Hi Rob
These are v2 of of_graph patch-set
Now OF graph is mainly used by V4L2 SoC, and ALSA SoC is using
different style for SoC <-> Codec binding.
But, for example, HDMI case, V4L2 <-> ALSA need to collaborate,
and then ALSA SoC needs to adjust to OF graph.
OTOH, V4L2's "OF graph" position is
Hi Rob
These are v2 of of_graph patch-set
Now OF graph is mainly used by V4L2 SoC, and ALSA SoC is using
different style for SoC <-> Codec binding.
But, for example, HDMI case, V4L2 <-> ALSA need to collaborate,
and then ALSA SoC needs to adjust to OF graph.
OTOH, V4L2's "OF graph" position is
There are two generics functions phy_ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings,
so we can use them instead of defining the same code in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes
---
drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c | 26 ++
1 files changed, 2
There are two generics functions phy_ethtool_{get|set}_link_ksettings,
so we can use them instead of defining the same code in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes
---
drivers/net/ethernet/nxp/lpc_eth.c | 26 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
On 06/28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:26:53AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 06/28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > The clk notifier symbols are hidden by COMMON_CLK. However on some
> > > platforms HAVE_CLK might be set while COMMON_CLK not which leads to
> > >
On 06/28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:26:53AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 06/28, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > The clk notifier symbols are hidden by COMMON_CLK. However on some
> > > platforms HAVE_CLK might be set while COMMON_CLK not which leads to
> > >
Hi Steve,
On 06/28/2016 09:43 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:58:50 +0200
> Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> While running tools/testing/selftests test suite with KASAN I hit the
>> following use-after-free report:
>>
>>
>>
>>
Hi Steve,
On 06/28/2016 09:43 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:58:50 +0200
> Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> While running tools/testing/selftests test suite with KASAN I hit the
>> following use-after-free report:
>>
>>
>>
>>
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 18:07 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:49:15 -0700, Joe Perches said:
>
> >
> > Another potentially useful plugin, especially for embedded systems,
> > would be to compress any string literal marked with
> >
> >
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 18:07 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:49:15 -0700, Joe Perches said:
>
> >
> > Another potentially useful plugin, especially for embedded systems,
> > would be to compress any string literal marked with
> >
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:54:37PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On these PMICs the usb cable connection/disconnection is
> indicated by the usb-valid interrupt being high or low
> respectively. Let's make an extcon for that, so we can notify usb
> drivers of the cable state.
>
> Cc: Bjorn
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:54:37PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On these PMICs the usb cable connection/disconnection is
> indicated by the usb-valid interrupt being high or low
> respectively. Let's make an extcon for that, so we can notify usb
> drivers of the cable state.
>
> Cc: Bjorn
- Original Message -
> From: "Steven Rostedt"
> To: "Chunyu Hu"
> Cc: "Namhyung Kim" , "LKML"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 4:03:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] tracing: Make latency tracers
- Original Message -
> From: "Steven Rostedt"
> To: "Chunyu Hu"
> Cc: "Namhyung Kim" , "LKML"
> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 4:03:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] tracing: Make latency tracers fully support the
> set_graph_notrace
>
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 04:03:12 -0400 (EDT)
>
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:30:40 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Currently ftrace_graph_ent{,_entry} and ftrace_graph_ret{,_entry} struct
> can have padding bytes at the end due to alignment in 64-bit data type.
> As these data are recorded so frequently, those paddings waste
>
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:30:40 +0900
Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Currently ftrace_graph_ent{,_entry} and ftrace_graph_ret{,_entry} struct
> can have padding bytes at the end due to alignment in 64-bit data type.
> As these data are recorded so frequently, those paddings waste
> non-negligible space. As
trace_printk() is a very helpful tool for debugging the kernel. It adds
lots of tricks to optimize itself to prevent any "heisenbugs". That is,
having the addition of tracing cause the bug to change its timing and
disappear. One of this tricks is to use trace_bprintk() when possible,
which just
trace_printk() is a very helpful tool for debugging the kernel. It adds
lots of tricks to optimize itself to prevent any "heisenbugs". That is,
having the addition of tracing cause the bug to change its timing and
disappear. One of this tricks is to use trace_bprintk() when possible,
which just
Hello,
on NUMA enabled server equipped with 4 Intel E5-4610 v2 CPUs we
observe following performance degradation:
Runtime to run "lu.C.x" test from NAS Parallel Benchmarks after
booting the kernel:
real 1m57.834s
user 113m51.520s
Then we disable and re-enable one core:
echo 0 >
Hello,
on NUMA enabled server equipped with 4 Intel E5-4610 v2 CPUs we
observe following performance degradation:
Runtime to run "lu.C.x" test from NAS Parallel Benchmarks after
booting the kernel:
real 1m57.834s
user 113m51.520s
Then we disable and re-enable one core:
echo 0 >
Hi Sebastian,
Sorry about the extra dtsi file, I accidentally included it in the v5
patch set (wasn't in <= v4).
Thanks,
Chris
On 29/06/2016 4:16 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Chris Lapa wrote:
This patch set adds device tree support for
Hi Sebastian,
Sorry about the extra dtsi file, I accidentally included it in the v5
patch set (wasn't in <= v4).
Thanks,
Chris
On 29/06/2016 4:16 AM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
Hi Chris,
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 12:26:05PM +1000, Chris Lapa wrote:
This patch set adds device tree support for
On 06/28, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > So please forget unless you see another reason for this change.
> >
>
> But I might need to that anyway for procfs to read the the stack,
> right? Do you see another way to handle
On 06/28, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > So please forget unless you see another reason for this change.
> >
>
> But I might need to that anyway for procfs to read the the stack,
> right? Do you see another way to handle that case?
Well,
On 06/28, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Then try_get_task_stack(tsk) becomes
>
> void *try_get_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> void *stack = tsk->stack;
> if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(>stackref))
>stack = NULL;
> return stack;
> }
On 06/28, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Then try_get_task_stack(tsk) becomes
>
> void *try_get_task_stack(struct task_struct *tsk)
> {
> void *stack = tsk->stack;
> if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(>stackref))
>stack = NULL;
> return stack;
> }
2016-06-29 4:07 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini :
>
>
> On 28/06/2016 20:34, yunhong jiang wrote:
>> Paolo, thanks for reply.
>>
>> Which race window you are talking about? Is it the
>> kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer()? If yes, hope we will not forgot it once the
>> lapic timer is not
2016-06-29 4:07 GMT+08:00 Paolo Bonzini :
>
>
> On 28/06/2016 20:34, yunhong jiang wrote:
>> Paolo, thanks for reply.
>>
>> Which race window you are talking about? Is it the
>> kvm_lapic_switch_to_hv_timer()? If yes, hope we will not forgot it once the
>> lapic timer is not pinned anymore in
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:13:32AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/06/16 03:08, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:50:11PM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
> >>This patch adds a new prune_icache_sb function for the VFS slab
> >>shrinker to call. Trying to directly free
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:13:32AM +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/06/16 03:08, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 02:50:11PM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
> >>This patch adds a new prune_icache_sb function for the VFS slab
> >>shrinker to call. Trying to directly free
Add support for embedding position independent executables (PIE) in the
kernel. Those PIEs can then be loaded into memory allocated using genalloc.
For example, this allows running code from SRAM which is usually needed for
suspend/resume or to change the DDR timings. That code is usually written
Hi,
This series introduces Position Independent Executables (PIEs) for the
ARM architecture.
The main goal is to avoid having to write low level code in assembly as
this is currently the case for suspend/resume. Multiple platforms will
benefit from this infrastructure: at91, rockchip, sunxi,
Add support for embedding position independent executables (PIE) in the
kernel. Those PIEs can then be loaded into memory allocated using genalloc.
For example, this allows running code from SRAM which is usually needed for
suspend/resume or to change the DDR timings. That code is usually written
Hi,
This series introduces Position Independent Executables (PIEs) for the
ARM architecture.
The main goal is to avoid having to write low level code in assembly as
this is currently the case for suspend/resume. Multiple platforms will
benefit from this infrastructure: at91, rockchip, sunxi,
Using the PIE infrastructure allows to write the whole suspend/resume
functions in C instead of assembly.
The only remaining assembly instruction is wfi for armv5
It makes the code shorter and clearer.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
---
Using the PIE infrastructure allows to write the whole suspend/resume
functions in C instead of assembly.
The only remaining assembly instruction is wfi for armv5
It makes the code shorter and clearer.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 1 +
On Tue, Jun 28 2016, "PaX Team" wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2016 at 22:50, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
>> > +extern const char *kstrdup_const(const char *s, gfp_t gfp) __nocapture(1);
>>
>> OK, so this one is pretty dangerous, and probably wrong. If one does
>>
>> foo->bar =
On Tue, Jun 28 2016, "PaX Team" wrote:
> On 28 Jun 2016 at 22:50, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
>> > +extern const char *kstrdup_const(const char *s, gfp_t gfp) __nocapture(1);
>>
>> OK, so this one is pretty dangerous, and probably wrong. If one does
>>
>> foo->bar =
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Scott Branden
wrote:
>
>
> On 16-06-28 03:10 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
>>
>> From: Jon Mason
>>
>> Add the ability to reboot via a reset of the processor. This is
>> achieved via a write of 0x39 to the CRU Reset
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Scott Branden
wrote:
>
>
> On 16-06-28 03:10 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
>>
>> From: Jon Mason
>>
>> Add the ability to reboot via a reset of the processor. This is
>> achieved via a write of 0x39 to the CRU Reset Register. Unfortunately,
>> this only resets the core
Am Donnerstag, 23 Juni 2016, 10:25:06 schrieb Dave Young:
> On 06/22/16 at 08:30pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 22 Juni 2016, 18:20:47 schrieb Dave Young:
> > > The patch looks good, but could the subject be more specific?
> > >
> > > For example just like the first sentence of
Am Donnerstag, 23 Juni 2016, 10:25:06 schrieb Dave Young:
> On 06/22/16 at 08:30pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 22 Juni 2016, 18:20:47 schrieb Dave Young:
> > > The patch looks good, but could the subject be more specific?
> > >
> > > For example just like the first sentence of
Am Dienstag, 28 Juni 2016, 15:20:55 schrieb Dave Young:
> On 06/27/16 at 04:21pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > Please ignore previous reply, I mistakenly send a broken mail without
> > subject, sorry about it. Resend the reply here.
> >
> > On 06/27/16 at 01:37pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > > Am
Am Dienstag, 28 Juni 2016, 15:20:55 schrieb Dave Young:
> On 06/27/16 at 04:21pm, Dave Young wrote:
> > Please ignore previous reply, I mistakenly send a broken mail without
> > subject, sorry about it. Resend the reply here.
> >
> > On 06/27/16 at 01:37pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> > > Am
From: Jon Mason
Add the ability to reboot via a reset of the processor. This is
achieved via a write of 0x39 to the CRU Reset Register. Unfortunately,
this only resets the core and not the other IP blocks. So if possible,
other methods should be used on the individual
From: Jon Mason
Add the ability to reboot via a reset of the processor. This is
achieved via a write of 0x39 to the CRU Reset Register. Unfortunately,
this only resets the core and not the other IP blocks. So if possible,
other methods should be used on the individual boards.
Signed-off-by:
From: Jon Mason
Add the ability to reboot via a reset of the processor. This is
achieved via a write of 0x2f9 to the CRU Reset Register. Unfortunately,
this only resets the core and not the other IP blocks. So if possible,
other methods should be used on the individual
From: Jon Mason
Add the ability to reboot via a reset of the processor. This is
achieved via a write of 0x2f9 to the CRU Reset Register. Unfortunately,
this only resets the core and not the other IP blocks. So if possible,
other methods should be used on the individual boards.
Signed-off-by:
On 16-06-28 03:10 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
From: Jon Mason
Add the ability to reboot via a reset of the processor. This is
achieved via a write of 0x39 to the CRU Reset Register. Unfortunately,
this only resets the core and not the other IP blocks. So if possible,
other
On 16-06-28 03:10 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
From: Jon Mason
Add the ability to reboot via a reset of the processor. This is
achieved via a write of 0x39 to the CRU Reset Register. Unfortunately,
this only resets the core and not the other IP blocks. So if possible,
other methods should be used
The private structure contain a pointer to phydev, but the structure
net_device already contain such pointer. So we can remove the pointer
phydev in the private structure, and update the driver to use the
one contained in struct net_device.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes
---
The usb-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF).
Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate
platform-device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the
simply-mfd mechanism.
As the usb-phy is part of the kernel for some releases now, we keep
the old
The private structure contain a pointer to phydev, but the structure
net_device already contain such pointer. So we can remove the pointer
phydev in the private structure, and update the driver to use the
one contained in struct net_device.
Signed-off-by: Philippe Reynes
---
The usb-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF).
Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate
platform-device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the
simply-mfd mechanism.
As the usb-phy is part of the kernel for some releases now, we keep
the old
Splitting off the bcm5301x reset device tree changes from the patch
series (originally sent on
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395155.html
and resent on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/11/953) and adding a
Northstar Plus reset device tree change.
I'd like to get
Splitting off the bcm5301x reset device tree changes from the patch
series (originally sent on
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-December/395155.html
and resent on https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/11/953) and adding a
Northstar Plus reset device tree change.
I'd like to get
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:49:15 -0700, Joe Perches said:
> Another potentially useful plugin, especially for embedded systems,
> would be to compress any string literal marked with
>
> __attribute__((format(printf, string-index,)))
>
> and decompress the compressed format on the stack in
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 14:49:15 -0700, Joe Perches said:
> Another potentially useful plugin, especially for embedded systems,
> would be to compress any string literal marked with
>
> __attribute__((format(printf, string-index,)))
>
> and decompress the compressed format on the stack in
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:50:27 +0200
Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > But people don't usually run "make smatch" on debug kernels.
> > trace_printk() currently is not allowed to be used in the kernel. When
>
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 23:50:27 +0200
Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > But people don't usually run "make smatch" on debug kernels.
> > trace_printk() currently is not allowed to be used in the kernel. When
> > it is used, a big ugly banner is posted on
Quoting Neil Armstrong (2016-06-28 01:49:37)
> On 06/26/2016 09:28 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > + uphy->cal_sleep_clk = clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "cal_sleep");
> > + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> > + return PTR_ERR(clk);
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> In the bindings the cal_sleep is marked
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:27:29 +0200
Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > I probably should make a trace_printk() that doesn't default to the
> > binary print, to handle things like this.
> >
> > trace_printk_ptr()?
> >
> > Or even just see if I can find a way that detects this
On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 21:27:29 +0200
Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > I probably should make a trace_printk() that doesn't default to the
> > binary print, to handle things like this.
> >
> > trace_printk_ptr()?
> >
> > Or even just see if I can find a way that detects this in the fmt
> > string.
Quoting Neil Armstrong (2016-06-28 01:49:37)
> On 06/26/2016 09:28 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > + uphy->cal_sleep_clk = clk = devm_clk_get(>dev, "cal_sleep");
> > + if (IS_ERR(clk))
> > + return PTR_ERR(clk);
>
> Hi Stephen,
>
> In the bindings the cal_sleep is marked
Quoting Roger Quadros (2016-06-28 02:13:57)
> On 28/06/16 11:47, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I must have confused you. There are two modules in the PMIC that
> > are doing detection here. The charger module is detecting the VBUS event
> > and this misc module is detecting the ID pin. I'm not
Quoting Roger Quadros (2016-06-28 02:13:57)
> On 28/06/16 11:47, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Sorry I must have confused you. There are two modules in the PMIC that
> > are doing detection here. The charger module is detecting the VBUS event
> > and this misc module is detecting the ID pin. I'm not
With the inclusion of atomic FETCH-OP variants, many places in the
kernel can make use of atomic_fetch_$op() to avoid the callers that
need to compute the value/state _before_ the operation. Peter laid
out the machinery but we are still missing the simpler dec,inc calls
(which future patches will
With the inclusion of atomic FETCH-OP variants, many places in the
kernel can make use of atomic_fetch_$op() to avoid the callers that
need to compute the value/state _before_ the operation. Peter laid
out the machinery but we are still missing the simpler dec,inc calls
(which future patches will
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 13:34 +0200, Emese Revfy wrote:
> I would like to introduce the initify gcc plugin. The kernel already has
> a mechanism to free up code and data memory that is only used during kernel
> or module initialization.
> This plugin will teach the compiler to find more such code
On Tue, 2016-06-28 at 13:34 +0200, Emese Revfy wrote:
> I would like to introduce the initify gcc plugin. The kernel already has
> a mechanism to free up code and data memory that is only used during kernel
> or module initialization.
> This plugin will teach the compiler to find more such code
On Tue, Jun 28 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> But people don't usually run "make smatch" on debug kernels.
> trace_printk() currently is not allowed to be used in the kernel. When
> it is used, a big ugly banner is posted on boot up saying that the
> kernel is in "debug mode"
On Tue, Jun 28 2016, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> But people don't usually run "make smatch" on debug kernels.
> trace_printk() currently is not allowed to be used in the kernel. When
> it is used, a big ugly banner is posted on boot up saying that the
> kernel is in "debug mode" and is "unstable"
On 28 Jun 2016 at 22:50, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > +extern const char *kstrdup_const(const char *s, gfp_t gfp) __nocapture(1);
>
> OK, so this one is pretty dangerous, and probably wrong. If one does
>
> foo->bar = kstrdup_const(a-macro-that-might-be-a-string-literal)
>
> in an .init
On 28 Jun 2016 at 22:50, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > +extern const char *kstrdup_const(const char *s, gfp_t gfp) __nocapture(1);
>
> OK, so this one is pretty dangerous, and probably wrong. If one does
>
> foo->bar = kstrdup_const(a-macro-that-might-be-a-string-literal)
>
> in an .init
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> If so, that seems considerably more complicated than just adding a reference
>> count.
>
> Fair enough.
Ahh, and if you put
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
>> If so, that seems considerably more complicated than just adding a reference
>> count.
>
> Fair enough.
Ahh, and if you put the reference count just in the task_struct (next
to
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:34:04AM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote:
> The documentation currently uses the non-standard vendor prefix stm
> and st-micro for STMicroelectronics. The drivers do not specify the
> vendor prefixes since the I2C Core strips them away from the DT
Note that people are working
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:34:04AM -0700, Stefan Agner wrote:
> The documentation currently uses the non-standard vendor prefix stm
> and st-micro for STMicroelectronics. The drivers do not specify the
> vendor prefixes since the I2C Core strips them away from the DT
Note that people are working
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Or are you
> suggesting that we actually make a list somewhere of stacks that are
> nominally unused but are still around for RCU's benefit and then
> scavenge from that lest when we need a new stack?
Yes. We'd
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> Or are you
> suggesting that we actually make a list somewhere of stacks that are
> nominally unused but are still around for RCU's benefit and then
> scavenge from that lest when we need a new stack?
Yes. We'd have to make our own
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:02:59PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Of course I could add "my-shiny-new-board" compatible to the device
> tree and spidev. Then when I build my-shiny-new-board2 and it happens
> to also use userspace driver I will not bother to update the
> compatible nor will
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:02:59PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> Of course I could add "my-shiny-new-board" compatible to the device
> tree and spidev. Then when I build my-shiny-new-board2 and it happens
> to also use userspace driver I will not bother to update the
> compatible nor will
On Monday 27 June 2016 04:48 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi,
[auto build test WARNING on v4.7-rc5]
[also build test WARNING on next-20160624]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Monday 27 June 2016 04:48 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
Hi,
[auto build test WARNING on v4.7-rc5]
[also build test WARNING on next-20160624]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Jessica Yu writes:
> Hi Rusty,
Hi Jessica,
> I noticed that the module loader keeps .altinstructions and
> .altinstr_replacement (which are normally freed after kernel init) in
> core memory after module init, so these sections are never freed for
> modules.
>
> In fact, the
Jessica Yu writes:
> Hi Rusty,
Hi Jessica,
> I noticed that the module loader keeps .altinstructions and
> .altinstr_replacement (which are normally freed after kernel init) in
> core memory after module init, so these sections are never freed for
> modules.
>
> In fact, the module loader seems
Add regulators to the Tegra210 Smaug DTS file including
support for the max77620 PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein
---
v3:
- Fixed up ramp delays
- s/maxim,enable-sleep/maxim,device-state-on-disabled-event/
- remove GPIO 3 from pp3300
v2:
- Updated reg properties to
Add regulators to the Tegra210 Smaug DTS file including
support for the max77620 PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Rhyland Klein
---
v3:
- Fixed up ramp delays
- s/maxim,enable-sleep/maxim,device-state-on-disabled-event/
- remove GPIO 3 from pp3300
v2:
- Updated reg properties to match current binding
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:45:56PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that we have a proper binding for Ethernet switches hanging off
> different buses, and a driver for the BCM53125 switch, add its Device
> Tree as a child MDIO node, at MDIO address 30 (Broadcom pseudo-PHY
> address) and
On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 05:45:56PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> Now that we have a proper binding for Ethernet switches hanging off
> different buses, and a driver for the BCM53125 switch, add its Device
> Tree as a child MDIO node, at MDIO address 30 (Broadcom pseudo-PHY
> address) and
On Tue 28 Jun 14:05 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 1:58:26 PM CEST Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >
> > +config QCOM_WCNSS_PIL
> > + tristate "Qualcomm WCNSS Peripheral Image Loader"
> > + depends on OF && ARCH_QCOM
> > + select QCOM_MDT_LOADER
> > +
On 28/06/16 00:18, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:38 AM, wrote:
>> On 2016-06-27 08:23, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>
>>> If you have affected hardware please test. Thank you.
>>
>>
>> For what it's worth, I've been using libata
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> But I might need to that anyway for procfs to read the the stack,
>> right? Do you see another way to handle that case?
>
>
On Tue 28 Jun 14:05 PDT 2016, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 28, 2016 1:58:26 PM CEST Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >
> > +config QCOM_WCNSS_PIL
> > + tristate "Qualcomm WCNSS Peripheral Image Loader"
> > + depends on OF && ARCH_QCOM
> > + select QCOM_MDT_LOADER
> > +
On 28/06/16 00:18, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:38 AM, wrote:
>> On 2016-06-27 08:23, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>>
>>> If you have affected hardware please test. Thank you.
>>
>>
>> For what it's worth, I've been using libata on sparc64 for roughly two
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 2:14 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> But I might need to that anyway for procfs to read the the stack,
>> right? Do you see another way to handle that case?
>
> I think the other way to handle the kernel stack
On Tue, Jun 28 2016, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> When using trace_printk for cpumask I've got wrong results,
> some bitmaps were completely different from what I expected.
>
> Currently you get wrong results when using trace_printk
> on local cpumask, like:
>
> void test(void)
> {
>
On Tue, Jun 28 2016, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> When using trace_printk for cpumask I've got wrong results,
> some bitmaps were completely different from what I expected.
>
> Currently you get wrong results when using trace_printk
> on local cpumask, like:
>
> void test(void)
> {
> struct
Quoting Rob Herring (2016-06-28 13:55:18)
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 01:12:52PM +0900, Jongsung Kim wrote:
> > There is no way to set additional flags for a DT-initialized fixed-
> > factor-clock, and it can be problematic i.e., when the clock rate
> > needs to be changed. [1][2]
> >
> > This
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 04:40:07PM -0500, Han Xu wrote:
>> add the clocks and clock-names in DT property, gpmi-io clock is
>> mandatory for all platforms, but some platforms, such as i.MX6Q may
>> need more extra clocks for
201 - 300 of 2104 matches
Mail list logo