Hi,
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 23:29:22 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> + */
> +static inline int __fprobe_handler(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip,
> +struct fprobe *fp, struct ftrace_regs *fregs,
> +void *data)
> +{
Jason Wang 于2023年11月10日周五 10:32写道：
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:09 PM Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 2:39 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 11:03 AM Jason Wang wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 2:57 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 21:18:48 -0500
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 10:51:54 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
>
> > So this patch registers ftrace_ops for each fgraph_ops to ftrace.
> > This means that the ftrace_graph_func() will be called twice or more
> > on the same
On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 3:09 PM Jason Wang wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 2:39 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 11:03 AM Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 2:57 PM Cindy Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 3:30 PM Jason Wang wrote:
> > > > >
>
On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 10:51:54 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote:
> So this patch registers ftrace_ops for each fgraph_ops to ftrace.
> This means that the ftrace_graph_func() will be called twice or more
> on the same function.
> Thus should I call ftrace_startup() once when the first
Hi,
I found strange behavior that if we set two or more probes on the same function,
its callback called twice or more. Also, the stacktrace failed.
And I found the root cause is here;
On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 23:26:42 +0900
"Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" wrote:
> @@ -910,9 +917,10 @@ int
Tested by: Chris Yan
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:51:18 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > I guess I'm not fully understanding what the cond rescheds are for. But
> > would an IPI to all CPUs setting NEED_RESCHED, fix it?
>
> If all livepatch arches had the ORC unwinder, yes.
>
> The problem is that frame pointer (and
Josh Poimboeuf writes:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:50:48PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
>> >> I guess I'm not fully understanding what the cond rescheds are for. But
>> >> would an IPI to all CPUs setting NEED_RESCHED, fix it?
>>
>> Yeah. We could just temporarily toggle to full preemption, when
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 11:52:17AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 09:30:21AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 10:12:37AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > Big company's should take the responsibility to train and provide
> > > skill
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 02:50:48PM -0800, Ankur Arora wrote:
> >> I guess I'm not fully understanding what the cond rescheds are for. But
> >> would an IPI to all CPUs setting NEED_RESCHED, fix it?
>
> Yeah. We could just temporarily toggle to full preemption, when
> NEED_RESCHED_LAZY is always
Josh Poimboeuf writes:
> On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 12:31:47PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:26:37 -0800
>> Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>>
>> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 06:16:09PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:56:53 -0800
>> > > Ankur Arora wrote:
On Thu, Nov 09, 2023 at 12:31:47PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:26:37 -0800
> Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 06:16:09PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:56:53 -0800
> > > Ankur Arora wrote:
> > >
> > > > This reverts
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:50:15PM -0500, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 02:01:56PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > Now that modprobe.d is searched under ${prefix}/lib, allow a complete
> > transition to files only under ${prefix} by adding a ${module_directory}
> >
On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 03:25:19AM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Tuesday 2023-10-17 19:50, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> >> +AC_ARG_WITH([module_directory],
> >> +AS_HELP_STRING([--with-module-directory=DIR], [directory in which
> >> to
> >> look for kernel modules - typically
On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 09:26:37 -0800
Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 06:16:09PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:56:53 -0800
> > Ankur Arora wrote:
> >
> > > This reverts commit e3ff7c609f39671d1aaff4fb4a8594e14f3e03f8.
> > >
> > > Note that removing this
On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 06:16:09PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 13:56:53 -0800
> Ankur Arora wrote:
>
> > This reverts commit e3ff7c609f39671d1aaff4fb4a8594e14f3e03f8.
> >
> > Note that removing this commit reintroduces "live patches failing to
> > complete within a
On 08.11.23 21:46, Dave Hansen wrote:
Yes, you've missed something. For your reading pleasure:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/2.Process.html?highlight=merge%20window
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-tip.html
My bad, thank you for pointing out the
18 matches
Mail list logo
