > > is that brilliant, new ideas get rewarded one way or another.
> >
> > and in this case, the reward is that the idea got used and credit was
> > given
>
> You
On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 01:34 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 08/01, Gregory Haskins wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-08-02 at 00:50 +0400, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > > On 08/01, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It's translating priorities through the work queues, which doesn't seem
> > > > to happen
> I will give up. I didn't checked code earlier. This driver is using SMM.
> Probably
> firmware isn't what it should be, or I have overwritten it when I was
> flashing
> Linux. I see in datasheet that it isn't possible to write driver in other
> way.
> Sadly sound card is generating SMI
Mathieu
I have been working with your Kernel Markers infrastructure now for some
time and have run into an extendability issue.
Essentially I am failing to find a way to extend the current
__trace_mark macro with site-specific context. That is, I would like the
ability to create different
This patch demonstrates an extension field to the
low-level marker functionality, and updates macros to accept
this additional data.
Index: linux-2.6.22-rc6-mm1/include/linux/marker.h
===
---
Please pull from:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/ide-2.6.git/
to receive the following updates:
drivers/ide/arm/icside.c |3 +-
drivers/ide/ide-tape.c |2 +-
drivers/ide/pci/alim15x3.c |2 +-
drivers/ide/pci/cmd64x.c |4 +-
drivers/ide/pci/cs5520.c
Greg:
For those of us who forget that when bits 21 and bit 31 in a hardware
register exposed with debugfs, I should see 2149580800 when I cat it (vs
0x8020), any objections to providing a hex output interface to the
debugfs?
Since the input side already takes decimal & hex, I don't think
1 - 100 of 1048 matches
Mail list logo
