On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:28:22AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> That would be nice. Muli, want to make a patch for this?
Sure, I'll put something together.
Cheers,
Muli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> For some reason I can't see and don't know how to debug, in 2.6.23 on my
> server I don't get the vga console, but only get the dummy console.
Please check if this bug report matches the issue you are seeing:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9310
Cheers,
FJP
--
On Feb 16, 2008 10:22 PM, Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 15, 2008 12:16 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h |2 +
> > > include/linux/percpu.h|9 -
> >
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:38:12 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel oopses, followed by softlockup several times (have
>> pasted
>> only some of them) on the x86_64 machine. The machine has 4 cpu(s).
>>
>> BUG: unable to handle
Andrew wrote:
> (Note: I consider it blatantly incorrect to send a reply both to a
> mailing list and directly to the address of someone who is subscribed to
> that list
Regardless of how you consider it, that is how responding to these big
lists -must- work.
There is no practical way for
don't need get that at beginning.
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
index ecd91ea..13110f6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/srat_64.c
@@ -132,7 +132,6 @@ acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init(struct
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:25:40 -0800 Joel Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:25:22AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
> ...
> > +avoid-divides-in-bits_to_longs.patch
>
> Andrew,
we don't need copy too. already have x86_cpu_to_node_map
Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
index 1aecc65..69b33e3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c
@@ -546,8 +546,6 @@ void __cpuinit
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:46:23PM +1100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>> What does this EIP correspond to in your kernel? Also:
>>>
>>> c01687f0 c0417ab6 c040288f c040299a c0403270
>>>
>>> (as guesses of potential callers to try and work out a stack trace).
>>>
>>
> (My usual technique is
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:25:40PM -0800, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:25:22AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
> ...
> > +avoid-divides-in-bits_to_longs.patch
>
> Andrew,
> This
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:46:23PM +1100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Joel Becker wrote:
>> ksymoops is no help at all, but I got these from objdump of
>> vmlinux:
>>
>> c04040bd xen_set_pte
>> c0417ab6 set_pte_present
>> c040288f set_bit
>> c040299a __raw_spin_unlock
>> c0403270 __set_64bit
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:25:22AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
...
> +avoid-divides-in-bits_to_longs.patch
Andrew,
This patch, by introducing sizeof(long) in the BITS_TO_LONGS
math, changes
On Feb 15, 2008 12:16 PM, Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h |2 +
> > include/linux/percpu.h|9 -
>
> couldnt these two generic bits be done separately (perhaps a preparatory
>
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:46:47AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Something like this:
> diff --git a/arch/Kconfig b/arch/Kconfig
> index 3d72dc3..f2928c5 100644
> --- a/arch/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/Kconfig
> @@ -29,3 +29,8 @@ config KPROBES
>
> config HAVE_KPROBES
> def_bool n
> +
> +#
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:41:11PM -0500, Yoshinori Sato wrote:
> This file require sh-sci
>
> Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> include/asm-h8300/sci.h | 34 ++
> 1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:26:18 -0800
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 13:03:54 +0100 Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, per connection basis. Some workloads want to open/close more than 1000
> > sockets per second.
>
> ie: slowpath
Definitely not
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:32:25 -0800 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
>
> When SMP=n, x86_64 build gets:
>
>
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:16:03 -0800 Randy Dunlap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
>
> ACPI is enabled, but DMI=n.
>
>
Hi Robin,
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 21:23:47 -0500 Robin Getz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You can grab (i386 rpms and tar ball) that should work from:
>
> http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/toolchain/frs/?action=FrsReleaseView_id=375
>
> You will need:
> - toolchain
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
When SMP=n, x86_64 build gets:
arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `acpi_save_state_mem':
(.text+0xfd7f): undefined reference to
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:09:47 -0500 Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sorry. I mistake orign.
> Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
Please include a full description of your patches!
>
> diff --git a/arch/h8300/kernel/setup.c b/arch/h8300/kernel/setup.c
> index
Hi James,
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 09:14:32 -0600 James Bottomley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Do you have the tree and build logs available anywhere? I'd like to
> turn off the merge tree builds when this is able to replace it.
The tree is at
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 10:38:12 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel oopses, followed by softlockup several times (have
> pasted
> only some of them) on the x86_64 machine. The machine has 4 cpu(s).
>
> BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
ACPI is enabled, but DMI=n.
linux-2.6.25-rc2-mm1/drivers/acpi/thermal.c: In function 'acpi_thermal_init':
At Sat, 16 Feb 2008 20:55:02 -0800,
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:39:09 -0500 Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > At Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:29:49 -0800,
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:13:37 -0500 Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
Hi Andrew,
The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel oopses, followed by softlockup several times (have
pasted
only some of them) on the x86_64 machine. The machine has 4 cpu(s).
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0219
IP: [] security_inode_getattr+0x4/0x21
PGD 1da947067 PUD
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:37:19 PST, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Which other potential clients have been identified and how important it it
> to those?
The powerpc ehea utilizes its own mmu. Not sure about the importance
to the driver. (But will investigate :)
++doug
--
To unsubscribe from this
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrew,
>>
>> The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
>> kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
>>
>> There has been discussion
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 09:40:33 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
> kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
>
> There has been discussion on the patch for this panic
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:39:09 -0500 Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:29:49 -0800,
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:13:37 -0500 Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > initrd setting fix.
> > >
> > > arch/h8300/kernel/setup.c |
On Feb 15, 2008 10:00 PM, Robert Hancock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, in order for the CPU to batch up more writes you'd have to map the
> BAR as either write-combining or write-back. If it's not listed in
> /proc/mtrr it will be the default setting of uncacheable.
Ok, this is pretty
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:58:06 -0800 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
Yes, adding -m32 to the X86_32 config ccflags (as is done for the
X86_64 case) makes it build for me. (like patch below)
It's wrong, though, because you can't assume a
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:58:06 -0800 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
Yes, adding -m32 to the X86_32 config ccflags (as is done for the
X86_64 case) makes it build for me. (like patch below)
It's wrong, though, because you can't assume a 32-bit compiler knows
This file require sh-sci
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
include/asm-h8300/sci.h | 34 ++
1 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include/asm-h8300/sci.h
diff --git a/include/asm-h8300/sci.h
At Fri, 15 Feb 2008 22:29:49 -0800,
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:13:37 -0500 Yoshinori Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > initrd setting fix.
> >
> > arch/h8300/kernel/setup.c |5 +++--
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:58:06 -0800 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >
> > Yes, adding -m32 to the X86_32 config ccflags (as is done for the
> > X86_64 case) makes it build for me. (like patch below)
> >
>
> It's wrong, though, because you can't assume a 32-bit compiler knows
>
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:58:39 +0800 Peter Teoh wrote:
> Can some explain the cause of this error (it has been like this for the
> last two git pull from linus tree):
>
> Kernel: arch/x86/boot/bzImage is ready (#1)
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 1589 modules
> ERROR:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 08:39:08 +0100, Willy Tarreau said:
> I don't understand why kernel developers always think that users spend
> their whole time testing their new stuff. That is mostly true for a lot
> of desktop users, but definitely not for servers. On a server, you may
> *ignore* that a new
On 17-02-08 04:56, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
On 16-02-08 20:01, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Roel Kluin wrote:
Not entirely sure who to send this to
---
Replace !likely(x) by likely(!x)
Whoa...
Are you sure this is correct?
!likely(x) is equivalent to unlikely(!x)
Not with
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 08:12:40PM -0500, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> [...] and I would not be in the least surprised if this turned out to
> be yet one more problem with gmail
It is; Gmail will refuse to POP more than one copy of a mail to you,
no matter how many copies it recieves via different
Hi Andrew,
The signals-do_signal_stop-use-signal_group_exit.patch is causing the
kernel panic, while booting in to the 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel on x86.
There has been discussion on the patch for this panic on
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/16/99
[ 25.512919] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging
Jiri -
This is just to confirm that I have been running all day on a kernel
built with CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED turned 'off' and have not seen the problem
with my keyboard (I never noticed a problem with the mouse as others
have)
At slack moments through the day I have taken the oppertunity to
Randy Dunlap wrote:
Yes, adding -m32 to the X86_32 config ccflags (as is done for the
X86_64 case) makes it build for me. (like patch below)
It's wrong, though, because you can't assume a 32-bit compiler knows
about -m32.
You need $(call cc-option,-m32).
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Since commit aaa04c28cb9a1efd42541fdb7ab648231c2a2263 [blk_end_request:
changing ide-cd (take 4)] I cannot burn any CD/DVD any more, getting the
following error from wodim:
Errno: 0 (Success), write_g1 scsi
Rene Herman wrote:
On 16-02-08 20:01, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Roel Kluin wrote:
Not entirely sure who to send this to
---
Replace !likely(x) by likely(!x)
Whoa...
Are you sure this is correct?
!likely(x) is equivalent to unlikely(!x)
Not with respect to its value I believe? likely(x) ==
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
The 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 kernel panic's while boot up on the s390x
Unable to handle kernel pointer dereference at virtual kernel address
00
00
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> Messages sent to my address directly are explicitly not filtered into
> the folders I have set up for various mailing lists, so that if someone
> does send me a "heads up" reply for a specific topic on a list to which
> I am subscribed it does not get
Thank-you for the kind and prompt review, kosaki-san.
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 1.940.382.4214
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Ok ... this would (I suspect, just from code reading, no bytes were
harmed in actual testing of this) have a minor change to how white
space is handled writing integer flags to cpuset files, and a minor
inconstency.
1) Existing cpuset code lets you set a flag (e.g. cpu_exclusive) by doing:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hugh Dickins writes:
> Hi Erez,
>
> Aside from the occasional "unionfs: new lower inode mtime" messages
> on directories (which I've got into the habit of ignoring now), the
> only problem I'm still suffering with unionfs over tmpfs (not tested
> any other fs's
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 11:21:07AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > What is the status of getting infiniband to use this facility?
>
> Well we are talking about this it seems.
It seems the IB folks think allowing RDMA over virtual memory is not
Ensure that we lock the branch configuration of parent and child dentries in
operations which need it, and in the right order.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/commonfops.c | 31 +---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 26 +---
From: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Replace unionfs_read_inode() with unionfs_iget(), and call that instead of
iget(). unionfs_iget() then uses iget_locked() directly and returns a
proper error code instead of an inode in the event of an error.
unionfs_fill_super() returns any error
Dentry branch configuration "info node" lock should extend to calls to
copy_attr_times.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/commonfops.c | 14 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/commonfops.c
From: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/inode.c | 12 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/inode.c b/fs/unionfs/inode.c
index
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 13 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index a956b94..f8f65e1 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
@@ -410,15 +410,10
This is not strictly necessary, but it helps quiet a gcc-4.2 warning (a good
optimizer may optimize this initialization away).
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/inode.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1
To be used by rest of revalidation code, as well a callers who already
locked the child and parent dentry branch-configurations.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 87 +++---
fs/unionfs/union.h |3 ++
2 files
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/subr.c |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/subr.c b/fs/unionfs/subr.c
index 68a6280..1a40f63 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/subr.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/subr.c
@@ -247,8 +247,14 @@ void
From: Jan Blunck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Add path_put() functions for releasing a reference to the dentry and
vfsmount of a struct path in the right order
* Switch from path_release(nd) to path_put(>path)
* Rename dput_path() to path_put_conditional()
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <[EMAIL
Remove unnecessary calls to update branch m/ctimes, and use them only when
needed. Update branch vfsmounts after operations that could cause a copyup.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/commonfops.c |9 +++--
fs/unionfs/copyup.c |3 ++-
This reduces text size by about 6k.
Cc: Hugh Dickins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/fanout.h | 50 --
fs/unionfs/subr.c | 50 ++
Remove unionfs's versions thereof.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/main.c | 10 +-
fs/unionfs/super.c| 27 ++-
include/linux/namei.h | 12
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 55 --
1 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c b/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
index cd15243..afa2120 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/dentry.c
+++
When looking up a lower object in multiple branches, especially for
directories, ignore any existing entries whose type is different than the
type of the first found object (otherwise we'll be trying to, say, call
readdir on a non-dir inode).
Signed-off-by: Himanshu Kanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/inode.c |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/unionfs/inode.c b/fs/unionfs/inode.c
index 8d939dc..6377533 100644
--- a/fs/unionfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/unionfs/inode.c
@@ -820,7 +820,11 @@ static
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/concepts.txt | 13 +
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/concepts.txt
b/Documentation/filesystems/unionfs/concepts.txt
index
This prevents the lower super_block from being destroyed too early, when a
lower file system is being unmounted with MNT_FORCE or MNT_DETACH.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/main.c |3 +++
fs/unionfs/super.c | 14 ++
fs/unionfs/union.h |2 +-
3
The following is a series of patchsets related to Unionfs. The most
significant changes are several fixes to races/locking. This release also
supports newer APIs in 2.6.25-rc: not using iget/read_inode, using the
changed d_path, using the revised nameidata which embeds a struct path, and
using
For some reason I can't see and don't know how to debug, in 2.6.23 on my
server I don't get the vga console, but only get the dummy console.
I also noticed that the documentation is wrong and the Kconfig file is
confused; it's impossible to not have DUMMY_CONSOLE set, because at least
one of
I submitted this patch to the zen-sources Gentoo community and got
much praise and has promptly been included. This kind of thing have
very likely already been done in other patchsets, but I haven't seen
it around, so I've gone ahead and made one. The idea is that one can
enable -Os and various
Hi Paul,
> > iff?
> > other portions looks good :)
>
> "iff" -- "if and only if"
>
> It is from my days, a long long time ago, as a student of mathematical
> logic and set theory. I was too lazy to spell that one out. My bad.
not at all.
I did't know the abbreviation, sorry.
I think your
On 16-02-08 20:01, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Roel Kluin wrote:
Not entirely sure who to send this to
---
Replace !likely(x) by likely(!x)
Whoa...
Are you sure this is correct?
!likely(x) is equivalent to unlikely(!x)
Not with respect to its value I believe? likely(x) == !!(x), and
On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:54:53 +0100
Hans-Jürgen Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:39:46 -0800
> schrieb Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:59:32 +0100
> > Hans-Jürgen Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm playing around with a
On Sat 16 Feb 2008 10:33, Stephen Rothwell pondered:
> On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:33:50 +0800 "Bryan Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Could you please add Blackfin tree to the linux-next
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/blackfin-2.6.git
> > for-linus
>
> Added,
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:22:52 -0800 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 16 of February 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
> >>
> >>>
Yo,
Anyone seen a 2.6.24 system deadlock unable to printk because another
task is already holding the console lock?
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Saturday, 16 of February 2008, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 03:09:49AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:59:07 +0100 Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `amd_smp_thermal_interrupt':
> > >
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 16 of February 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
The ACPI wakeup in C patch (I think) won't build for me on x86_32
On Saturday, 16 of February 2008, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 00:25:22 -0800 Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.25-rc2/2.6.25-rc2-mm1/
>
> The ACPI wakeup in C patch (I think) won't build for me on x86_32
> (i.e., i386
On 2/16/2008 6:11 PM, Alan Stern wrote:
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide
consensus, possibly because different people have different workflow
Am Sat, 16 Feb 2008 14:39:46 -0800
schrieb Arjan van de Ven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 22:59:32 +0100
> Hans-Jürgen Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm playing around with a vanilla 2.6.25-rc1, adding patches to make
> > it work on an Asus EeePC. That one has the problem
[Try this again, except this time I'll force the attachment as inline text!]
Hi,
I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog enabled,
by using the
"acpi=noirq" option. (There does seem to be some unhappiness with bridge
symlinks in sysfs,
though.)
Cheers,
Chris
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Since commit aaa04c28cb9a1efd42541fdb7ab648231c2a2263 [blk_end_request:
>> changing ide-cd (take 4)] I cannot burn any CD/DVD any more, getting the
>> following error from wodim:
>>
>> Errno: 0 (Success), write_g1 scsi sendcmd: no
Hi,
I have managed to boot 2.6.24.1 on this machine, with the NMI watchdog enabled,
by using the
"acpi=noirq" option. (There does seem to be some unhappiness with bridge
symlinks in sysfs,
though.)
Cheers,
Chris
__
Sent from
On Saturday, 16 of February 2008, Marcin Slusarz wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 03:09:49AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Feb 2008 11:59:07 +0100 Marcin Slusarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > arch/x86/kernel/built-in.o: In function `amd_smp_thermal_interrupt':
> > >
Mel Gorman wrote:
> If you send me patches to apply on top of 2.6.25-rc1, I'll give them a spin
> on the machine in question. Reverting didn't work out very well as there are
> too many collisions with patches that were applied later. I eventually got
> the machine booting but it only succeeds
On Feb 17, 2008 12:18 AM, Guillaume Chazarain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2008 6:14 PM, Alessandro Suardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Feb 16 16:51:49 sandman kernel: BUG: rwlock recursion on CPU#0,
>
> Same thing here, bisected it to:
>
> commit
Andreas Schwab wrote:
Since commit aaa04c28cb9a1efd42541fdb7ab648231c2a2263 [blk_end_request:
changing ide-cd (take 4)] I cannot burn any CD/DVD any more, getting the
following error from wodim:
Errno: 0 (Success), write_g1 scsi sendcmd: no error
CDB: 2A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1F 00
status: 0x2
On Feb 16 2008 17:27, Rob Landley wrote:
>The build does this:
>> VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
>> --- - Fri Feb 15 23:38:41 2008
>> +++ arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds Fri Feb 15 23:38:41 2008
>> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
>> +VDSO32_PRELINK = 0x0;
>> +VDSO32_rt_sigreturn = 0x040c;
>>
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Quel Qun wrote:
> > Please also enable CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST=y, which should catch the place
> > where a list corruption happens.
>
> Thank you for the hand holding. I must admit I do not anything
> about kernel debugging.
>
> With or without nohz=off, the crashes are very
[ 58.097923] =
[ 58.098883] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[ 58.099603] 2.6.25-rc2-1avb #1
[ 58.100013] -
[ 58.100672] wpa_supplicant/2682 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 58.100672]
Add support for the SEGA Dreamcast controller as a joystick device. Based on
Yaegashi Takeshi's old 2.4 driver (never in mainline) with the addition of
functioning removal (and reinsertion) code.
Signed-off-by: Adrian McMenamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -ruN
Is anybody else having trouble compiling the kernel with binutils 2.17?
The build does this:
> VDSOSYM arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-syms.lds
> --- - Fri Feb 15 23:38:41 2008
> +++ arch/x86/vdso/vdso32-int80-syms.lds Fri Feb 15 23:38:41 2008
> @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
> +VDSO32_PRELINK = 0x0;
>
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:27:33PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Feb 16, 2008 12:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > People, who do cleanups - I'm not talking about running lindent here -
> > > read through the code
Allow the removal (and subsequent reinsertion) of the maple_keyb (maple
keyboard) driver by adding a working removal function.
Also tidy long lines.
Signed-off-by: Adrian McMenamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -ruN a/drivers/input/keyboard/maple_keyb.c
b/drivers/input/keyboard/maple_keyb.c
Remove an unused variable from the definition of struct maple_device
Signed-off-by: Adrian McMenamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -ruN a/include/linux/maple.h b/include/linux/maple.h
--- a/include/linux/maple.h 2008-02-16 20:52:09.0 +
+++ b/include/linux/maple.h 2008-02-16
On Feb 16, 2008 6:14 PM, Alessandro Suardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Feb 16 16:51:49 sandman kernel: BUG: rwlock recursion on CPU#0,
Same thing here, bisected it to:
commit 45b503548210fe6f23e92b856421c2a3f05fd034
Author: Laszlo Attila Toth balabit.hu>
Date: Tue Feb 12 22:42:09 2008 -0800
On Sat, 16 Feb 2008, Andrew Buehler wrote:
> > For another, getting two copies of a message is no big deal --
>
> I disagree.
Everyone has his own taste. Obviously there's no world-wide consensus,
possibly because different people have different workflow habits and so
are affected by duplicate
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 12:27:33PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Feb 16, 2008 12:18 PM, Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > People, who do cleanups - I'm not talking about running lindent here -
> > read through the code while they fix it up.
> >
> > Actually they find bugs
1 - 100 of 667 matches
Mail list logo
