Re: [PATCH]: Atmel Serial Console interrupt handler splitup

On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:49:32 + Russell King - ARM Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 09:56:30PM +0100, Remy Bohmer wrote: > > > > +#define lread(port) __raw_readl(port) > > > > +#define lwrite(v, port) __raw_writel(v, port) > > > > > > Why is this

Update ip command line processing

Recently the documentation in Documentation/nfsroot.txt was update to note that in fact ip=off and ip=::off as the latter is ignored and the default (on) is used. This was certainly a step in the direction of reducing confusion. But it seems to me that the code ought to be fixed up so that ip=

Re: [PATCH 1/4 -mm] kexec based hibernation -v7 : kexec jump

On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 02:27 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > "Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 19:25 -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > >> "Huang, Ying" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] > >> > /* > >> > * Do not allocate memory (or fail in any way) in ma

Re: [RFC PATCH 06/12] PAT 64b: Add ioremap_wc support

"Siddha, Suresh B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes. We are looking for comments for our proposal to track the > reserved/non-reserved regions some what different. > This is the critical issue which had been holding off PAT for years now... The mattr infrastructure appears to do a decent job of

Re: [PATCH] drivers/s390/: Spelling fixes

On Monday 17 December 2007 20:40, Joe Perches wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > drivers/s390/block/dasd_3990_erp.c |2 +- > drivers/s390/block/dasd_eckd.c |2 +- > drivers/s390/char/sclp_rw.c|2 +- > drivers/s390/char/tape_3590.c |2

Re: [PATCH 2/9] readahead: clean up and simplify the code for filemap page fault readahead

On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 07:59:30PM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote: > @@ -1321,78 +1401,69 @@ int filemap_fault(struct vm_area_struct > struct address_space *mapping = file->f_mapping; > struct file_ra_state *ra = &file->f_ra; > struct inode *inode = mapping->host; > + pgoff_t off

Re: [rfc][patch 1/3] block: non-atomic queue_flags prep

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:44:40AM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Sat, Dec 15 2007, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > This is just an idea I had, which might make request processing a little > > bit cheaper depending on queue behaviour. For example if it is getting > > plugged > > unplugged frequ

Re: [PATCH][MMC] Fix wrong EXT_CSD_REV handling

On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:01:03 +0900 "Kyungmin Park" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, reserved word should or must be zero, then it should check "if > (ext_csd_struct <= 2)" instead of ">= 2". > In the Spec. 4.2, it can have three value 0, 1, or 2. There's no other > restriction. As I said, the

<    1   2   3   4   5