On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:53:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'memory_events_show':
> mm/memcontrol.c:5453:23: warning: array
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:53:30PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> After merging the akpm-current tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>
> mm/memcontrol.c: In function 'memory_events_show':
> mm/memcontrol.c:5453:23: warning: array
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:30:31PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> When you want to change the brightness using a PWM signal, one thing you
> need to consider is how human perceive the brightness. Human perceive
> the brightness change non-linearly, we have better sensitivity at low
>
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:30:31PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> When you want to change the brightness using a PWM signal, one thing you
> need to consider is how human perceive the brightness. Human perceive
> the brightness change non-linearly, we have better sensitivity at low
>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:27:45PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:05:12PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:34:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > I could say something like:
> > >
> > > "Pairs with dependency ordering from both
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:27:45PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:05:12PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:34:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > I could say something like:
> > >
> > > "Pairs with dependency ordering from both
Am 06.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Valin:
Hi Christian,
Is there a way to turn off these huge pages at boot-time/run-time?
Only at compile time by not setting CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.
Alternatively you can avoid enabling CONFIG_SWIOTLB which will avoid the
slow DMA path as well.
Am 06.04.2018 um 17:30 schrieb Jean-Marc Valin:
Hi Christian,
Is there a way to turn off these huge pages at boot-time/run-time?
Only at compile time by not setting CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.
Alternatively you can avoid enabling CONFIG_SWIOTLB which will avoid the
slow DMA path as well.
On 04/06/2018 10:34 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:44:16PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
On 04/05/2018 04:17 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 12:59:35PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
On 04/05/2018 12:19 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The point of that patch was
On 04/06/2018 10:34 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:44:16PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
On 04/05/2018 04:17 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 12:59:35PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
On 04/05/2018 12:19 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
The point of that patch was
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:30:29PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Setting num-interpolated-steps in the dts will allow you to have linear
> interpolation between values of brightness-levels. This way a high
> resolution pwm duty cycle can be used without having to list out every
> possible
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 12:30:29PM +0100, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> Setting num-interpolated-steps in the dts will allow you to have linear
> interpolation between values of brightness-levels. This way a high
> resolution pwm duty cycle can be used without having to list out every
> possible
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:55:03PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:04:18PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > + /* Temporary hack for handling lock imbalance. */
> > > + if (__mutex_owner(>lo_ctl_mutex) == current)
> > > +
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:55:03PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:04:18PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > > + /* Temporary hack for handling lock imbalance. */
> > > + if (__mutex_owner(>lo_ctl_mutex) == current)
> > > +
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:02:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>> 06dd3dfeea60e2a6457a6aedf97afc8e6d2ba497 (Thu Apr 5 03:07:20 2018 +)
>> Merge tag
Hi Jacopo,
(CC'ing Mark Brown)
On Friday, 6 April 2018 17:25:58 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:15:35PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday, 6 April 2018 15:41:56 EEST Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >> Document Thine THC63LVD1024 LVDS decoder device tree bindings.
> >>
>
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 5:36 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:02:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
>> 06dd3dfeea60e2a6457a6aedf97afc8e6d2ba497 (Thu Apr 5 03:07:20 2018 +)
>> Merge tag 'char-misc-4.17-rc1' of
>>
Hi Jacopo,
(CC'ing Mark Brown)
On Friday, 6 April 2018 17:25:58 EEST jacopo mondi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 04:15:35PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Friday, 6 April 2018 15:41:56 EEST Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >> Document Thine THC63LVD1024 LVDS decoder device tree bindings.
> >>
>
The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
is factored out into a separate function.
Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
out if a cpu or a scheduler group is over-utilized.
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
The functionality that a given utilization fits into a given capacity
is factored out into a separate function.
Currently it is only used in wake_cap() but will be re-used to figure
out if a cpu or a scheduler group is over-utilized.
Cc: Ingo Molnar
Cc: Peter Zijlstra
Signed-off-by: Dietmar
From: Quentin Perret
The energy consumption of each CPU in the system is modeled with a list
of values representing its dissipated power and compute capacity at each
available Operating Performance Point (OPP). These values are derived
from existing information in the
From: Quentin Perret
The energy consumption of each CPU in the system is modeled with a list
of values representing its dissipated power and compute capacity at each
available Operating Performance Point (OPP). These values are derived
from existing information in the kernel (currently used by
From: Quentin Perret
In case an energy model is available, waking tasks are re-routed into a
new energy-aware placement algorithm. The eligible CPUs to be used in the
energy-aware wakeup path are restricted to the highest non-overutilized
sched_domain containing prev_cpu
From: Quentin Perret
In preparation for the definition of an energy-aware wakeup path, a
helper function is provided to estimate the consequence on system energy
when a specific task wakes-up on a specific CPU. compute_energy()
estimates the OPPs to be reached by all
From: Quentin Perret
In case an energy model is available, waking tasks are re-routed into a
new energy-aware placement algorithm. The eligible CPUs to be used in the
energy-aware wakeup path are restricted to the highest non-overutilized
sched_domain containing prev_cpu and this_cpu. If no such
From: Quentin Perret
In preparation for the definition of an energy-aware wakeup path, a
helper function is provided to estimate the consequence on system energy
when a specific task wakes-up on a specific CPU. compute_energy()
estimates the OPPs to be reached by all frequency domains and
From: Thara Gopinath
Energy-aware scheduling should only operate when the system is not
overutilized. There must be cpu time available to place tasks based on
utilization in an energy-aware fashion, i.e. to pack tasks on
energy-efficient cpus without harming the
From: Quentin Perret
Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) has to be started from the arch code.
This commit enables it from the arch topology driver for arm/arm64
systems, hence enabling a better support for Arm big.LITTLE and future
DynamIQ architectures.
Cc: Greg
From: Thara Gopinath
Energy-aware scheduling should only operate when the system is not
overutilized. There must be cpu time available to place tasks based on
utilization in an energy-aware fashion, i.e. to pack tasks on
energy-efficient cpus without harming the overall throughput.
In case the
From: Quentin Perret
Energy Aware Scheduling (EAS) has to be started from the arch code.
This commit enables it from the arch topology driver for arm/arm64
systems, hence enabling a better support for Arm big.LITTLE and future
DynamIQ architectures.
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Signed-off-by:
1. Overview
The Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS) based on Morten Rasmussen's posting on
LKML [1] is currently part of the AOSP Common Kernel and runs on
today's smartphones with Arm's big.LITTLE CPUs.
Based on the experience gained over the last two and a half years in
product development, we propose
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:02:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> 06dd3dfeea60e2a6457a6aedf97afc8e6d2ba497 (Thu Apr 5 03:07:20 2018 +)
> Merge tag 'char-misc-4.17-rc1' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc
>
1. Overview
The Energy Aware Scheduler (EAS) based on Morten Rasmussen's posting on
LKML [1] is currently part of the AOSP Common Kernel and runs on
today's smartphones with Arm's big.LITTLE CPUs.
Based on the experience gained over the last two and a half years in
product development, we propose
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 05:02:02PM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot hit the following crash on upstream commit
> 06dd3dfeea60e2a6457a6aedf97afc8e6d2ba497 (Thu Apr 5 03:07:20 2018 +)
> Merge tag 'char-misc-4.17-rc1' of
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/char-misc
>
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hans de Goede
commit 3bf7b5d6d017c27e0d3b160aafb35a8e7cfeda1f upstream.
Commit b17e5729a630 ("libata: disable LPM for Crucial BX100 SSD 500GB
drive"), introduced a
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hans de Goede
commit 3bf7b5d6d017c27e0d3b160aafb35a8e7cfeda1f upstream.
Commit b17e5729a630 ("libata: disable LPM for Crucial BX100 SSD 500GB
drive"), introduced a ATA_HORKAGE_NOLPM quirk for
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hans de Goede
commit d418ff56b8f2d2b296daafa8da151fe27689b757 upstream.
When commit 9c7be59fc519af ("libata: Apply NOLPM quirk to Crucial MX100
512GB SSDs") was added it
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hans de Goede
commit d418ff56b8f2d2b296daafa8da151fe27689b757 upstream.
When commit 9c7be59fc519af ("libata: Apply NOLPM quirk to Crucial MX100
512GB SSDs") was added it inherited the
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Biggers
commit 058f58e235cbe03e923b30ea7c49995a46a8725f upstream.
syzkaller reported a crash in ata_bmdma_fill_sg() when writing to
/dev/sg1. The immediate cause
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Biggers
commit 058f58e235cbe03e923b30ea7c49995a46a8725f upstream.
syzkaller reported a crash in ata_bmdma_fill_sg() when writing to
/dev/sg1. The immediate cause was that the ATA
Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
Add gcc attribute unused for `l` variable, replace `path` variable directly
with prom_scratch. Fix warnings treated as errors with W=1:
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:607:6: error: variable ‘l’ set but
not used
Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
Add gcc attribute unused for `l` variable, replace `path` variable directly
with prom_scratch. Fix warnings treated as errors with W=1:
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c:607:6: error: variable ‘l’ set but
not used [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:56:49 +0300
Stefan Popa wrote:
> The AD5694/AD5694R/AD5695R/AD5696/AD5696R are a family of 4 channel DAC
> s with 12-bit, 14-bit and 16-bit precision respectively. The devices have
> either no built-in reference, or built-in 2.5V reference.
>
> The
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:56:49 +0300
Stefan Popa wrote:
> The AD5694/AD5694R/AD5695R/AD5696/AD5696R are a family of 4 channel DAC
> s with 12-bit, 14-bit and 16-bit precision respectively. The devices have
> either no built-in reference, or built-in 2.5V reference.
>
> The AD5671R/AD5675R are
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Takashi Iwai
commit 8e6b1a72a75bb5067ccb6b56d8ca4aa3a300a64e upstream.
In loopback_open() and loopback_close(), we assign and release the
substream object to the corresponding
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Takashi Iwai
commit 8e6b1a72a75bb5067ccb6b56d8ca4aa3a300a64e upstream.
In loopback_open() and loopback_close(), we assign and release the
substream object to the corresponding cable in a racy
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 09:52 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> The host byte has to be shifted by 16 not 6.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_isr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Biggers
commit 9173e5e80729c8434b8d27531527c5245f4a5594 upstream.
syzkaller hit a WARN() in ata_qc_issue() when writing to /dev/sg0. This
happened because it issued
On Fri, 2018-04-06 at 09:52 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> The host byte has to be shifted by 16 not 6.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_isr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_isr.c
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Biggers
commit 9173e5e80729c8434b8d27531527c5245f4a5594 upstream.
syzkaller hit a WARN() in ata_qc_issue() when writing to /dev/sg0. This
happened because it issued a READ_6 command
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:09:16PM -0400, David Rivshin wrote:
> From: David Rivshin
>
> NUMREGBYTES (which is used as the size for gdb_regs[]) is incorrectly based
> on DBG_MAX_REG_NUM instead of GDB_MAX_REGS. DBG_MAX_REG_NUM is the number
> of total registers, while
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 04:09:16PM -0400, David Rivshin wrote:
> From: David Rivshin
>
> NUMREGBYTES (which is used as the size for gdb_regs[]) is incorrectly based
> on DBG_MAX_REG_NUM instead of GDB_MAX_REGS. DBG_MAX_REG_NUM is the number
> of total registers, while GDB_MAX_REGS is the number
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ju Hyung Park
commit ca6bfcb2f6d9deab3924bf901e73622a94900473 upstream.
Samsung explicitly states that queued TRIM is supported for Linux with
860 PRO and 860 EVO.
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ju Hyung Park
commit ca6bfcb2f6d9deab3924bf901e73622a94900473 upstream.
Samsung explicitly states that queued TRIM is supported for Linux with
860 PRO and 860 EVO.
Make the previous
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> index e47b2dbbdef3..9284048cf5b0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,15 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
>*/
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> index e47b2dbbdef3..9284048cf5b0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/perf_regs.c
> @@ -157,6 +157,15 @@ void perf_get_regs_user(struct perf_regs *regs_user,
>*/
>
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hans de Goede
commit 9c7be59fc519af9081c46c48f06f2b8fadf55ad8 upstream.
Various people have reported the Crucial MX100 512GB model not working
with LPM set to min_power.
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Hans de Goede
commit 9c7be59fc519af9081c46c48f06f2b8fadf55ad8 upstream.
Various people have reported the Crucial MX100 512GB model not working
with LPM set to min_power. I've now received a
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arend Van Spriel
commit 455f3e76cfc0d893585a5f358b9ddbe9c1e1e53b upstream.
The firmware has a requirement that the P2P_DEVICE address should
be different from
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arend Van Spriel
commit 455f3e76cfc0d893585a5f358b9ddbe9c1e1e53b upstream.
The firmware has a requirement that the P2P_DEVICE address should
be different from the address of the primary
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
This reverts commit 093c265afffb0a91a7611c3bb74d0883731a807b which is
commit 382bd4de61827dbaaf5fb4fb7b1f4be4a86505e7 upstream.
It causes too many problems with the stable tree, and would require too
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
This reverts commit 093c265afffb0a91a7611c3bb74d0883731a807b which is
commit 382bd4de61827dbaaf5fb4fb7b1f4be4a86505e7 upstream.
It causes too many problems with the stable tree, and would require too
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 17cfe79a65f98abe535261856c5aef14f306dff7 ]
syzkaller found an issue caused by lack of sufficient checks
in l2tp_tunnel_create()
RAW
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Eric Dumazet
[ Upstream commit 17cfe79a65f98abe535261856c5aef14f306dff7 ]
syzkaller found an issue caused by lack of sufficient checks
in l2tp_tunnel_create()
RAW sockets can not be
Currently the loop checks for non-zero count of sensors for each type
of sensors which is completely wrong. It also results in aborting the
registration of sensors if one or more types of sensors are completely
not supported by the platform SCMI firmware.
This patch fixes the issue by continue to
Currently the loop checks for non-zero count of sensors for each type
of sensors which is completely wrong. It also results in aborting the
registration of sensors if one or more types of sensors are completely
not supported by the platform SCMI firmware.
This patch fixes the issue by continue to
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alexey Kodanev
[ Upstream commit 67f93df79aeefc3add4e4b31a752600f834236e2 ]
dccp_disconnect() sets 'dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid' tx handler to NULL,
therefore if DCCP
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alexey Kodanev
[ Upstream commit 67f93df79aeefc3add4e4b31a752600f834236e2 ]
dccp_disconnect() sets 'dp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid' tx handler to NULL,
therefore if DCCP socket is disconnected and
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christophe JAILLET
[ Upstream commit 00777fac28ba3e126b9e63e789a613e8bd2cab25 ]
If the optional regulator is deferred, we must release some resources.
They
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christophe JAILLET
[ Upstream commit 00777fac28ba3e126b9e63e789a613e8bd2cab25 ]
If the optional regulator is deferred, we must release some resources.
They will be re-allocated when the
Hi Christian,
Is there a way to turn off these huge pages at boot-time/run-time? Right
now the recent kernels are making Firefox pretty much unusable for me.
I've been able to revert the patch from 4.15 but it's not really a
long-term solution.
You mention that the purpose of the patch is to
Hi Christian,
Is there a way to turn off these huge pages at boot-time/run-time? Right
now the recent kernels are making Firefox pretty much unusable for me.
I've been able to revert the patch from 4.15 but it's not really a
long-term solution.
You mention that the purpose of the patch is to
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nicolas Dichtel
[ Upstream commit 02a2385f37a7c6594c9d89b64c4a1451276f08eb ]
nlmsg_multicast() consumes always the skb, thus the original skb must be
freed only
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nicolas Dichtel
[ Upstream commit 02a2385f37a7c6594c9d89b64c4a1451276f08eb ]
nlmsg_multicast() consumes always the skb, thus the original skb must be
freed only when this function is called
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arvind Yadav
[ Upstream commit fa6a91e9b907231d2e38ea5ed89c537b3525df3d ]
Free memory by calling put_device(), if afiucv_iucv_init is not
successful.
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arvind Yadav
[ Upstream commit fa6a91e9b907231d2e38ea5ed89c537b3525df3d ]
Free memory by calling put_device(), if afiucv_iucv_init is not
successful.
Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: David Ahern
[ Upstream commit 2cbb4ea7de167b02ffa63e9cdfdb07a7e7094615 ]
Only allow ifindex from IP_PKTINFO to override SO_BINDTODEVICE settings
if the index is actually
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes
[ Upstream commit 6e5d58fdc9bedd0255a8781b258f10bbdc63e975 ]
When errors are enqueued to the error queue via sock_queue_err_skb()
function, it
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: David Ahern
[ Upstream commit 2cbb4ea7de167b02ffa63e9cdfdb07a7e7094615 ]
Only allow ifindex from IP_PKTINFO to override SO_BINDTODEVICE settings
if the index is actually set in the message.
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes
[ Upstream commit 6e5d58fdc9bedd0255a8781b258f10bbdc63e975 ]
When errors are enqueued to the error queue via sock_queue_err_skb()
function, it is possible that the
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:56:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Avoid duplication of code related to got_idle_tick
>
> Move the code setting ts->got_idle_tick into tick_sched_do_timer() to
> avoid code duplication.
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 02:56:36PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Avoid duplication of code related to got_idle_tick
>
> Move the code setting ts->got_idle_tick into tick_sched_do_timer() to
> avoid code duplication.
>
> No intentional changes
Hi Laurent,
On 04/06/2018 04:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Monday, 26 February 2018 14:16:04 EEST Philippe Cornu wrote:
>> This patch clarifies the adjusted_mode documentation
>> for a bridge directly connected to a crtc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
Hi Laurent,
On 04/06/2018 04:53 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Monday, 26 February 2018 14:16:04 EEST Philippe Cornu wrote:
>> This patch clarifies the adjusted_mode documentation
>> for a bridge directly connected to a crtc.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
Hi Kishon,
On 02/04/2018 14:29, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> In order to be able to provide correct driver_data for pci_epf device,
> a separate configfs entry for each pci_epf_device_id table entry in
> pci_epf_driver is required.
>
> Add support to create configfs entry for each
Hi Kishon,
On 02/04/2018 14:29, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> In order to be able to provide correct driver_data for pci_epf device,
> a separate configfs entry for each pci_epf_device_id table entry in
> pci_epf_driver is required.
>
> Add support to create configfs entry for each
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Wiedmann
[ Upstream commit 1063e432bb45be209427ed3f1ca3908e4aa3c7d7 ]
qeth_wait_for_threads() is potentially called by multiple users, make
sure to notify all
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Wiedmann
[ Upstream commit 17bf8c9b3d499d5168537c98b61eb7a1fcbca6c2 ]
For calling ccw_device_start(), issue_next_read() needs to hold the
device's ccwlock.
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Wiedmann
[ Upstream commit 17bf8c9b3d499d5168537c98b61eb7a1fcbca6c2 ]
For calling ccw_device_start(), issue_next_read() needs to hold the
device's ccwlock.
This is satisfied for the
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Wiedmann
[ Upstream commit 1063e432bb45be209427ed3f1ca3908e4aa3c7d7 ]
qeth_wait_for_threads() is potentially called by multiple users, make
sure to notify all of them after
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arkadi Sharshevsky
[ Upstream commit cbcc607e18422555db569b593608aec26111cb0b ]
The __send_and_alloc_skb() receives a skb ptr as a parameter but in
case it fails the
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arkadi Sharshevsky
[ Upstream commit cbcc607e18422555db569b593608aec26111cb0b ]
The __send_and_alloc_skb() receives a skb ptr as a parameter but in
case it fails the skb is not valid:
- Send
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Wiedmann
[ Upstream commit 6be687395b3124f002a653c1a50b3260222b3cd7 ]
On removal, a qeth card's netdevice is currently not properly freed
because the call
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Julian Wiedmann
[ Upstream commit 6be687395b3124f002a653c1a50b3260222b3cd7 ]
On removal, a qeth card's netdevice is currently not properly freed
because the call chain looks as follows:
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Florian Fainelli
[ Upstream commit a069215cf5985f3aa1bba550264907d6bd05c5f7 ]
When unbinding/removing the driver, we will run into the following warnings:
[
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Florian Fainelli
[ Upstream commit a069215cf5985f3aa1bba550264907d6bd05c5f7 ]
When unbinding/removing the driver, we will run into the following warnings:
[ 259.655198] fec
Hi Andrea,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:05:12PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:34:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I could say something like:
> >
> > "Pairs with dependency ordering from both xchg_tail and explicit
> >dereferences of node->next"
> >
> > but it's
Hi Andrea,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 03:05:12PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 12:34:36PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > I could say something like:
> >
> > "Pairs with dependency ordering from both xchg_tail and explicit
> >dereferences of node->next"
> >
> > but it's
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Linus Walleij
commit 87a73eb5b56fd6e07c8e499fe8608ef2d8912b82 upstream.
It turns out that the loop where we read manufacturer
jedec_read_mfd() can under some
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Linus Walleij
commit 87a73eb5b56fd6e07c8e499fe8608ef2d8912b82 upstream.
It turns out that the loop where we read manufacturer
jedec_read_mfd() can under some circumstances get a
601 - 700 of 2290 matches
Mail list logo