Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v3 13/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support

2014-09-02 Thread Alexander Spyridakis
On 1 September 2014 19:35, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > On 01/09/14 15:57, Hanjun Guo wrote: > > From: Tomasz Nowicki > > > > ACPI kernel uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization. It needs to > > parse GIC related subtables, collect CPU interface and distributor > > addresses and call driver

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v3 13/17] ARM64 / ACPI: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support

2014-09-02 Thread Alexander Spyridakis
On 1 September 2014 19:35, Marc Zyngier marc.zyng...@arm.com wrote: On 01/09/14 15:57, Hanjun Guo wrote: From: Tomasz Nowicki tomasz.nowi...@linaro.org ACPI kernel uses MADT table for proper GIC initialization. It needs to parse GIC related subtables, collect CPU interface and

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2014-08-18 Thread Alexander Spyridakis
> Yes, I think so. If you meet any problem , please let us know, and we will > update the wiki. > >> >> Should I assume that UEFI is mandatory (alternative being the aarch64 >> bootwrapper), as described in Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt? > > Yes, UEFI is mandatory if you want to use ACPI.

Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1

2014-08-18 Thread Alexander Spyridakis
Yes, I think so. If you meet any problem , please let us know, and we will update the wiki. Should I assume that UEFI is mandatory (alternative being the aarch64 bootwrapper), as described in Documentation/arm64/arm-acpi.txt? Yes, UEFI is mandatory if you want to use ACPI. Hello Hanjun,