Hi,
This is a gentle ping.
On 03/02/2017 03:10 PM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> While reading sched deadline code, I find out that a constrained
> deadline task could be replenished before the next period if
> activated after the deadline, opening the window to run for more
> than Q/P.
Hi,
This is a gentle ping.
On 03/02/2017 03:10 PM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> While reading sched deadline code, I find out that a constrained
> deadline task could be replenished before the next period if
> activated after the deadline, opening the window to run for more
> than Q/P.
Found with scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolconv.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis
Reviewed-by: Christian König
---
Changes from v1:
- Rebased on v4.11-rc1
- Added Reviewed-by
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 4 ++--
Found with scripts/coccinelle/misc/boolconv.cocci.
Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis
Reviewed-by: Christian König
---
Changes from v1:
- Rebased on v4.11-rc1
- Added Reviewed-by
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gfx_v8_0.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v8_0.c | 4 ++--
Hi,
Sorry for replying to this thread late.
On 15 March 2017 at 11:19, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Punit,
>
> Adding David Woods since he seems to have added the arm64-specific
> huge_pte_offset() code.
>
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:46:36PM +, Punit Agrawal wrote:
Hi,
Sorry for replying to this thread late.
On 15 March 2017 at 11:19, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Punit,
>
> Adding David Woods since he seems to have added the arm64-specific
> huge_pte_offset() code.
>
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 05:46:36PM +, Punit Agrawal wrote:
>> From
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On 15/03/17 05:59, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Patrick Bellasi
>> wrote:
>> > On 13-Mar 03:08, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>> >> Hi Patrick,
>> >>
>> >>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Juri Lelli wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> On 15/03/17 05:59, Joel Fernandes wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:40 AM, Patrick Bellasi
>> wrote:
>> > On 13-Mar 03:08, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
>> >> Hi Patrick,
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Patrick
> -Original Message-
> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Christian König
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 3:38 AM
> To: Ayyappa Ch
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; amd-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org;
> -Original Message-
> From: amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Christian König
> Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2017 3:38 AM
> To: Ayyappa Ch
> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; amd-
> g...@lists.freedesktop.org;
On 03/15/2017, 04:58 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Great, cause I'm currently cleaning up that code too, and this would
> cause conflicts ;-)
Then I should hide right after I send out v2 of the macros cleanup
series in a couple of minutes, right ;)?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9579623/
--
On 03/15/2017, 04:58 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Great, cause I'm currently cleaning up that code too, and this would
> cause conflicts ;-)
Then I should hide right after I send out v2 of the macros cleanup
series in a couple of minutes, right ;)?
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9579623/
--
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 09:01 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 16:41 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:25 PM, 쪼르 wrote:
> > > It seems that attacker can leak kernel memory(slab) by this vulnerability.
> > > I make a PoC code, and it
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:20:28AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Patrick Bellasi
> wrote:
> > On 13-Mar 03:46, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Patrick Bellasi
> >> wrote:
> >>
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 09:01 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 16:41 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:25 PM, 쪼르 wrote:
> > > It seems that attacker can leak kernel memory(slab) by this vulnerability.
> > > I make a PoC code, and it works well on
> > >
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 06:20:28AM -0700, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Patrick Bellasi
> wrote:
> > On 13-Mar 03:46, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Patrick Bellasi
> >> wrote:
> >> > The CPU CGroup controller allows to assign a
The X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs expose the status of AC power
supply.
This adds the AC power supply driver to the MFD cells of the AXP22X
PMICs.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard
Acked-by: Sebastian
The X-Powers AXP20X and AXP22X PMICs expose the status of AC power
supply.
This adds the AC power supply driver to the MFD cells of the AXP22X
PMICs.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard
Acked-by: Sebastian Reichel
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones
---
On 15/03/17 03:51, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
Hi Suzuki,
On 15 March 2017 at 02:06, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 14/03/17 17:40, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On 14 March 2017 at 11:32, Mathieu Poirier
wrote:
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose"
On 15/03/17 03:51, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
Hi Suzuki,
On 15 March 2017 at 02:06, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
On 14/03/17 17:40, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
On 14 March 2017 at 11:32, Mathieu Poirier
wrote:
From: "Suzuki K. Poulose"
For software sources (i.e STM), there could be multiple agents
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 16:41 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:25 PM, 쪼르 wrote:
> > It seems that attacker can leak kernel memory(slab) by this vulnerability.
> > I make a PoC code, and it works well on
> > ae50dfd61665086e617cc9e554a1285d52765670.
> >
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 16:41 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:25 PM, 쪼르 wrote:
> > It seems that attacker can leak kernel memory(slab) by this vulnerability.
> > I make a PoC code, and it works well on
> > ae50dfd61665086e617cc9e554a1285d52765670.
> > but, I found that PoC
On 15 Mar 2017, at 4:01, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Zi Yan wrote:
> include/linux/swapops.h:223:2: warning: missing braces around initializer
> [-Wmissing-braces]
>>> return (pmd_t){ 0 };
>>> ^
>>>
On 15 Mar 2017, at 4:01, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Zi Yan wrote:
> include/linux/swapops.h:223:2: warning: missing braces around initializer
> [-Wmissing-braces]
>>> return (pmd_t){ 0 };
>>> ^
>>>include/linux/swapops.h:223:2: warning:
Hi Fathi,
On 03/15/2017 07:15 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> powerpc selftests allow to override ARCH for cross-compilation by making
> the first ARCH assignment weak.
> Use the same approach in breakpoints, ipc and prctl tests to:
> - keep uname usage consistent across selftests
> - make it easier
Hi Fathi,
On 03/15/2017 07:15 AM, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> powerpc selftests allow to override ARCH for cross-compilation by making
> the first ARCH assignment weak.
> Use the same approach in breakpoints, ipc and prctl tests to:
> - keep uname usage consistent across selftests
> - make it easier
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> This tool allows to construct and concat multiple I2C messages into one
> single transfer. Its aim is to test I2C master controllers, and so there
> is no SMBus fallback.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang
>
> This tool allows to construct and concat multiple I2C messages into one
> single transfer. Its aim is to test I2C master controllers, and so there
> is no SMBus fallback.
>
> I've been missing such a tool a
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Jan Glauber wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> I've not heard back from you regarding the bitfields so I assume this
> means you're insisting on that point. I'd really like to make some
> progress with this series, so I'm reposting now. All comments should
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 2:24 PM, Jan Glauber wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> I've not heard back from you regarding the bitfields so I assume this
> means you're insisting on that point. I'd really like to make some
> progress with this series, so I'm reposting now. All comments should be
> addressed.
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:49:54 +0100
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/15/2017, 04:40 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> -#else
> >> -# define function_hookmcount
> >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mcount)
> >> -#endif
> >> -
> >> /* All cases save the original rbp (8 bytes) */
> >> #ifdef
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 16:49:54 +0100
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/15/2017, 04:40 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >> -#else
> >> -# define function_hookmcount
> >> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mcount)
> >> -#endif
> >> -
> >> /* All cases save the original rbp (8 bytes) */
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
> >> #
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:56:02PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 09:59 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > For regular processes, the time taken in its exit() path to free its
> > used memory is not a problem. But there are heavy ones that consume
> > several Terabytes memory and the time
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:56:02PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 09:59 AM, Aaron Lu wrote:
> > For regular processes, the time taken in its exit() path to free its
> > used memory is not a problem. But there are heavy ones that consume
> > several Terabytes memory and the time
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Commit 500462a9de65 "timers: Switch to a non-cascading wheel" replaced
> the 'classic' timer wheel, which aimed for near 'exact' expiry of the
> timers. Their analysis was that the vast majority of timeout timers
> are used as
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 01:45:53PM -0500, Nayna Jain wrote:
> Commit 500462a9de65 "timers: Switch to a non-cascading wheel" replaced
> the 'classic' timer wheel, which aimed for near 'exact' expiry of the
> timers. Their analysis was that the vast majority of timeout timers
> are used as
On 03/15/2017, 04:40 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> -#else
>> -# define function_hook mcount
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mcount)
>> -#endif
>> -
>> /* All cases save the original rbp (8 bytes) */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
>> # ifdef CC_USING_FENTRY
>> @@ -297,6 +290,7 @@ trace:
>> jmp
On 03/15/2017, 04:40 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> -#else
>> -# define function_hook mcount
>> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(mcount)
>> -#endif
>> -
>> /* All cases save the original rbp (8 bytes) */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
>> # ifdef CC_USING_FENTRY
>> @@ -297,6 +290,7 @@ trace:
>> jmp
On 03/15/2017 06:01 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 07 mar 2017, alle ore 18:44, Jens Axboe ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> On 03/04/2017 09:01 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> @@ -560,6 +600,15 @@ struct bfq_data {
>>> struct bfq_io_cq *bio_bic;
>>> /* bfqq associated with
On 03/15/2017 06:01 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 07 mar 2017, alle ore 18:44, Jens Axboe ha
>> scritto:
>>
>> On 03/04/2017 09:01 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>> @@ -560,6 +600,15 @@ struct bfq_data {
>>> struct bfq_io_cq *bio_bic;
>>> /* bfqq associated with the task issuing
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:00:08PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On 15/03/17 16:08, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:51:27PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> Since commit 3c293f4e08b5 ("net: phy: Trigger state machine on state
> >> change and not polling.")
> >>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 05:00:08PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> On 15/03/17 16:08, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:51:27PM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> Since commit 3c293f4e08b5 ("net: phy: Trigger state machine on state
> >> change and not polling.")
> >>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:25 PM, 쪼르 wrote:
> It seems that attacker can leak kernel memory(slab) by this vulnerability.
> I make a PoC code, and it works well on
> ae50dfd61665086e617cc9e554a1285d52765670.
> but, I found that PoC wasn't work on Ubuntu16.04.02 4.4.0-64-generic
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 4:25 PM, 쪼르 wrote:
> It seems that attacker can leak kernel memory(slab) by this vulnerability.
> I make a PoC code, and it works well on
> ae50dfd61665086e617cc9e554a1285d52765670.
> but, I found that PoC wasn't work on Ubuntu16.04.02 4.4.0-64-generic
> #85-Ubuntu SMP.
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:13 +, Dan O'Donovan wrote:
> Currently, Auto Flow Control is not working correctly on the Atom
> X5-Z8350 "Cherry Trail" SoC, because an "RTS override" feature is
> enabled in a vendor-specific register in the LPSS UART. The symptom
> is that RTS is not de-asserted as
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 14:13 +, Dan O'Donovan wrote:
> Currently, Auto Flow Control is not working correctly on the Atom
> X5-Z8350 "Cherry Trail" SoC, because an "RTS override" feature is
> enabled in a vendor-specific register in the LPSS UART. The symptom
> is that RTS is not de-asserted as
This will be used by the powergating driver to ensure proper sequencer
state when the SATA domain is powergated.
Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c | 25 +
include/linux/clk/tegra.h| 1 +
2 files
This will be used by the powergating driver to ensure proper sequencer
state when the SATA domain is powergated.
Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver
---
drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra210.c | 25 +
include/linux/clk/tegra.h| 1 +
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:35:29AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 15-03-17 01:14:27, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:07:38AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:57:45PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:18:14PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 15-03-17 16:59:59, Aaron Lu wrote:
> [...]
> > The proposed parallel free did this: if the process has many pages to be
> > freed, accumulate them in these struct mmu_gather_batch(es) one after
> > another till 256K pages are
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:35:29AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 15-03-17 01:14:27, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 11:07:38AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:57:45PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:18:14PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 15-03-17 16:59:59, Aaron Lu wrote:
> [...]
> > The proposed parallel free did this: if the process has many pages to be
> > freed, accumulate them in these struct mmu_gather_batch(es) one after
> > another till 256K pages are
A side effect of 89d8232411a8 ("tty/serial: atmel_serial: BUG: stop DMA
from transmitting in stop_tx") is that the console can be called with
TX path disabled. Then the system would hang trying to push charecters
out in atmel_console_putchar().
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre
A side effect of 89d8232411a8 ("tty/serial: atmel_serial: BUG: stop DMA
from transmitting in stop_tx") is that the console can be called with
TX path disabled. Then the system would hang trying to push charecters
out in atmel_console_putchar().
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre
Fixes: 89d8232411a8
The X-Powers AXP22X PMIC exposes the status of AC power supply.
This adds the AC power supply subnode for the AXP22X PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard
---
v2:
The X-Powers AXP22X PMIC exposes the status of AC power supply.
This adds the AC power supply subnode for the AXP22X PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard
---
v2:
- changed DT node name from ac_power_supply to ac-power-supply,
- removed
Add the basic ability to register the device through device tree, more
work is needed to get each individual sub-driver functioning correctly
but this is enough to get the device to probe from device tree.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
---
Changes since v3:
Add the basic ability to register the device through device tree, more
work is needed to get each individual sub-driver functioning correctly
but this is enough to get the device to probe from device tree.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
---
Changes since v3:
- No longer check return of
Now the wm831x-core has basic DT support we can update this driver to
allow use of the GPIOs within a device tree system.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
---
No change since v3, but still needs to go through
Now the wm831x-core has basic DT support we can update this driver to
allow use of the GPIOs within a device tree system.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
Acked-by: Linus Walleij
---
No change since v3, but still needs to go through Lee's tree.
Thanks,
Charles
drivers/gpio/gpio-wm831x.c | 5
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:44:36 +0100
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> @@ -16,14 +17,6 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
>
> -#ifdef CC_USING_FENTRY
> -# define function_hook __fentry__
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__fentry__)
There's a reason the export symbols are here.
> -#else
> -#
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:44:36 +0100
Jiri Slaby wrote:
> @@ -16,14 +17,6 @@
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
>
> -#ifdef CC_USING_FENTRY
> -# define function_hook __fentry__
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(__fentry__)
There's a reason the export symbols are here.
> -#else
> -# define function_hook
Add a device tree binding document for the wm831x series of PMICs.
Currently only support for the registering the device and the GPIOs are
actually implemented in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
---
Changes since v3:
- Remove / on IRQ signal
-
Add a device tree binding document for the wm831x series of PMICs.
Currently only support for the registering the device and the GPIOs are
actually implemented in the driver.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
---
Changes since v3:
- Remove / on IRQ signal
- Change file paths to be relative
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > it was brought up again just before I sent my patch. I just want to
> > point out that 9442211 doesn't address
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:03:44PM +0100, Michal Marek wrote:
> Dne 15.3.2017 v 15:51 Tom Rini napsal(a):
> > I found https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9442211/ today and I see that
> > it was brought up again just before I sent my patch. I just want to
> > point out that 9442211 doesn't address
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 20:40 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:18:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:07:37AM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
> > > or __blk_mq_requeue_request(). Another issue with this function is that
> > > the
> >
> >
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 20:40 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 08:18:53PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 12:07:37AM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
> > > or __blk_mq_requeue_request(). Another issue with this function is that
> > > the
> >
> >
WM8960 derives bit clock from sysclock using BCLKDIV[3:0] of R8
clocking register (See WM8960 datasheet, page 71).
There are use cases, like this:
aplay -Dhw:0,0 -r 48000 -c 1 -f S20_3LE -t raw audio48k20b_3LE1c.pcm
where no BCLKDIV applied to sysclock can give us the exact requested
bitclk, so
WM8960 derives bit clock from sysclock using BCLKDIV[3:0] of R8
clocking register (See WM8960 datasheet, page 71).
There are use cases, like this:
aplay -Dhw:0,0 -r 48000 -c 1 -f S20_3LE -t raw audio48k20b_3LE1c.pcm
where no BCLKDIV applied to sysclock can give us the exact requested
bitclk, so
Add a separate function for finding (sysclk, lrclk, bclk)
when the clock is auto or mclk. This makes code easier to
read and reduces the indentation level in wm8960_configure_clocking.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta
---
sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 82
Add a separate function for finding (sysclk, lrclk, bclk)
when the clock is auto or mclk. This makes code easier to
read and reduces the indentation level in wm8960_configure_clocking.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baluta
---
sound/soc/codecs/wm8960.c | 82
This patch series allows running S20_3LE encoded samples on wm8960 codec.
First patch does a small refactoring of sysclk frequency search because
wm8960_configure_sysclk was getting pretty convoluted.
The second patch allows relaxing bitclock computation in the way that
if an exact bitclk
This patch series allows running S20_3LE encoded samples on wm8960 codec.
First patch does a small refactoring of sysclk frequency search because
wm8960_configure_sysclk was getting pretty convoluted.
The second patch allows relaxing bitclock computation in the way that
if an exact bitclk
From: Colin Ian King
At the end of the timeout loop, retries will always be zero so
the check for zero is redundant so remove it. Also replace
printk with pr_err as recommended by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
From: Colin Ian King
At the end of the timeout loop, retries will always be zero so
the check for zero is redundant so remove it. Also replace
printk with pr_err as recommended by checkpatch.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/netxen/netxen_nic_init.c | 9 ++---
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:27:34PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> From: Alex Belits
>
> Some users must have 4K pages while needing a 48-bit VA space size.
> The cleanest way do do this is to go to a 4-level page table for this
> case. Each page table level using order-0
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:45:55AM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> This config option never really worked, and has bit-rotted to the
> point of being completely useless. Remove it completely.
Thanks, queued for 4.12.
Ralf
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 05:27:34PM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> From: Alex Belits
>
> Some users must have 4K pages while needing a 48-bit VA space size.
> The cleanest way do do this is to go to a 4-level page table for this
> case. Each page table level using order-0 pages adds 9 bits to the
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 11:45:55AM -0800, David Daney wrote:
> This config option never really worked, and has bit-rotted to the
> point of being completely useless. Remove it completely.
Thanks, queued for 4.12.
Ralf
Am 12.03.2017 um 17:22 schrieb Tomas Szepe:
> Hello Oleksij,
>
>> can you please give GPL permission for this code.
>
> Fine by me.
>
Thank you,
is you permission enough, or I should wait for Andrew response?
--
Regards,
Oleksij
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Am 12.03.2017 um 17:22 schrieb Tomas Szepe:
> Hello Oleksij,
>
>> can you please give GPL permission for this code.
>
> Fine by me.
>
Thank you,
is you permission enough, or I should wait for Andrew response?
--
Regards,
Oleksij
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:34:02PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> > What tree are you targetting with these changes? Do you expect
> > them to go via the MIPS or the net-next tree?
> >
> > Please be explicit about this in the future.
> >
>
> Sorry I didn't mention it.
>
> My expectation is that
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 05:34:02PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> > What tree are you targetting with these changes? Do you expect
> > them to go via the MIPS or the net-next tree?
> >
> > Please be explicit about this in the future.
> >
>
> Sorry I didn't mention it.
>
> My expectation is that
This patch makes it possible to pass additional arguments in addition
to uevent action name when writing /sys/.../uevent attribute. These
additional arguments are then inserted into generated synthetic uevent
as additional environment variables.
Before, we were not able to pass any additional
This patch makes it possible to pass additional arguments in addition
to uevent action name when writing /sys/.../uevent attribute. These
additional arguments are then inserted into generated synthetic uevent
as additional environment variables.
Before, we were not able to pass any additional
The X-Powers AXP20X PMIC exposes the status of AC power supply, the
current current and voltage supplied to the board by the AC power
supply.
This adds the AC power supply subnode for AXP20X PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
The X-Powers AXP20X PMIC exposes the status of AC power supply, the
current current and voltage supplied to the board by the AC power
supply.
This adds the AC power supply subnode for AXP20X PMIC.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Schulz
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard
---
v2:
- changed
Hi Alan,
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 10:35 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>
> > As of commit bb475230b8e5 ("reset: make optional functions really
> > optional"), the reset framework API calls use NULL pointers to describe
> > optional, non-present reset controls.
Hi Alan,
On Wed, 2017-03-15 at 10:35 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2017, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>
> > As of commit bb475230b8e5 ("reset: make optional functions really
> > optional"), the reset framework API calls use NULL pointers to describe
> > optional, non-present reset controls.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:59:35PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> > Add a device tree binding document for the wm831x series of PMICs.
> > Currently only support for the registering the device and the GPIOs are
> > actually implemented in the driver.
> >
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:59:35PM +, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Charles Keepax wrote:
>
> > Add a device tree binding document for the wm831x series of PMICs.
> > Currently only support for the registering the device and the GPIOs are
> > actually implemented in the driver.
> >
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:29:29 +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> While ensuring that the destination address is link-local iff the source
> address is would also be an option, it didn't seem too useful as the
> destination address will be a multicast address anyways in "normal" VXLAN
>
On Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:29:29 +0100, Matthias Schiffer wrote:
> While ensuring that the destination address is link-local iff the source
> address is would also be an option, it didn't seem too useful as the
> destination address will be a multicast address anyways in "normal" VXLAN
>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:19:01AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:57:02PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>
>> > - wm8960->bclk = snd_soc_params_to_bclk(params);
>> > + wm8960->bclk =
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:19:01AM +, Charles Keepax wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:57:02PM +0200, Daniel Baluta wrote:
>
>> > - wm8960->bclk = snd_soc_params_to_bclk(params);
>> > + wm8960->bclk = params_physical_width(params) *
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:38:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > However there are still three problems left:
> > > > 1. More and more reports show that other platforms also
> > > >encountered the same issue, so the quirk list might
> > > >be endless.
> > > > 2. Each CPUs
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 06:38:03PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > However there are still three problems left:
> > > > 1. More and more reports show that other platforms also
> > > >encountered the same issue, so the quirk list might
> > > >be endless.
> > > > 2. Each CPUs
On 15/03/17 14:33, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 15/03/17 13:28, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 15/03/17 10:56, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:39:26AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 15/03/17 09:21, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:52:34PM +, Suzuki
On 15/03/17 14:33, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 15/03/17 13:28, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 15/03/17 10:56, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 09:39:26AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 15/03/17 09:21, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 02:52:34PM +, Suzuki
901 - 1000 of 1820 matches
Mail list logo