Song Liu writes:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:26 PM Puranjay Mohan wrote:
>>
>> Song Liu writes:
>>
>> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:10 PM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On 2/12/25 3:32 PM, Song Liu wrote:
>> >> > I run some tests with this set and my RFC set [1]. Most of
>> >> > the test is don
Peter Xu writes:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 11:43:46PM +, Ackerley Tng wrote:
>> +static struct folio *kvm_gmem_hugetlb_alloc_folio(struct hstate *h,
>> + struct hugepage_subpool
>> *spool)
>> +{
>> +bool memcg_charge_was_prepared;
>> +stru
Song Liu writes:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:45 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:36:04PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
>> > > > [ 81.261748] copy_process+0xfdc/0xfd58 [livepatch_special_static]
>> > >
>> > > Does that copy_process+0xfdc/0xfd58 resolve to this line in
>> > >
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 11:26 PM Puranjay Mohan wrote:
>
> Song Liu writes:
>
> > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:10 PM Indu Bhagat wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2/12/25 3:32 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> >> > I run some tests with this set and my RFC set [1]. Most of
> >> > the test is done with kpatch-build. I tested
Song Liu writes:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:10 PM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>>
>> On 2/12/25 3:32 PM, Song Liu wrote:
>> > I run some tests with this set and my RFC set [1]. Most of
>> > the test is done with kpatch-build. I tested both Puranjay's
>> > version [3] and my version [4].
>> >
>> > For gcc
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:40:33PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:10 PM Indu Bhagat wrote:
> >
> > On 2/12/25 3:32 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> > > I run some tests with this set and my RFC set [1]. Most of
> > > the test is done with kpatch-build. I tested both Puranjay's
> > > versi
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:36:04PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> > > [ 81.261748] copy_process+0xfdc/0xfd58 [livepatch_special_static]
> >
> > Does that copy_process+0xfdc/0xfd58 resolve to this line in
> > copy_process()?
> >
> > refcount_inc(¤t->signal->sigcnt);
> >
> > Mayb
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 4:10 PM Indu Bhagat wrote:
>
> On 2/12/25 3:32 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> > I run some tests with this set and my RFC set [1]. Most of
> > the test is done with kpatch-build. I tested both Puranjay's
> > version [3] and my version [4].
> >
> > For gcc 14.2.1, I have seen the fol
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 3:49 PM Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:32:40PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> > [ 81.250437] [ cut here ]
> > [ 81.250818] refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.
> > [ 81.251201] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 95 at lib/refcount.c:22
> >
>You need to update the title now that you're moving also queued_replies.
>
Well, I will update the title in V3 version.
>On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 03:19:21PM +0800, Junnan Wu wrote:
>>When executing suspend to ram twice in a row,
>>the `rx_buf_nr` and `rx_buf_max_nr` increase to three times vq->nu
>On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 12:48:03PM +0100, leona...@redhat.com wrote:
>>Like for the other patch, some maintainers have not been CCd.
>
>Yes, please use `scripts/get_maintainer.pl`.
>
Ok, I will add other maintainers by this script in next push.
>>
>>On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:20:33PM +0800, Jun
> Running "make kselftest" results in several errors like these:
>
> pidfd_fdinfo_test.c:231:36: error: ‘MS_REC’ undeclared (first use in
> this function)
> 231 | r = mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_REC | MS_PRIVATE, 0);
>
> pidfd_fdinfo_test.c:231:45: error: ‘MS_PRIVATE’ undeclared (first use
Hi Antonio,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 39f54262ba499d862420a97719d2f0eea0cbd394]
url:
https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Antonio-Quartulli/net-introduce-OpenVPN-Data-Channel-Offload-ovpn/20250211-091029
base: 39f54262ba499d86
On 2/12/25 3:32 PM, Song Liu wrote:
I run some tests with this set and my RFC set [1]. Most of
the test is done with kpatch-build. I tested both Puranjay's
version [3] and my version [4].
For gcc 14.2.1, I have seen the following issue with this
test [2]. This happens with both upstream and 6.13
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 03:32:40PM -0800, Song Liu wrote:
> [ 81.250437] [ cut here ]
> [ 81.250818] refcount_t: saturated; leaking memory.
> [ 81.251201] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 95 at lib/refcount.c:22
> refcount_warn_saturate+0x6c/0x140
> [ 81.251841] Modules linked i
Hello,
2025-02-11, 01:39:53 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> All minor and major reported problems have been finally addressed.
> Big thanks to Sabrina, who took the time to guide me through
> converting the peer socket to an RCU pointer.
Something is off (not sure if it's new to this version):
I run some tests with this set and my RFC set [1]. Most of
the test is done with kpatch-build. I tested both Puranjay's
version [3] and my version [4].
For gcc 14.2.1, I have seen the following issue with this
test [2]. This happens with both upstream and 6.13.2.
The livepatch loaded fine, but the
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 16:06 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> > Tracking associated maps for a program is not necessary. As long as
> > the last BPF program using the BPF map is unloaded, the kernel will
> > automatically free not-anymore-referenced BPF map. Note that
> > bpf_object itself will keep
On 2/12/25 12:34 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
Hi John,
On 6/13/24 19:30, John Hubbard wrote:
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
-#include
+#include
#include
#include
I'm
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 05:31:59PM +0800, David Gow wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 14:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >
> > On 04.10.24 21:00, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> > > Pedro Orlando writes:
> > >> From: Gabriela Bittencourt
> > >>
> > >> Change utf8 kunit test filename and path to fo
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 2/11/25 13:18, Huang, Kai wrote:
> >>> This requires low-level SGX implementation knowledge to fully
> >>> understand. Both what "ETRACK, EBLOCK and EWB" are in the first place,
> >>> how they are involved in reclaim and also why ERE
Hi John,
On 6/13/24 19:30, John Hubbard wrote:
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/protection_keys.c
> @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> -#include
> +#include
> #include
> #include
I'm not quite sure how but this b
Add support for the MIPS 64bit N64 and ILP32 N32 ABIs.
In addition to different byte orders and ABIs there are also different
releases of the MIPS architecture. To avoid blowing up the test matrix,
only add a subset of all possible test combinations.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
---
tools/in
it holes above */
---
base-commit: 16681bea9a80080765c98b545ad74c17de2d513c
change-id: 20250212-nolibc-test-constructor-42491ba71a19
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh
FYI Willy,
On 2025-02-11 12:03:52+0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> The list is getting overly long and any modifications introduce a lot of
> noise and are prone to conflicts. Split the string into a bash array
> and break that into multiple lines.
I picked up this trivial change already.
>
> Si
When testing if we should try to compact memory or drop caches before we
run the THP or HugeTLB tests we use | as an or operator. This doesn't work
since run_vmtests.sh is written in shell where this is used to pipe the
output of the first argument into the second. Instead use the shell's -o
operat
Currently the mm selftests refuse to run if huge pages are not available in
the current system but this is an optional feature and not all the tests
actually require them. Change the test during startup to be non-fatal and
skip or omit tests which actually rely on having huge pages, allowing the
ot
Currently the mm selftests refuse to run if we don't have huge page
support but there are plenty of tests that don't depend on this feature,
relax this requirement to allow coverage on relevant systems (eg, most
32 bit arm ones).
While doing this I noticed a bug with an existing check if we're run
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:21:38AM -0600, Yan Zhai wrote:
> Hi Brian, Jiri
>
> thanks for the comments.
>
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 8:47 AM Brian Vazquez wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 4:19 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2025 at 11:22:35PM -0800, Yan Zhai wrote:
> > > >
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>
> > Is it me who cut something or the above missing this information (total
> > tests)?
> > If the latter, how are we supposed to answer to the question if the failed
> > test
> > is from new bunch of cases I hypothetically added or regr
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025, at 15:29, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> The kselftest-vDSO/vdso_test_abi test encounters failures when built
> and executed using GCC-13 on armv7 architecture.
> The issue has been observed on both TI X15 devices and QEMU-armv7.
>
> Interestingly, the same test passes without any is
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 09:33:46AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> >
>
> As an aside, how can I compile with the warning settings used by
> kernel test robot?
>
This is a Smatch warning.
https://github.com/error27/smatch
https://github.com/error27/smatch/blob/master/Documentation/smatch.rst
R
The "page" pointer is always NULL at this point. Adding a check is
a bit confusing. Delete it.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
---
fs/dax.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/dax.c b/fs/dax.c
index 9e4940a0b286..21a743996f90 100644
--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 01:42:15PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Vlastimil,
>
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 17:01, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > On 2/3/25 12:13, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by
> > > adjusting the maintainer role for a
0250211-000245
> base: a64dcfb451e254085a7daee5fe51bf22959d52d3
> patch link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250210-ww_mutex-kunit-convert-v1-1-972f0201f71e%40gmail.com
> patch subject: [PATCH] ww_mutex: convert self-test to KUnit
> config: i386-randconfig-141-20250212
> (https://download.01.or
The kselftest-vDSO/vdso_test_abi test encounters failures when built
and executed using GCC-13 on armv7 architecture.
The issue has been observed on both TI X15 devices and QEMU-armv7.
Interestingly, the same test passes without any issues when built using
Clang-19.This failure is specific to GCC-
Hello,
On 2/12/25 04:18, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:57:40AM +0100, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
>> Hello Bjorn,
>>
>> On 12/6/24 23:07, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 09:42:09AM GMT, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
Add a remoteproc TEE (Trusted Execution Enviro
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 11:41:38 +,
Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:36:31AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > For the crash at hand, which clearly shows nVHE, can you report
> > whether the following hack fixes it for you?
> >
> > M.
>
> No luck, I'm afraid. It still crash
On 12.02.25 07:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 04.10.24 21:00, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> Pedro Orlando writes:
> [...]
>> This breaks compilation for me.
>>
>> fs/unicode/tests/utf8_kunit.c:11:10: fatal error: utf8n.h: No such file or
>> directory
>>11 | #include "utf8n.h"
>>
On 2/12/25 04:54, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 11:33:31AM +0100, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/10/24 00:14, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>> On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 09:42:10AM GMT, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
This patch updates the rproc_ops structures to include two new
Test that queues which are used for AF_XDP have the xsk nest attribute.
The attribute is currently empty, but its existence means the AF_XDP is
being used for the queue. Enable CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS for
selftests/drivers/net tests, as well.
Signed-off-by: Joe Damato
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski
---
Greetings:
Welcome to v7. Added CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS to the selftests/driver/net
kernel config in patch 3. Updated the xdp_helper.c to return -1 on
AF_XDP non-existence, and updated queues.py to skip the test if AF_XDP
does not exist (but fail in other failure cases). Tested on kernels with
and with
Hello,
syzbot found the following issue on:
HEAD commit:febbc555cf0f Merge tag 'nfsd-6.14-1' of git://git.kernel.o..
git tree: upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=137a78e458
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=48f90cac5eea091a
das
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 06:37:06PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:10:52 -0800 Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > > I can't comment on NIPA because I have no idea how it works. Maybe
> > > there is a kernel with some options enabled and other kernels with
> > > various options disa
Create a test for the robust list mechanism. Test the following uAPI
operations:
- Creating a robust mutex where the lock waiter is wake by the kernel
when the lock owner died
- Setting a robust list to the current task
- Getting a robust list from the current task
- Getting a robust list from a
Create ASSERT_{EQ, NE, TRUE, FALSE} macros to make test creation easier.
Signed-off-by: André Almeida
---
.../testing/selftests/futex/include/logging.h | 38 +++
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/include/logging.h
b/tools/testing/selfte
Add basic support to run various MIPS variants via kunit_tool using the
virtualized malta platform.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
---
tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/mips.py | 18 ++
tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/mips64.py | 19 +++
tools/testing/kunit
On MIPS the memblock allocator is configured to allocate bottom-up.
The memory map is allocated by the mm core through memblock and uses
MEMBLOCK_LOW_LIMIT as minimal address. This constant is defined as zero because
it assumes that "we are using top down, so it is safe to use 0 here".
So the memor
Add basic support to run various MIPS variants via kunit_tool using the
virtualized malta platform.
Various kunit tests from drivers/firmware/cirrus/ are failing on MIPS.
They are fixed in [0].
[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250211-cs_dsp-kunit-strings-v1-1-d9bc2035d...@linutronix.de/
Signed
Hi Vlastimil,
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 17:01, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> On 2/3/25 12:13, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > The subsystem status is currently reported with --role(stats) by
> > adjusting the maintainer role for any status different from Maintained.
> > This has two downsides:
> >
> > - if a
On Mon, 2025-02-10 at 11:59 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> When compiling a kernel with GCC using `make W=1` with
> CONFIG_WERROR=y
> (which is default nowadays), the build fails:
>
> drivers/char/virtio_console.c:1427:9: note: ‘snprintf’ output between
> 9 and 27 bytes into a destination of size
On Wed, 2025-02-12 at 12:48 +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Remove hard-coded strings by using the str_yes_no() helper function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum
> ---
> drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Amit Shah
-ww_mutex-kunit-convert-v1-1-972f0201f71e%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH] ww_mutex: convert self-test to KUnit
config: i386-randconfig-141-20250212
(https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250212/202502121806.cs6r741y-...@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.3 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm
Remove hard-coded strings by using the str_yes_no() helper function.
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum
---
drivers/char/virtio_console.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/virtio_console.c b/drivers/char/virtio_console.c
index 24442485e73e..35af0cc11d
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 17:11, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:36:31AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > For the crash at hand, which clearly shows nVHE, can you report
> > whether the following hack fixes it for you?
> >
> > M.
>
> No luck, I'm afraid. It still crashes the
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:36:31AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> For the crash at hand, which clearly shows nVHE, can you report
> whether the following hack fixes it for you?
>
> M.
No luck, I'm afraid. It still crashes the same way.
https://tuxapi.tuxsuite.com/v1/groups/linaro/projects/a
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:36:31AM +, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 11:24:06 +,
> Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> >
> > Regression on rk3399-rock-pi-4b while running kvm-unit-tests with
> > nvhe, protected and vhe mode with virtualization enabled.
>
> I do not buy this. RK3399 only h
The tests done by test_xdp_redirect_multi.sh are now fully covered by
the CI through test_xdp_veth.c.
Remove test_xdp_redirect_multi.sh
Remove xdp_redirect_multi.c that was used by the script to load and
attach the BPF programs.
Remove their entries in the Makefile
Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev
S
XDP redirections with BPF_F_BROADCAST and BPF_F_EXCLUDE_INGRESS flags
are tested by test_xdp_redirect_multi.sh but not within the test_progs
framework.
Add a broadcast test case in test_xdp_veth.c to test them.
Use the same BPF programs than the one used by
test_xdp_redirect_multi.sh.
Use a BPF ma
XDP programs loaded on egress is tested by test_xdp_redirect_multi.sh
but not by the test_progs framework.
Add a test case in test_xdp_veth.c to test the XDP program on egress.
Use the same BPF program than test_xdp_redirect_multi.sh that replaces
the source MAC address by one provided through a B
Broadcasting flags are hardcoded for each kind for protocol.
Create a redirect_flags map that allows to select the broadcasting flags
to use in the bpf_redirect_map(). The protocol ID is used as a key.
Set the old hardcoded values as default if the map isn't filled by the
BPF caller.
Acked-by: St
Tests use the root network namespace, so they aren't fully independent
of each other. For instance, the index of the created veth interfaces
is incremented every time a new test is launched.
Wrap the network topology in a network namespace to ensure full
isolation. Use the append_tid() helper to e
The network configuration is defined by a table of struct
veth_configuration. This isn't convenient if we want to add a network
configuration that isn't linked to a veth pair.
Create a struct net_configuration that holds the veth_configuration
table to ease adding new configuration attributes in u
Hi all,
This patch series continues the work to migrate the *.sh tests into
prog_tests framework.
test_xdp_redirect_multi.sh tests the XDP redirections done through
bpf_redirect_map().
This is already partly covered by test_xdp_veth.c that already tests
map redirections at XDP level. What isn't
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 07:43:11PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 16:47:44 +0200
> Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 08, 2025 at 04:13:24PM -0500, Aren Moynihan wrote:
> > > Using dev_err_probe instead of dev_err and return makes the errors
> >
> > Use dev_err_probe()
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 02:14:19AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 08:22:24PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 7:28 PM Joel Fernandes
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 1:45 PM Joel Fernandes
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:
On 12/02/2025 12:31 pm, Dave Hansen wrote:
On 2/11/25 13:18, Huang, Kai wrote:
This requires low-level SGX implementation knowledge to fully
understand. Both what "ETRACK, EBLOCK and EWB" are in the first place,
how they are involved in reclaim and also why EREMOVE doesn't lead to
the same fa
On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 08:22:24PM -0500, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 7:28 PM Joel Fernandes wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 1:45 PM Joel Fernandes
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 11:49 AM Paul E. McKenney
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 09:58:11PM
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 06:43, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 5:38 PM Boqun Feng wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tamir,
>
> Hi Boqun, thanks for taking a look.
>
> > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 10:59:12AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > > Convert this unit test to a KUnit test.
> > >
> >
> >
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 at 14:45, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>
> On 04.10.24 21:00, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> > Pedro Orlando writes:
> >> From: Gabriela Bittencourt
> >>
> >> Change utf8 kunit test filename and path to follow the style
> >> convention on Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/style.rst
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 at 16:40, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11 2025, David Gow wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 at 19:57, Rasmus Villemoes
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, Feb 07 2025, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 5:01 AM Rasmus Villemoes
> >> > wrote:
> >>
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:24:44 +0100
Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> "Gary Guo" writes:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:57:36 +0100
> > Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> >
> >> The `Index` implementation on `BStr` was lost when we switched `BStr` from
> >> a type alias of `[u8]` to a newtype. This patch adds b
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:13:10 +0100
Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> "Gary Guo" writes:
>
> > On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:57:39 +0100
> > Andreas Hindborg wrote:
> >
> >> Add the trait `ParseInt` for parsing string representations of integers
> >> where the string representations are optionally prefixed
73 matches
Mail list logo
