> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > +void sgx_dec_usage_count(void)
> > > +{
> > > + if (atomic_dec_return(&sgx_usage_count))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + guard(mutex)(&sgx_svn_lock);
> > > +
> > > + if (atomic_read(&sgx
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at 22:52, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> The "ret" variable isn't initialized if we don't enter the loop. For
> example, if "channel->state" is not SMD_CHANNEL_OPENED.
>
> Fixes: 33e3820dda88 ("rpmsg: smd: Use spinlock in tx path")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
> ---
> Naresh, co
When we specify apply_bytes, we divide the msg into multiple segments,
each with a length of 'send', and every time we send this part of the data
using tcp_bpf_sendmsg_redir(), we use sk_msg_return_zero() to uncharge the
memory of the specified 'send' size.
However, if the first segment of data fa
The selftest can reproduce an issue where we miss the uncharge operation
when freeing msg, which will cause the following warning. We fixed the
issue and added this reproducer to selftest to ensure it will not happen
again.
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 40 at net/ipv4/a
Cong reported a warning when running ./test_sockmp:
https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/aAmIi0vlycHtbXeb@pop-os.localdomain/T/#t
[ cut here ]
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 40 at net/ipv4/af_inet.c inet_sock_destruct+0x173/0x1d5
Tainted: [W]=WARN
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9,
On 4/25/25 08:34, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:47:13 +0700 Bui Quang Minh wrote:
This only includes the selftest for virtio-net deadlock bug. The fix
commit has been applied already.
This conflicts with Joe's series slightly:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250424002746.16891-1-jd
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:15:11AM -0700, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> Vishal Annapurve writes:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 1:15 AM Yan Zhao wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:55:51PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 4/24/2025 12:25 PM, Yan Zhao wrote:
> >> > > On Thu, Apr
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 06:32:18PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:27:32 + Joe Damato wrote:
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/ksft.h
> > +static void ksft_ready(void)
>
> > +static void ksft_wait(void)
>
> These need to be static inlines.
> I'll fix when app
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:47:13 +0700 Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> This only includes the selftest for virtio-net deadlock bug. The fix
> commit has been applied already.
This conflicts with Joe's series slightly:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250424002746.16891-1-jdam...@fastly.com/
Could you rebase on
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 00:27:32 + Joe Damato wrote:
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/ksft.h
> +static void ksft_ready(void)
> +static void ksft_wait(void)
These need to be static inlines.
I'll fix when applying cause I think this series may conflict
with Bui Quang Minh's
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:10:15 +0800 you wrote:
> Use the API `sysconf()` to query page size at runtime, instead of using
> hard code number 4096.
>
> And use `posix_memalign` to allocate the page size aligned momory.
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:34:00 -0600 Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 4/24/25 5:29 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:09:28 -0600 Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> Applied, thanks!
> >>
> >> [1/1] selftests: iou-zcrx: Get the page size at runtime
> >> commit: 6f4cc653bf408ad0cc203c6ab3088b11f5da
On 4/24/25 5:29 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:09:28 -0600 Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:10:15 +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote:
>>> Use the API `sysconf()` to query page size at runtime, instead of using
>>> hard code number 4096.
>>>
>>> And use `posix_memalign` to alloc
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:09:28 -0600 Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:10:15 +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote:
> > Use the API `sysconf()` to query page size at runtime, instead of using
> > hard code number 4096.
> >
> > And use `posix_memalign` to allocate the page size aligned momory.
> >
> >
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 6:38 AM Alexis Lothoré
wrote:
>
> Hi Xu,
>
> On Thu Apr 24, 2025 at 2:00 PM CEST, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> > On 4/24/2025 3:24 AM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> >> Hi Andrii,
> >>
> >> On Wed Apr 23, 2025 at 7:15 PM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:14 AM Al
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 22:10:15 +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote:
> Use the API `sysconf()` to query page size at runtime, instead of using
> hard code number 4096.
>
> And use `posix_memalign` to allocate the page size aligned momory.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] selftests: iou-zcrx: Get the page size a
On 2025-04-19 07:10, Haiyue Wang wrote:
> Use the API `sysconf()` to query page size at runtime, instead of using
> hard code number 4096.
>
> And use `posix_memalign` to allocate the page size aligned momory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang
> ---
> .../selftests/drivers/net/hw/iou-zcrx.c
Recent discussions around commit ad1afb003939 ("vlan_dev: VLAN 0 should
be treated as "no vlan tag" (802.1p packet)") have sparked the question
what happens with the DSA (and possibly other switchdev) data path when
the bridge says that ports should have no PVID VLAN, but the 8021q
module, as the r
The following set of commands:
ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 # vlan_default_pvid 1 is implicit
ip link set swp0 master br0
bridge vlan add dev swp0 vid 1
should result in the dropping of untagged and 802.1p-tagged traffic, but
we see that it continues to be accepted. Whereas, had w
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:33:49 +0700 Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> Yes, the kernel returns EBUSY. Loop and retry sounds good to me but it's
> not easy to get the return code when using bkg(). So for simplicity,
> I'll retry with sleep(1) 3 times when the xdp_helper fails.
I meant retry _inside_ the xdp_
The Automated Testing Summit (ATS) 2025 will be held as a co-located event at
the Open Source Summit North America, and we’re now accepting talk proposals!
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/open-source-summit-north-america/features/co-located-events/#automated-testing-summit-2025
📅 Date: June 2
On 4/22/25 02:51, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 11:00:24AM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
Nolibc is useful for selftests as the test programs can be very small,
and compiled with just a kernel cros
Vishal Annapurve writes:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 1:15 AM Yan Zhao wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:55:51PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/24/2025 12:25 PM, Yan Zhao wrote:
>> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:09:22AM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote:
>> > >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 03
On 2025-04-24 06:55, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 10:10:15PM +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote:
>> Use the API `sysconf()` to query page size at runtime, instead of using
>> hard code number 4096.
>>
>> And use `posix_memalign` to allocate the page size aligned momory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:42 AM Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>
> * Andrii Nakryiko [250424 12:04]:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:20 AM Suren Baghdasaryan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:24 PM Liam R. Howlett
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Andrii Nakryiko [250423 18:06]:
> > > > >
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 9:42 AM Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>
> * Andrii Nakryiko [250424 12:04]:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:20 AM Suren Baghdasaryan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:24 PM Liam R. Howlett
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > * Andrii Nakryiko [250423 18:06]:
> > > > >
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > +void sgx_dec_usage_count(void)
> > +{
> > + if (atomic_dec_return(&sgx_usage_count))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + guard(mutex)(&sgx_svn_lock);
> > +
> > + if (atomic_read(&sgx_usage_count
* Andrii Nakryiko [250424 12:04]:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:20 AM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:24 PM Liam R. Howlett
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > * Andrii Nakryiko [250423 18:06]:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 2:49 PM Suren Baghdasaryan
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 8:20 AM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:24 PM Liam R. Howlett
> wrote:
> >
> > * Andrii Nakryiko [250423 18:06]:
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 2:49 PM Suren Baghdasaryan
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:49 PM Andrii Nakryik
PCI region request functions such as pci_request_region() currently have
the problem of becoming sometimes managed functions, if
pcim_enable_device() instead of pci_enable_device() was called. The PCI
subsystem wants to remove this deprecated behavior from its interfaces.
octeopn_ep enables its de
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:30:39AM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 11:05 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > On 2025-04-23 11:16:49 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 11:30:39AM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> Not sure if something like that would be desirable upstream. This is
> happening for us when running the hostap "hwsim" tests inside UML (with
> time-travel). At least internally, we could carry a custom patch to add
> the lockdep_of
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 5:24 PM Liam R. Howlett wrote:
>
> * Andrii Nakryiko [250423 18:06]:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 2:49 PM Suren Baghdasaryan
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 3:49 PM Andrii Nakryiko
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 10:50 AM Suren Baghdas
Arnaud, Daniel, Iuliana, Andrew and Tanmay - please test this patchset
on the platforms you are working on.
Thanks,
Mathieu
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 at 13:42, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
>
> While there's a common function to parse "memory-region" properties for
> DMA pool regions, there's not anything
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:53:34PM +, Jon Kohler wrote:
>
>
> > On Apr 24, 2025, at 8:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > !---|
> > CAUTION: External Email
> >
> > |---
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 07:55 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > > > That said, handling this deep in the bowels of EPC page allocation
> see
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 10:10:15PM +0800, Haiyue Wang wrote:
> Use the API `sysconf()` to query page size at runtime, instead of using
> hard code number 4096.
>
> And use `posix_memalign` to allocate the page size aligned momory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haiyue Wang
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 1:15 AM Yan Zhao wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:55:51PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 4/24/2025 12:25 PM, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:09:22AM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 03:02:02PM -0700, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> On Apr 24, 2025, at 8:11 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> !---|
> CAUTION: External Email
>
> |---!
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:48:53PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wro
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, Kai Huang wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 07:55 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > > That said, handling this deep in the bowels of EPC page allocation seems
> > > > u
Hi Xu,
On Thu Apr 24, 2025 at 2:00 PM CEST, Xu Kuohai wrote:
> On 4/24/2025 3:24 AM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
>> Hi Andrii,
>>
>> On Wed Apr 23, 2025 at 7:15 PM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:14 AM Alexis Lothoré
>>> wrote:
Hi Andrii,
On Wed Apr 16,
Release all carveouts under imx_rproc after rproc_attach() fails to solve
the following kmemleak:
unreferenced object 0x861c5d00 (size 128):
comm "kworker/u12:3", pid 59, jiffies 4294893509 (age 149.220s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 .
The selftest reproduces the deadlock scenario when binding/unbinding XDP
program, XDP socket, rx ring resize on virtio_net interface.
Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh
---
.../testing/selftests/drivers/net/hw/Makefile | 1 +
.../selftests/drivers/net/hw/xsk_reconfig.py | 68 +++
2
Hi Thomas,
[ quick response ]
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:48:10PM +0200, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Make sure that any nolibc header can be included in any order.
> Even if nolibc.h was not pre-included already.
I've been wondering how to do this already and didn't come up with any
great solution.
When rproc_attach() fails release rproc->clean_table to
solve the following kmemleak:
unreferenced object 0x86a99800 (size 1024):
comm "kworker/u12:3", pid 59, jiffies 4294893670 (age 121.140s)
hex dump (first 32 bytes):
00 00 00 00 00 80 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 10 00
00 00 00
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:48:53PM +0200, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> On 4/20/25 3:05 AM, Jon Kohler wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > index b9b9e9d40951..9b04025eea66 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> > @@ -769,13 +769,17 @@ static vo
Inclusion of any nolibc header file should also bring all other headers.
On the other hand it should also be possible to include any nolibc header
files
in any order.
Currently this is implemented by including the catch-all nolibc.h after the
headers own definitions.
This is problematic if one nol
On 4/24/2025 3:24 AM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
Hi Andrii,
On Wed Apr 23, 2025 at 7:15 PM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:14 AM Alexis Lothoré
wrote:
Hi Andrii,
On Wed Apr 16, 2025 at 11:24 PM CEST, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2025 at 1:32 PM Alexis Lothoré (
Make sure that any nolibc header can be included in any order.
Even if nolibc.h was not pre-included already.
This conflicts indirectly with "tools/nolibc: various new functions" [0].
I'll resolve those conflicts when applying.
[0]
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20250423-nolibc-misc-v1-0-a925bf402
On 4/20/25 3:05 AM, Jon Kohler wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/net.c b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> index b9b9e9d40951..9b04025eea66 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/net.c
> @@ -769,13 +769,17 @@ static void handle_tx_copy(struct vhost_net *net,
> struct socket *sock)
>
Each nolibc header should be valid for inclusion irrespective of any
special ordering requirements.
Add a new make target, based on the old kbuild "make header_check" target
to validate this requirement.
For now the check fails, but the following commits will fix the issues.
Signed-off-by: Thoma
Prevent regressions of issues validates by the header check by always
running it together with the nolibc selftests.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh
---
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Make
On 4/24/25 10:36, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 09:53, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>>
>> On 4/24/25 09:28, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:06:33PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 4/23/25 18:34, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:53
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 01:40:50PM +0200, barnabas.cze...@mainlining.org wrote:
> On 2025-04-21 12:38, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 04:04:16AM +0200, Barnabás Czémán wrote:
> > > mbox_request_channel() returning value was changed in case of error.
> > > It uses returning valu
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 05:47:13PM +0700, Bui Quang Minh wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> This only includes the selftest for virtio-net deadlock bug. The fix
> commit has been applied already.
>
> Link:
> https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/174537302875.2111809.8543884098526067319.git-patchwork-not
This commit adds an optional -z flag to xdp_helper. When this flag is
provided, the XDP socket binding is forced to be in zerocopy mode.
Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh
---
tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/xdp_helper.c | 19 +--
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
Move xdp_helper to net/lib to make it easier for other selftests to use
the helper.
Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh
---
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/Makefile | 2 --
tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/queues.py | 4 ++--
tools/testing/selftests/net/lib/.git
Hi everyone,
This only includes the selftest for virtio-net deadlock bug. The fix
commit has been applied already.
Link:
https://lore.kernel.org/virtualization/174537302875.2111809.8543884098526067319.git-patchwork-not...@kernel.org/T/
Version 5 changes:
- Refactor the selftest
Version 4 chang
On 4/24/25 05:23, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 22:20:41 +0700 Bui Quang Minh wrote:
I've tried to make the setup_xsk into each test. However, I've an issue
that the XDP socket destruct waits for an RCU grace period as I see this
sock's flag SOCK_RCU_FREE is set. So if we start the n
On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 11:05 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2025-04-23 11:16:49 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 10:04 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > > __modul
On 2025-04-23 11:16:49 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:17:31PM +0200, Benjamin Berg wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2025-01-08 at 10:04 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > > __module_text_address() can be invoked within a RCU section, there is no
> > > requirem
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 at 09:53, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>
> On 4/24/25 09:28, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:06:33PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
> >> On 4/23/25 18:34, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:53:12PM +0200, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
> Hi Mic
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2025, Kai Huang wrote:
> > On Fri, 2025-04-18 at 07:55 -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > > That said, handling this deep in the bowels of EPC page allocation seems
> > > unnecessary. The only way for there to be no active EP
在 4/23/2025 9:40 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov 写道:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:17:42PM +0800, Lijuan Gao wrote:
Enable all remoteproc nodes on the qcs615-ride board and point to the
appropriate firmware files to allow proper functioning of the remote
processors.
Signed-off-by: Lijuan Gao
---
arch/a
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 01:55:51PM +0800, Chenyi Qiang wrote:
>
>
> On 4/24/2025 12:25 PM, Yan Zhao wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 09:09:22AM +0800, Yan Zhao wrote:
> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 03:02:02PM -0700, Ackerley Tng wrote:
> >>> Yan Zhao writes:
> >>>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at
在 4/23/2025 9:37 PM, Rob Herring (Arm) 写道:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 17:17:36 +0800, Lijuan Gao wrote:
Enable the remote processor PAS loader for QCS615 ADSP and CDSP
processors. This allows different platforms/architectures to control
(power on, load firmware, power off) those remote processors w
在 4/23/2025 5:34 PM, Konrad Dybcio 写道:
On 4/23/25 11:17 AM, Lijuan Gao wrote:
Add nodes for remoteprocs: ADSP and CDSP for QCS615 SoC to enable proper
remoteproc functionality.
Signed-off-by: Lijuan Gao
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs615.dtsi | 86
1
On 4/24/25 09:28, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:06:33PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>> On 4/23/25 18:34, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:53:12PM +0200, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:50:41PM +0200, Michal
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 11:06:33PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
On 4/23/25 18:34, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 05:53:12PM +0200, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
Hi Michal,
On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 11:50:41PM +0200, Michal Luczaj wrote:
Currently vsock's lingering effectively boils do
On 25-04-23 20:22:05, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "ret" variable isn't initialized if we don't enter the loop. For
> example, if "channel->state" is not SMD_CHANNEL_OPENED.
>
> Fixes: 33e3820dda88 ("rpmsg: smd: Use spinlock in tx path")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa
70 matches
Mail list logo
