On 13.03.2013, at 18:28, Doug Anderson wrote:
Alexander,
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
- err = gpio_request_one(gpio, GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH, ehci_vbus_gpio);
- if (err)
+ /* reset pulls the line down, then up again */
+ err
on
Arndale systems for me.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
CC: Vivek Gautam
CC: Jingoo Han
CC: Alan Stern
CC: Kukjin Kim
CC: Felipe Balbi
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman
---
As this affects 3.9, this patch should definitely be considered for inclusion
there.
---
drivers/usb/host/ehci-s5p.c | 10
on
Arndale systems for me.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
CC: Vivek Gautam gautam.vi...@samsung.com
CC: Jingoo Han jg1@samsung.com
CC: Alan Stern st...@rowland.harvard.edu
CC: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
CC: Felipe Balbi ba...@ti.com
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman gre
On 10.12.2012, at 21:43, Rene Rebe wrote:
>
> On 10.12.2012, at 21:19, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10.12.2012, at 20:54, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guenter,
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:51:35AM -0500, Gabriel L. S
On 10.12.2012, at 20:54, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
>> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:51:35AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
>>> The AppleSMC contains two char[32] keys, OSK0 and OSK1, which are not
>>> reported in the key count and index by default. These keys are used by
>>> the OS X
> This patch creates a sysfs entry which reports the value of these keys
> as an ASCII string, to help emulators (such as QEMU) load OS X when
> running on genuine Apple hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabriel L. Somlo
Acked-by: Alexander Graf
Alex
> ---
>
> For extra cont
creates a sysfs entry which reports the value of these keys
as an ASCII string, to help emulators (such as QEMU) load OS X when
running on genuine Apple hardware.
Signed-off-by: Gabriel L. Somlo so...@cmu.edu
Acked-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
Alex
---
For extra context: To boot OS X
On 10.12.2012, at 20:54, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:51:35AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
The AppleSMC contains two char[32] keys, OSK0 and OSK1, which are not
reported in the key count and index by default. These keys are used by
the OS X boot sequence,
On 10.12.2012, at 21:43, Rene Rebe r...@exactcode.com wrote:
On 10.12.2012, at 21:19, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
On 10.12.2012, at 20:54, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
Hi Guenter,
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 09:51:35AM -0500, Gabriel L. Somlo wrote:
The AppleSMC contains two char[32
The new uapi framework splits kernel internal and user space exported
bits of header files more cleanly. Adjust the ePAPR header accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild |1 -
arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 56
The new uapi framework splits kernel internal and user space exported
bits of header files more cleanly. Adjust the ePAPR header accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/Kbuild |1 -
arch/powerpc/include/asm/epapr_hcalls.h | 56
On 11.10.2012, at 17:50, Scott Wood wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 08:04:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>> On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Commit 549d62d8
On 11.10.2012, at 11:27, David Howells wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
>> I just removed epapr_hcalls.h from the Kbuild file as I am not sure how
>> it should be broken up. David, can you have a look at this, please?
>
> Files should be broken up along around __KERNEL__ conditionals. If
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>
>> Commit 549d62d889b4 ("KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
>> for hcalls") from the kvm-ppc tree added an include of asm/epapr_hcall.h
>> to the user visible part of
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Commit 549d62d889b4 (KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
for hcalls) from the kvm-ppc tree added an include of asm/epapr_hcall.h
to the user visible part
On 11.10.2012, at 11:27, David Howells wrote:
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
I just removed epapr_hcalls.h from the Kbuild file as I am not sure how
it should be broken up. David, can you have a look at this, please?
Files should be broken up along around __KERNEL__
On 11.10.2012, at 17:50, Scott Wood wrote:
On 10/11/2012 08:04:58 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 11.10.2012, at 05:32, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
Commit 549d62d889b4 (KVM: PPC: use definitions in epapr header
lock/spin_lock in one spot where we
> switch pools.
>
> - We need to provide locking around dart_tlb_invalidate_all and
> dart_tlb_invalidate_one now that the global lock is gone.
>
> Reported-by: Alexander Graf
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard
> ---
>
> There is sti
to provide locking around dart_tlb_invalidate_all and
dart_tlb_invalidate_one now that the global lock is gone.
Reported-by: Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org
---
There is still an issue with the lazy u3 flushing, but I wanted
to get this out for testing
On 03.10.2012, at 00:17, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 02.10.2012 [23:47:39 +0200], Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 02.10.2012, at 23:43, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Ben,
>>>
>>> On 02.10.2012 [10:58:29 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmi
On 02.10.2012, at 23:43, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On 02.10.2012 [10:58:29 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>> Phew. Here we go :). It looks to be more of a PPC specific problem
>>
On 05.08.2012, at 11:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall
>
> Convert a 0 error return code to a negative one, as returned elsewhere in the
> function.
>
> A new label is also added to avoid freeing things that are known to not yet
> be allocated.
>
> A simplified version of the
On 05.08.2012, at 11:52, Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall ju...@diku.dk
Convert a 0 error return code to a negative one, as returned elsewhere in the
function.
A new label is also added to avoid freeing things that are known to not yet
be allocated.
A simplified version of the
On 02.10.2012, at 23:43, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Hi Ben,
On 02.10.2012 [10:58:29 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
Phew. Here we go :). It looks to be more of a PPC specific problem
than it appeared as at first:
Ok, so I
On 03.10.2012, at 00:17, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
On 02.10.2012 [23:47:39 +0200], Alexander Graf wrote:
On 02.10.2012, at 23:43, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
Hi Ben,
On 02.10.2012 [10:58:29 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-01 at 16:03 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote
On 28.09.2012, at 17:10, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:19:55AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 28.09.2012, at 04:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>
>>>&g
On 28.09.2012, at 17:10, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:19:55AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 28.09.2012, at 04:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Below are OOPS excerpts from different rc's I tried. All
On 28.09.2012, at 17:10, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:19:55AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> On 28.09.2012, at 04:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>>
>>>&g
On 28.09.2012, at 17:10, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 04:19:55AM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 28.09.2012, at 04:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Below are OOPS excerpts from different rc's I tried. All
On 28.09.2012, at 04:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>
>> Below are OOPS excerpts from different rc's I tried. All of them crashed -
>> all the way up to current Linus' master branch. I haven't cross-checked, but
&g
Howdy,
While running 3.6.0-rcX I am having a few issues with nfsd on my PPC970 based
system. For some reason every time I actually end up accessing an NFS share on
it, it crashes away at random points. It looks a lot like corrupted pointers in
all logs. I also can't reproduce the oopses
Howdy,
While running 3.6.0-rcX I am having a few issues with nfsd on my PPC970 based
system. For some reason every time I actually end up accessing an NFS share on
it, it crashes away at random points. It looks a lot like corrupted pointers in
all logs. I also can't reproduce the oopses
On 28.09.2012, at 04:04, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Below are OOPS excerpts from different rc's I tried. All of them crashed -
all the way up to current Linus' master branch. I haven't cross-checked, but
I don't remember any
On 02.08.2012, at 09:08, Raghavendra K T
wrote:
> On 08/01/2012 11:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:19:01PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>>> On 08/01/2012 08:37 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:23:59PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>
On 02.08.2012, at 09:08, Raghavendra K T raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
wrote:
On 08/01/2012 11:55 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 04:19:01PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 08/01/2012 08:37 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:23:59PM +0530,
On 07/24/2012 10:53 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
From: Raghavendra K T
Thanks Alex for KVM_HC_FEATURES inputs and Jan for VAPIC_POLL_IRQ,
and Peter (HPA) for suggesting hypercall ABI addition.
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T
---
Please have a closer look at Hypercall ABI newly added
Changes
On 07/24/2012 10:53 AM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
From: Raghavendra K T raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Thanks Alex for KVM_HC_FEATURES inputs and Jan for VAPIC_POLL_IRQ,
and Peter (HPA) for suggesting hypercall ABI addition.
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra K T raghavendra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
---
On 12.07.2012, at 05:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in
> arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S between commit c75df6f96c59
> ("powerpc: Fix usage of register macros getting ready for %r0 change")
> from the powerpc tree
On 11.07.2012, at 13:23, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 02:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>>> yes the data structure itself seems based on the algorithm
>>>> and not on arch specific things. That should work. If we move that to
>>>>
On 11.07.2012, at 13:04, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 07/11/2012 01:17 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 11/07/12 11:06, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> [...]
Almost all s390 kernels use diag9c (directed yield to a given guest cpu)
for spinlocks, though.
>>>
>>> Perhaps x86 should copy this.
>>
On 11.07.2012, at 13:04, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/11/2012 01:17 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 11/07/12 11:06, Avi Kivity wrote:
[...]
Almost all s390 kernels use diag9c (directed yield to a given guest cpu)
for spinlocks, though.
Perhaps x86 should copy this.
See
On 11.07.2012, at 13:23, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 07/11/2012 02:16 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
yes the data structure itself seems based on the algorithm
and not on arch specific things. That should work. If we move that to
common
code then s390 will use that scheme automatically
On 12.07.2012, at 05:57, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Today's linux-next merge of the kvm-ppc tree got a conflict in
arch/powerpc/kvm/booke_interrupts.S between commit c75df6f96c59
(powerpc: Fix usage of register macros getting ready for %r0 change)
from the powerpc tree and
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Carsten Emde wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
David Brown wrote:
I thought I'd try out the realtime patch set and it didn't work
at all
with kvm. The console didn't dump anything and the system
completely
locked up.
Up to now, the unmodified kvm
On Oct 30, 2007, at 10:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Carsten Emde wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
David Brown wrote:
I thought I'd try out the realtime patch set and it didn't work
at all
with kvm. The console didn't dump anything and the system
completely
locked up.
Up to now, the unmodified kvm
Hi,
when calling a semctl(IPC_STAT) without IPC_64 the check if the memory
is unevaluated. This patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Index: linux/ipc/compat.c
===
--- linux.orig/ipc/compat.c
+++
Hi,
when calling a semctl(IPC_STAT) without IPC_64 the check if the memory
is unevaluated. This patch fixes this.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux/ipc/compat.c
===
--- linux.orig/ipc/compat.c
+++ linux
801 - 847 of 847 matches
Mail list logo
