'struct i2c_algorithm' and 'struct virtio_device_id' are not modified in
this driver.
Constifying this structure moves some data to a read-only section, so
increase overall security, especially when the structure holds some
function pointers, which is the case for struct i2c_algorithm.
On a x86_6
On Sat, Sep 7, 2024 at 1:14 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 10:43:10AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > clang gives the following:
> >
> > elf.c:102:1: error: unused function '__sym_remove'
> > [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> > 102 | INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct symbol, node, unsign
From: syzbot
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 09:04:21 -0700
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit:22f902dfc51e Merge tag 'i2c-for-6.10-rc7' of git://git.ker..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=166ba6e198
> kernel con
Hi, Petr
>
> The 1st patch adds the pointer to struct klp_ops into struct
> klp_func. We might check the state a similar way as klp_ftrace_handler().
>
> I had something like this in mind when I suggested to move the pointer:
>
> static ssize_t using_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> struct kobj_at
Hi, Petr
> On Sep 7, 2024, at 00:39, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> On Fri 2024-09-06 17:39:46, zhang warden wrote:
>> Hi, John & Miroslav
>>
Would it be possible to just use klp_transition_patch and implement the
logic just in using_show()?
>>>
>>> Yes, containing the logic to the
e (this is a W=1 build):
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240907/202409071354.clw9rcwr-...@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot
| Clo
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
HEAD commit:d1f2d51b711a Merge tag 'clk-fixes-for-linus' of git://git...
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1378abc798
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=58a85aa
Hi Jingyi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on eb8c5ca373cbb018a84eb4db25c863302c9b6314]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jingyi-Wang/dt-bindings-remoteproc-qcom-sa8775p-pas-Document-QCS8300-remoteproc/20240904-164345
base: eb8
use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chunhui-Li/module-abort-module-loading-when-sysfs-setup-suffer-errors/20240907-02
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/
Thank you for the review, I have added the changelog as requested.
Changelog:
- Added missing newline to the `ksft_print_msg` in `test_zswap_writeback`
function.
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Anees
---
tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_zswap.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 10:43:10AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> clang gives the following:
>
> elf.c:102:1: error: unused function '__sym_remove' [-Werror,-Wunused-function]
> 102 | INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct symbol, node, unsigned long,
> __subtree_last,
> |
> ^
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 11:46 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 10:32:00AM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
> > +++ w/tools/objtool/elf.c
> > @@ -468,10 +468,8 @@ static void elf_add_symbol(struct elf *elf,
> > struct symbol *sym)
> > *
> > * TODO: is this still true?
> >
TL;DR This patch comes from a discussion we had with Jakub and Paolo.
This patch updates the IOAM selftests to support the new "tunsrc"
feature of IOAM. As a consequence, some changes were required. For
example, the IPv6 header must be accessed to check some fields (i.e.,
the source address for th
On Sat, 7 Sep 2024 15:15:06 +0800
Hui Guo wrote:
> Hi Kernel Maintainers,
> we found a crash "general protection fault in lookup_object_or_alloc"
> in upstream, and reproduced it successfully, this bug is a KASAN.
>
> HEAD Commit: 88fac17500f4ea49c7bac136cf1b27e7b9980075(Merge tag
> 'fuse-fixes-
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:47:06PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> Normally I build objtool with
>
> make tools/objtool
>
> or just
>
> make
>
> Those use the objtool Makefile without all the extra kernel flags.
>
> How do you normally build objtool?
>
Usually as part of the kernel buil
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 04:38:56PM +0100, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> commit ac3b43283923 ("module: replace module_layout with module_memory")
> introduced a set of memory regions for the module layout sharing the
> same attributes but didn't update the kmemleak scanned areas which
> intended to lim
use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chunhui-Li/module-abort-module-loading-when-sysfs-setup-suffer-errors/20240907-02
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/
On 9/6/2024 3:10 PM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
The current implementation of the waiting mechanism in probe() waits for
the 'released_from_reset' flag to be set which is done in
k3_r5_rproc_prepare() as part of rproc_fw_boot(). This causes unexpected
failures in cases where the firmware is unavaila
Hi Kernel Maintainers,
we found a crash "general protection fault in lookup_object_or_alloc"
in upstream, and reproduced it successfully, this bug is a KASAN.
HEAD Commit: 88fac17500f4ea49c7bac136cf1b27e7b9980075(Merge tag
'fuse-fixes-6.11-rc7')
kernel config:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/an
19 matches
Mail list logo
