On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:40:23PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Will Deacon writes:
>
> > @@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ int intel_bts_interrupt(void)
> > return handled;
> >
> > perf_aux_output_end(>handle, local_xchg(>data_size, 0),
> > -
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:40:23PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Will Deacon writes:
>
> > @@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ int intel_bts_interrupt(void)
> > return handled;
> >
> > perf_aux_output_end(>handle, local_xchg(>data_size, 0),
> > - !!local_xchg(>lost,
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:18:20PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> If the kernel is configured to be built with debug symbols, or
> has bug tables, comparing files may not work if line numbers
> change. This makes comparing object files with these options
> harder to do. Let's strip out
Hi Stephen,
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:18:20PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> If the kernel is configured to be built with debug symbols, or
> has bug tables, comparing files may not work if line numbers
> change. This makes comparing object files with these options
> harder to do. Let's strip out
Hello,
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:30:03 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> I have just tested it and as I feared, with HWBM enabled, a simple iperf
> just doesn't work.
And that's expected: the whole point of HWBM is that the buffer into
which a RX packet is placed is allocated by the HW, and its
Hello,
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 14:30:03 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> I have just tested it and as I feared, with HWBM enabled, a simple iperf
> just doesn't work.
And that's expected: the whole point of HWBM is that the buffer into
which a RX packet is placed is allocated by the HW, and its
What's the verdict? We've got [1] which is about to become another
(driver) implementation - better to change before that merges than
after I guess.
-Brian
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/13/304
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:56:55AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 15 February 2017 at 11:39,
What's the verdict? We've got [1] which is about to become another
(driver) implementation - better to change before that merges than
after I guess.
-Brian
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/2/13/304
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:56:55AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi,
On 15 February 2017 at 11:39,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:35:04PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:27:16PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > Use devm_gpiochip_add_data to simplify the error path in
> > samsung_gpiolib_register. Additionally this would also fix a leak if
> > the pinctrl driver was
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:35:04PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:27:16PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> > Use devm_gpiochip_add_data to simplify the error path in
> > samsung_gpiolib_register. Additionally this would also fix a leak if
> > the pinctrl driver was
Will Deacon writes:
> @@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ int intel_bts_interrupt(void)
> return handled;
>
> perf_aux_output_end(>handle, local_xchg(>data_size, 0),
> - !!local_xchg(>lost, 0));
> + local_xchg(>lost, 0) ?
Will Deacon writes:
> @@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ int intel_bts_interrupt(void)
> return handled;
>
> perf_aux_output_end(>handle, local_xchg(>data_size, 0),
> - !!local_xchg(>lost, 0));
> + local_xchg(>lost, 0) ?
> +
Em Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:00:23PM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:20:20 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/plugin_function.c
> > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int function_handler(struct trace_seq *s, struct
> >
Em Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:00:23PM -0500, Steven Rostedt escreveu:
> On Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:20:20 -0300
> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > +++ b/tools/lib/traceevent/plugin_function.c
> > @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int function_handler(struct trace_seq *s, struct
> > pevent_record *record,
>
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:36:08 +0100
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, February 17, 2017 10:36:40 AM Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > This driver is orphan since commit 2e591e7b3ac2 ("ARM: at91: remove
> > at91sam9261/at91sam9g10 legacy board support").
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 13:36:08 +0100
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Friday, February 17, 2017 10:36:40 AM Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > This driver is orphan since commit 2e591e7b3ac2 ("ARM: at91: remove
> > at91sam9261/at91sam9g10 legacy board support"). Given that nobody cared
> >
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> I think the design must ensure that the following usage models can be
> monitored:
>- the allocations in your CAT partitions
>- the allocations from a task (inclusive of children tasks)
>- the allocations from a group of tasks
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> I think the design must ensure that the following usage models can be
> monitored:
>- the allocations in your CAT partitions
>- the allocations from a task (inclusive of children tasks)
>- the allocations from a group of tasks
On 02/17/2017, 02:16 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:47:57AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> This is just a preview, not to merged now, only later with DWARF
>> unwinder series. This is what the series will serve for (aside from
>> cleanup and unification).
>>
>> I am aware of
On 02/17/2017, 02:16 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:47:57AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> This is just a preview, not to merged now, only later with DWARF
>> unwinder series. This is what the series will serve for (aside from
>> cleanup and unification).
>>
>> I am aware of
Hi Jisheng,
On ven., févr. 17 2017, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> In hot code path mvneta_rx_hwbm(), the rx_desc->status is read twice.
> The rx_desc is allocated by dma_alloc_coherent, it's uncacheable if
> the device isn't cache-coherent, reading from uncached memory is
>
Hi Jisheng,
On ven., févr. 17 2017, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> In hot code path mvneta_rx_hwbm(), the rx_desc->status is read twice.
> The rx_desc is allocated by dma_alloc_coherent, it's uncacheable if
> the device isn't cache-coherent, reading from uncached memory is
> fairly slow. So reuse the
2017-02-17 14:15 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori :
> On Thursday 16 February 2017 11:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> Similarly to vpif capture: we need to register the vpif display driver
>> and the corresponding adv7343 encoder in pdata-quirks as the DT
>> support is not complete -
2017-02-17 14:15 GMT+01:00 Sekhar Nori :
> On Thursday 16 February 2017 11:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> Similarly to vpif capture: we need to register the vpif display driver
>> and the corresponding adv7343 encoder in pdata-quirks as the DT
>> support is not complete - there isn't
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:27:16PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Use devm_gpiochip_add_data to simplify the error path in
> samsung_gpiolib_register. Additionally this would also fix a leak if
> the pinctrl driver was unbound, although admittedly I can't see any
> good use-case for doing so, but
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:27:16PM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
> Use devm_gpiochip_add_data to simplify the error path in
> samsung_gpiolib_register. Additionally this would also fix a leak if
> the pinctrl driver was unbound, although admittedly I can't see any
> good use-case for doing so, but
Em Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:13:52PM -0500, Steven Rostedt (VMware) escreveu:
> Fix the typo of the function name pevent_data_prempt_count()
Thanks, applied and added:
Fixes: c52d9e4e677b ("tools lib traceevent: Add retrieval of preempt count and
latency flags")
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by:
Em Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:13:52PM -0500, Steven Rostedt (VMware) escreveu:
> Fix the typo of the function name pevent_data_prempt_count()
Thanks, applied and added:
Fixes: c52d9e4e677b ("tools lib traceevent: Add retrieval of preempt count and
latency flags")
- Arnaldo
> Signed-off-by:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation
> >> isolation. Please refer to the last
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 05:11:57PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 02/15/2017 11:50 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 05:37:22PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >>This four patches define CDM node with HugeTLB & Buddy allocation
> >> isolation. Please refer to the last
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:10 PM, wrote:
> From: Matthew Gerlach
>
> Device Tree bindings for Altera Partial Reconfiguraion IP?
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach
> ---
>
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 3:10 PM, wrote:
> From: Matthew Gerlach
>
> Device Tree bindings for Altera Partial Reconfiguraion IP?
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Gerlach
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/fpga/altera-pr-ip.txt | 12
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> create
Hi Jisheng,
On ven., févr. 17 2017, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> In hot code path such as mvneta_rx_hwbm() and mvneta_rx_swbm, the
> buf_phys_addr field of rx_dec is accessed. The rx_desc is allocated by
> dma_alloc_coherent, it's uncacheable if the device isn't cache
>
Hi Jisheng,
On ven., févr. 17 2017, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> In hot code path such as mvneta_rx_hwbm() and mvneta_rx_swbm, the
> buf_phys_addr field of rx_dec is accessed. The rx_desc is allocated by
> dma_alloc_coherent, it's uncacheable if the device isn't cache
> coherent, reading from
Em Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:33:29AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> Hi, Arnaldo :)
>
> Regarding perf annotate:
>
> 1) Problem : wrong line numbers on perf-annotate (both stdio and TUI)
> 2) Problem : wrong sum of overhead(percent) matching source lines
> 3) Suggestion : new option showing only
Em Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:33:29AM +0900, Taeung Song escreveu:
> Hi, Arnaldo :)
>
> Regarding perf annotate:
>
> 1) Problem : wrong line numbers on perf-annotate (both stdio and TUI)
> 2) Problem : wrong sum of overhead(percent) matching source lines
> 3) Suggestion : new option showing only
The patch
spi: ti-qspi: revise ti_qspi_probe() failure flow
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to
The patch
spi: ti-qspi: revise ti_qspi_probe() failure flow
has been applied to the spi tree at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to
On 17 February 2017 at 12:45, Tobias Jakobi
wrote:
> Hello Maxime,
>
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:43:06PM +0100, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>>> I was wondering about the following. Wasn't there some strict
>>> requirement about code going
On 17 February 2017 at 12:45, Tobias Jakobi
wrote:
> Hello Maxime,
>
> Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:43:06PM +0100, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>>> I was wondering about the following. Wasn't there some strict
>>> requirement about code going upstream, which also included
Create device tree bindings documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ramiro Oliveira
Acked-by: Rob Herring
---
.../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5647.txt | 35 ++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
The OV5647 sensor from Omnivision supports up to 2592x1944 @ 15 fps, RAW 8
and RAW 10 output formats, and MIPI CSI-2 interface.
The driver adds support for 640x480 RAW 8.
Signed-off-by: Ramiro Oliveira
---
MAINTAINERS| 7 +
drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig |
Create device tree bindings documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ramiro Oliveira
Acked-by: Rob Herring
---
.../devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5647.txt | 35 ++
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/i2c/ov5647.txt
diff
The OV5647 sensor from Omnivision supports up to 2592x1944 @ 15 fps, RAW 8
and RAW 10 output formats, and MIPI CSI-2 interface.
The driver adds support for 640x480 RAW 8.
Signed-off-by: Ramiro Oliveira
---
MAINTAINERS| 7 +
drivers/media/i2c/Kconfig | 11 +
Hello,
This patchset adds support for the Omnivision OV5647 sensor.
At the moment it only supports 640x480 in RAW 8.
This is the ninth version of the OV5647 camera driver patchset.
v9:
- Remove unused struct
- Remove comments
- Refactor error handling in i2c r/w functions
- Change
Hello,
This patchset adds support for the Omnivision OV5647 sensor.
At the moment it only supports 640x480 in RAW 8.
This is the ninth version of the OV5647 camera driver patchset.
v9:
- Remove unused struct
- Remove comments
- Refactor error handling in i2c r/w functions
- Change
When passing "test_suspend=mem" to the kernel:
PM: can't test 'mem' suspend state
and the suspend test is not run.
Commit 406e79385f3223d8 ("PM / sleep: System sleep state selection
interface rework") changed pm_labels[] from a contiguous NULL-terminated
array to a sparse array (with the
When passing "test_suspend=mem" to the kernel:
PM: can't test 'mem' suspend state
and the suspend test is not run.
Commit 406e79385f3223d8 ("PM / sleep: System sleep state selection
interface rework") changed pm_labels[] from a contiguous NULL-terminated
array to a sparse array (with the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
> > +
> > +struct emac_variant {
> > + u32 default_syscon_value;
>
> Why do you need a default value? Can't you read it from the syscon
> directly?
>
Why not, but you can see the default value as "value for
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 08:05:24PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
[...]
> > +
> > +struct emac_variant {
> > + u32 default_syscon_value;
>
> Why do you need a default value? Can't you read it from the syscon
> directly?
>
Why not, but you can see the default value as "value for
On Thursday 16 February 2017 11:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Similarly to vpif capture: we need to register the vpif display driver
> and the corresponding adv7343 encoder in pdata-quirks as the DT
> support is not complete - there isn't currently a way to define the
> output_routing in the
On Thursday 16 February 2017 11:51 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Similarly to vpif capture: we need to register the vpif display driver
> and the corresponding adv7343 encoder in pdata-quirks as the DT
> support is not complete - there isn't currently a way to define the
> output_routing in the
Hi,
On Friday 17 February 2017 03:20 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Add endpoint mode support to designware driver. This uses the
> EP Core layer introduced recently to add endpoint mode support.
> *Any* function driver can now use this designware device
> in order to achieve the EP
Hi,
On Friday 17 February 2017 03:20 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Add endpoint mode support to designware driver. This uses the
> EP Core layer introduced recently to add endpoint mode support.
> *Any* function driver can now use this designware device
> in order to achieve the EP
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:47:57AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> This is just a preview, not to merged now, only later with DWARF
> unwinder series. This is what the series will serve for (aside from
> cleanup and unification).
>
> I am aware of CFI_STARTPROC and CFI_ENDPROC left defined in other
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:47:57AM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> This is just a preview, not to merged now, only later with DWARF
> unwinder series. This is what the series will serve for (aside from
> cleanup and unification).
>
> I am aware of CFI_STARTPROC and CFI_ENDPROC left defined in other
Hi,
On Friday, February 17, 2017 10:36:40 AM Boris Brezillon wrote:
> This driver is orphan since commit 2e591e7b3ac2 ("ARM: at91: remove
> at91sam9261/at91sam9g10 legacy board support"). Given that nobody cared
> adding DT support to it, it probably means it's no longer used and is
> thus a
Hi,
On Friday, February 17, 2017 10:36:40 AM Boris Brezillon wrote:
> This driver is orphan since commit 2e591e7b3ac2 ("ARM: at91: remove
> at91sam9261/at91sam9g10 legacy board support"). Given that nobody cared
> adding DT support to it, it probably means it's no longer used and is
> thus a
Às 9:50 AM de 2/17/2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I escreveu:
> Add Documentation to help users use pci endpoint to configure
> pci endpoint function and to bind the endpoint function
> with endpoint controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
> ---
>
Às 9:50 AM de 2/17/2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I escreveu:
> Add Documentation to help users use pci endpoint to configure
> pci endpoint function and to bind the endpoint function
> with endpoint controller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I
> ---
> Documentation/PCI/00-INDEX
From: "david.wu"
Add constants and callback functions for the dwmac on rk3328 socs.
As can be seen, the base structure is the same, only registers and the
bits in them moved slightly.
Signed-off-by: david.wu
---
From: "david.wu"
Add constants and callback functions for the dwmac on rk3328 socs.
As can be seen, the base structure is the same, only registers and the
bits in them moved slightly.
Signed-off-by: david.wu
---
.../devicetree/bindings/net/rockchip-dwmac.txt | 1 +
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:15:56PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 16, 2017 01:36:05 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 03:42:10PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > But when I discussed this with Vincent, he suggested that it may not be
> > > required
> >
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 01:15:56PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, February 16, 2017 01:36:05 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 03:42:10PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > But when I discussed this with Vincent, he suggested that it may not be
> > > required
> >
Hi James,
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 20:09 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:56:23AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > The TPM1.2 PCR Extend operation only returns 20 bytes in the body,
> > which is the size of the PCR state.
> >
> > This fixes a problem where IMA gets errors
Hi James,
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 20:09 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:56:23AM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> > The TPM1.2 PCR Extend operation only returns 20 bytes in the body,
> > which is the size of the PCR state.
> >
> > This fixes a problem where IMA gets errors
Hello Maxime,
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:43:06PM +0100, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>> I was wondering about the following. Wasn't there some strict
>> requirement about code going upstream, which also included that there
>> was a full open-source driver stack for it?
>>
Hello Maxime,
Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:43:06PM +0100, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>> I was wondering about the following. Wasn't there some strict
>> requirement about code going upstream, which also included that there
>> was a full open-source driver stack for it?
>>
If the free segments are used up, then new_curseg will fail for
CURSEG_WARM_NODE, in this case, we should use change_curseg instead of
new_curseg.
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
If the free segments are used up, then new_curseg will fail for
CURSEG_WARM_NODE, in this case, we should use change_curseg instead of
new_curseg.
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song
---
fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
index
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song
---
include/f2fs_fs.h | 3 +++
lib/libf2fs.c | 3 +++
mkfs/f2fs_format.c | 21 ++---
mkfs/f2fs_format_main.c | 10 +-
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song
---
include/f2fs_fs.h | 3 +++
lib/libf2fs.c | 3 +++
mkfs/f2fs_format.c | 21 ++---
mkfs/f2fs_format_main.c | 10 +-
4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/f2fs_fs.h b/include/f2fs_fs.h
Rethink the meaning of reserved segments and overprovision segments in f2fs
The key issue is that flash FTL has already made overprovision itself, e.g. 7%,
according to the difference between gigabyte (GB) and gibibyte (GiB). And this
part can nenver be seen by the upper file system. The device
Rethink the meaning of reserved segments and overprovision segments in f2fs
The key issue is that flash FTL has already made overprovision itself, e.g. 7%,
according to the difference between gigabyte (GB) and gibibyte (GiB). And this
part can nenver be seen by the upper file system. The device
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:56:26AM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:33:04PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> Good morning to everyone.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
> > > Just as an aside, has anyone given any thought
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 03:56:26AM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:33:04PM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> Good morning to everyone.
>
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 02:06:42PM -0600, Dr. Greg Wettstein wrote:
> > > Just as an aside, has anyone given any thought
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:22:14PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Philipp, Steve and Russell,
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:43:38PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > I think with Russell's explanation of how the imx219 sensor operates,
> > we'll have to do something before calling the sensor
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 02:22:14PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Philipp, Steve and Russell,
>
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:43:38PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > I think with Russell's explanation of how the imx219 sensor operates,
> > we'll have to do something before calling the sensor
-migration/20170217-200523
config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/copy_pages_mthread.c: In fu
-migration/20170217-200523
config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
mm/copy_pages_mthread.c: In fu
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older
> pr_warning in the kernel source tree.
>
> Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files.
>
> This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate
>
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> There are ~4300 uses of pr_warn and ~250 uses of the older
> pr_warning in the kernel source tree.
>
> Make the use of pr_warn consistent across all kernel files.
>
> This excludes all files in tools/ as there is a separate
> define pr_warning
On 02/17/2017 07:30 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>
>
> 在 2017/2/17 14:05, Michael Ellerman 写道:
>> Pan Xinhui writes:
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
>>> index 9c0e17c..f6e5c3d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
>>> +++
On 02/17/2017 07:30 AM, Pan Xinhui wrote:
>
>
> 在 2017/2/17 14:05, Michael Ellerman 写道:
>> Pan Xinhui writes:
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
>>> index 9c0e17c..f6e5c3d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/xmon/xmon.c
>>> @@ -76,6
Hi Philipp, Steve and Russell,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:43:38PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 14:27 -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> >
> > On 02/16/2017 02:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:19:02PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> >
Hi Philipp, Steve and Russell,
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:43:38PM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-16 at 14:27 -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> >
> > On 02/16/2017 02:20 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 06:19:02PM -0800, Steve Longerbeam wrote:
> >
Hi Linus,
Please pull one last powerpc fix for 4.10. This is actually tagged for
stable, so it's not the end of the world if you'd rather not pull it
this late.
cheers
The following changes since commit f83e6862047e1e371bdc5d512dd6cabe8a3965b8:
powerpc/powernv: Properly set "host-ipi" on
Hi Linus,
Please pull one last powerpc fix for 4.10. This is actually tagged for
stable, so it's not the end of the world if you'd rather not pull it
this late.
cheers
The following changes since commit f83e6862047e1e371bdc5d512dd6cabe8a3965b8:
powerpc/powernv: Properly set "host-ipi" on
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 01:36:05 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 03:42:10PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > But when I discussed this with Vincent, he suggested that it may not be
> > required
> > at all as the scheduler (with the helped of "decayed") doesn't call into
>
On Thursday, February 16, 2017 01:36:05 PM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 03:42:10PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > But when I discussed this with Vincent, he suggested that it may not be
> > required
> > at all as the scheduler (with the helped of "decayed") doesn't call into
>
Many "embedded" architectures provide CMDLINE_FORCE to allow the kernel
to override the command line provided by an inflexible bootloader.
However there is currrently no way for the kernel to override the
initramfs image provided by the bootloader meaning there are still ways
for bootloaders to
Many "embedded" architectures provide CMDLINE_FORCE to allow the kernel
to override the command line provided by an inflexible bootloader.
However there is currrently no way for the kernel to override the
initramfs image provided by the bootloader meaning there are still ways
for bootloaders to
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:48:42PM +0100, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > This patch adds documentation for Device-Tree bindings for the
> > Allwinner dwmac-sun8i driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 07:48:18PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 01:48:42PM +0100, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > This patch adds documentation for Device-Tree bindings for the
> > Allwinner dwmac-sun8i driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe
> > ---
> >
If we crossed a sample window while in NO_HZ we will add LOAD_FREQ to
the pending sample window time on exit, setting the next update not
one window into the future, but two.
This situation on exiting NO_HZ is described by:
this_rq->calc_load_update < jiffies < calc_load_update
In this
If we crossed a sample window while in NO_HZ we will add LOAD_FREQ to
the pending sample window time on exit, setting the next update not
one window into the future, but two.
This situation on exiting NO_HZ is described by:
this_rq->calc_load_update < jiffies < calc_load_update
In this
'calc_load_update' is accessed without any kind of locking and there's
a clear assumption in the code that only a single value is read or
written.
Make this explicit by using READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), and avoid
unintentionally seeing multiple values, or having the load/stores
split.
Peter, Frederic,
Here's a v2 of the patch series to fix the loadavg spikes I'm seeing
on a v3.12 based kernel, caused by delaying load sampling if a sample
period was crossed while in NO_HZ idle.
I tried to make the changelog for PATCH 1 clearer this time around by
incorporating suggestions
'calc_load_update' is accessed without any kind of locking and there's
a clear assumption in the code that only a single value is read or
written.
Make this explicit by using READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), and avoid
unintentionally seeing multiple values, or having the load/stores
split.
Peter, Frederic,
Here's a v2 of the patch series to fix the loadavg spikes I'm seeing
on a v3.12 based kernel, caused by delaying load sampling if a sample
period was crossed while in NO_HZ idle.
I tried to make the changelog for PATCH 1 clearer this time around by
incorporating suggestions
901 - 1000 of 1398 matches
Mail list logo