Re: [PATCH RESEND RFC 1/4] drivers: pinctrl: qcom: add wakeup capability to GPIO

2018-08-10 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 18:30:53 +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Marc Zyngier (2018-08-07 23:26:32) > > On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 23:05:07 -0700 > > Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > Quoting Lina Iyer (2018-08-02 05:58:27) > > > > On Thu, Aug 02 2018 at 01:27 -0600, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH RESEND RFC 1/4] drivers: pinctrl: qcom: add wakeup capability to GPIO

2018-08-10 Thread Marc Zyngier
On Thu, 09 Aug 2018 18:30:53 +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > Quoting Marc Zyngier (2018-08-07 23:26:32) > > On Tue, 07 Aug 2018 23:05:07 -0700 > > Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > > > Quoting Lina Iyer (2018-08-02 05:58:27) > > > > On Thu, Aug 02 2018 at 01:27 -0600, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > > > > >

[PATCH] cpuidle: menu: Handle stopped tick more aggressively

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Commit 87c9fe6ee495 (cpuidle: menu: Avoid selecting shallow states with stopped tick) missed the case when the target residencies of deep idle states of CPUs are above the tick boundary which may cause the CPU to get stuck in a shallow idle state for a long time. Say

[PATCH] cpuidle: menu: Handle stopped tick more aggressively

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
From: Rafael J. Wysocki Commit 87c9fe6ee495 (cpuidle: menu: Avoid selecting shallow states with stopped tick) missed the case when the target residencies of deep idle states of CPUs are above the tick boundary which may cause the CPU to get stuck in a shallow idle state for a long time. Say

Re: a13c600e15 ("x86/mm/pti: Move user W+X check into .."): WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/dump_pagetables.c:283 note_page

2018-08-10 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 06:33:42AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > [9.635329] x86/mm: Checking user space page tables > [9.636271] [ cut here ] > [9.637045] x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address > (ptrval)/0xffc01000 > [9.638228] WARNING: CPU: 0

Re: a13c600e15 ("x86/mm/pti: Move user W+X check into .."): WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/dump_pagetables.c:283 note_page

2018-08-10 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 06:33:42AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > [9.635329] x86/mm: Checking user space page tables > [9.636271] [ cut here ] > [9.637045] x86/mm: Found insecure W+X mapping at address > (ptrval)/0xffc01000 > [9.638228] WARNING: CPU: 0

Re: [PATCH] sched: idle: Reenable sched tick for cpuidle request

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:53 AM, wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote: > > [...] > >> > >> And I really would prefer to avoid restarting the tick here, because >> > >> it is overhead and quite likely unnecessary. >> > > >> > > I understand the logic when

Re: [PATCH] sched: idle: Reenable sched tick for cpuidle request

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 7:53 AM, wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 11:31:46PM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote: > > [...] > >> > >> And I really would prefer to avoid restarting the tick here, because >> > >> it is overhead and quite likely unnecessary. >> > > >> > > I understand the logic when

Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] cpuidle: menu: Correct the criteria for stopping tick

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:13 AM, wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:47:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Leo Yan wrote: [cut] >> And that will cause the tick to be stopped unnecessarily in certain >> situations, so why is this better? > > Let's see below

Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] iio:adxl372: Add FIFO and interrupts support

2018-08-10 Thread Dan Carpenter
Hi Stefan, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stefan-Popa/iio-accel-Add-adxl372-driver/20180807-050955 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git togreg smatch warnings: drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c:704

Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] cpuidle: menu: Correct the criteria for stopping tick

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:13 AM, wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:47:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Leo Yan wrote: [cut] >> And that will cause the tick to be stopped unnecessarily in certain >> situations, so why is this better? > > Let's see below

Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] iio:adxl372: Add FIFO and interrupts support

2018-08-10 Thread Dan Carpenter
Hi Stefan, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Stefan-Popa/iio-accel-Add-adxl372-driver/20180807-050955 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git togreg smatch warnings: drivers/iio/accel/adxl372.c:704

[PATCH v2 5/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use phydm_reg.h from rtlwifi

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Use rtlwifi/phydm/phydm_reg.h instead of odm_reg.h and remove the now unused odm_reg.h. All defines from odm_reg.h are defined with the same values in rtlwifi/phydm/phydm_reg.h. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- .../staging/rtl8188eu/include/odm_precomp.h | 2 +-

[PATCH v2 1/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use is_multicast_ether_addr in rtw_security.c

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Use is_multicast_ether_addr instead of custom IS_MCAST in core/rtw_security.c. In all uses the address array is properly aligned. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- v2: checked that in all uses of is_multicast_ether_addr the address array/memory is properly aligned and updated the commit

[PATCH v2 1/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use is_multicast_ether_addr in rtw_security.c

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Use is_multicast_ether_addr instead of custom IS_MCAST in core/rtw_security.c. In all uses the address array is properly aligned. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- v2: checked that in all uses of is_multicast_ether_addr the address array/memory is properly aligned and updated the commit

[PATCH v2 5/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use phydm_reg.h from rtlwifi

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Use rtlwifi/phydm/phydm_reg.h instead of odm_reg.h and remove the now unused odm_reg.h. All defines from odm_reg.h are defined with the same values in rtlwifi/phydm/phydm_reg.h. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- .../staging/rtl8188eu/include/odm_precomp.h | 2 +-

[PATCH v2 3/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use is_multicast_ether_addr in rtw_xmit.c

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Use is_multicast_ether_addr instead of custom IS_MCAST in core/rtw_xmit.c. In all uses the address array is properly aligned. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c | 35 +++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v2 3/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use is_multicast_ether_addr in rtw_xmit.c

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Use is_multicast_ether_addr instead of custom IS_MCAST in core/rtw_xmit.c. In all uses the address array is properly aligned. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_xmit.c | 35 +++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH v2 2/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use is_multicast_ether_addr in rtw_recv.c

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Use is_multicast_ether_addr instead of custom IS_MCAST in core/rtw_recv.c. In all uses the address array/memory is properly aligned. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c | 35 --- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH v2 4/5] staging: rtl8188eu: remove unused IS_MCAST

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Remove the now unused IS_MCAST. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h | 8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h index 4a56e54e38f6..0a952edf8a81 100644 ---

[PATCH v2 2/5] staging: rtl8188eu: use is_multicast_ether_addr in rtw_recv.c

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Use is_multicast_ether_addr instead of custom IS_MCAST in core/rtw_recv.c. In all uses the address array/memory is properly aligned. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_recv.c | 35 --- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff

[PATCH v2 4/5] staging: rtl8188eu: remove unused IS_MCAST

2018-08-10 Thread Michael Straube
Remove the now unused IS_MCAST. Signed-off-by: Michael Straube --- drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h | 8 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/include/wifi.h index 4a56e54e38f6..0a952edf8a81 100644 ---

Re: [PATCH] sched: idle: Avoid retaining the tick when it has been stopped

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:19 AM, wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> If the tick has been stopped already, but the governor has not asked to >> stop it (which it can do sometimes), the idle loop should invoke >>

Re: [PATCH] sched: idle: Avoid retaining the tick when it has been stopped

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:19 AM, wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote: >> From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> If the tick has been stopped already, but the governor has not asked to >> stop it (which it can do sometimes), the idle loop should invoke >>

Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] cpuidle: menu: Correct the criteria for stopping tick

2018-08-10 Thread leo . yan
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:47:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Leo Yan wrote: > > The criteria for keeping tick running is the prediction duration is less > > than TICK_USEC, > > Yes, because if the predicted idle duration is less than the tick > period,

Re: [RESEND PATCH v1 1/2] cpuidle: menu: Correct the criteria for stopping tick

2018-08-10 Thread leo . yan
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 10:47:17PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 7:20 PM, Leo Yan wrote: > > The criteria for keeping tick running is the prediction duration is less > > than TICK_USEC, > > Yes, because if the predicted idle duration is less than the tick > period,

Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Fix compiling warring in smp=n case

2018-08-10 Thread Vincent Guittot
Hi Dou, On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 04:35, Dou Liyang wrote: > > When compiling kernel with SMP disabled, the build warns with: > > kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘update_rq_clock_task’: > kernel/sched/core.c:139:17: warning: unused variable ‘irq_delta’ > [-Wunused-variable] > s64 steal = 0,

Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Fix compiling warring in smp=n case

2018-08-10 Thread Vincent Guittot
Hi Dou, On Fri, 10 Aug 2018 at 04:35, Dou Liyang wrote: > > When compiling kernel with SMP disabled, the build warns with: > > kernel/sched/core.c: In function ‘update_rq_clock_task’: > kernel/sched/core.c:139:17: warning: unused variable ‘irq_delta’ > [-Wunused-variable] > s64 steal = 0,

Re: [PATCH] dd: Invoke one probe retry cycle after every initcall level

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:30 AM, wrote: > On 2018-08-06 01:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Sodagudi Prasad >> wrote: From: RAFAEL J. WYSOCKI Date: Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] dd: Invoke one probe retry cycle after

Re: [PATCH] dd: Invoke one probe retry cycle after every initcall level

2018-08-10 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 12:30 AM, wrote: > On 2018-08-06 01:53, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:20 AM, Sodagudi Prasad >> wrote: From: RAFAEL J. WYSOCKI Date: Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:21 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] dd: Invoke one probe retry cycle after

Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] tracing: Add snapshot action

2018-08-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 09:34:16AM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi > > Add support for hist:handlerXXX($var).snapshot(), which will take a > snapshot of the current trace buffer whenever handlerXXX is hit. > > As a first user, this also adds snapshot() action support for the >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] introduce memory.oom.group

2018-08-10 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 09-08-18 13:10:10, David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > In a cgroup-aware oom killer world, yes, we need the ability to > > > > > specify > > > > > that the usage of the entire subtree should be compared as a single > > > > > entity with other

Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] tracing: Add snapshot action

2018-08-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 09:34:16AM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi > > Add support for hist:handlerXXX($var).snapshot(), which will take a > snapshot of the current trace buffer whenever handlerXXX is hit. > > As a first user, this also adds snapshot() action support for the >

Re: [PATCH 0/3] introduce memory.oom.group

2018-08-10 Thread Michal Hocko
On Thu 09-08-18 13:10:10, David Rientjes wrote: > On Wed, 8 Aug 2018, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > In a cgroup-aware oom killer world, yes, we need the ability to > > > > > specify > > > > > that the usage of the entire subtree should be compared as a single > > > > > entity with other

Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] tracing: Add conditional snapshot

2018-08-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 09:34:14AM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi > > Currently, tracing snapshots are context-free - they capture the ring > buffer contents at the time the tracing_snapshot() function was > invoked, and nothing else. Additionally, they're always taken >

Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] tracing: Add conditional snapshot

2018-08-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 09:34:14AM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi > > Currently, tracing snapshots are context-free - they capture the ring > buffer contents at the time the tracing_snapshot() function was > invoked, and nothing else. Additionally, they're always taken >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] tracing: Refactor hist trigger action code

2018-08-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Tom, On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 09:34:11AM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi > > The hist trigger action code currently implements two essentially > hard-coded pairs of 'actions' - onmax(), which tracks a variable and > saves some event fields when a max is hit, and onmatch(), which

Re: [PATCH v3 1/7] tracing: Refactor hist trigger action code

2018-08-10 Thread Namhyung Kim
Hi Tom, On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 09:34:11AM -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > From: Tom Zanussi > > The hist trigger action code currently implements two essentially > hard-coded pairs of 'actions' - onmax(), which tracks a variable and > saves some event fields when a max is hit, and onmatch(), which

Re: [PATCH v3] resource: Merge resources on a node when hot-adding memory

2018-08-10 Thread Rashmica Gupta
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:54:09 +1000 Rashmica Gupta > wrote: > >> When hot-removing memory release_mem_region_adjustable() splits >> iomem resources if they are not the exact size of the memory being >> hot-deleted. Adding this memory back

Re: [PATCH v3] resource: Merge resources on a node when hot-adding memory

2018-08-10 Thread Rashmica Gupta
On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 11:12 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:54:09 +1000 Rashmica Gupta > wrote: > >> When hot-removing memory release_mem_region_adjustable() splits >> iomem resources if they are not the exact size of the memory being >> hot-deleted. Adding this memory back

Re: Linux 3.18.111

2018-08-10 Thread Seung-Woo Kim
On 2018년 08월 08일 19:06, Seung-Woo Kim wrote: > On 2018년 07월 05일 09:52, Al Viro wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 10:01:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 9:43 PM Seung-Woo Kim wrote: I think the commit itself is required. Simple, but not reliable,

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM64: dts: meson-gx: add dmcbus and canvas nodes.

2018-08-10 Thread Maxime Jourdan
2018-08-09 9:53 GMT+02:00 Neil Armstrong : > On 08/08/2018 10:41, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 00:00 +0200, Maxime Jourdan wrote: >>> Wrap the canvas node in a syscon node. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Jourdan >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx.dtsi | 17

Re: Linux 3.18.111

2018-08-10 Thread Seung-Woo Kim
On 2018년 08월 08일 19:06, Seung-Woo Kim wrote: > On 2018년 07월 05일 09:52, Al Viro wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 02, 2018 at 10:01:25PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 9:43 PM Seung-Woo Kim wrote: I think the commit itself is required. Simple, but not reliable,

Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] ARM64: dts: meson-gx: add dmcbus and canvas nodes.

2018-08-10 Thread Maxime Jourdan
2018-08-09 9:53 GMT+02:00 Neil Armstrong : > On 08/08/2018 10:41, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 00:00 +0200, Maxime Jourdan wrote: >>> Wrap the canvas node in a syscon node. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Jourdan >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/amlogic/meson-gx.dtsi | 17

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] soc: amlogic: add meson-canvas driver

2018-08-10 Thread Maxime Jourdan
2018-08-08 17:10 GMT+02:00 Neil Armstrong : > On 08/08/2018 09:45, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 00:00 +0200, Maxime Jourdan wrote: >>> Amlogic SoCs have a repository of 256 canvas which they use to >>> describe pixel buffers. >>> >>> They contain metadata like width, height, block

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] soc: amlogic: add meson-canvas driver

2018-08-10 Thread Maxime Jourdan
2018-08-08 17:10 GMT+02:00 Neil Armstrong : > On 08/08/2018 09:45, Jerome Brunet wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 00:00 +0200, Maxime Jourdan wrote: >>> Amlogic SoCs have a repository of 256 canvas which they use to >>> describe pixel buffers. >>> >>> They contain metadata like width, height, block

linux-next: build failure after merge of the ida tree

2018-08-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Matthew, After merging the ida tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c: In function 'iscsi_login_zero_tsih_s1': drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c:376:16: error: 'sess_idr_lock' undeclared (first use in this

linux-next: build failure after merge of the ida tree

2018-08-10 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Matthew, After merging the ida tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this: drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c: In function 'iscsi_login_zero_tsih_s1': drivers/target/iscsi/iscsi_target_login.c:376:16: error: 'sess_idr_lock' undeclared (first use in this

Re: [PATCH] sched: idle: Avoid retaining the tick when it has been stopped

2018-08-10 Thread leo . yan
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > If the tick has been stopped already, but the governor has not asked to > stop it (which it can do sometimes), the idle loop should invoke > tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(), to let tick_nohz_stop_tick()

Re: [PATCH] sched: idle: Avoid retaining the tick when it has been stopped

2018-08-10 Thread leo . yan
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 07:08:34PM +0200, Rafael J . Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > If the tick has been stopped already, but the governor has not asked to > stop it (which it can do sometimes), the idle loop should invoke > tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick(), to let tick_nohz_stop_tick()

Re: [PATCH 01/16] MAINTAINERS: Switch a maintainer for drivers/staging/gasket

2018-08-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:40:06PM -0700, John Joseph wrote: > Acked-by: John Joseph Why are you acking something you supposidly already signed-off on? > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Todd Poynor wrote: > > From: Todd Poynor > > > > Todd Poynor takes over for John Joseph. > > > >

Re: [PATCH 01/16] MAINTAINERS: Switch a maintainer for drivers/staging/gasket

2018-08-10 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 08:40:06PM -0700, John Joseph wrote: > Acked-by: John Joseph Why are you acking something you supposidly already signed-off on? > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 8:20 PM, Todd Poynor wrote: > > From: Todd Poynor > > > > Todd Poynor takes over for John Joseph. > > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add i.MX8MQ clock driver

2018-08-10 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Abel, On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 05:45:37PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote: > This is basically just a resend of the following patchset: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-clk/msg23141.html > > I've just updated the patchset and implemented Shawn's > and Aisheng's comments. > > I hope I haven't

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add i.MX8MQ clock driver

2018-08-10 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Abel, On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 05:45:37PM +0300, Abel Vesa wrote: > This is basically just a resend of the following patchset: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-clk/msg23141.html > > I've just updated the patchset and implemented Shawn's > and Aisheng's comments. > > I hope I haven't

<    4   5   6   7   8   9