On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 10:14 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > Please don't apply this one as is. The spi and usb bits weren't written
> > by me, and given that I don't have access to the corresponding hardware
> > at the moment, I'd have a really hard
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Surya Prabhakar N wrote:
> Hi,
>Replacing kmalloc with kzalloc and cleaning up memset in
> drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Surya Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c b/drivers/net/sb1250-mac.c
> index e7fdcf1..2dca5a7
Hi Chris,
On 12/08/07, Chris Holvenstot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This morning I reported an issue which cause a failure of the
> 2.6.23-rc2-git4 kernel to boot on my system. The contents of my post
> may be viewed here:
>
> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0708.1/1959.html
>
>
On Sun, 2007-08-12 at 23:32 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index a8fb231..1f81c05 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3308,6 +3308,12 @@ P:
>
> Please, people, try to think for a minute. Patch series are good not
> just because; there are rational reasons for that. None of those
> applies here; if anything, you've made sure that this patchbomb will
> be less reviewed.
This huge serie had one nice property.
Relavent people got only
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:09:01PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Forgot
Could you please in the usage give a short intro to
what is the actual purpose of this script.
And no - I do not like the unix style where programs
says nada what they are supposed to do.
Sam
-
To unsubscribe from
Stefan Richter wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:26:16 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DIGI INTL. EPCA DRIVER
-P: Digi International, Inc
+P: Digi International Inc
The "," is correct and how they added themselves.
Please don't hide other types of change in a large
--- David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Seems like over-design - we don't need to support LSM stacking, and we
> > don't need to support pushing/popping more than one level of context.
>
> It will, at some point hopefully, be possible for
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 11:19 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> Yep, agreed.
OK. saved in my tree as
EXT4 FILE SYSTEM
P: Ted Ts'o
M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: Eric Sandeen
M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
P: Mingming Cao
M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S: Maintained
F:
On Fri, 10 Aug 2007 01:39:10 +0200
Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As I've wrote in the patch description, all it does is to remove an if()
> check that could never be false (which is easily verifyable if you look
> at the source code).
>
> I've also verified that my patch does not
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 10:14 -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 3889034..6e99107 100644
> > ---
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >Replacing kmalloc with kzalloc and cleaning up memset in
> > arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
> >
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Surya Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ---
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 16:11 +0200, Stefan Richter wrote:
> Joe Perches wrote:
> > I'll fix it and resubmit about 10 non-individual patches
> > in a couple of days.
>
> Better resubmit a single updated combo patch, for the entire MAINTAINERS
> file in one go. Unless you receive general
Scott Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:21:03 -0400 Alan Cox
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the patch itself appears to be wrapped and
mangled
and is not suitable for application.
I just verified that several patches I've submitted since 8/10 hit
this same issue due to *some* recent change
Linus, please pull from
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git for-linus
This tree is also available from kernel.org mirrors at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
for-linus
This will get some small fixes for 2.6.23:
Dotan
Jens Axboe wrote:
#for-akpm is usually only in very few -mm release anyway, so it's not
like it would have made much difference. We/you/I need to improve that,
certainly.
Honestly, for bsg, it wasn't much of an issue. We had build problems
when bsg was merged which was unfortunate but got fixed
This is a clean 2.6.23-rc3-hrt1 with no additional patches, .config
attached. make bzImage stops at:
LD drivers/acpi/resources/built-in.o
CC drivers/acpi/sleep/poweroff.o
CC drivers/acpi/sleep/wakeup.o
CC drivers/acpi/sleep/main.o
CC drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.o
On 8/13/07, Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/13/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:37:08 -0700
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > diff
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 10:00 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> Hey there-
> Currently, there exists no method for a process to query the resource
> limits of another process. They can be inferred via some mechanisms but they
> cannot be explicitly determined. Given that this information can be
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> On 11/08/07, Udo van den Heuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Using Cups 1.2.12 on Linux 2.6.22.1.
(...)
>> I clikc that link and hear the ping-ping of the BUG:
>
> This is very interesting. Can you reproduce this bug?
I think so. (at least: I have seen it before:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:36:42PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index b616562..fa8fb1c 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -4377,6 +4377,9 @@
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 11:49 +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index 90c1b81..ac2226b 100644
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > @@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ ARPD SUPPORT
> > P: Jonathan Layes
> > L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > S: Maintained
> > +F:
Hi Jesper,
On 11/08/07, Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed this in dmesg :
>
> [ 3216.262987] (scsi0:A:4:0): Unexpected busfree in Message-in phase
> [ 3216.263058] SEQADDR == 0x16c
> [ 3216.263724] target0:0:4: FAST-10 SCSI 10.0 MB/s ST (100 ns, offset 16)
>
>
--- Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 15:51 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> ...
> > Actually, to address Stephen Smalley's requirements also, how about making
> > things a bit more complex. Have the following suite of functions:
> >
> > (1) int
Joe Perches wrote:
I grew weary of looking up the appropriate
maintainer email address(es) to CC: for a patch.
I added flags to the MAINTAINERS file
F: file pattern
for each maintained block and a script to parse
the modified blocks for maintainer and list
email addresses.
perl
On 8/13/07, Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:37:08 -0700
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> > index af16a17..7a7f837 100644
> > ---
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Joe,
What a storm :( This should have been one single patch IMHO, or grouped
by maintainer or subsystem or something.
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:22:18 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Can you please point me to where this new pattern
Hi Udo,
On 11/08/07, Udo van den Heuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using Cups 1.2.12 on Linux 2.6.22.1.
> Managing a printer from a Win2K workstation via the http interface.
> I am at: http://box:631/printers
> I click Set as default.
> I see:
> 426 Upgrade Required
>
> You must access this
From: Mijo Safradin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
trivial change: fix warning
Signed-off-by: Mijo Safradin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Christian Krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: linux-2.6.22/drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_si_intf.c
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
As guest accounting is hw dependent, I think we should add a hook in the
accounting functions.
>>> Isn't PF_VM exactly such a hook? All the hypervisor needs to do is to
>>> set/unset it correctly?
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> Andrew please drop
> introduce-strtol_check_range-fix.patch
> introduce-strtol_check_range.patch
> from -mm.
>
> strtol_check_range() semantics is broken, because caller can't distinguish
> -E from valid negative number if he wants to
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 19:38 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Except for drivers/net/ppp_synctty.c.
It seems poor form to have 5 file entries where 1 would do.
Would renaming this one file to pppsynctty.c work?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
(added Cc: linux1394-user)
lepton wrote:
>My computer has two 1394 port, one is in the front panel, and another
> is in the back. I found with linux 1394 ethernet support, I only get one
> ethernet device named eth1.
>After read code, I found author says "This is where we add all of
> our
> I'm not Joe, but I gather this change is in order to support generation
> of RFC 278 headers by the proposed script.
The mail system supports comma characters if you must put names in and
this is well tested both for names and for usernames (because of TOPS,
old compu$erve etc)
Fix the script
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> >> As guest accounting is hw dependent, I think we should add a hook in the
> >> accounting functions.
> >>
> >
> > Isn't PF_VM exactly such a hook? All the hypervisor needs to do is to
> > set/unset it correctly?
>
> In fact, no.
>
>
Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Seems like over-design - we don't need to support LSM stacking, and we
> don't need to support pushing/popping more than one level of context.
It will, at some point hopefully, be possible for someone to try, say, NFS
exporting a cached ISO9660 mount
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index c4a3480..4cf1579 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2453,6 +2453,7 @@ M:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
L: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W:
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 03:01:28AM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > EXT4 FILE SYSTEM
> > -P: Stephen Tweedie, Andrew Morton
> > -M: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > +P: Stephen Tweedie
> > +M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > +P: Andrew Morton
> > +M: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > +P:
--- Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 11:54 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> > Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Sigh. So it's not only SELinux specific, but RedHat specific as well.
> >
> > *Blink*. How did you come to that conclusion?
> >
>
Yes - I will fix this up.
On 8/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 1c014f1..5144e4e 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 5377742..0e0e351 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3854,6 +3854,7 @@ P: Josh Triplett
> M: [EMAIL
sk malik wrote:
> memcpy copies a part of memory to some other location
> but It will not work for all cases of overlapping
> blocks.(if the start of destination block falls
> between the source block)
>
> while memove copes with overlapping areas.
>
> then why is memcpy present in the sources
Andi Kleen (on Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:08:45 +0200) wrote:
>On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 12:33:05PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>
>>
>> if (cpu_has_ds) {
>> unsigned int l1;
>> --- linux-2.6.23-rc3/arch/i386/kernel/traps.c2007-08-13
>> 08:59:45.0 +0200
>> +++
Quoting Eric W. Biederman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Oleg Nesterov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On 08/10, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >>
> >> Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >> >On 08/10, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> >>Quoting Pavel Emelyanov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >> >>>+/*
> >> >>>+ * the namespaces access
Signed-off-by: Mike Isely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 62b6ede..3889034 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 15:51 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I haven't looked into the issues at all and I bet there are plenty,
> > maybe in audit and places outside of the security realm, but this
> > looks like a clean approach from the LSM
On 13/08/07, James Smart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok here's what happened,
>
> - We changed the define so that it matched what we are using. We never
> configure
>more than 4 HBQ, thus the index will never be beyond 0-3. The if-check is
> actually
>innoculous. Given that the
Hi Linus,
If you got this email twice, please forgive me for sending it again.
Because I found LKML didn't receive this email, let me try again.
Please pull from 'for-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git for-linus
to receive the following
Thanks.
Acked-by: Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index 4157218..c1a9131 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2524,6 +2524,9 @@ M:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:54:38 -0400
Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Use the new generic cmpxchg_local (disables interrupt) for 8, 16 and
> 64 bits cmpxchg_local. Use the __cmpxchg_u32 primitive for 32 bits
> cmpxchg_local.
>
> Note that cmpxchg only uses the __cmpxchg_u32 or
Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I haven't looked into the issues at all and I bet there are plenty,
> maybe in audit and places outside of the security realm, but this
> looks like a clean approach from the LSM interface standpoint. Do
> you want the entire task or just
Hi All,
We are using the i.MX21 Litekit. It has got a USB host port on it
and the driver is imx21-hcd.c provided by the vendor. When I plug in a
USB stick into the host port, the kernel hangs with the following
error:
usb 1-2: device descriptor read/64, error -110
I have read on the
On Sunday 12 August 2007 11:54, Niels wrote:
> On Friday 10 August 2007 14:43, Niels wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 12:57, Ismail Dönmez wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday 08 August 2007 13:48:29 you wrote:
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 23:18, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 11:23:41PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index a165698..b8bb108 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -740,6 +740,8 @@ P:
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 14:54 +0200, Ingo Saitz wrote:
> This is a clean 2.6.23-rc3-hrt1 with no additional patches, .config
> attached. make bzImage stops at:
>
> LD drivers/acpi/resources/built-in.o
> CC drivers/acpi/sleep/poweroff.o
> CC drivers/acpi/sleep/wakeup.o
> CC
Alan Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 23:26:16 -0700
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> DIGI INTL. EPCA DRIVER
>> -P: Digi International, Inc
>> +P: Digi International Inc
>
> The "," is correct and how they added themselves.
>
> Please don't hide other types of change in a large changeset without
Keith Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Originally sent to the maintainer of the i386 math-emu code
> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) but that mail was bounced[1]. Is anybody
> maintaining the math-emu code and do we even care about it anymore?
I can take a patch, but I would prefer if it was tested
e.g.
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity:
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
[copying Ingo and Rusty]
@Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
It's not
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>
>>> Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
>>>
The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a
virtual
machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good
sk malik wrote:
Hi, All
We were looking at "[kernel]/lib/string.c"
(http://lxr.linux.no/source/lib/string.c#L500)
memcpy copies a part of memory to some other location
but It will not work for all cases of overlapping
blocks.(if the start of destination block falls
between the source block)
Laurent Vivier wrote:
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do
that.
I did something
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> >
> >>> [copying Ingo and Rusty]
> >>>
> >
> > @Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
> >
> >
>
> It's not configured to do so. Can
My mail is a little big. In order not to be blocked I try to attach it.
Regards,
Guillaume
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
On a laptop Aopen 1556 or 1557 my integrated card-reader doesn't work.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
The card-reader of my laptop (Aopen 1556 or
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Avi Kivity:
> Laurent's patch gives the best of both worlds: on old 'top', you get
> guest time accounted as user time, while on new 'top' it is accounted
> separately. This is done by reporting user time as the sum of the real
> user time and guest time. A
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
>> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
>> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do
> that.
>
> I did something similar for or s390guest
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
[copying Ingo and Rusty]
@Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
It's not configured to do so. Can you be more specific?
The patches look good. A couple of comments:
- perhaps
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACK.
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ACK.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures)
Second thoughts ... Add the documentation file as well.
F: drivers/scsi/aacraid/
+F: Documentation/scsi/aacraid.txt
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: Salyzyn, Mark
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 9:34 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
>
David Brownell wrote:
> Is there general agreement that these "F:" entries should be used?
> Rather than, say, embedding references in the relevant parts of
> the source tree, adjacent to those files, where they would be more
> visible to people making relevant changes.
>
> I'm also concerned
Am Montag, 13. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> > [copying Ingo and Rusty]
@Avi, seems that sourceforge is mangling the cc list?
> >
> > The patches look good. A couple of comments:
> >
> > - perhaps the new fields should be guarded by a #ifdef CONFIG_HYPERVISOR
> > (selected by
On Aug 13 2007 11:55, sk malik wrote:
>Subject: why use memcpy when memmove is there?
>memcpy copies a part of memory to some other location
>but It will not work for all cases of overlapping
>blocks.(if the start of destination block falls
>between the source block)
>
>while memove copes with
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 3889034..6e99107 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3768,6 +3768,11 @@ P: Nicolas
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 03:53:11PM +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
...
> I've thought e.g. about "fasteoi" for this "Virtual Wire" timer for
> i386: I hope it's OK, but since is it any problem to add some comment
> here, why it's OK with resending here (with POWERPC it's easier to
> think it's
Hi!
> > min_free_kbytes documentation says:
> >
> > min_free_kbytes:
> >
> > This is used to force the Linux VM to keep a minimum number
> > of kilobytes free. The VM uses this number to compute a pages_min
> > value for each lowmem zone in the system. Each lowmem zone gets
> > a number of
Hi!
min_free_kbytes documentation says:
min_free_kbytes:
This is used to force the Linux VM to keep a minimum number
of kilobytes free. The VM uses this number to compute a pages_min
value for each lowmem zone in the system. Each lowmem zone gets
a number of reserved free pages based
Joe Perches wrote:
> I'll fix it and resubmit about 10 non-individual patches
> in a couple of days.
Better resubmit a single updated combo patch, for the entire MAINTAINERS
file in one go. Unless you receive general objections.
--
Stefan Richter
-=-=-=== =--- -==-=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-
Christian Borntraeger wrote:
Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do
that.
I did something similar for or s390guest
Hi Linus,
Please pull from 'for-linus' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git for-linus
to receive the following updates:
arch/blackfin/Kconfig |2 +-
arch/blackfin/kernel/bfin_gpio.c | 323
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 09:43 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 05:08:18PM -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 16:25 -0400, Lee Schermerhorn wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 10:42 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Just got a bit of time
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 09:21:03 -0400 Alan Cox
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the patch itself appears to be wrapped and
>mangled
>and is not suitable for application.
I just verified that several patches I've submitted since 8/10 hit
this same issue due to *some* recent change on the server side of
Am Freitag, 10. August 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> The aim of these two patches is to measure the CPU time used by a virtual
> machine. All comments are welcome... I'm not sure it's the good way to do
that.
I did something similar for or s390guest prototype, that Carsten posted in
May. I
Hi,
please in the future send just one patch for this; there's no real
reason to split this up this finegrained...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hey there-
Currently, there exists no method for a process to query the resource
limits of another process. They can be inferred via some mechanisms but they
cannot be explicitly determined. Given that this information can be usefull to
know during the debugging of an application, I've
On Aug 13 2007 00:07, Joe Perches wrote:
>> Hung Hing Lun (Chinese full name), Mike (English name)
>> Wong Hoi Sing (Chinese full name), Edison (English name)
>>
>> Regards,
>> Edison
>
>I believe commas will cause problems with some
>emailers. If you weren't allowed to use a comma,
>what would
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 11:54 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sigh. So it's not only SELinux specific, but RedHat specific as well.
>
> *Blink*. How did you come to that conclusion?
>
> > > (3) The cache driver wants to access the files in the
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Michael Schmitz wrote:
> > > Anyone using mouseemu on m68k Mac?
> >
> > Yes, and on powermac too. It provides the paste key for gpm and I'm quite
> > fond of it. But if there's a better alternative, I'll happily try it
> > instead.
>
> Too much overhead on m68k? On powermac
On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 15:46 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> min_free_kbytes documentation says:
>
> min_free_kbytes:
>
> This is used to force the Linux VM to keep a minimum number
> of kilobytes free. The VM uses this number to compute a pages_min
> value for each lowmem zone in the
On Mon, Aug 13, 2007 at 02:07:15PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 13:28 +0200, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> > Maybe I miss something, but:
> > - why it's not done in other places with handle_level_irq or
>
> I removed the PENDING bit magic in handle_level_irq, which was put
* Heiko Carstens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:54:51AM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Use the standard __cmpxchg for every type that can be updated atomically.
> > Use the new generic cmpxchg_local (disables interrupt) for other types.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007 15:43:30 +0530
Surya Prabhakar N <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>Replacing kmalloc with kzalloc and cleaning up memset in
> drivers/net/tokenring/3c359.c
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Surya Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe
--- David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Casey Schaufler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sigh. So it's not only SELinux specific, but RedHat specific as well.
>
> *Blink*. How did you come to that conclusion?
>
> > > (3) The cache driver wants to access the files in the cache, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Acked-by: Vlad Yasevich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo
ACK
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; AACRAID
> Subject: [PATCH] [19/2many]
> > Anyone using mouseemu on m68k Mac?
>
> Yes, and on powermac too. It provides the paste key for gpm and I'm quite
> fond of it. But if there's a better alternative, I'll happily try it
> instead.
Too much overhead on m68k? On powermac it never gave me trouble, but I was
surprised to hear
ACK
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; AACRAID
> Subject: [PATCH] [21/2many]
> ->s_group_desc have to be zero filled because if sb_read() failed
> we jump to following error path.
> failed_mount2:
> for (i = 0; i < db_count; i++)
> brelse(sbi->s_group_desc[i]);<< Bad things may happen here
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
ACK
Sincerely -- Mark Salyzyn
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 2:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; AACRAID
> Subject: [PATCH] [20/2many]
On 2007-08-13 08:34:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Add file pattern to MAINTAINER entry
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 6a99fe5..ed3be09 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -3799,6 +3799,8 @@ M: [EMAIL
> Hi,
>Replacing kmalloc with kzalloc and cleaning up memset in
> arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
>
>
> Signed-off-by: Surya Prabhakar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
>
> diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c b/arch/i386/kernel/io_apic.c
> index 4b8a8da..1329615 100644
> ---
401 - 500 of 2570 matches
Mail list logo
