3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Thomas Vincent-Cross
[ Upstream commit 832e4e1f76b8a84991e9db56fdcef1ebce839b8b ]
Add Marvell 88SE9220 DMA quirk as found and tested on bug 42679.
Link:
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Randy Dunlap
[ Upstream commit 1e0ce03bf142454f38a5fc050bf4fd698d2d36d8 ]
The "mdr" command should repeat (continue) when only Enter/Return
is pressed, so make it do so.
Signed-off-by: Randy
On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:52:53 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-28 16:27, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 May 2018 12:10:02 +0200
> > Peter Rosin wrote:
> >
> >> On 2018-05-28 00:11, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>> On 2018-05-27 11:18,
On Mon, 28 May 2018 17:52:53 +0200
Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-05-28 16:27, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> > On Mon, 28 May 2018 12:10:02 +0200
> > Peter Rosin wrote:
> >
> >> On 2018-05-28 00:11, Peter Rosin wrote:
> >>> On 2018-05-27 11:18, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Colin Ian King
[ Upstream commit 67300abdbe9f1717532aaf4e037222762716d0f6 ]
Currently an out of range dev->nr is detected by just reporting the
issue and later on an
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Colin Ian King
[ Upstream commit 67300abdbe9f1717532aaf4e037222762716d0f6 ]
Currently an out of range dev->nr is detected by just reporting the
issue and later on an out-of-bounds read on
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andrzej Hajda
[ Upstream commit cdb68fbd4e7962be742c4f29475220c5bf28d8a5 ]
Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated from
the PLL
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andrzej Hajda
[ Upstream commit cdb68fbd4e7962be742c4f29475220c5bf28d8a5 ]
Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated from
the PLL coefficients. If that is not
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andrzej Hajda
[ Upstream commit a8321e7887410a2b2e80ab89d1ef7b30562658ea ]
Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated
from PLL coefficients.
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andrzej Hajda
[ Upstream commit a8321e7887410a2b2e80ab89d1ef7b30562658ea ]
Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated
from PLL coefficients. If that is not the
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andrzej Hajda
[ Upstream commit 179db533c08431f509a3823077549773d519358b ]
Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated from
the PLL
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andrzej Hajda
[ Upstream commit 179db533c08431f509a3823077549773d519358b ]
Rates declared in PLL rate tables should match exactly rates calculated from
the PLL coefficients. If that is not
Am Montag, den 28.05.2018, 17:53 +0200 schrieb Stefan Agner:
> On 28.05.2018 09:55, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 11:54:40PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > > From: Lucas Stach
> > >
> > > Set up the NAND Flash controller clock to run at 150MHz
> > >
On Mon, 28 May 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:12:09AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Well, I don't really _want_ them; nor does the ipc code which already
does a WARN_ON() (but that goes away in future patches). What I want
is to get rid of the return path. So I don't
On Mon, 28 May 2018, Herbert Xu wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:12:09AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Well, I don't really _want_ them; nor does the ipc code which already
does a WARN_ON() (but that goes away in future patches). What I want
is to get rid of the return path. So I don't
Am Montag, den 28.05.2018, 17:53 +0200 schrieb Stefan Agner:
> On 28.05.2018 09:55, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 11:54:40PM +0200, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > > From: Lucas Stach
> > >
> > > Set up the NAND Flash controller clock to run at 150MHz
> > > instead of the rate
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Maciej W. Rozycki
commit 9a3a92ccfe3620743d4ae57c987dc8e9c5f88996 upstream.
Check the TIF_32BIT_FPREGS task setting of the tracee rather than the
tracer in determining the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Maciej W. Rozycki
commit 9a3a92ccfe3620743d4ae57c987dc8e9c5f88996 upstream.
Check the TIF_32BIT_FPREGS task setting of the tracee rather than the
tracer in determining the layout of
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Maciej W. Rozycki
commit 71e909c0cdad28a1df1fa14442929e68615dee45 upstream.
Correct commit 7aeb753b5353 ("MIPS: Implement task_user_regset_view.")
and expose the FIR register
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Maciej W. Rozycki
commit 71e909c0cdad28a1df1fa14442929e68615dee45 upstream.
Correct commit 7aeb753b5353 ("MIPS: Implement task_user_regset_view.")
and expose the FIR register using the unused
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Colin Ian King
commit ba3696e94d9d590d9a7e55f68e81c25dba515191 upstream.
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in debugfs_entries text.
Fixes: 669e846e6c4e ("KVM/MIPS32:
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Colin Ian King
commit ba3696e94d9d590d9a7e55f68e81c25dba515191 upstream.
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in debugfs_entries text.
Fixes: 669e846e6c4e ("KVM/MIPS32: MIPS arch specific APIs for
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Richard Guy Briggs
[ Upstream commit 23138ead270045f1b3e912e667967b6094244999 ]
If there is a memory allocation error when trying to change an audit
kernel feature value, the
3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Richard Guy Briggs
[ Upstream commit 23138ead270045f1b3e912e667967b6094244999 ]
If there is a memory allocation error when trying to change an audit
kernel feature value, the ignored
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit 5a93790d4e2df73e30c965ec6e49be82fc3ccfce upstream.
xfs_attr_[get|remove]() have unlocked attribute fork checks to optimize
away a lock cycle in cases
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Brian Foster
commit 5a93790d4e2df73e30c965ec6e49be82fc3ccfce upstream.
xfs_attr_[get|remove]() have unlocked attribute fork checks to optimize
away a lock cycle in cases where the fork does
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Corneliu Doban
commit 5f651b870485ee60f5abbbd85195a6852978894a upstream.
When the host controller accepts only 32bit writes, the value of the
16bit TRANSFER_MODE
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Corneliu Doban
commit 5f651b870485ee60f5abbbd85195a6852978894a upstream.
When the host controller accepts only 32bit writes, the value of the
16bit TRANSFER_MODE register, that has the same
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: NeilBrown
[ Upstream commit dce2630c7da73b0634686bca557cc8945cc450c8 ]
There are 2 comments in the NFSv4 code which suggest that
SIGLOST should possibly be sent to a process.
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: NeilBrown
[ Upstream commit dce2630c7da73b0634686bca557cc8945cc450c8 ]
There are 2 comments in the NFSv4 code which suggest that
SIGLOST should possibly be sent to a process. In these
cases a
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:56:25AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.45 release.
> There are 496 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:56:25AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.14.45 release.
> There are 496 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alex Williamson
[ Upstream commit aa008206634363ef800fbd5f0262016c9ff81dea ]
The Marvell 9128 is the original device generating bug 42679, from which
many other
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alex Williamson
[ Upstream commit aa008206634363ef800fbd5f0262016c9ff81dea ]
The Marvell 9128 is the original device generating bug 42679, from which
many other Marvell DMA alias quirks have
On Fri 25-05-18 12:36:08, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > > The oom reaper ensures forward progress by setting MMF_OOM_SKIP itself if
> > > it cannot reap an mm. This can happen for a variety of reasons,
> > > including:
> > >
> > > - the inability to
On Fri 25-05-18 12:36:08, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> > > The oom reaper ensures forward progress by setting MMF_OOM_SKIP itself if
> > > it cannot reap an mm. This can happen for a variety of reasons,
> > > including:
> > >
> > > - the inability to
On Mon, 28 May 2018 00:42:12 +0200,
Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On May 28 2018 06:23, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King
> >
> > The error for a -ve value in ret is redundant as all previous
> > assignments to ret have an associated -ve check and hence
On Mon, 28 May 2018 00:42:12 +0200,
Takashi Sakamoto wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On May 28 2018 06:23, Colin King wrote:
> > From: Colin Ian King
> >
> > The error for a -ve value in ret is redundant as all previous
> > assignments to ret have an associated -ve check and hence it
> > is impossible for
On 05/25/2018 09:52 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 24-05-18 09:37:18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/24/2018 04:43 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> +The traditional way to avoid this deadlock problem is to clear __GFP_FS
>>> +resp. __GFP_IO (note the later implies clearing the first as well) in
On 05/25/2018 09:52 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 24-05-18 09:37:18, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 05/24/2018 04:43 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
>>> +The traditional way to avoid this deadlock problem is to clear __GFP_FS
>>> +resp. __GFP_IO (note the later implies clearing the first as well) in
On 05/25/2018 05:51 PM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2018, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>> index 9ebe659bd4a5..5bff0571b360 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -296,11 +296,16 @@ static
On 05/25/2018 05:51 PM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2018, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/slab.h b/include/linux/slab.h
>> index 9ebe659bd4a5..5bff0571b360 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/slab.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/slab.h
>> @@ -296,11 +296,16 @@ static
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tejun Heo
commit 322579dcc865b94b47345ad1b6002ad167f85405 upstream.
Sandisk SSDs SD7SN6S256G and SD8SN8U256G are regularly locking up
regularly under sustained moderate load
On Mon 28-05-18 09:48:54, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:16:24AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 25-05-18 08:17:15, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:43:41PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > +FS/IO code then simply calls the appropriate save
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Dan Carpenter
[ Upstream commit 123af9043e93cb6f235207d260d50f832cdb5439 ]
The loop timeout doesn't work because it's a post op and ends with "tmo"
set to -1. I
On Mon 28-05-18 09:48:54, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:16:24AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Fri 25-05-18 08:17:15, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:43:41PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > +FS/IO code then simply calls the appropriate save
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Dan Carpenter
[ Upstream commit 123af9043e93cb6f235207d260d50f832cdb5439 ]
The loop timeout doesn't work because it's a post op and ends with "tmo"
set to -1. I changed it from a post-op to a
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Tejun Heo
commit 322579dcc865b94b47345ad1b6002ad167f85405 upstream.
Sandisk SSDs SD7SN6S256G and SD8SN8U256G are regularly locking up
regularly under sustained moderate load with NCQ enabled.
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner
[ Upstream commit 91633eed73a3ac37aaece5c8c1f93a18bae616a9 ]
So far only CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_REALTIME were taken into account as
well as
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[ Upstream commit 249d98e567e25dd03e015e2d31e1b7b9648f34df ]
When setting the "dwarf" unwinder for a specific event and not
specifying the max-stack,
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Anna-Maria Gleixner
[ Upstream commit 91633eed73a3ac37aaece5c8c1f93a18bae616a9 ]
So far only CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_REALTIME were taken into account as
well as HRTIMER_MODE_ABS/REL in the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[ Upstream commit 249d98e567e25dd03e015e2d31e1b7b9648f34df ]
When setting the "dwarf" unwinder for a specific event and not
specifying the max-stack, the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
[ Upstream commit d777f8de99b05d399c0e4e51cdce016f26bd971b ]
If a field is a dynamic string, get_field_str() returned just the
offset/size value
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)"
[ Upstream commit d777f8de99b05d399c0e4e51cdce016f26bd971b ]
If a field is a dynamic string, get_field_str() returned just the
offset/size value and not the string.
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Takashi Iwai
[ Upstream commit c469652bb5e8fb715db7d152f46d33b3740c9b87 ]
The commit ffcd28d88e4f ("ALSA: hda - Select INPUT for Realtek
HD-audio codec") introduced the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: mulhern
[ Upstream commit 9b28a1102efc75d81298198166ead87d643a29ce ]
Fixes:
1. The use of "exceeds" when the opposite of exceeds, falls below,
was meant.
2. Properly
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: mulhern
[ Upstream commit 9b28a1102efc75d81298198166ead87d643a29ce ]
Fixes:
1. The use of "exceeds" when the opposite of exceeds, falls below,
was meant.
2. Properly speaking, a table can not
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Takashi Iwai
[ Upstream commit c469652bb5e8fb715db7d152f46d33b3740c9b87 ]
The commit ffcd28d88e4f ("ALSA: hda - Select INPUT for Realtek
HD-audio codec") introduced the reverse-selection of
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ulf Magnusson
[ Upstream commit ae7440ef0c8013d68c00dad6900e7cce5311bb1c ]
expr_trans_compare() always allocates and returns a new expression,
giving the following leak
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Ulf Magnusson
[ Upstream commit ae7440ef0c8013d68c00dad6900e7cce5311bb1c ]
expr_trans_compare() always allocates and returns a new expression,
giving the following leak outline:
...
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "weiyongjun (A)"
[ Upstream commit 0ddcff49b672239dda94d70d0fcf50317a9f4b51 ]
'hwname' is malloced in hwsim_new_radio_nl() and should be freed
before leaving from the
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "weiyongjun (A)"
[ Upstream commit 0ddcff49b672239dda94d70d0fcf50317a9f4b51 ]
'hwname' is malloced in hwsim_new_radio_nl() and should be freed
before leaving from the error handling cases,
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jan Chochol
[ Upstream commit cbebc6ef4fc830f4040d4140bf53484812d5d5d9 ]
Since commit 57e62324e469 ("NFS: Store the legacy idmapper result in the
keyring")
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Jan Chochol
[ Upstream commit cbebc6ef4fc830f4040d4140bf53484812d5d5d9 ]
Since commit 57e62324e469 ("NFS: Store the legacy idmapper result in the
keyring") nfs_idmap_cache_timeout changed
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nikolay Borisov
[ Upstream commit 9ea2c7c9da13c9073e371c046cbbc45481ecb459 ]
When modifying a tree where the root is at BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 then
the level variable is going
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Nikolay Borisov
[ Upstream commit 9ea2c7c9da13c9073e371c046cbbc45481ecb459 ]
When modifying a tree where the root is at BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 then
the level variable is going to be 7 (this is
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Liu Bo
[ Upstream commit 343e4fc1c60971b0734de26dbbd475d433950982 ]
Setting plug can merge adjacent IOs before dispatching IOs to the disk
driver.
Without plug, it'd not
gcc-8 warns that pcm_instance->name is not necessarily terminated correctly
if the input is more than 80 characters long or lacks a termination byte
itself:
In function 'strncpy',
inlined from 'cfg_device' at sound/xen/xen_snd_front_cfg.c:399:3,
inlined from 'xen_snd_front_cfg_card' at
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Liu Bo
[ Upstream commit 343e4fc1c60971b0734de26dbbd475d433950982 ]
Setting plug can merge adjacent IOs before dispatching IOs to the disk
driver.
Without plug, it'd not be a problem for
gcc-8 warns that pcm_instance->name is not necessarily terminated correctly
if the input is more than 80 characters long or lacks a termination byte
itself:
In function 'strncpy',
inlined from 'cfg_device' at sound/xen/xen_snd_front_cfg.c:399:3,
inlined from 'xen_snd_front_cfg_card' at
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnd Bergmann
[ Upstream commit 96d5eaa9bb74d299508d811d865c2c41b38b0301 ]
While testing with the ARM specific memset() macro removed, I ran into a
compiler warning that shows
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Arnd Bergmann
[ Upstream commit 96d5eaa9bb74d299508d811d865c2c41b38b0301 ]
While testing with the ARM specific memset() macro removed, I ran into a
compiler warning that shows an old bug:
Hi Greg.
Thanks for your review.
Please see my comments inline.
Best Regards,
Oleksandr Shamray
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: 28 мая 2018 г. 15:35
> To: Oleksandr Shamray
> Cc: a...@arndb.de;
Hi Greg.
Thanks for your review.
Please see my comments inline.
Best Regards,
Oleksandr Shamray
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: 28 мая 2018 г. 15:35
> To: Oleksandr Shamray
> Cc: a...@arndb.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
>
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sudip Mukherjee
commit 136d769e0b3475d71350aa3648a116a6ee7a8f6c upstream.
While whitelisting Micron M500DC drives, the tweaked blacklist entry
enabled queued TRIM
4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Sudip Mukherjee
commit 136d769e0b3475d71350aa3648a116a6ee7a8f6c upstream.
While whitelisting Micron M500DC drives, the tweaked blacklist entry
enabled queued TRIM from M500IT variants also.
Hi Peter,
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:06:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 08:46:48AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 2380bc228dd0..cda3affd45b7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++
Hi Peter,
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 05:06:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 08:46:48AM -0700, Paul Burton wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> > index 2380bc228dd0..cda3affd45b7 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> > +++
Without CONFIG_INPUT, or with a modular input layer and built-in
tablet driver, we get a link error:
ERROR: "input_event" [drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_tbmc.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "input_register_device" [drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_tbmc.ko]
undefined!
ERROR: "input_set_capability"
Without CONFIG_INPUT, or with a modular input layer and built-in
tablet driver, we get a link error:
ERROR: "input_event" [drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_tbmc.ko] undefined!
ERROR: "input_register_device" [drivers/platform/chrome/chromeos_tbmc.ko]
undefined!
ERROR: "input_set_capability"
On Fri 25-05-18 15:18:11, David Rientjes wrote:
[...]
> Let's see what Mike and Aneesh say, because they may object to using
> VM_FAULT_OOM because there's no way to guarantee that we'll come under the
> limit of hugetlb_cgroup as a result of the oom. My assumption is that we
> use
On Fri 25-05-18 15:18:11, David Rientjes wrote:
[...]
> Let's see what Mike and Aneesh say, because they may object to using
> VM_FAULT_OOM because there's no way to guarantee that we'll come under the
> limit of hugetlb_cgroup as a result of the oom. My assumption is that we
> use
Testing randconfig builds after the return of the mmp ccic driver shows
a link error in some configurations:
drivers/media/platform/marvell-ccic/mcam-core.o: In function `mccic_register':
mcam-core.c:(.text+0x2e48): undefined reference to `vb2_dma_contig_memops'
A closer look at the mcam-core.c
Testing randconfig builds after the return of the mmp ccic driver shows
a link error in some configurations:
drivers/media/platform/marvell-ccic/mcam-core.o: In function `mccic_register':
mcam-core.c:(.text+0x2e48): undefined reference to `vb2_dma_contig_memops'
A closer look at the mcam-core.c
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 01:31:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commits
>
> 116aeb887371 ("iw_cxgb4: provide detailed provider-specific CM_ID
> information")
> to
> 0252f73334f9 ("IB/qib: Fix DMA api warning with debug kernel")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their
On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 01:31:12PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Commits
>
> 116aeb887371 ("iw_cxgb4: provide detailed provider-specific CM_ID
> information")
> to
> 0252f73334f9 ("IB/qib: Fix DMA api warning with debug kernel")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their
The return type of ACCESS_ONCE is configuration dependent and may be either
'int' or 'long int' for the writecache_has_error() macro, so we get a warning
like this for either format string:
In file included from drivers/md/dm-writecache.c:8:
drivers/md/dm-writecache.c: In function
The return type of ACCESS_ONCE is configuration dependent and may be either
'int' or 'long int' for the writecache_has_error() macro, so we get a warning
like this for either format string:
In file included from drivers/md/dm-writecache.c:8:
drivers/md/dm-writecache.c: In function
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:12:09AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> Well, I don't really _want_ them; nor does the ipc code which already
> does a WARN_ON() (but that goes away in future patches). What I want
> is to get rid of the return path. So I don't really care if we convert
> them to WARN
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 06:12:09AM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>
> Well, I don't really _want_ them; nor does the ipc code which already
> does a WARN_ON() (but that goes away in future patches). What I want
> is to get rid of the return path. So I don't really care if we convert
> them to WARN
On 05/24/2018 05:32 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:00:06PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> - the vmstat/meminfo counter name is rather general and might suggest it also
>> includes reclaimable page caches, which it doesn't
>>
>> Suggestions welcome for all three points.
On 05/24/2018 05:32 PM, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 01:00:06PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> - the vmstat/meminfo counter name is rather general and might suggest it also
>> includes reclaimable page caches, which it doesn't
>>
>> Suggestions welcome for all three points.
The tegra_cpuidle_pcie_irqs_in_use() function is stubbed out for non-ARM
builds, but now we can compile-test the Tegra pci driver on non-Tegra
ARM platforms as well, which results in a new link error:
drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.o: In function `tegra_pcie_map_irq':
pci-tegra.c:(.text+0x288):
The tegra_cpuidle_pcie_irqs_in_use() function is stubbed out for non-ARM
builds, but now we can compile-test the Tegra pci driver on non-Tegra
ARM platforms as well, which results in a new link error:
drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.o: In function `tegra_pcie_map_irq':
pci-tegra.c:(.text+0x288):
Use fixed width integer types for ecoff structs to make elf2ecoff work
on 64bit host machines
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer
---
arch/mips/boot/ecoff.h | 58 +++---
arch/mips/boot/elf2ecoff.c | 29 +++
2
On Sat 26-05-18 15:37:05, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Vladimir Davydov
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:55:01AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >> Based on several conditions the kernel can decide to force charge an
> >> allocation for a
Use fixed width integer types for ecoff structs to make elf2ecoff work
on 64bit host machines
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer
---
arch/mips/boot/ecoff.h | 58 +++---
arch/mips/boot/elf2ecoff.c | 29 +++
2 files changed, 43
On Sat 26-05-18 15:37:05, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:51 AM, Vladimir Davydov
> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 11:55:01AM -0700, Shakeel Butt wrote:
> >> Based on several conditions the kernel can decide to force charge an
> >> allocation for a memcg i.e. overcharge
On Wed 2018-05-23 11:01:07, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (05/22/18 17:43), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > CPU0 CPU1CPU2
> > >
> > > printk()
> > > vprintk_emit()
> > > spin_lock(_lock)
> > >
> > >
On Fri 25-05-18 05:00:44, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > ie if we had more,
> > > could we solve our pain by making them more generic?
> >
> > Well, if you have more you will consume more bits in the struct pages,
> > right?
>
> Not
801 - 900 of 4398 matches
Mail list logo