[PATCH v5 2/3] thermal: tegra: fix memory allocation

2018-12-02 Thread Wei Ni
Fix memory allocation to store the pointers to thermal_zone_device. Signed-off-by: Wei Ni Acked-by: Thierry Reding --- drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c index

[PATCH v5 0/3] Fixes for Tegra soctherm

2018-12-02 Thread Wei Ni
This series fixed some issues for Tegra soctherm Main changes from v4: 1. fixed for the parsing sensor id. 2. keep warning for missing critical trips. Main changes from v3: 1. updated codes for parsing sensor id, per Thierry's comments Main changes from v2: 1. add codes to parse sensor id to

Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] zram: writeback throttle

2018-12-02 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (12/03/18 11:40), Minchan Kim wrote: [..] > + down_read(>init_lock); > + atomic64_set(>stats.bd_wb_limit, val); > + if (val == 0) > + zram->stop_writeback = false; > + up_read(>init_lock); [..] > + if (zram->stop_writeback) { > + ret

Re: [PATCH v4 7/7] zram: writeback throttle

2018-12-02 Thread Sergey Senozhatsky
On (12/03/18 11:40), Minchan Kim wrote: [..] > + down_read(>init_lock); > + atomic64_set(>stats.bd_wb_limit, val); > + if (val == 0) > + zram->stop_writeback = false; > + up_read(>init_lock); [..] > + if (zram->stop_writeback) { > + ret

RE: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed.

2018-12-02 Thread Rangankar, Manish
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Meyer > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 2:22 AM > To: Dept-Eng QLogic Storage Upstream upstr...@cavium.com>; j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; > martin.peter...@oracle.com; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH] scsi:

RE: [PATCH] scsi: qla4xxx: NULL check before some freeing functions is not needed.

2018-12-02 Thread Rangankar, Manish
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Meyer > Sent: Monday, December 3, 2018 2:22 AM > To: Dept-Eng QLogic Storage Upstream upstr...@cavium.com>; j...@linux.vnet.ibm.com; > martin.peter...@oracle.com; linux-s...@vger.kernel.org; linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [PATCH] scsi:

[GIT] Sparc

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
1) Some implicit switch fallthrough fixes from Stephen Rothwell. 2) Missing of_node_put() in various sparc drivers from Yangtao Li. Please pull, thanks! The following changes since commit 25e19c1fe421280a47f37c3571aa379e6e67966c: Merge tag 'libnvdimm-fixes-4.20-rc3' of

[GIT] Sparc

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
1) Some implicit switch fallthrough fixes from Stephen Rothwell. 2) Missing of_node_put() in various sparc drivers from Yangtao Li. Please pull, thanks! The following changes since commit 25e19c1fe421280a47f37c3571aa379e6e67966c: Merge tag 'libnvdimm-fixes-4.20-rc3' of

[PATCH -tip] kernel/sched,wake_q: Branch predict wake_q_add() cmpxchg

2018-12-02 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
The cmpxchg will fail when the task is already in the process of waking up, and as such is an extremely rare occurrence. Micro-optimize the call and put an unlikely() around it. To no surprise, when using CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES under a number of workloads the incorrect rate was a mere

[PATCH -tip] kernel/sched,wake_q: Branch predict wake_q_add() cmpxchg

2018-12-02 Thread Davidlohr Bueso
The cmpxchg will fail when the task is already in the process of waking up, and as such is an extremely rare occurrence. Micro-optimize the call and put an unlikely() around it. To no surprise, when using CONFIG_PROFILE_ANNOTATED_BRANCHES under a number of workloads the incorrect rate was a mere

Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace

2018-12-02 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:28:26PM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > This patch introduces a means for syscalls matched in seccomp to notify > some other task that a particular filter has been triggered. > > The motivation for this is primarily for use with containers. For example, > if a container

Re: [PATCH v9 3/4] seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace

2018-12-02 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:28:26PM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > This patch introduces a means for syscalls matched in seccomp to notify > some other task that a particular filter has been triggered. > > The motivation for this is primarily for use with containers. For example, > if a container

[PATCH RESEND V2 3/4] ARM: dts: imx6ul: Add flexcan stop mode wakeup support

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
From: Aisheng Dong Add stop-mode property which is required by stop mode wakeup feature. Signed-off-by: Aisheng Dong Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi

[PATCH RESEND V2 4/4] ARM: dts: imx7s: Add flexcan stop mode wakeup support

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
From: Aisheng Dong Add stop-mode property which is required by stop mode wakeup feature. Signed-off-by: Aisheng Dong Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi

[PATCH RESEND V2 2/4] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: Add flexcan stop mode wakeup support

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
From: Aisheng Dong Add stop-mode property which is required by stop mode wakeup feature. Signed-off-by: Aisheng Dong Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi

[PATCH RESEND V2 3/4] ARM: dts: imx6ul: Add flexcan stop mode wakeup support

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
From: Aisheng Dong Add stop-mode property which is required by stop mode wakeup feature. Signed-off-by: Aisheng Dong Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul.dtsi

[PATCH RESEND V2 4/4] ARM: dts: imx7s: Add flexcan stop mode wakeup support

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
From: Aisheng Dong Add stop-mode property which is required by stop mode wakeup feature. Signed-off-by: Aisheng Dong Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx7s.dtsi

[PATCH RESEND V2 2/4] ARM: dts: imx6qdl: Add flexcan stop mode wakeup support

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
From: Aisheng Dong Add stop-mode property which is required by stop mode wakeup feature. Signed-off-by: Aisheng Dong Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6qdl.dtsi

[PATCH RESEND V2 1/4] ARM: dts: imx6sx: Add flexcan stop mode wakeup support

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
From: Aisheng Dong Add stop-mode property which is required by stop mode wakeup feature. Signed-off-by: Aisheng Dong Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi

[PATCH RESEND V2 0/4] ARM: dts: imx: Add flexcan stop mode wake

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
This patchset intends to add flexcan stop mode wakeup support on IMX6/7 platforms. ChangeLog: V1->V2: *update stop mode property(stop-mode -> fsl,stop-mode). Hi Shawn, This property has been merged both flexcan bindings doc and kernel driver. Best Regards, Joakim Zhang Aisheng

[PATCH RESEND V2 1/4] ARM: dts: imx6sx: Add flexcan stop mode wakeup support

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
From: Aisheng Dong Add stop-mode property which is required by stop mode wakeup feature. Signed-off-by: Aisheng Dong Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang --- arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6sx.dtsi

[PATCH RESEND V2 0/4] ARM: dts: imx: Add flexcan stop mode wake

2018-12-02 Thread Joakim Zhang
This patchset intends to add flexcan stop mode wakeup support on IMX6/7 platforms. ChangeLog: V1->V2: *update stop mode property(stop-mode -> fsl,stop-mode). Hi Shawn, This property has been merged both flexcan bindings doc and kernel driver. Best Regards, Joakim Zhang Aisheng

Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] seccomp: switch system call argument type to void *

2018-12-02 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:28:25PM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > The const qualifier causes problems for any code that wants to write to the > third argument of the seccomp syscall, as we will do in a future patch in > this series. > > The third argument to the seccomp syscall is documented as

Re: [PATCH v9 2/4] seccomp: switch system call argument type to void *

2018-12-02 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:28:25PM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > The const qualifier causes problems for any code that wants to write to the > third argument of the seccomp syscall, as we will do in a future patch in > this series. > > The third argument to the seccomp syscall is documented as

Re: [PATCH] serial/sunsu: add missing of_node_put()

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
From: Yangtao Li Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:06:15 -0500 > of_find_node_by_path() acquires a reference to the node > returned by it and that reference needs to be dropped by its caller. > This place is not doing this, so fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li Several coding style problems and

Re: [PATCH] serial/sunsu: add missing of_node_put()

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
From: Yangtao Li Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:06:15 -0500 > of_find_node_by_path() acquires a reference to the node > returned by it and that reference needs to be dropped by its caller. > This place is not doing this, so fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li Several coding style problems and

Re: [PATCH] sbus: char: add of_node_put()

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
From: Yangtao Li Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:30:40 -0500 > use of_node_put() to release the refcount. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li Applied.

Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: add missing of_node_put()

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
From: Yangtao Li Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:22:54 -0500 > of_find_node_by_path() acquires a reference to the node > returned by it and that reference needs to be dropped by its caller. > This place is not doing this, so fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li Applied.

Re: [PATCH] drivers/sbus/char: add of_node_put()

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
From: Yangtao Li Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:38:26 -0500 > use of_node_put() to release the refcount. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li Applied.

Re: [PATCH] sbus: char: add of_node_put()

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
From: Yangtao Li Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:30:40 -0500 > use of_node_put() to release the refcount. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li Applied.

Re: [PATCH] drivers/tty: add missing of_node_put()

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
From: Yangtao Li Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 10:22:54 -0500 > of_find_node_by_path() acquires a reference to the node > returned by it and that reference needs to be dropped by its caller. > This place is not doing this, so fix it. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li Applied.

Re: [PATCH] drivers/sbus/char: add of_node_put()

2018-12-02 Thread David Miller
From: Yangtao Li Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 08:38:26 -0500 > use of_node_put() to release the refcount. > > Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li Applied.

Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] seccomp: hoist struct seccomp_data recalculation higher

2018-12-02 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:28:24PM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > In the next patch, we're going to use the sd pointer passed to > __seccomp_filter() as the data to pass to userspace. Except that in some > cases (__seccomp_filter(SECCOMP_RET_TRACE), emulate_vsyscall(), every time > seccomp is

Re: [PATCH v9 1/4] seccomp: hoist struct seccomp_data recalculation higher

2018-12-02 Thread Serge E. Hallyn
On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 08:28:24PM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > In the next patch, we're going to use the sd pointer passed to > __seccomp_filter() as the data to pass to userspace. Except that in some > cases (__seccomp_filter(SECCOMP_RET_TRACE), emulate_vsyscall(), every time > seccomp is

BROTHERS HOOD

2018-12-02 Thread Illuminati brotherschurch
HELLO Are you a business man, politician, musical, student and you want to be rich, powerful and be famous in life or need a power to achieving your dreams. You can achieve your dreams by being a member of the Illuminati. With this all your dreams and heart desire can be fully accomplish, if

BROTHERS HOOD

2018-12-02 Thread Illuminati brotherschurch
HELLO Are you a business man, politician, musical, student and you want to be rich, powerful and be famous in life or need a power to achieving your dreams. You can achieve your dreams by being a member of the Illuminati. With this all your dreams and heart desire can be fully accomplish, if

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ia64: Remove unused header files

2018-12-02 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 03-12-18, 10:12, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 30-11-18, 09:16, Yangtao Li wrote: > > seq_file.h does not need to be included,so remove it.Moreover deleted a > > line of meaningless return and move the module declaration to the end. > > In a function whose return type is void, returning on the last

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ia64: Remove unused header files

2018-12-02 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 03-12-18, 10:12, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 30-11-18, 09:16, Yangtao Li wrote: > > seq_file.h does not need to be included,so remove it.Moreover deleted a > > line of meaningless return and move the module declaration to the end. > > In a function whose return type is void, returning on the last

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ia64: Remove unused header files

2018-12-02 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 30-11-18, 09:16, Yangtao Li wrote: > seq_file.h does not need to be included,so remove it.Moreover deleted a > line of meaningless return and move the module declaration to the end. > In a function whose return type is void, returning on the last line is > not required. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ia64: Remove unused header files

2018-12-02 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 30-11-18, 09:16, Yangtao Li wrote: > seq_file.h does not need to be included,so remove it.Moreover deleted a > line of meaningless return and move the module declaration to the end. > In a function whose return type is void, returning on the last line is > not required. > > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] pci: p2pdma: clean up documentation and kernel-doc

2018-12-02 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2018-12-01 10:31 a.m., Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > > Fix typos, spellos, and grammar in p2pdma.rst and p2pdma.c. > > Fix return value(s) in function pci_p2pmem_alloc_sgl(). > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas > Cc: Jonathan

Re: [PATCH] pci: p2pdma: clean up documentation and kernel-doc

2018-12-02 Thread Logan Gunthorpe
On 2018-12-01 10:31 a.m., Randy Dunlap wrote: > From: Randy Dunlap > > Fix typos, spellos, and grammar in p2pdma.rst and p2pdma.c. > > Fix return value(s) in function pci_p2pmem_alloc_sgl(). > > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas > Cc: Jonathan

Re: [RFC PATCH net v2] net: phy: Fix the issue that netif always links up after resuming

2018-12-02 Thread Kunihiko Hayashi
Hi Florian Heiner, On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:47:37 +0100 wrote: > On 30.11.2018 18:46, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > On 11/30/2018 1:25 AM, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote: > >> Even though the link is down before entering hibernation, > >> there is an issue that the network interface always links

Re: [RFC PATCH net v2] net: phy: Fix the issue that netif always links up after resuming

2018-12-02 Thread Kunihiko Hayashi
Hi Florian Heiner, On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:47:37 +0100 wrote: > On 30.11.2018 18:46, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > > > On 11/30/2018 1:25 AM, Kunihiko Hayashi wrote: > >> Even though the link is down before entering hibernation, > >> there is an issue that the network interface always links

[PATCH 19/22] mfd: wm831x-core: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM831X drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that when reading the driver

[PATCH 19/22] mfd: wm831x-core: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM831X drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that when reading the driver

[PATCH 18/22] mfd: wm831x-i2c: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM831X_I2C drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM831x/2x PMICs with I2C" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 20/22] mfd: wm8350-i2c: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM8350_I2C drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM8350 with I2C" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 18/22] mfd: wm831x-i2c: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM831X_I2C drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM831x/2x PMICs with I2C" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 20/22] mfd: wm8350-i2c: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM8350_I2C drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM8350 with I2C" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 22/22] mfd: wm8400-core: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM8400 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM8400" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned,

[PATCH 17/22] mfd: wm831x-spi: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM831X_SPI drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM831x/2x PMICs with SPI" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 22/22] mfd: wm8400-core: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM8400 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM8400" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned,

[PATCH 17/22] mfd: wm831x-spi: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM831X_SPI drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Wolfson Microelectronics WM831x/2x PMICs with SPI" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 21/22] mfd: wm8350-core: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM8350 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that when reading the driver

[PATCH 21/22] mfd: wm8350-core: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_WM8350 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so that when reading the driver

[PATCH 16/22] mfd: tps80031: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_TPS80031 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "TI TPS80031/TPS80032 Power Management chips" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 14/22] mfd: tps65090: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_TPS65090 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "TI TPS65090 Power Management chips" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially

[PATCH 16/22] mfd: tps80031: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_TPS80031 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "TI TPS80031/TPS80032 Power Management chips" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 14/22] mfd: tps65090: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_TPS65090 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "TI TPS65090 Power Management chips" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially

[PATCH 15/22] mfd: tps65910: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_TPS65910 drivers/mfd/Kconfig-bool "TI TPS65910 Power Management chip" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially

[PATCH 15/22] mfd: tps65910: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_TPS65910 drivers/mfd/Kconfig-bool "TI TPS65910 Power Management chip" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially

[PATCH 12/22] mfd: sta2x11: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_STA2X11 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "STMicroelectronics STA2X11" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so

[PATCH 13/22] mfd: syscon: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_SYSCON drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "System Controller Register R/W Based on Regmap" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 11/22] mfd: rc5t583: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_RC5T583 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Ricoh RC5T583 Power Management system device" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 09/22] mfd: htc-i2cpld: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig for this option is currently: config HTC_I2CPLD bool "HTC I2C PLD chip support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that when reading the driver there is no doubt it is

[PATCH 10/22] mfd: max8925-core: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_MAX8925 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Maxim Semiconductor MAX8925 PMIC Support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular

[PATCH 12/22] mfd: sta2x11: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_STA2X11 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "STMicroelectronics STA2X11" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular infrastructure use, so

[PATCH 13/22] mfd: syscon: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_SYSCON drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "System Controller Register R/W Based on Regmap" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 11/22] mfd: rc5t583: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_RC5T583 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Ricoh RC5T583 Power Management system device" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 09/22] mfd: htc-i2cpld: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig for this option is currently: config HTC_I2CPLD bool "HTC I2C PLD chip support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that when reading the driver there is no doubt it is

[PATCH 10/22] mfd: max8925-core: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_MAX8925 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Maxim Semiconductor MAX8925 PMIC Support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces of modular

[PATCH 07/22] mfd: da9055-core: make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_DA9055 drivers/mfd/Kconfig-bool "Dialog Semiconductor DA9055 PMIC Support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially

[PATCH 08/22] mfd: db8500-prcmu: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_DB8500_PRCMU drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "ST-Ericsson DB8500 Power Reset Control Management Unit" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces

[PATCH 06/22] mfd: da9055-i2c: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Makefile/Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Makefile:da9055-objs := da9055-core.o da9055-i2c.o drivers/mfd/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_DA9055) += da9055.o ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code

[PATCH 07/22] mfd: da9055-core: make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_DA9055 drivers/mfd/Kconfig-bool "Dialog Semiconductor DA9055 PMIC Support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially

[PATCH 08/22] mfd: db8500-prcmu: drop unused MODULE_ tags from non-modular code

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_DB8500_PRCMU drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "ST-Ericsson DB8500 Power Reset Control Management Unit" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the couple traces

[PATCH 06/22] mfd: da9055-i2c: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Makefile/Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Makefile:da9055-objs := da9055-core.o da9055-i2c.o drivers/mfd/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_MFD_DA9055) += da9055.o ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code

[PATCH v2 00/22] mfd: demodularization of non-modular drivers

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[v1 --> v2: add some more commits as requested by Lee (MFD maintainer), update the 00/NN text; re-do build and link testing on new linux-next. ] This group of MFD drivers are all controlled by "bool" Kconfig settings, but contain various amounts of largely pointless uses of infrastructure

[PATCH 05/22] mfd: da9052-*: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfigis currently controlling compilation of this code are: mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_DA9052_SPI mfd/Kconfig:bool "Dialog Semiconductor DA9052/53 PMIC variants with SPI" mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_DA9052_I2C mfd/Kconfig:bool "Dialog Semiconductor DA9052/53 PMIC variants with I2C"

[PATCH 04/22] mfd: da903x: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config PMIC_DA903X drivers/mfd/Kconfig-bool "Dialog Semiconductor DA9030/DA9034 PMIC Support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH v2 00/22] mfd: demodularization of non-modular drivers

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[v1 --> v2: add some more commits as requested by Lee (MFD maintainer), update the 00/NN text; re-do build and link testing on new linux-next. ] This group of MFD drivers are all controlled by "bool" Kconfig settings, but contain various amounts of largely pointless uses of infrastructure

[PATCH 05/22] mfd: da9052-*: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfigis currently controlling compilation of this code are: mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_DA9052_SPI mfd/Kconfig:bool "Dialog Semiconductor DA9052/53 PMIC variants with SPI" mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_DA9052_I2C mfd/Kconfig:bool "Dialog Semiconductor DA9052/53 PMIC variants with I2C"

[PATCH 04/22] mfd: da903x: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config PMIC_DA903X drivers/mfd/Kconfig-bool "Dialog Semiconductor DA9030/DA9034 PMIC Support" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is

[PATCH 03/22] mfd: as3711: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_AS3711 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "AMS AS3711" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that when reading

[PATCH 03/22] mfd: as3711: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_AS3711 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "AMS AS3711" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that when reading

[PATCH 02/22] mfd: adp5520: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Makefile/Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_PMIC_ADP5520) += adp5520.o drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config PMIC_ADP5520 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Analog Devices ADP5520/01 MFD PMIC Core Support" ...meaning that it currently is not being

[PATCH 02/22] mfd: adp5520: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Makefile/Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Makefile:obj-$(CONFIG_PMIC_ADP5520) += adp5520.o drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config PMIC_ADP5520 drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "Analog Devices ADP5520/01 MFD PMIC Core Support" ...meaning that it currently is not being

[PATCH 01/22] mfd: aat2870-core: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_AAT2870_CORE drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "AnalogicTech AAT2870" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so

[PATCH 01/22] mfd: aat2870-core: Make it explicitly non-modular

2018-12-02 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is: drivers/mfd/Kconfig:config MFD_AAT2870_CORE drivers/mfd/Kconfig:bool "AnalogicTech AAT2870" ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone. Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: Introduce new vm_insert_range API

2018-12-02 Thread Souptick Joarder
Hi Mike, On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:43 PM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 11:49:44AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > > Previouly drivers have their own way of mapping range of > > kernel pages/memory into user vma and this was done by > > invoking vm_insert_page() within a loop.

Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] mm: Introduce new vm_insert_range API

2018-12-02 Thread Souptick Joarder
Hi Mike, On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:43 PM Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 11:49:44AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote: > > Previouly drivers have their own way of mapping range of > > kernel pages/memory into user vma and this was done by > > invoking vm_insert_page() within a loop.

Re: [PATCH v12 4/5] x86/boot: Parse SRAT table from RSDP and store immovable memory

2018-12-02 Thread Chao Fan
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:54:33AM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote: >On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:24:54AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote: >> >> /* acpitb.c */ >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE >> >> +/* Store the amount of immovable memory regions */ >> >> +int num_immovable_mem; >> >> +#endif >> >> + >> >>

Re: [PATCH v12 4/5] x86/boot: Parse SRAT table from RSDP and store immovable memory

2018-12-02 Thread Chao Fan
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:54:33AM -0500, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote: >On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 09:24:54AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote: >> >> /* acpitb.c */ >> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE >> >> +/* Store the amount of immovable memory regions */ >> >> +int num_immovable_mem; >> >> +#endif >> >> + >> >>

[PATCH] mailbox: Hi3660: Fixup mailbox state machine malfunction issue

2018-12-02 Thread Kevin Wangtao
Current mailbox driver of Hi3660 release the mailbox directly before sending a new message which may cause last message lost and next message sending doesn't take effect actually. This patch fixs this issue by following the right progress below, each time before sending a message, mailbox driver

[PATCH] mailbox: Hi3660: Fixup mailbox state machine malfunction issue

2018-12-02 Thread Kevin Wangtao
Current mailbox driver of Hi3660 release the mailbox directly before sending a new message which may cause last message lost and next message sending doesn't take effect actually. This patch fixs this issue by following the right progress below, each time before sending a message, mailbox driver

RE: [PATCHv2 3/6] PCI: layerscape: Add the EP mode support

2018-12-02 Thread Xiaowei Bao
Hi Lorenzo, -Original Message- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Sent: 2018年11月30日 18:55 To: Xiaowei Bao Cc: bhelg...@google.com; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li ; kis...@ti.com; a...@arndb.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. Lian ; Mingkai Hu ; Roy Zang

RE: [PATCHv2 3/6] PCI: layerscape: Add the EP mode support

2018-12-02 Thread Xiaowei Bao
Hi Lorenzo, -Original Message- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Sent: 2018年11月30日 18:55 To: Xiaowei Bao Cc: bhelg...@google.com; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li ; kis...@ti.com; a...@arndb.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. Lian ; Mingkai Hu ; Roy Zang

RE: [PATCHv2 5/6] pci: layerscape: Add the EP mode support.

2018-12-02 Thread Xiaowei Bao
Hi Lorenzo, -Original Message- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Sent: 2018年12月1日 0:22 To: Xiaowei Bao Cc: bhelg...@google.com; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li ; kis...@ti.com; a...@arndb.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. Lian ; Mingkai Hu ; Roy Zang ;

RE: [PATCHv2 5/6] pci: layerscape: Add the EP mode support.

2018-12-02 Thread Xiaowei Bao
Hi Lorenzo, -Original Message- From: Lorenzo Pieralisi Sent: 2018年12月1日 0:22 To: Xiaowei Bao Cc: bhelg...@google.com; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li ; kis...@ti.com; a...@arndb.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. Lian ; Mingkai Hu ; Roy Zang ;

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >