David Miller writes:
> From: Andrew Lunn
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:14:10 +0200
>
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> From: Esben Haabendal
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal
>>> ---
David Miller writes:
> From: Andrew Lunn
> Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2018 16:14:10 +0200
>
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:05:40PM +0200, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>>> From: Esben Haabendal
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/phy/dp83640.c | 17 +
>>> 1 file
Commit-ID: e726c8511c052ba40dc943517b54011e42c2dfa3
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e726c8511c052ba40dc943517b54011e42c2dfa3
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:35:32 -0300
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate:
Commit-ID: e726c8511c052ba40dc943517b54011e42c2dfa3
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/e726c8511c052ba40dc943517b54011e42c2dfa3
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:35:32 -0300
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:50:44 -0300
Commit-ID: caf61de356189f0925b23c3922bd16b53bb7c768
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/caf61de356189f0925b23c3922bd16b53bb7c768
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:43:38 -0300
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate:
Commit-ID: caf61de356189f0925b23c3922bd16b53bb7c768
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/caf61de356189f0925b23c3922bd16b53bb7c768
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:43:38 -0300
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:51:28 -0300
Commit-ID: c0459a092509f9c2ff91cc070cd2645d38e7cf7b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c0459a092509f9c2ff91cc070cd2645d38e7cf7b
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:13:24 -0300
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate:
Commit-ID: c0459a092509f9c2ff91cc070cd2645d38e7cf7b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c0459a092509f9c2ff91cc070cd2645d38e7cf7b
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:13:24 -0300
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:18:39 -0300
Commit-ID: 0d75f123a6dcdacb3550b0c3c44a283f7259289e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0d75f123a6dcdacb3550b0c3c44a283f7259289e
Author: Adrian Hunter
AuthorDate: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:13:17 +0200
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate:
Commit-ID: 0d75f123a6dcdacb3550b0c3c44a283f7259289e
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/0d75f123a6dcdacb3550b0c3c44a283f7259289e
Author: Adrian Hunter
AuthorDate: Tue, 6 Mar 2018 11:13:17 +0200
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
CommitDate: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 11:03:33 -0300
perf
* Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > I.e. I'd generate the names like this:
> >
> > __{x64,x32,ia32}[_compat]_sys_waittid()
> >
> > The fully consistent nomenclature would be someting like this:
> >
> > 8105f1e0 tkernel_waitid# common C
* Dominik Brodowski wrote:
> > I.e. I'd generate the names like this:
> >
> > __{x64,x32,ia32}[_compat]_sys_waittid()
> >
> > The fully consistent nomenclature would be someting like this:
> >
> > 8105f1e0 tkernel_waitid# common C function (64-bit
> > kargs)
> >
From: Colin Ian King
There is a double assignment to cdev->ports, the first is redundant
as it is over-written so remove it.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1467432 ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
From: Colin Ian King
There is a double assignment to cdev->ports, the first is redundant
as it is over-written so remove it.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1467432 ("Unused value")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
drivers/crypto/chelsio/chtls/chtls_main.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
On 4/5/18 5:04 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 2018-04-05 03:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:25:16 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> From: Randy Dunlap
>>>
>>> If the reiserfs mount option's journal name contains a '%' character,
On 4/5/18 5:04 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 2018-04-05 03:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018 18:25:16 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>>> From: Randy Dunlap
>>>
>>> If the reiserfs mount option's journal name contains a '%' character,
>>> it can lead to a WARN_ONCE() in
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:59:59AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-04-06 3:59 GMT+09:00 Jiri Olsa :
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:50:00AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> 2018-04-06 0:16 GMT+09:00 Jiri Olsa :
> >> > There's no need to pass LD* arguments
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:59:59AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-04-06 3:59 GMT+09:00 Jiri Olsa :
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:50:00AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >> 2018-04-06 0:16 GMT+09:00 Jiri Olsa :
> >> > There's no need to pass LD* arguments to link-vmlinux.sh,
> >> > because
Since the 4.16 kernel my uvcvideo webcam on Thinkpad X1 Carbon (5th
gen) stopped working with gst-launch-1.0, kamoso (kde webcam app),
Firefox and Chromium on sites like appear.in, talky.io, Google
Hangouts and meet.jit.si.
It works fine in 4.15
The camera is:
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04f2:b5ce
Since the 4.16 kernel my uvcvideo webcam on Thinkpad X1 Carbon (5th
gen) stopped working with gst-launch-1.0, kamoso (kde webcam app),
Firefox and Chromium on sites like appear.in, talky.io, Google
Hangouts and meet.jit.si.
It works fine in 4.15
The camera is:
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04f2:b5ce
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:02:56AM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Yury,
>
> An ISB at the beginning of the vectors? This is odd, taking an IRQ to get in
> here would be a context-synchronization-event too, so the ISB is superfluous.
>
> The ARM-ARM has a list of 'Context-Synchronization event's
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 11:02:56AM +0100, James Morse wrote:
> Hi Yury,
>
> An ISB at the beginning of the vectors? This is odd, taking an IRQ to get in
> here would be a context-synchronization-event too, so the ISB is superfluous.
>
> The ARM-ARM has a list of 'Context-Synchronization event's
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:40:01PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > So at first glance it seemed like a race condition. However, the
> > unwinder was only trying to dereference the frame pointer (RBP:
> > 8801b05e67f8), which should have never been poisoned in the first
> > place.
> >
> > So
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:40:01PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > So at first glance it seemed like a race condition. However, the
> > unwinder was only trying to dereference the frame pointer (RBP:
> > 8801b05e67f8), which should have never been poisoned in the first
> > place.
> >
> > So
[adding linux-mm and akpm]
On 04/06/2018 07:11 AM, Tom Abraham wrote:
>
>
> Calling swapon() on a zero length swap file on SSD can lead to a
>
> divide-by-zero.
[adding linux-mm and akpm]
On 04/06/2018 07:11 AM, Tom Abraham wrote:
>
>
> Calling swapon() on a zero length swap file on SSD can lead to a
>
> divide-by-zero.
Christian Brauner writes:
>> At a practical level there should be no receivers. Plus performance
>> issues. At least my memory is that any unprivileged user on the system
>> is allowed to listen to those events.
>
> Any unprivileged user is allowed to listen to
Christian Brauner writes:
>> At a practical level there should be no receivers. Plus performance
>> issues. At least my memory is that any unprivileged user on the system
>> is allowed to listen to those events.
>
> Any unprivileged user is allowed to listen to uevents if they have
>
Hi Masami,
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 10:53 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:34:13 -0500
> Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> > Hi Masami,
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 12:50 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Can you print
Hi Masami,
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 10:53 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 18:34:13 -0500
> Tom Zanussi wrote:
>
> > Hi Masami,
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 12:50 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > Can you print out the error with which
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> Today's kernel oopsed on s390. Bisect points to:
> 3c8ba0d61d04 ("kernel.h: Retain constant expression output for max()/min()")
>
> [1.898277] dasd-eckd 0.0.3304: DASD with 4 KB/block, 21636720 KB total
> size,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 2:47 AM, Sebastian Ott wrote:
> Today's kernel oopsed on s390. Bisect points to:
> 3c8ba0d61d04 ("kernel.h: Retain constant expression output for max()/min()")
>
> [1.898277] dasd-eckd 0.0.3304: DASD with 4 KB/block, 21636720 KB total
> size, 48 KB/track, compatible
Quoting Sekhar Nori (2018-04-06 02:37:03)
>
> Can you please check that and confirm there is no issue with genpd and
> using CLK_OF_DECLARE() to initialize clocks?
>
> Unless you report an issue back, or Mike and Stephen have ideas about
> how to handle the dependency between PSC/PLL derived
Quoting Sekhar Nori (2018-04-06 02:37:03)
>
> Can you please check that and confirm there is no issue with genpd and
> using CLK_OF_DECLARE() to initialize clocks?
>
> Unless you report an issue back, or Mike and Stephen have ideas about
> how to handle the dependency between PSC/PLL derived
Hi Christian,
On 04/09/2018 07:48 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 06.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Valin:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Is there a way to turn off these huge pages at boot-time/run-time?
>
> Only at compile time by not setting CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.
Any reason why
echo never
Hi Christian,
On 04/09/2018 07:48 AM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 06.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Valin:
>> Hi Christian,
>>
>> Is there a way to turn off these huge pages at boot-time/run-time?
>
> Only at compile time by not setting CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.
Any reason why
echo never
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-02 03:45:45)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> index e89584e..e0c83ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> @@ -83,6 +88,38 @@ static int gdsc_poll_status(struct gdsc *sc, unsigned int
> reg, bool en)
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-04-02 03:45:45)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> index e89584e..e0c83ba 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> @@ -83,6 +88,38 @@ static int gdsc_poll_status(struct gdsc *sc, unsigned int
> reg, bool en)
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 14:49:22 +0100
Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 06/04/18 14:25, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:09:16PM -0400, David Rivshin wrote:
> >> From: David Rivshin
> >>
> >> NUMREGBYTES (which is used as the size
On Fri, 6 Apr 2018 14:49:22 +0100
Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 06/04/18 14:25, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:09:16PM -0400, David Rivshin wrote:
> >> From: David Rivshin
> >>
> >> NUMREGBYTES (which is used as the size for gdb_regs[]) is incorrectly based
> >> on
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:21:38PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Updated version below.
>
> --
>
> From 466c35c36cae392cfee5e54a2884792972e789ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roman Gushchin
> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:31:35 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: treat memory.low
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 01:21:38PM +0100, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> Updated version below.
>
> --
>
> From 466c35c36cae392cfee5e54a2884792972e789ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Roman Gushchin
> Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 19:31:35 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v4 3/4] mm: treat memory.low value inclusive
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:52:15PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 04/06/2018 05:13 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > Question: Should this 'flags' be per-node? Is it ok for a congested
> > memcg to call wait_iff_congested for all nodes?
>
> Indeed, congestion state should be pre-node. If memcg on
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:52:15PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> On 04/06/2018 05:13 AM, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> > Question: Should this 'flags' be per-node? Is it ok for a congested
> > memcg to call wait_iff_congested for all nodes?
>
> Indeed, congestion state should be pre-node. If memcg on
On 4/5/2018 9:12 PM, Peter Dolding wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Casey Schaufler
>> wrote:
>>> On 4/5/2018 3:31 AM, Peter Dolding wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Igor
On 4/5/2018 9:12 PM, Peter Dolding wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:31 AM, Sargun Dhillon wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Casey Schaufler
>> wrote:
>>> On 4/5/2018 3:31 AM, Peter Dolding wrote:
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 7:55 PM, Igor Stoppa
wrote:
> On 01/04/18 08:41,
On 4/6/2018 6:00 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
Build failes due to that the directory isn't created before we execute
the build rule.
cc1: fatal error: can’t open ‘drivers/memory/emif-asm-offsets.s’ for
writing: No such file or directory compilation terminated.
On 4/6/2018 6:00 AM, Anders Roxell wrote:
Build failes due to that the directory isn't created before we execute
the build rule.
cc1: fatal error: can’t open ‘drivers/memory/emif-asm-offsets.s’ for
writing: No such file or directory compilation terminated.
Acked-by: Remi Machet
-Original Message-
From: Mark Greer
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 9:17 PM
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt ; Paul Mackerras
; Michael Ellerman
Cc: Remi Machet
Acked-by: Remi Machet
-Original Message-
From: Mark Greer
Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2018 9:17 PM
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt ; Paul Mackerras
; Michael Ellerman
Cc: Remi Machet ; Dale Farnsworth ;
linuxppc-...@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Mark Greer
Subject: [PATCH
On 06/04/2018 23:47, Peng Hao wrote:
> warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmx_enable_tdp’
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index
On 06/04/2018 23:47, Peng Hao wrote:
> warning: no previous prototype for ‘vmx_enable_tdp’
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Hao
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index f0fd50b..86681bc 100644
>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:20:28PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> We have separate LRU list for each memory cgroup. Memory reclaim iterates
> over cgroups and calls shrink_inactive_list() every inactive LRU list.
> Based on the state of a single LRU shrink_inactive_list() may flag
> the whole
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:20:28PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> We have separate LRU list for each memory cgroup. Memory reclaim iterates
> over cgroups and calls shrink_inactive_list() every inactive LRU list.
> Based on the state of a single LRU shrink_inactive_list() may flag
> the whole
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:23:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.127 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:23:01PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.127 release.
> There are 72 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:08:59PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:40:20 +0200
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 10:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:11:38AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:08:59PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Apr 2018 10:40:20 +0200
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2018-04-05 at 10:27 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 09:11:38AM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm
From: Colin Ian King
Currently chip is being dereferenced by the call to dev_get_drvdata
before it is being null checked, however, chip can never be null, so
this check is misleading and redundant. Remove it.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1357806 ("Dereference before
From: Colin Ian King
Currently chip is being dereferenced by the call to dev_get_drvdata
before it is being null checked, however, chip can never be null, so
this check is misleading and redundant. Remove it.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1357806 ("Dereference before null check")
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:
>
> On 06/04/18 14:56, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Fabien DESSENNE
>> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/04/18 11:38, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:28
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 8:35 PM, Fabien DESSENNE wrote:
>
> On 06/04/18 14:56, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Fabien DESSENNE
>> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/04/18 11:38, Jassi Brar wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 4:28 PM, Fabien Dessenne
wrote:
On 04/05/2018 09:53 PM, CHANDAN VN wrote:
INITRD reserved area entry is not removed from memblock
even though initrd reserved area is freed. After freeing
the memory it is released from memblock. The same can be
checked from /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/reserved.
The patch makes sure that the
On 04/05/2018 09:53 PM, CHANDAN VN wrote:
INITRD reserved area entry is not removed from memblock
even though initrd reserved area is freed. After freeing
the memory it is released from memblock. The same can be
checked from /sys/kernel/debug/memblock/reserved.
The patch makes sure that the
On Fri 06-04-18 11:54:41, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:53:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > mm/memcontrol.c: In function
On Fri 06-04-18 11:54:41, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:53:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) produced this warning:
> >
> > mm/memcontrol.c: In function
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:38:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 07:38:44AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 08:54:50PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 6:38 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 07:01:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >>
> > >> syzbot hit the following
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:20:27PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> Only kswapd can have non-zero nr_immediate, and current_may_throttle() is
> always true for kswapd (PF_LESS_THROTTLE bit is never set) thus it's
> enough to check stat.nr_immediate only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:20:27PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> Only kswapd can have non-zero nr_immediate, and current_may_throttle() is
> always true for kswapd (PF_LESS_THROTTLE bit is never set) thus it's
> enough to check stat.nr_immediate only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin
>
On 2018-04-06 20:43, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:35:49PM +0530, sricha...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
I tried booting mainline built with qcom_defconfig on ap148 and
did boot. Not sure if your bootloader's bootarg is this,
'console=ttyMSM0,115200n8' ?
Yes, I think so.
On 2018-04-06 20:43, Richard Cochran wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 06:35:49PM +0530, sricha...@codeaurora.org
wrote:
I tried booting mainline built with qcom_defconfig on ap148 and
did boot. Not sure if your bootloader's bootarg is this,
'console=ttyMSM0,115200n8' ?
Yes, I think so.
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:45:41AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Christian Brauner writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:59:49PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Christian Brauner writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Apr 05,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:45:41AM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Christian Brauner writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:59:49PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Christian Brauner writes:
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:26:59PM +0300, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
> >> >> On 05.04.2018
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 09:42:25 -0700, Florian Fainelli
wrote:
> Commit a09cd356586d ("ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver")
> attempted to annotate the structure rpi_power_domain_packet with
> __packed but introduced a typo and made it named __packet instead. Just
>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:20:26PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> Update some comments that become stale since transiton from per-zone
> to per-node reclaim.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
On Sun, 1 Apr 2018 09:42:25 -0700, Florian Fainelli
wrote:
> Commit a09cd356586d ("ARM: bcm2835: add rpi power domain driver")
> attempted to annotate the structure rpi_power_domain_packet with
> __packed but introduced a typo and made it named __packet instead. Just
> drop the annotation since
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:20:26PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> Update some comments that become stale since transiton from per-zone
> to per-node reclaim.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrey Ryabinin
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:05:41PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Currently chip is being dereferenced by the call to dev_get_drvdata
> before it is being null checked, hence we have a potential null
> pointer dereference bug. Fix this by only
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:05:41PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> Currently chip is being dereferenced by the call to dev_get_drvdata
> before it is being null checked, hence we have a potential null
> pointer dereference bug. Fix this by only dereferencing it after the
>
Hi Linus,
Here are the RDMA patches for for 4.17.
This cycle we have some interesting conflicts, a syzkaller related bug fix in
rc clashed very badly with the Mellanox shared pull request. Doug made the
resolution in the RDMA tree for-next tree and DaveM refered to it when he
pulled in the same
Hi Linus,
Here are the RDMA patches for for 4.17.
This cycle we have some interesting conflicts, a syzkaller related bug fix in
rc clashed very badly with the Mellanox shared pull request. Doug made the
resolution in the RDMA tree for-next tree and DaveM refered to it when he
pulled in the same
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:39:22PM +0530, Gaurav Dhingra wrote:
> Wrap comment to fix warning "prefer a maximum 75 chars per line"
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Dhingra
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - use correct format for multiline comment
> Changes in v3:
> -
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:39:22PM +0530, Gaurav Dhingra wrote:
> Wrap comment to fix warning "prefer a maximum 75 chars per line"
>
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Dhingra
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - use correct format for multiline comment
> Changes in v3:
> - include commit log
> ---
>
From: Colin Ian King
Currently chip is being dereferenced by the call to dev_get_drvdata
before it is being null checked, hence we have a potential null
pointer dereference bug. Fix this by only dereferencing it after the
null check.
Detected by CoverityScan,
From: Colin Ian King
Currently chip is being dereferenced by the call to dev_get_drvdata
before it is being null checked, hence we have a potential null
pointer dereference bug. Fix this by only dereferencing it after the
null check.
Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1357806 ("Dereference before
Hi Heiner,
On 30 March 2018 at 10:37, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 30.03.2018 um 08:50 schrieb Vincent Guittot:
>> On 29 March 2018 at 19:40, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> Am 29.03.2018 um 09:41 schrieb Vincent Guittot:
>>
I'm finally not so
Hi Heiner,
On 30 March 2018 at 10:37, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> Am 30.03.2018 um 08:50 schrieb Vincent Guittot:
>> On 29 March 2018 at 19:40, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
>>> Am 29.03.2018 um 09:41 schrieb Vincent Guittot:
>>
I'm finally not so sure that i have the right set up to reproduce
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:52:17AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Mark Greer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 12:02:46AM +0530, Gaurav Dhingra wrote:
> >> Wrap comment to fix warning "prefer a maximum 75 chars per line"
> >>
> >>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:52:17AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Mark Greer wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 04, 2018 at 12:02:46AM +0530, Gaurav Dhingra wrote:
> >> Wrap comment to fix warning "prefer a maximum 75 chars per line"
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Dhingra
> >>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:43:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:55:03PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:04:18PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > > + /* Temporary hack for handling lock imbalance. */
> > > > +
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 05:43:43PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:55:03PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:04:18PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > > + /* Temporary hack for handling lock imbalance. */
> > > > +
On 04/06/2018 12:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:09 AM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:46:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2018 10:27 AM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
4.9-stable
On 04/06/2018 12:22 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:09 AM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 10:46:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> On 02/23/2018 10:27 AM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 01:13:20PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
> 2018-03-20 12:22 GMT+01:00 Daniel Thompson :
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:04:31PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> Gentle ping for this series, there
On 04/06/2018 10:34 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:44:16PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
On 04/05/2018 04:17 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 12:59:35PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
On 04/05/2018 12:19 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The point of that patch was
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 01:13:20PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
>
> 2018-03-20 12:22 GMT+01:00 Daniel Thompson :
> > On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:04:31PM +0100, Enric Balletbo Serra wrote:
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> Gentle ping for this series, there is any possibility you have
On 04/06/2018 10:34 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:44:16PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
On 04/05/2018 04:17 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 12:59:35PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
On 04/05/2018 12:19 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The point of that patch was
On 4/6/18 4:12 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
>
> The reason of q->mq_freeze_depth == 1 turned out that loop_set_status()
> forgot to call blk_mq_unfreeze_queue() at error paths for
> info->lo_encrypt_type != NULL case.
Thanks for finding this, applied.
--
On 4/6/18 4:12 AM, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
>
> The reason of q->mq_freeze_depth == 1 turned out that loop_set_status()
> forgot to call blk_mq_unfreeze_queue() at error paths for
> info->lo_encrypt_type != NULL case.
Thanks for finding this, applied.
--
501 - 600 of 2290 matches
Mail list logo