4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yan, Zheng
commit 84583cfb973c4313955c6231cc9cb3772d280b15 upstream.
For a large directory, program needs to issue multiple readdir
syscalls to get all dentries. When there
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Yan, Zheng
commit 84583cfb973c4313955c6231cc9cb3772d280b15 upstream.
For a large directory, program needs to issue multiple readdir
syscalls to get all dentries. When there are multiple
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Stephen Boyd
commit 7a3b7cd332db08546f3cdd984f11773e0d1999e7 upstream.
The ULPI bus can be built as a module, and it will soon be
calling these functions when it
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Stephen Boyd
commit 7a3b7cd332db08546f3cdd984f11773e0d1999e7 upstream.
The ULPI bus can be built as a module, and it will soon be
calling these functions when it supports probing devices from
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Maciej W. Rozycki
commit 27fe2200dad2de8207a694024a7b9037dff1b280 upstream.
This is a user-visible message, so we want it to be spelled correctly.
Fixes: 5f9f41c474be
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Maciej W. Rozycki
commit 27fe2200dad2de8207a694024a7b9037dff1b280 upstream.
This is a user-visible message, so we want it to be spelled correctly.
Fixes: 5f9f41c474be ("MIPS: kernel: Prepare
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 13:31 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 15:48 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 12:08 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 14:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:49:14AM
On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 13:31 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 15:48 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 12:08 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 14:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:49:14AM
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Bjorn Andersson
commit d50daa2af2618dab6d21634e65a5fbcf4ae437d6 upstream.
Include the OF-based modalias in the uevent sent when registering SPMI
devices, so that
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Bjorn Andersson
commit d50daa2af2618dab6d21634e65a5fbcf4ae437d6 upstream.
Include the OF-based modalias in the uevent sent when registering SPMI
devices, so that user space has a chance to
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Chunyu Hu
commit db9108e054700c96322b0f0028546aa4e643cf0b upstream.
Hit the kmemleak when executing instance_rmdir, it forgot releasing
mem of tracing_cpumask. With this fix,
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Chunyu Hu
commit db9108e054700c96322b0f0028546aa4e643cf0b upstream.
Hit the kmemleak when executing instance_rmdir, it forgot releasing
mem of tracing_cpumask. With this fix, the warn does not
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 04:11:29PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 03:48 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 12:08 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 14:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:49:14AM -0700, James Bottomley
On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 04:11:29PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 07/25/2017 03:48 PM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 12:08 -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> >>On Tue, 2017-07-25 at 14:04 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >>>On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:49:14AM -0700, James Bottomley
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Greg Hackmann
Commit ff86bf0c65f1 ("alarmtimer: Rate limit periodic intervals") sets a
minimum bound on the alarm timer interval. This minimum bound shouldn't
be applied
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Greg Hackmann
Commit ff86bf0c65f1 ("alarmtimer: Rate limit periodic intervals") sets a
minimum bound on the alarm timer interval. This minimum bound shouldn't
be applied if the interval is 0.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Linus Torvalds
commit bd664f6b3e376a8ef4990f87d08271cc2d01ba9a upstream.
I made the mistake of upgrading my desktop to the new Fedora 26 that
comes with
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Linus Torvalds
commit bd664f6b3e376a8ef4990f87d08271cc2d01ba9a upstream.
I made the mistake of upgrading my desktop to the new Fedora 26 that
comes with gcc-7.1.1.
There's nothing wrong per
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alex Williamson
commit 811642d8d8a82c0cce8dc2debfdaf23c5a144839 upstream.
If vfio_iommu_group_notifier() acquires a group reference and that
reference becomes the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alex Williamson
commit 811642d8d8a82c0cce8dc2debfdaf23c5a144839 upstream.
If vfio_iommu_group_notifier() acquires a group reference and that
reference becomes the last reference to the group,
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 20777bc57c346b6994f465e0d8261a7fbf213a09 upstream.
Commit 7eda8b8e9677 ("NFC: Use IDR library to assing NFC devices IDs")
moved device-id allocation and
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 20777bc57c346b6994f465e0d8261a7fbf213a09 upstream.
Commit 7eda8b8e9677 ("NFC: Use IDR library to assing NFC devices IDs")
moved device-id allocation and struct-device
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 15e0c59f1535926a939d1df66d6edcf997d7c1b9 upstream.
Make sure to check the tty-device pointer before trying to access the
parent device to avoid
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 15e0c59f1535926a939d1df66d6edcf997d7c1b9 upstream.
Make sure to check the tty-device pointer before trying to access the
parent device to avoid dereferencing a NULL-pointer
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mateusz Jurczyk
commit a0323b979f81ad2deb2c8836eab506534891876a upstream.
Check that the NFC_ATTR_TARGET_INDEX and NFC_ATTR_PROTOCOLS attributes (in
addition to
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 45dd39b974f663dd5cdcbea7358a077ab0b0 upstream.
The nci-device was never deregistered in the event that
fw-initialisation failed.
Fix this by moving
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mateusz Jurczyk
commit a0323b979f81ad2deb2c8836eab506534891876a upstream.
Check that the NFC_ATTR_TARGET_INDEX and NFC_ATTR_PROTOCOLS attributes (in
addition to NFC_ATTR_DEVICE_INDEX) are
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 45dd39b974f663dd5cdcbea7358a077ab0b0 upstream.
The nci-device was never deregistered in the event that
fw-initialisation failed.
Fix this by moving the firmware
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 22/07/17 02:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Send a PVCALLS_SOCKET command to the backend, use the masked
> > req_prod_pvt as req_id. This way, req_id is guaranteed to be between 0
> > and PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING. We already have a slot in the rsp
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mateusz Jurczyk
commit f6a5885fc4d68e7f25ffb42b9d8d80aebb3bacbb upstream.
Verify that the caller-provided sockaddr structure is large enough to
contain the sa_family
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 22/07/17 02:11, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Send a PVCALLS_SOCKET command to the backend, use the masked
> > req_prod_pvt as req_id. This way, req_id is guaranteed to be between 0
> > and PVCALLS_NR_REQ_PER_RING. We already have a slot in the rsp
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mateusz Jurczyk
commit f6a5885fc4d68e7f25ffb42b9d8d80aebb3bacbb upstream.
Verify that the caller-provided sockaddr structure is large enough to
contain the sa_family field, before accessing it
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 07:02:12PM -0400, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> From: "Dennis Zhou (Facebook)"
>
> This patch introduces the bitmap metadata blocks and adds the skeleton
> of the code that will be used to maintain these blocks. Each chunk's
> bitmap is made up of full
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 07:02:12PM -0400, Dennis Zhou wrote:
> From: "Dennis Zhou (Facebook)"
>
> This patch introduces the bitmap metadata blocks and adds the skeleton
> of the code that will be used to maintain these blocks. Each chunk's
> bitmap is made up of full metadata blocks. These
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 05:59:04 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:05:03 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> > > If HCD_DEAD(hcd) is "true" in
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 05:59:04 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:05:03 AM Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jul 2017, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> > > If HCD_DEAD(hcd) is "true" in check_root_hub_suspended(), it is
> > > rather
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mateusz Jurczyk
commit 608c4adfcabab220142ee335a2a003ccd1c0b25b upstream.
Fix the sockaddr length verification in the connect() handler of NFC/LLCP
sockets, to compare
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mateusz Jurczyk
commit 608c4adfcabab220142ee335a2a003ccd1c0b25b upstream.
Fix the sockaddr length verification in the connect() handler of NFC/LLCP
sockets, to compare against the size of the
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit 3f04d98e972b59706bd43d6cc75efac91f8fba50 upstream.
The decoder uses its current timestamp in samples. Usually that is a
timestamp that has already
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit 3f04d98e972b59706bd43d6cc75efac91f8fba50 upstream.
The decoder uses its current timestamp in samples. Usually that is a
timestamp that has already passed, but in some
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:51:46 +0800 "Huang, Ying" wrote:
> The swap cache stats could be gotten only via sysrq, which isn't
> convenient in some situation. So the sysfs interface of swap cache
> stats is added for that. The added sysfs directories/files are as
> follow,
>
On Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:51:46 +0800 "Huang, Ying" wrote:
> The swap cache stats could be gotten only via sysrq, which isn't
> convenient in some situation. So the sysfs interface of swap cache
> stats is added for that. The added sysfs directories/files are as
> follow,
>
> /sys/kernel/mm/swap
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit 22c06892332d8916115525145b78e606e9cc6492 upstream.
Move decoder error setting into one condition.
Cc'ed to stable because later fixes depend on
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit 22c06892332d8916115525145b78e606e9cc6492 upstream.
Move decoder error setting into one condition.
Cc'ed to stable because later fixes depend on it.
Signed-off-by: Adrian
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnd Bergmann
commit bd7e31bbade02bc1e92aa00d5cf2cee2da66838a upstream.
gcc-7 suggests that an expression using a bitwise not and a bitmask
on a 'bool' variable is better
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 0cbe40112f42cf5e008f9127f6cd5952ba3946c7 upstream.
This specifically fixes resource leaks in the registration error paths.
Device-managed resources is a
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnd Bergmann
commit bd7e31bbade02bc1e92aa00d5cf2cee2da66838a upstream.
gcc-7 suggests that an expression using a bitwise not and a bitmask
on a 'bool' variable is better written using boolean
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit 0cbe40112f42cf5e008f9127f6cd5952ba3946c7 upstream.
This specifically fixes resource leaks in the registration error paths.
Device-managed resources is a bad fit for this
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit f952eaceb089b691eba7c4e13686e742a8f26bf5 upstream.
Intel PT uses IP compression based on the last IP. For decoding purposes,
'last IP' is not
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit f952eaceb089b691eba7c4e13686e742a8f26bf5 upstream.
Intel PT uses IP compression based on the last IP. For decoding purposes,
'last IP' is not updated when a branch target
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit ad7167a8cd174ba7d8c0d0ed8d8410521206d104 upstream.
A value of zero is used to indicate that there is no IP. Ensure the
value is zero when the
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit ad7167a8cd174ba7d8c0d0ed8d8410521206d104 upstream.
A value of zero is used to indicate that there is no IP. Ensure the
value is zero when the state is
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Snitzer
commit d19a55ccad15a486ffe03030570744e5d5bd9f8e upstream.
Reported-by: David Binderman
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mike Snitzer
commit d19a55ccad15a486ffe03030570744e5d5bd9f8e upstream.
Reported-by: David Binderman
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
---
drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
commit a16e37726c444cbda91e73ed5f742e717bfe866f upstream.
Gcc 7.1 complains about:
drivers/media/platform/s5p-jpeg/jpeg-core.c: In function
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
commit a16e37726c444cbda91e73ed5f742e717bfe866f upstream.
Gcc 7.1 complains about:
drivers/media/platform/s5p-jpeg/jpeg-core.c: In function
's5p_jpeg_parse_hdr.isra.9':
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit c592fafbdbb6b1279b76a54722d1465ca77e5bde upstream.
The thermal child device reuses the parent MFD-device device-tree node
when registering a thermal zone,
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Johan Hovold
commit c592fafbdbb6b1279b76a54722d1465ca77e5bde upstream.
The thermal child device reuses the parent MFD-device device-tree node
when registering a thermal zone, but did not take
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Viresh Kumar
commit 289d72afddf83440117c35d864bf0c6309c1d011 upstream.
After the lock is dropped, it is possible that the cpufreq_dev gets
freed before we call
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Viresh Kumar
commit 289d72afddf83440117c35d864bf0c6309c1d011 upstream.
After the lock is dropped, it is possible that the cpufreq_dev gets
freed before we call get_level() and that can cause
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Miaoqing Pan
commit cf8ce1ea61b75712a154c93e40f2a5af2e4dd997 upstream.
One scenario that could lead to UAF is two threads writing
simultaneously to the "tx99" debug
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit 12b7080609097753fd8198cc1daf589be3ec1cca upstream.
The return compression stack must be cleared whenever there is a PSB. Fix
one case where that
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit 12b7080609097753fd8198cc1daf589be3ec1cca upstream.
The return compression stack must be cleared whenever there is a PSB. Fix
one case where that was not happening.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Miaoqing Pan
commit cf8ce1ea61b75712a154c93e40f2a5af2e4dd997 upstream.
One scenario that could lead to UAF is two threads writing
simultaneously to the "tx99" debug file. One of them would
set
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Miaoqing Pan
commit bde717ab473668377fc65872398a102d40cb2d58 upstream.
The hard coded register 0x9864 and 0x9924 are invalid
for ar9300 chips.
Signed-off-by: Miaoqing
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Miaoqing Pan
commit bde717ab473668377fc65872398a102d40cb2d58 upstream.
The hard coded register 0x9864 and 0x9924 are invalid
for ar9300 chips.
Signed-off-by: Miaoqing Pan
Signed-off-by:
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit ee14ac0ef6827cd6f9a572cc83dd0191ea17812c upstream.
Intel PT uses IP compression based on the last IP. For decoding
purposes, 'last IP' is
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit ee14ac0ef6827cd6f9a572cc83dd0191ea17812c upstream.
Intel PT uses IP compression based on the last IP. For decoding
purposes, 'last IP' is considered to be reset to zero
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Miaoqing Pan
commit 07246c115801c27652700e3679bb58661ef7ed65 upstream.
The bug was triggered when do suspend/resuming continuously
on Dell XPS L322X/0PJHXN version
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Miaoqing Pan
commit 07246c115801c27652700e3679bb58661ef7ed65 upstream.
The bug was triggered when do suspend/resuming continuously
on Dell XPS L322X/0PJHXN version 9333 (2013) with kernel
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit 622b7a47b843c78626f40c1d1aeef8483383fba2 upstream.
The decoder will try to use branch packets to find an IP to start decoding
or to recover from
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Adrian Hunter
commit 622b7a47b843c78626f40c1d1aeef8483383fba2 upstream.
The decoder will try to use branch packets to find an IP to start decoding
or to recover from errors. Currently the FUP
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.40 release.
There are 125 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jul 27 19:19:43 UTC 2017.
Anything
This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.9.40 release.
There are 125 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.
Responses should be made by Thu Jul 27 19:19:43 UTC 2017.
Anything
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michael Ellerman
commit 01e6a61aceb82e13bec29502a8eb70d9574f97ad upstream.
Although it's not documented anywhere, there is an expectation that
atomic64_inc_not_zero()
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michael Ellerman
commit 01e6a61aceb82e13bec29502a8eb70d9574f97ad upstream.
Although it's not documented anywhere, there is an expectation that
atomic64_inc_not_zero() returns a result which
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Anton Blanchard
commit 64e756c55aa46fc18fd53e8f3598b73b528d8637 upstream.
>From POWER4 onwards, mfocrf() only places the specified CR field into
the destination GPR, and the
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nicholas Bellinger
commit 138d351eefb727ab9e41a3dc5f112ceb4f6e59f2 upstream.
This patch re-introduces part of a long standing login workaround that
was recently dropped
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Anton Blanchard
commit 87c4b83e0fe234a1f0eed131ab6fa232036860d5 upstream.
The mcrf emulation code was using the CR field number directly as the shift
value, without taking
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Anton Blanchard
commit 87c4b83e0fe234a1f0eed131ab6fa232036860d5 upstream.
The mcrf emulation code was using the CR field number directly as the shift
value, without taking into account that CR
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Anton Blanchard
commit 64e756c55aa46fc18fd53e8f3598b73b528d8637 upstream.
>From POWER4 onwards, mfocrf() only places the specified CR field into
the destination GPR, and the rest of it is set
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nicholas Bellinger
commit 138d351eefb727ab9e41a3dc5f112ceb4f6e59f2 upstream.
This patch re-introduces part of a long standing login workaround that
was recently dropped by:
commit
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
commit c6bb0b8d426a8cf865ca9c8a532cc3a2927cfceb upstream.
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a
context is entry
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
commit c6bb0b8d426a8cf865ca9c8a532cc3a2927cfceb upstream.
On radix, the process table entry we want to clear when destroying a
context is entry 0, not entry 1. This has
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnd Bergmann
commit 4a4274bf2dbbd1c7a45be0c89a1687c9d2eef4a0 upstream.
In the stable linux-3.16 branch, I ran into a warning in the
wlcore driver:
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Herbert Xu
commit 096f41d3a8fcbb8dde7f71379b1ca85fe213eded upstream.
The parsing of sadb_x_ipsecrequest is broken in a number of ways.
First of all we're not
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnd Bergmann
commit 4a4274bf2dbbd1c7a45be0c89a1687c9d2eef4a0 upstream.
In the stable linux-3.16 branch, I ran into a warning in the
wlcore driver:
drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/spi.c: In
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Herbert Xu
commit 096f41d3a8fcbb8dde7f71379b1ca85fe213eded upstream.
The parsing of sadb_x_ipsecrequest is broken in a number of ways.
First of all we're not verifying sadb_x_ipsecrequest_len.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Bart Van Assche
commit 9f4ab18ac51dc87345a9cbd2527e6acf7a0a9335 upstream.
scsiback_release_cmd() must not dereference se_cmd->se_tmr_req
because that memory is
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Bart Van Assche
commit 9f4ab18ac51dc87345a9cbd2527e6acf7a0a9335 upstream.
scsiback_release_cmd() must not dereference se_cmd->se_tmr_req
because that memory is freed by target_free_cmd_mem()
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 7:09 PM, wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Existing overlay unit tests examine individual pieces of the overlay
> code. The new tests target the entire process of applying an overlay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 7:09 PM, wrote:
> From: Frank Rowand
>
> Existing overlay unit tests examine individual pieces of the overlay
> code. The new tests target the entire process of applying an overlay.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand
> ---
[...]
> @@ -1261,6 +1263,8 @@ void __init
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ewan D. Milne
commit f9279c968c257ee39b0d7bd2571a4d231a67bcc1 upstream.
The addition of the STARGET_REMOVE state had the side effect of
introducing a race condition that can
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ewan D. Milne
commit f9279c968c257ee39b0d7bd2571a4d231a67bcc1 upstream.
The addition of the STARGET_REMOVE state had the side effect of
introducing a race condition that can cause a crash.
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Bjorn Helgaas
commit 13cfc732160f7bc7e596128ce34cda361c556966 upstream.
Neither soft poweroff (transition to ACPI power state S5) nor
suspend-to-RAM (transition to state
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Bjorn Helgaas
commit 13cfc732160f7bc7e596128ce34cda361c556966 upstream.
Neither soft poweroff (transition to ACPI power state S5) nor
suspend-to-RAM (transition to state S3) works on the
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Chen Yu
commit e60514bd4485c0c7c5a7cf779b200ce0b95c70d6 upstream.
Currently we saw a lot of "No irq handler" errors during hibernation, which
caused the system hang
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Shawn Lin
commit dc8cca5ef25ac4cb0dfc37467521a759767ff361 upstream.
Rockchip's RC has two banks of registers for the root port: a normal bank
that is strictly
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Shawn Lin
commit dc8cca5ef25ac4cb0dfc37467521a759767ff361 upstream.
Rockchip's RC has two banks of registers for the root port: a normal bank
that is strictly compatible with the PCIe spec,
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Chen Yu
commit e60514bd4485c0c7c5a7cf779b200ce0b95c70d6 upstream.
Currently we saw a lot of "No irq handler" errors during hibernation, which
caused the system hang finally:
ata4.00: qc
801 - 900 of 2870 matches
Mail list logo