This patch add and enable SAI device.
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-twr.dts | 6 ++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-twr.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-twr.dts
index 1a58678..e4106dd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-twr.dts
+++ b/
This patch add and enable SGTL5000 codec support, and also specified
the corresponding SAI node.
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li
Signed-off-by: Alison Wang ;
+ audio-codec = <&codec>;
+ audio-routing =
+ "MIC_IN", "Mic Jack",
+ "Mic
This adds Freescale SAI ASoC Audio support.
This implementation is only compatible with device tree definition.
Features:
o Supports playback/capture
o Supports 16/20/24 bit PCM
o Supports 8k - 96k sample rates
o Supports slave mode only.
Signed-off-by: Alison Wang
---
sound/soc/fsl/Kconfig |
This patch add the SAI's edma mux Tx and Rx support.
Signed-off-by: Jingchang Lu
Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610.dtsi
index 18e3a4c..391f180 100
Hello,
This patch series is mostly Freescale's SAI SoC Digital Audio Interface driver
implementation. And the implementation is only compatible with device tree
definition.
This patch series is based on linux-next and has been tested on Vybrid VF610
Tower board using device tree.
Changed in
On 10/23/2013 02:26 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> Hello Maintainers:
>
> Is this patch OK, please help check when you have time.
Mainline commit cbf8b8ca3ec "btrfs: change extent-same to copy entire argument
struct" removed the usage of __put_user_unaligned hence this patch is no longer
needed.
Thx,
-Vi
* Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patchset tries to enhance error message when perf failed to parse
> option argument. Currently it just shows entire usage and options
> which may fill two pages of screen. It's hard for me to say it's
> really helpful to users. ;-)
>
> With this patch ser
* Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:51 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >
> > ( If you think this is too dangerous for too little benefit then
> > I'll drop this separate tree and will send the original commits in
> > the merge window. )
>
> Ugh. I hate hate hate the timing, an
From: Namhyung Kim
The -s (--sort) option was processed after normal option parsing so
that it cannot call the parse_options_usage() automatically.
Currently it calls usage_with_options() which shows entire help
messages for event option. Fix it by showing just -s options.
$ perf report -s he
Hi,
This patchset tries to enhance error message when perf failed to parse
option argument. Currently it just shows entire usage and options
which may fill two pages of screen. It's hard for me to say it's
really helpful to users. ;-)
With this patch series, it changed to show only related opti
From: Namhyung Kim
If setup_browser() called earlier than option parsing, the actual
error message can be discarded during the terminal reset. So move it
after setup_sorting() checks whether the sort keys are valid.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim
---
tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 24
From: Namhyung Kim
The -s (--sort) option was processed after normal option parsing so
that it cannot call the parse_options_usage() automatically.
Currently it calls usage_with_options() which shows entire help
messages for event option. Fix it by showing just -s options.
$ perf top -s help
From: Namhyung Kim
Print related option help messages only when it failed to process
options. While at it, modify parse_options_usage() to skip usage part
so that it can be used for showing multiple option help messages
naturally like below:
$ perf stat -Bx, ls
-B option not supported with
From: Namhyung Kim
Current option parser outputs whole option help string when it failed
to parse an option. However this is not good for user if the command
has many option, she might feel hard which one is related easily.
Fix it by just showing the help message of the given option only.
Requ
Hi Rodrigo,
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:13:34 +, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 03:56:10PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> From: Namhyung Kim
>> /*
>> + * This is for detecting cycles or recursions so that they're
>> + * cumulated only one time to prevent entries more t
* David Ahern wrote:
> When building out of tree:
>
> make perf-tar-src-pkg
What's the canonical way to build a perf tarball? I didn't find any
makefile target for that.
> tar -xf perf-.tar -C /tmp
> cd /tmp/perf
> make -C tools/perf
>
> you get the warning message:
> make[1]: *** No rule t
We don't validate iph->ihl which may lead a dead loop if we meet a IPIP
skb whose iph->ihl is zero. Fix this by failing immediately when iph->ihl
is evil (less than 5).
This issue were introduced by commit ec5efe7946280d1e84603389a1030ccec0a767ae
(rps: support IPIP encapsulation).
Cc: Eric Dumaze
601 - 617 of 617 matches
Mail list logo