Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ?

2007-11-21 Thread Nick Piggin
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 06:07, Arjan van de Ven wrote: On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:43:46 +1100 Of course it is, if you want to effectively use your resources. Imagine if the task balancer only polled once every 10s. but unlike the task balancer, moving an irq is really expensive. (at

Re: Posix file capabilities in 2.6.24rc2; now 2.6.24-rc3

2007-11-21 Thread Andrew Morgan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Serge E. Hallyn wrote: The problem is that when you run a setuid binary, its pP and pE are fully raised. The following patch fixes it for me. Chris, does it fix your problem? Andrew, am I again confusing myself and doing something unsafe? I

<    2   3   4   5   6   7