Simple cleanup to use the new APIs.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
drivers/block/cciss.c | 54 ++-
drivers/block/cciss.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss.c
Simple cleanup to use the new APIs.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
drivers/block/cciss.c | 54 ++-
drivers/block/cciss.h | 6 ++
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/block/cciss.c
Again, I need to see a proper "[PATCH net-next v2 0/3]" header posting
explaining this series.
Thanks.
Again, I need to see a proper "[PATCH net-next v2 0/3]" header posting
explaining this series.
Thanks.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:13:28PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With CONFIG_SERIO=m, we get a build error for the rmi4-f03 driver,
> added in linux-4.10:
>
> warning: (HID_RMI) selects RMI4_F03 which has unmet direct dependencies (!UML
> && INPUT && RMI4_CORE && (SERIO=y || RMI4_CORE=SERIO))
>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 02:13:28PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With CONFIG_SERIO=m, we get a build error for the rmi4-f03 driver,
> added in linux-4.10:
>
> warning: (HID_RMI) selects RMI4_F03 which has unmet direct dependencies (!UML
> && INPUT && RMI4_CORE && (SERIO=y || RMI4_CORE=SERIO))
>
I don't see a proper "[PATCH v2 0/5] ..." posting, and I can't tell what
tree you are targetting this series at.
I don't see a proper "[PATCH v2 0/5] ..." posting, and I can't tell what
tree you are targetting this series at.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:37 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 01:19 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 11:19:32AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
>> > This allows any subtree to be uid/gid shifted and bound elsewhere.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:37 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 01:19 -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 11:19:32AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
>> > This allows any subtree to be uid/gid shifted and bound elsewhere.
>> > It does this by operating simlarly
From: Stefan Brüns
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:20:33 +0100
>
> /* Validate the protocol - only support UMTS for now */
> - if (lsi->protocol != SIERRA_NET_PROTOCOL_UMTS) {
> + if (lsi->protocol == SIERRA_NET_PROTOCOL_UMTS) {
...
> + } else if
From: Stefan Brüns
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 21:20:33 +0100
>
> /* Validate the protocol - only support UMTS for now */
> - if (lsi->protocol != SIERRA_NET_PROTOCOL_UMTS) {
> + if (lsi->protocol == SIERRA_NET_PROTOCOL_UMTS) {
...
> + } else if (lsi->protocol ==
From: Siarhei Volkau
This patch not introduce new features, just prepare code for
adding sun6i PWM driver in next commit.
A31 SoC have a different set of prescalers than others ASoCs, but
its position and count in the control register are the same.
This patch make the table
From: Siarhei Volkau
This patch not introduce new features, just prepare code for
adding sun6i PWM driver in next commit.
A31 SoC have a different set of prescalers than others ASoCs, but
its position and count in the control register are the same.
This patch make the table of prescalers
From: Siarhei Volkau
This patch introduce the sun6i PWM driver itself:
- sun6i register operations,
- sun6i prescaler table,
- DT bindings for A31 SoC,
- documentation update.
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Volkau
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-sun4i.txt
From: Siarhei Volkau
This patch introduce the sun6i PWM driver itself:
- sun6i register operations,
- sun6i prescaler table,
- DT bindings for A31 SoC,
- documentation update.
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Volkau
---
.../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-sun4i.txt | 3 +-
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:30:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:03:01PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > For x86 it's a little painful due to '%' in the register names, but it looks
> > possible. The below appears to do the mangling correctly (then screams due
> > to
>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:30:36PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:03:01PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > For x86 it's a little painful due to '%' in the register names, but it looks
> > possible. The below appears to do the mangling correctly (then screams due
> > to
>
From: Siarhei Volkau
First of all im sorry for accidentally sent old patch,
please ignore them.
This is the second version of the sun6i PWM patchset.
- added missing documentation changes
- dts changes in separate patch
Thanks to Julian Calaby for tips.
From: Siarhei Volkau
First of all im sorry for accidentally sent old patch,
please ignore them.
This is the second version of the sun6i PWM patchset.
- added missing documentation changes
- dts changes in separate patch
Thanks to Julian Calaby for tips.
--
This
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:14:56AM -0600, Zi Yan wrote:
>
>
> Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:11:05AM -0600, Zi Yan wrote:
> This causes memory leak or kernel crashing, if VM_BUG_ON() is enabled.
> >>> The problem is that numabalancing calls change_huge_pmd() under
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 11:14:56AM -0600, Zi Yan wrote:
>
>
> Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:11:05AM -0600, Zi Yan wrote:
> This causes memory leak or kernel crashing, if VM_BUG_ON() is enabled.
> >>> The problem is that numabalancing calls change_huge_pmd() under
From: Siarhei Volkau
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Volkau
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
index ee1eb6d..fcba129 100644
---
From: Siarhei Volkau
Signed-off-by: Siarhei Volkau
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
index ee1eb6d..fcba129 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/sun6i-a31.dtsi
+++
On 01/24/2017 11:23 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/01/17 14:47, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 01/23/2017 01:59 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 01/23/2017 05:09 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
Handling of multiple concurrent Xenstore accesses through xenbus driver
either from the kernel or
On 01/24/2017 11:23 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24/01/17 14:47, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 01/23/2017 01:59 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>>> On 01/23/2017 05:09 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
Handling of multiple concurrent Xenstore accesses through xenbus driver
either from the kernel or
On 02/06/2017 12:00 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> PVHv2 support for unprivileged guests.
>
> Changes in v3:
> * See patches 4 and 5
>
Applied to for-linus-4.11
-boris
On 02/06/2017 12:00 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> PVHv2 support for unprivileged guests.
>
> Changes in v3:
> * See patches 4 and 5
>
Applied to for-linus-4.11
-boris
Reported-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
Fixes: 9aed02feae57bf7 ("ARC: [arcompact] handle unaligned access delay slot")
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-snps-...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
---
Reported-by: Jo-Philipp Wich
Fixes: 9aed02feae57bf7 ("ARC: [arcompact] handle unaligned access delay slot")
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-snps-...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta
---
arch/arc/kernel/unaligned.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1
On 07.02.2017 20:22, Tobias Guggenmos wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. Februar 2017, 11:30:30 CET schrieb Larry Finger:
>> On 02/05/2017 05:34 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> BTW, I have an issue with the 8192cu: WiFi stops to work after a while
>>> (3-15 minutes) if I enable WMM QoS on the AP. There is
On 07.02.2017 20:22, Tobias Guggenmos wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 5. Februar 2017, 11:30:30 CET schrieb Larry Finger:
>> On 02/05/2017 05:34 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>>> BTW, I have an issue with the 8192cu: WiFi stops to work after a while
>>> (3-15 minutes) if I enable WMM QoS on the AP. There is
2016-12-19 17:17+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> Pending interrupts might be in the PI descriptor when the
> LAPIC is restored from an external state; we do not want
> them to be injected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář
>
2016-12-19 17:17+0100, Paolo Bonzini:
> Pending interrupts might be in the PI descriptor when the
> LAPIC is restored from an external state; we do not want
> them to be injected.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
Reviewed-by: Radim Krčmář
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 3 +--
>
From: Siarhei Volkau
A31 SoC have a different map of PWM registers than others Allwinner
SoCs, so the operation of access to the registers reworked for all
existing in driver SoCs.
Tested on Onda V972 (a31) and Marsboard A20, but only PWM
channel 0, because other channels
From: Siarhei Volkau
A31 SoC have a different map of PWM registers than others Allwinner
SoCs, so the operation of access to the registers reworked for all
existing in driver SoCs.
Tested on Onda V972 (a31) and Marsboard A20, but only PWM
channel 0, because other channels pins are not routed or
Hi,
this patch is meant to show that, if the body of the hook exit_icq is executed
from inside that hook, and not as deferred work, then a circular deadlock
occurs.
It happens if, on a CPU
- the body of icq_exit takes the scheduler lock,
- it does so from inside the exit_icq hook, which is
Hi,
this patch is meant to show that, if the body of the hook exit_icq is executed
from inside that hook, and not as deferred work, then a circular deadlock
occurs.
It happens if, on a CPU
- the body of icq_exit takes the scheduler lock,
- it does so from inside the exit_icq hook, which is
Hi Ramiro,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:38:28AM +, Ramiro Oliveira wrote:
...
> >> + ret = ov5647_write_array(sd, ov5647_640x480,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(ov5647_640x480));
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + dev_err(>dev, "write sensor_default_regs error\n");
> >>
Hi Ramiro,
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 11:38:28AM +, Ramiro Oliveira wrote:
...
> >> + ret = ov5647_write_array(sd, ov5647_640x480,
> >> + ARRAY_SIZE(ov5647_640x480));
> >> + if (ret < 0) {
> >> + dev_err(>dev, "write sensor_default_regs error\n");
> >>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:03:01PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> For x86 it's a little painful due to '%' in the register names, but it looks
> possible. The below appears to do the mangling correctly (then screams due to
> the mangled result being nonexistent).
> asm(
> " .macro
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:03:01PM +, Mark Rutland wrote:
> For x86 it's a little painful due to '%' in the register names, but it looks
> possible. The below appears to do the mangling correctly (then screams due to
> the mangled result being nonexistent).
> asm(
> " .macro
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> You've misunderstood the purpose of memfill. memfill allows the caller
> to specify a pattern which is not a single byte in size, eg memfill(addr,
> 0x12345678, 64) would result in 0x12345678 being reproduced 16 times.
> memset(addr, 0x12345678, 64)
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> You've misunderstood the purpose of memfill. memfill allows the caller
> to specify a pattern which is not a single byte in size, eg memfill(addr,
> 0x12345678, 64) would result in 0x12345678 being reproduced 16 times.
> memset(addr, 0x12345678, 64) would result in 0x78
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:53:56AM -0600, Christopher Bostic wrote:
> From: Chris Bostic
>
> Define the device tree bindings for the GPIO master type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Bostic
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.txt| 71
>
> Il giorno 02 feb 2017, alle ore 22:32, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
>
> On 02/02/2017 02:15 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>
>>> Il giorno 02 feb 2017, alle ore 16:30, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On 02/02/2017 02:19 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
The scheme is clear.
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:53:56AM -0600, Christopher Bostic wrote:
> From: Chris Bostic
>
> Define the device tree bindings for the GPIO master type.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Bostic
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi-master-gpio.txt| 71
> ++
> 1 file changed,
> Il giorno 02 feb 2017, alle ore 22:32, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
>
> On 02/02/2017 02:15 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>
>>> Il giorno 02 feb 2017, alle ore 16:30, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
>>>
>>> On 02/02/2017 02:19 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
The scheme is clear. One comment, in case it could
On 06/02/17 22:21, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
Hello Punit,
On 2/3/2017 9:17 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
Tyler Baicar writes:
From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang"
Add VM_FAULT_HWPOISON[_LARGE] handling to the arm64 page fault
handler. Handling of
On 06/02/17 22:21, Baicar, Tyler wrote:
Hello Punit,
On 2/3/2017 9:17 AM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
Tyler Baicar writes:
From: "Jonathan (Zhixiong) Zhang"
Add VM_FAULT_HWPOISON[_LARGE] handling to the arm64 page fault
handler. Handling of VM_FAULT_HWPOISON[_LARGE] is very similar
to
Prep change to make it possible to protect this field with a
scheduler lock.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
block/bfq-mq-iosched.c | 28 ++--
block/bfq-mq.h | 30 --
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28
Prep change to make it possible to protect this field with a
scheduler lock.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
block/bfq-mq-iosched.c | 28 ++--
block/bfq-mq.h | 30 --
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi,
I have finally pushed here [1] the current WIP branch of bfq for
blk-mq, which I have tentatively named bfq-mq.
This branch *IS NOT* meant for merging into mainline and contain code
that mau easily violate code style, and not only, in many
places. Commits implement the following main steps:
Hi,
I have finally pushed here [1] the current WIP branch of bfq for
blk-mq, which I have tentatively named bfq-mq.
This branch *IS NOT* meant for merging into mainline and contain code
that mau easily violate code style, and not only, in many
places. Commits implement the following main steps:
The version of bfq-ioc.c for bfq-iosched.c is not correct any more for
bfq-mq, because, in bfq-mq, the request queue lock is not being held
when bfq_bic_lookup is invoked. That function must then take that look
on its own. This commit removes the inclusion of bfq-ioc.c, copies the
content of
The version of bfq-ioc.c for bfq-iosched.c is not correct any more for
bfq-mq, because, in bfq-mq, the request queue lock is not being held
when bfq_bic_lookup is invoked. That function must then take that look
on its own. This commit removes the inclusion of bfq-ioc.c, copies the
content of
As for modifications of the operation, the major changes are the introduction
of a scheduler lock, and the moving to deferred work of the body of the hook
exit_icq. The latter change has been made to avoid deadlocks caused by the
combination of the following facts: 1) such a body takes the
As for modifications of the operation, the major changes are the introduction
of a scheduler lock, and the moving to deferred work of the body of the hook
exit_icq. The latter change has been made to avoid deadlocks caused by the
combination of the following facts: 1) such a body takes the
bio is used in bfq-mq's get_rq_priv, to get the request group. We could
pass directly the group here, but I thought that passing the bio was
more general, giving the possibility to get other pieces of information
if needed.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
bio is used in bfq-mq's get_rq_priv, to get the request group. We could
pass directly the group here, but I thought that passing the bio was
more general, giving the possibility to get other pieces of information
if needed.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente
---
block/blk-mq-sched.c | 8 +---
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:53:55AM -0600, Christopher Bostic wrote:
> From: Chris Bostic
>
> Add details on the basic functions of the FSI serial bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Bostic
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt | 54
>
On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 10:53:55AM -0600, Christopher Bostic wrote:
> From: Chris Bostic
>
> Add details on the basic functions of the FSI serial bus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Bostic
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fsi/fsi.txt | 54
> +++
> 1 file changed,
On 19/12/2016 17:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> These are the fixed patches that now pass vmx.flat. The issue in
> "KVM: x86: do not scan IRR twice on APICv vmentry" was that,
> in v1 of the patches, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt did not scan IRR
> at all if it found PIR.ON=0. This is now fixed in patches
On 19/12/2016 17:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> These are the fixed patches that now pass vmx.flat. The issue in
> "KVM: x86: do not scan IRR twice on APICv vmentry" was that,
> in v1 of the patches, kvm_cpu_get_interrupt did not scan IRR
> at all if it found PIR.ON=0. This is now fixed in patches
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:40:04AM +, David Howells wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> > [adding linux-arch to see if anyone there wants to do an optimised
> > version of memfill for their CPU]
>
> For mn10300, this is superfluous since the memset() implementation will
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:40:04AM +, David Howells wrote:
> Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> > [adding linux-arch to see if anyone there wants to do an optimised
> > version of memfill for their CPU]
>
> For mn10300, this is superfluous since the memset() implementation will do
> optimised
Am Sonntag, 5. Februar 2017, 11:30:30 CET schrieb Larry Finger:
> On 02/05/2017 05:34 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > BTW, I have an issue with the 8192cu: WiFi stops to work after a while
> > (3-15 minutes) if I enable WMM QoS on the AP. There is nothing suspicious
> > in KMSG, connection is up
Am Sonntag, 5. Februar 2017, 11:30:30 CET schrieb Larry Finger:
> On 02/05/2017 05:34 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > BTW, I have an issue with the 8192cu: WiFi stops to work after a while
> > (3-15 minutes) if I enable WMM QoS on the AP. There is nothing suspicious
> > in KMSG, connection is up
On 27/01/2017 19:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> As in the SVM patch, the guest physical address is passed by
> VMX to x86_emulate_instruction already, so mark the GPA as available
> in vcpu->arch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 3 +++
> 1 file
On 27/01/2017 19:34, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> As in the SVM patch, the guest physical address is passed by
> VMX to x86_emulate_instruction already, so mark the GPA as available
> in vcpu->arch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
On Mon, Feb 06 2017 at 9:49pm -0500,
Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:47:24PM -0900, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:53:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Still there on v4.9, 36 threads on nokia n900 cellphone.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Feb 06 2017 at 9:49pm -0500,
Kent Overstreet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:47:24PM -0900, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 01:53:09PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Still there on v4.9, 36 threads on nokia n900 cellphone.
> > >
> > > So.. what needs to be done
On 2/7/2017 5:09 AM, Peter Grandi wrote:
> This message is "for the public record" so if in the future
> someone tries to patent something like the below mechanism this
> message can be cited as prior art.
>
> The mechanism would be to add to each process, along with its
> "effective" id
On 2/7/2017 5:09 AM, Peter Grandi wrote:
> This message is "for the public record" so if in the future
> someone tries to patent something like the below mechanism this
> message can be cited as prior art.
>
> The mechanism would be to add to each process, along with its
> "effective" id
Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:11:05AM -0600, Zi Yan wrote:
This causes memory leak or kernel crashing, if VM_BUG_ON() is enabled.
>>> The problem is that numabalancing calls change_huge_pmd() under
>>> down_read(mmap_sem), not down_write(mmap_sem) as the rest of
Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:11:05AM -0600, Zi Yan wrote:
This causes memory leak or kernel crashing, if VM_BUG_ON() is enabled.
>>> The problem is that numabalancing calls change_huge_pmd() under
>>> down_read(mmap_sem), not down_write(mmap_sem) as the rest of
Hi Vlastimil,
[auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.10-rc7 next-20170207]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vlastimil-Babka/mm-slab-rename
Hi Vlastimil,
[auto build test WARNING on mmotm/master]
[also build test WARNING on v4.10-rc7 next-20170207]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vlastimil-Babka/mm-slab-rename
On 07.02.2017 19:45, Tobias Guggenmos wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2017, 09:45:31 CET schrieb Larry Finger:
>> On 02/06/2017 04:29 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 12:41 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
On 02/04/2017 10:58 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Seems the problem is
On 07.02.2017 19:45, Tobias Guggenmos wrote:
> Am Montag, 6. Februar 2017, 09:45:31 CET schrieb Larry Finger:
>> On 02/06/2017 04:29 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 12:41 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
On 02/04/2017 10:58 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Seems the problem is
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:02:51AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > (...)
> > > > We
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 09:02:51AM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Hi James,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > (...)
> > > > We
Hello, Andrew.
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:22:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > - if (is_root_cache(s)) {
> > + if (is_root_cache(s) && memcg_sysfs_enabled) {
>
> This could be turned on and off after bootup but I guess the result
> could be pretty confusing.
>
>
Hello, Andrew.
On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 04:22:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
> > - if (is_root_cache(s)) {
> > + if (is_root_cache(s) && memcg_sysfs_enabled) {
>
> This could be turned on and off after bootup but I guess the result
> could be pretty confusing.
>
>
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 03:51:47PM +, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun
>
> Add the missing platform_driver_unregister() and remove the duplicate
> platform_device_unregister(force_pdev) in the error handling case.
>
> Fixes: 00194826e6be ("tpm_tis: Clean up the
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 03:51:47PM +, Wei Yongjun wrote:
> From: Wei Yongjun
>
> Add the missing platform_driver_unregister() and remove the duplicate
> platform_device_unregister(force_pdev) in the error handling case.
>
> Fixes: 00194826e6be ("tpm_tis: Clean up the force=1 module
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> (...)
> > > We don't have the referenced commit above in 3.10 so we should be
> > > safe.
On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 07:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2017 at 10:38:48PM -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-06 at 23:26 +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> (...)
> > > We don't have the referenced commit above in 3.10 so we should be
> > > safe.
Hello,
Sorry about the delay.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:34:59PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index c3358d4f7932..b6411816787a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2343,7 +2343,16 @@ void drain_local_pages(struct zone
Hello,
Sorry about the delay.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 04:34:59PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index c3358d4f7932..b6411816787a 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -2343,7 +2343,16 @@ void drain_local_pages(struct zone
Thankfully there is an archive of older Arch ARM packages which should
reduce the amount amount of bisection / compiling I may need to do and
they have packages for most stable kernels between 4.9.0 and 4.9.8
http://tardis.tiny-vps.com/aarm/packages/l/linux-armv7/
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:45 PM,
Thankfully there is an archive of older Arch ARM packages which should
reduce the amount amount of bisection / compiling I may need to do and
they have packages for most stable kernels between 4.9.0 and 4.9.8
http://tardis.tiny-vps.com/aarm/packages/l/linux-armv7/
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:45 PM,
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> From: Tan Jui Nee
>
> Assign iTCO_version which effectively enables watchdog device on
> Intel Apollo Lake PCH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tan Jui Nee
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> From: Tan Jui Nee
>
> Assign iTCO_version which effectively enables watchdog device on
> Intel Apollo Lake PCH.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tan Jui Nee
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko
> ---
> drivers/mfd/lpc_ich.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
In create_perf_stat_counter(), we open events on a potentially per-cpu
or per-thread basis, depending on if we have a target CPU list. The
number of FDs we allocate depends on whether we're in per-thread or
per-cpu mode.
Subsequently, we close events using perf_evlist__close(), which assumes
that
In create_perf_stat_counter(), we open events on a potentially per-cpu
or per-thread basis, depending on if we have a target CPU list. The
number of FDs we allocate depends on whether we're in per-thread or
per-cpu mode.
Subsequently, we close events using perf_evlist__close(), which assumes
that
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> First of all, remove stalled references to datasheets. If someone knows
> the document numbers, it would be added later.
>
> Second, remove FSF snail address since it's subject to change. Actual
> information can be found on FSF site on the internet.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2017, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> First of all, remove stalled references to datasheets. If someone knows
> the document numbers, it would be added later.
>
> Second, remove FSF snail address since it's subject to change. Actual
> information can be found on FSF site on the internet.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:30:54PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Brian Foster wrote:
> > > The workload is to write to a single file on XFS from 10 processes
> > > demonstrated at
> > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201512052133.iae00551.lsoqftmffvo...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
> > > using "while :; do
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:30:54PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Brian Foster wrote:
> > > The workload is to write to a single file on XFS from 10 processes
> > > demonstrated at
> > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201512052133.iae00551.lsoqftmffvo...@i-love.sakura.ne.jp
> > > using "while :; do
801 - 900 of 1886 matches
Mail list logo