On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:51:56AM +0800, Jeremy Kerr wrote:
> Hi Al & Christoph,
>
> > Again, this really needs fixing. Preferably - as a separate commit
> > preceding this series, so that it could be
> > backported. simple_read_from_buffer() is a blocking operation.
>
> I'll put together a pa
Compliment of the day to you. I am Mrs.CHANTAL I am sending this brief
letter to solicit your partnership to transfer $13.5 Million US
Dollars.I shall send you more information and procedures when I receive
positive response From you. Please send me a message in My private
email
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:19:51PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 28-04-20, 08:37, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:01:44AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > > That is not true for everyone, it is only true for Intel, pls call
> > > > > that
> > > > > out as well...
> > > >
> > > > Why
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
arch/riscv/Kconfig
between commits:
d3c263cda1a5 ("riscv: Add KGDB support")
ce66581cb6e9 ("riscv: Use the XML target descriptions to report 3 system
registers")
from the risc-v tree and commit:
bbb6dc9ac443
Jens,
can you pick this up for the for-5.8/block tree? We're about ready
to kill ioctl_by_bdev after this series.
Jens,
can you pick this series up? At least 1-4 are probably usefu for 5.7
and -stable.
On 27/04/2020 21.26, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 15:06 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 15:10:00 +0200
>> Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>
>>> Reverting
>>>
>>> b1a471ec4df1 - hrtimer: Prevent using hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock() on
>>> migration_base
>>> 40aae5708e7a - hrt
Hi Boris,
On 28/4/2020 2:47 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:40:58 +0800
"Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
wrote:
Hi Boris,
On 28/4/2020 2:27 pm, Boris Brezillon wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 14:17:30 +0800
"Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX"
wrote:
Hi Miquel,
Thank you v
2020년 4월 24일 (금) 오전 11:51, Johannes Weiner 님이 작성:
>
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:44:42AM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 06:11:24PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > @@ -412,31 +407,43 @@ struct page *__read_swap_cache_async(swp_entry_t
> > > entry, gfp_t gfp_mask,
> > >
On 28-04-20, 08:37, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:01:44AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > That is not true for everyone, it is only true for Intel, pls call that
> > > > out as well...
> > >
> > > Why is it not true for everyone? How else do you get the pm stuff back
> > > to your
10 matches
Mail list logo