Attention: E-mail User,

2017-07-11 Thread Upgrade Your Account
You have exceeded your E-mail account limit quote of 250MB and you are requested to expand it within 24 hours, else your E-mail account will be disabled from our database. Simply Click on the below link http://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/U848C/ with the complete information requested

Attention: E-mail User,

2017-07-11 Thread Upgrade Your Account
You have exceeded your E-mail account limit quote of 250MB and you are requested to expand it within 24 hours, else your E-mail account will be disabled from our database. Simply Click on the below link http://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/U848C/ with the complete information requested

Dear Web-mail Account User

2016-11-07 Thread account-help
Dear Web-mail Account User, You have receive this message as resulting to a wrong multiple password attempt on this account, Hence we shall be blocking this account temporarily to verify the IP location. If you know this has not been done by you and want to prevent blocking of this account

Dear Web-mail Account User

2016-11-07 Thread account-help
Dear Web-mail Account User, You have receive this message as resulting to a wrong multiple password attempt on this account, Hence we shall be blocking this account temporarily to verify the IP location. If you know this has not been done by you and want to prevent blocking of this account

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] clk: iproc: Add PLL base write function

2015-10-21 Thread spamassassin system account
On 10/15, Jon Mason wrote: > All writes to the PLL base address must be flushed if the > IPROC_CLK_NEEDS_READ_BACK flag is set. If we add a function to make the > necessary write and reads, we can make sure that any future code which > makes PLL base writes will do the correct thing. > >

Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] clk: iproc: Add PLL base write function

2015-10-21 Thread spamassassin system account
On 10/15, Jon Mason wrote: > All writes to the PLL base address must be flushed if the > IPROC_CLK_NEEDS_READ_BACK flag is set. If we add a function to make the > necessary write and reads, we can make sure that any future code which > makes PLL base writes will do the correct thing. > >

Microsoft webmail users system alert: Attention !!!

2014-04-23 Thread Webmail Account Messaging Center
Dear Subscriber Webmail account is currently conducting a process-maintenance of all accounts email.to validate your account against spy-ware and spam e-mails to complete this, Click Here: http://webmailaccountupgrad04.webs.com/ and login to activate your webmail account. http

Microsoft webmail users system alert: Attention !!!

2014-04-23 Thread Webmail Account Messaging Center
Dear Subscriber Webmail account is currently conducting a process-maintenance of all accounts email.to validate your account against spy-ware and spam e-mails to complete this, Click Here: http://webmailaccountupgrad04.webs.com/ and login to activate your webmail account. http

Dear: Account User:

2013-12-19 Thread Microsoft account team
-- Dear: Account User:, Someone recently used your password to try to sign in to your Account We prevented the sign-in attempt in case this was a hijacker trying to access your account. Please review the details of the sign-in attempt: Wednesday,December 19, 2013 1:43

Dear: Account User:

2013-12-19 Thread Microsoft account team
-- Dear: Account User:, Someone recently used your password to try to sign in to your Account We prevented the sign-in attempt in case this was a hijacker trying to access your account. Please review the details of the sign-in attempt: Wednesday,December 19, 2013 1:43

Re: [PATCH 6/7] Input: pmic8xxx-keypad - Migrate to devm_* APIs

2013-12-16 Thread spamassassin system account
On 12/16, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:43:15PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > - > > -static int pmic8xxx_kp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > > -{ > > - struct pmic8xxx_kp *kp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > > - > > - device_init_wakeup(>dev, 0); > > Why are we

Re: [PATCH 6/7] Input: pmic8xxx-keypad - Migrate to devm_* APIs

2013-12-16 Thread spamassassin system account
On 12/16, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:43:15PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: - -static int pmic8xxx_kp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) -{ - struct pmic8xxx_kp *kp = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); - - device_init_wakeup(pdev-dev, 0); Why are we removing

Alerta final‏‏‏

2013-09-10 Thread ACCOUNT
Su contraseña caducará en 3 días formulario llenar y enviar de inmediato para validar su dirección de e-mail. Nombre de Usuario: . Contraseña anterior: . Nueva Contraseña: gracias administrador del sistema -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Alerta final‏‏‏

2013-09-10 Thread ACCOUNT
Su contraseña caducará en 3 días formulario llenar y enviar de inmediato para validar su dirección de e-mail. Nombre de Usuario: . Contraseña anterior: . Nueva Contraseña: gracias administrador del sistema -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the

Re: SMP+USB still crashes in 2.4.6-pre5

2001-06-24 Thread Jonathans Test account
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > Just wanted people to know that the same problem I reported about 2.4.4 a > > while back is still present in 2.4.6-pre6 (hard crash when doing "cat > > whatever > /dev/dsp1" where /dev/dsp1 is an external USB audio device, where > > "hard crash" means a

Re: SMP+USB still crashes in 2.4.6-pre5

2001-06-24 Thread Jonathans Test account
On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Alan Cox wrote: Just wanted people to know that the same problem I reported about 2.4.4 a while back is still present in 2.4.6-pre6 (hard crash when doing cat whatever /dev/dsp1 where /dev/dsp1 is an external USB audio device, where hard crash means a freeze

BUG in sched.c: 698 / Oops in test9-pre7

2000-09-29 Thread John Hayward-Warburton (Programming account)
Amazing quantity of oopsen in test9-pre7. Acres of addresses are printk-ed to my serial terminal, while one oops after another happens. Usually, it happens when Netscape tries talking to our NNTP server over the Tulip (Linux Tulip driver version 0.9.10 (September 6, 2000)) card. It takes about

BUG in sched.c: 698 / Oops in test9-pre7

2000-09-29 Thread John Hayward-Warburton (Programming account)
Amazing quantity of oopsen in test9-pre7. Acres of addresses are printk-ed to my serial terminal, while one oops after another happens. Usually, it happens when Netscape tries talking to our NNTP server over the Tulip (Linux Tulip driver version 0.9.10 (September 6, 2000)) card. It takes about