Casey Schaufler wrote:
> On 7/10/2015 7:57 AM, Alex Elsayed wrote:
>> Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>
>>> On 07/10/2015 09:43 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Stephen Smalley
>>>> wrote
Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 07/10/2015 09:43 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Stephen Smalley
>> wrote:
>>> On 07/09/2015 06:22 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
To be clear, faking metadata has one use-case, and one use-case only:
dbus1 compatibility
Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 3:27 PM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
>>
>> This is why I think kdbus is a bad idea: it solidifies as a linux kernel
>> API something which runs counter to granular OS virtualization (and
>> something which caused Windows to fall behind Linux
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16 2015 at 5:23am -0400,
> Alex Elsayed wrote:
>
>> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, Apr 09 2015 at 9:28am -0400,
>> > Pali Rohár wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Thursday 09 April 2015 09:12:08 Mike
Michel Machado wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> We have been developing Linux XIA, a new network stack that
> emphasizes evolvability and interoperability, for a couple of years, and
> it has now reached a degree of maturity that allows others to experiment
> with it.
>From looking at your wiki, "netw
Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 07:01:50PM +0100, Alexander Holler wrote:
>
>> Yeah, as I've already admitted in the bug, I never should have use
>> the word secure, because everyone nowadays seems to end up in panic
>> when reading that word.
>>
>> So, if I would be able to use sed on
Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> There should be a number measured in, say, nanoseconds in here
> somewhere. The actual extent of the speedup is unmeasurable here.
> Also, it's worth reading at least one of Linus' many rants about
> zero-copy. It's not an automatic win.
It's well-understood that it's
Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 14:43 -0700, Alex Elsayed wrote:
>> Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
>>
>>
>> > So the idea of allowing the in-kernel CDB emulation to run after
>> > user-space has returned unsupported opcode is problematic
Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 10:58:31PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On (07/29/14 12:00), Minchan Kim wrote:
>> > Hello Timofey,
>> >
>> > Why do you add new device unconditionally?
>> > Maybe we need new konb on sysfs or ioctl for adding new device?
>> > A
Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Mi, 2014-07-23 at 11:14 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:52:21PM +0300, Andrey Utkin wrote:
>> > Dear developers, please check bugzilla ticket
>> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80981 (not the initial
>> > issue, but starting
Reply inline, with a good bit of snipping done (posting via gmane, so
quote/content ratio is an issue).
Andy Grover wrote:
> +These backstores cover the most common use cases, but not all. One new
> +use case that other non-kernel target solutions, such as tgt, are able
> +to support is using Gl
Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:25:35 -0700
> Jeff Layton wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:05:16 -0700
>> Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 7:48 PM, Jeff Layton
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 17:23:24 -0700
>> > > Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > >
>> >
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> UML, lguest and Xen were done before the x86 architecture supported
>> hardware virtualization.
>
> [...]
>
>> but on KVM-enabled hardware KVM seems
>> like the better option (and is indeed what libguestfs uses.)
>
> While we're still on th
not debugging
> > 101998f6 tcm_vhost: Post-merge review changes requested by MST
> > f0e0e9bb tcm_vhost: Fix incorrect IS_ERR() usage in
> > vhost_scsi_map_iov_to_sgl
> Whoops.. Missed one extra target/pscsi regression bug-fix reported
> recently by Alex Elsayed (CC'ed) that has just been push
14 matches
Mail list logo
