Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 05:31:52PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
Plus if you're connected to such a device for monitoring purposes
you're probably powered by it as well, so you have little to gain
from suspend even if it works.
I currently don't have any HID UPS by hand to verif
Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 04:43:16PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Windows will autosuspend hubs, bluetooth devices, HID devices
Hi Matthew,
are you sure about windows suspending the HID devices in runtime? I
have never seen LEDs of USB
PS Monitoring Problems
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/27/334
Last known good : 2.6.20.6
Submitter : Nick Pasich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Caused-By :
Handled-By : Adam Kropelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/29/164
Status
Fix serious regression on non-EPiC edgeport usb-serial devices. Baud
rate and MCR/LCR registers are not being written on these models due
to apparent copy-n-paste errors introduced with EPiC support.
Failure reported by Nick Pasich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Signed-off-by: Adam Kropelin &
From: "Nick Pasich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Here's the dmesg output ..
[...]
Jul 29 05:20:07 NICK2 kernel: drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c: LCR -
write to send_cmd_write_uart_register register 0x03
Jul 29 05:20:07 NICK2 kernel: drivers/usb/serial/io_edgeport.c:
SendCmdWriteUartReg - Not writi
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:37:08 -0700
Nick Pasich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Greg/Peter/Al,
added linux-usb-devel.
I've been using the edgeport 4 port USB to Serial Converter
to monitor APC Smart UPS's via apcupsd for quite awhile on
various Linux boxes.
I just upgraded
Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Adam Kropelin wrote:
On Apcupsd we've recently introduced a libusb-based driver that does
all HID parsing in userspace. Not only does that free us from
hiddev, it also frees us from the umpteen other proprietary HID
interfaces across various plat
Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Adam Kropelin wrote:
I apologize for picking up this thread late and asking what may be a
question with an obvious answer... Will hiddev still exist after
hidraw and the HID bus redesign work is done? I have a
widely-deployed userspace app that relies on
Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Li Yu wrote:
What's the position of hidraw? It only is used when all other driver
is not usable on some report? or, it should be stick every working
device.
Current implementation (as you can see it in -mm or in my hid.git
tree) is creating hidraw interf
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
"Adam Kropelin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Can I get the corresponding lspci -xxx output. I suspect the BIOS
did not program the hypertransport MSI mapping capabilities
correctly. All it has to do is set the enable but still,
occasionally BIOS write
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
maybe I've been unclear, but here's how e1000 detects link changes:
1) by checking every 2 seconds in the watchdog by reading PHY
registers 2) by receiving an interrupt from the NIC with the LSI bit
in the interrupt control register
Auke Kok wrote:
Adam Kropelin wrote:
I've never had this device work 100% with MSI on any kernel version
I've tested so far. But I'm not the original reporter of the
problem, and I believe for him it was a true regression where a
previous kernel wored correctly.
maybe I'
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
None of the MSI code in e1000 has changed significantly either. as
far as I can see, the msi code in e1000 has not changed since
2.6.18. Nonetheless there's no way I can debug any of this without a
system.
[...]
Perhaps Adam can git-b
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 09:25:38AM -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 02:34:37PM -0500, Adam Kropelin wrote:
> >> (cc: list trimmed and thread moved to linux-pci)
> >>
> >> I have a PCI-E e1000 card that does not see i
Adam Kropelin wrote:
I've attached the contents dmesg, 'lspci -vvv', and 'cat
/proc/interrupts' from 2.6.20-rc5.
Actually attached this time.
--Adam
proc-irq-2.6.20-rc5
Description: Binary data
dmesg-2.6.20-rc5
Description: Binary data
lspci-2.6.20-rc5
Description: Binary data
(cc: list trimmed and thread moved to linux-pci)
I have a PCI-E e1000 card that does not see interrupts on 2.6.20-rc5
unless CONFIG_PCI_MSI is disabled. An e1000 maintainer indicated that
the PHY state is correct, it's just that the interrupt is not getting
thru to the kernel. Interestingly, o
Auke Kok wrote:
Adam Kropelin wrote:
I haven't been able to test rc5-mm yet because it won't boot on this
box. Applying git-e1000 directly to -rc4 or -rc5 results in a number
of rejects that I'm not sure how to fix. Some are obvious, but the
others I'm unsure of.
that wo
Auke Kok wrote:
Adam Kropelin wrote:
I am experiencing the no-link issue on a 82572EI single port copper
PCI-E card. I've only tried 2.6.20-rc5, so I cannot tell if this is a
regression or not yet. Will test older kernel soon.
Can provide details/logs if you want 'em.
we&
> Allen Parker wrote:
>> Allen Parker wrote:
>>> From what I've been able to gather, other Intel Pro/1000 chipsets
>>> work fine in 2.6.20-rc5. If the e1000 guys need any assistance
>>> testing, I'll be more than happy to volunteer myself as a guinea pig
>>> for patches.
>>
>> I wasn't aware t
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> If we can detect a problem at compile time, the compilation should
> fail.
[...]
> if (sizeof(struct nbd_request) != 28) {
> - printk(KERN_CRIT "nbd: sizeof nbd_request needs to be 28 in
> order to work!\n" );
> - return -EIO;
> + e
Stefan Nickl wrote:
Hi,
when trying to make the hiddev driver issue several Set_Report control
transfers to a custom device with 2.6.13-rc6, only the first transfer
in a row is carried out, while others immediately following it are
silently dropped.
This happens where hid_submit_report() (in hi
I've been meaning to play with inotify for a while now and finally made
time for it tonight. I'm not much of a GUI guy, so I'm mostly interested
in exploring the command line applications of inotify --i.e., what sort of
havoc can I wreak with it in a script.
To that end I sat down tonight a threw
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Mar 2005 11:43:05 +0100, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 02:21:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> >> - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
> >>problem..." type thing.)
>
> An obvious fix is an o
Jim Roland said:
>I expect someone will rebut my comments about the kernel (which is fine, I'm
>not a Kernel hacker
Okay, I'll take the bait, but I'm not a kernel hacker, either, so someone
should feel free to rebut *my* comments as well.
>but it is my understanding that the kernel uses your s
24 matches
Mail list logo
