PROTECTED]>
Damien Wyart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aaron Sethman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status : unknown
I have not seen the problem since using rc3, so I guess it is ok now.
Maybe the commit 9414232fa0cc28e2f51b8c76d260f2748f7953fc has fixed the
problem, but I am
Got the following trace on 2.6.20-rc2-git2 on x86-64. Let me know if
there is additional details that is needed.
-Aaron
BUG: scheduling while atomic: hald-addon-stor/0x2000/2902
Call Trace:
[] __sched_text_start+0x5d/0x834
[] __wake_up+0x43/0x70
[] scsi_done+0x0/0x20
[] atapi_xlat+0x0
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops. Note that
this card is one of the newer PCI-E cards. If any other info is needed
let me know.
Is this issue still present
Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops. Note that
this card is one of the newer PCI-E cards. If any other info is needed
let me know.
-Aaron
ACPI: PCI Interrupt :0c:00.0[A] -> GSI 17 (level, low) -> IRQ 17
PCI: Setting latency timer of device :0c:00.0 to 64
b
I've seen the exact same problem when trying to compile for sparc. I
might try and fix it myself, as it doesn't seemed to be fixed in the vger
cvs tree, or any other patch for that matter.
Regards,
Aaron
On Tue, 29 May 2001, John wrote:
> Sorry if this is a repeat. Can't find anything on it
__alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed.
I get many of these across the console when testing a network application
that. Basically the client opens up a bunch of connections to the server
and starts firing off data as quickly as it can. If you need further
information please let me know.
Reg
On 15 Jan 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Now, I'm not saying your filesystem is toast. I'm just saying that if
> you booted up in pre6, I'd suggest a quick reboot into a better kernel
> might be a good idea (be a jock, and do a sync and just push the reset
> button to force a proper fsck when it c
On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Daniel R. Kegel wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > Petru Paler wrote:
> > > This is one of the main thttpd design points: run in a select() loop. Since
> > > it is intended for mainly static workloads, it performs quite well...
> >
> > It can't scale in SMP.
>
> thttp
I am getting the following oops while trying to update the microcode of a
PII@266mhz using the microcode update driver. Below is the output of
ksymoops. This was built using egcs-1.1.2.
Also in case it matters I've applied the ide-2.2.18 patch so I can use my
Promise ATA66 controller and the
You might want to take a look at using reiserfs on the 130GB partition, as
its is journalled and doesn't need to be fsck'ed. Take a look a
http://devlinux.com/namesys/
Aaron
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Roberto Fichera wrote:
> At 19.00 21/11/00 +0100, Jakob Østergaard wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Nov 21, 200
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 02, 2000 at 07:07:12PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > 1. There are architectures where some other compiler may do better
> > > optimizations than gcc. I will cite some examples here, no need to argue
> >
> > I think we only care about this when t
Try compiling the said code with -fno-strict-aliasing, and your problems
will be solved. gcc is doing the right thing, just not what you expected.
The kernel already checks to see if gcc can grok -fno-strict-aliasing
Aaron
On 23 Oct 2000, David Wragg wrote:
> Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, James Sutherland wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 9 Oct 2000, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >
> > > > so dns helper is killed first, then netscape. (my idea might not
> > > > make sense though.)
> > >
> > > It makes some sense, but I don't think OOM is
13 matches
Mail list logo
