On Sun, 13 Feb 2005, Matthew Jacob wrote:
I'm curious why you'd have a non-compete for 1 year for just using BK.
Larry likes to participate in flamewars on LKML ? :-)
That would make BK more or less unique amongst packages, no?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005, Catalin(ux aka Dino) BOIE wrote:
I really suggest to push this limit to 4k. My reason is that under UML I need
to put a lot of stuff in command line and uml crash if I not extend this
limit. Can we make it depend on arhitecture?
another nice feature would be the kernel ignori
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
And how many competing implementations of video helpers/emulation code
do we have now?
- scitechsoft emu
- linuxbios emu
- etc. (I surely forgot some)
just a minor nit-pick. "linuxbios" is not an "emulator" but drop-in
replacement for commerical bi
hi all,
I would like point to work done by Li-Ta Lo.
It allows you to completely initalize the VGA BIOS w/out using
PC BIOS at all.
http://www.clustermatic.org/pipermail/linuxbios/2005-January/010236.html
unforunatelly the information the web is somewhat spar
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Robert W. Fuller wrote:
Has anybody ported Linux to a virtual machine? Does anybody have any
pointers aside from the lkml's abbreviated FAQ entry concering porting
to a new processor? What would be the best way of going about this?
Is there a supported architecture that is
hello,
fyi
CC arch/i386/kernel/timers/timer_pit.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/timers/common.o
LD arch/i386/kernel/timers/built-in.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/reboot.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/mpparse.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/apic.o
CC arch/i386/kernel/nmi.o
arch/i
6 matches
Mail list logo
