Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
> I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wi
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wish to create a bug report,
I can do it for you. You only need to provide acpidump.
and attach acpidump?
I'll see if I can
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
This no longer happens in 2.6.25-rc3: I see nothing in
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On my T61p, 2.6.25-rc2 seems to get acpi events from keypresses
such as Fn-F4 and lid open/close, prints them in /var/log/acpid
and reacts accordingly (my acpi scripts suspend on lid close and Fn-F4).
This no longer happens in 2.6.25-rc3: I see nothing in
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wish to create a bug report,
I can do it for you. You only need to provide acpidump.
and attach acpidump?
I'll see if I can
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:50 PM, Alexey Starikovskiy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
Did you guys stop accepting reports by mail?
I hope not.
It is easier to track bug information in bugzilla.
If you for some reason do not wish to create a bug
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 of February 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I think we should export the target sleep state somehow.
Yeah. By *not* using "->suspend()" for freezing or hibernate.
Please, Rafael - just make the
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 of February 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
I think we should export the target sleep state somehow.
Yeah. By *not* using -suspend() for freezing or hibernate.
Please, Rafael - just make the
Marton,
Could you please attach these patches to bug report? It is easier to track them
there.
Thanks,
Alex.
Németh Márton wrote:
From: Márton Németh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Add leading zeros to pr_debug() calls. For example if x=0x0a, the format
"0x%2x" will result the string "0x a", the format
Marton,
Could you please attach these patches to bug report? It is easier to track them
there.
Thanks,
Alex.
Németh Márton wrote:
From: Márton Németh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add leading zeros to pr_debug() calls. For example if x=0x0a, the format
0x%2x will result the string 0x a, the format
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
This is did not happen before; I am not sure right now what caused this
(i.e.
battery aging or some software change) nor whether this is
kernel/HAL/kpowersave
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
This is did not happen before; I am not sure right now what caused this (i.e.
battery aging or some software change) nor whether this is kernel/HAL/kpowersave
issue.
kpowersave is stuck at assuming battery is loading and at 94%. Sysfs displays
battery state as Full:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
This is did not happen before; I am not sure right now what caused this (i.e.
battery aging or some software change) nor whether this is kernel/HAL/kpowersave
issue.
kpowersave is stuck at assuming battery is loading and at 94%. Sysfs displays
battery state as Full:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Wednesday 02 January 2008, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
This is did not happen before; I am not sure right now what caused this
(i.e.
battery aging or some software change) nor whether this is
kernel/HAL/kpowersave
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 of December 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
the ACPI specification between versions 1.0x and 2.0. Namely, while ACPI
2.0 and later wants us to put devices into low power states before calling
_PTS,
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, 26 of December 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
the ACPI specification between versions 1.0x and 2.0. Namely, while ACPI
2.0 and later wants us to put devices into low power states before calling
_PTS,
Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between
acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which
Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:08:59PM -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 01:52:55 pm Borislav Petkov wrote:
From what i can roughly tell so far it seems like an resource conflict between
acpi and
the pnp requested regions in your patch which
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
cat
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:19/PNP0C0A:00/power_
supply/BAT1/status
This leads to a stacktrace as acpi_battery_get_property() returns 0 for a
case where it does not set val->int
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
cat
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:19/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT1/status
This leads to a stacktrace as acpi_battery_get_property() returns 0 for a
case where it does not set val->intval. These value is used as an array
index in
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
cat
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:19/PNP0C0A:00/power_supply/BAT1/status
This leads to a stacktrace as acpi_battery_get_property() returns 0 for a
case where it does not set val-intval. These value is used as an array
index in
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
cat
/sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/device:00/PNP0A08:00/device:19/PNP0C0A:00/power_
supply/BAT1/status
This leads to a stacktrace as acpi_battery_get_property() returns 0 for a
case where it does not set val-intval
Nov 2007 12:36:43 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
A> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)]
ACPI: Battery: remove cyc
Nov 2007 12:36:43 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
A On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)]
ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery
Andrey,
Fix already exists. It already went up to Len's tree.
Regards,
Alex.
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
Alexey, this fixes my patch that went into -rc2. Sorry for Oops.
Subject: [PATCH] 2.6.24-rc2: do not unregister power_supply in sysfs ->show
method
From: Andrey Borzenkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrey,
Fix already exists. It already went up to Len's tree.
Regards,
Alex.
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
Alexey, this fixes my patch that went into -rc2. Sorry for Oops.
Subject: [PATCH] 2.6.24-rc2: do not unregister power_supply in sysfs -show
method
From: Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andrew Morton wrote:
A> On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)]
ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal.
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
get_pr
Andrew Morton wrote:
A On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:35:23 +0300 Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[remove_cycle_at_battery_removal.patch text/x-patch (1.7KB)]
ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal.
From: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
get_property() should not call
t in order to not get stale data.
Regards,
Alex.
ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal.
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
get_property() should not call battery_update() on absent battery to
avoid cycle and oops.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hi,
is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call
acpi_battery_update() at all?
Alex?
If someone wants to read stale values, he could comment out acpi_battery_update.
Regards,
Alex.
-
To
Hi Romano,
EC was changed to automatically choose it's working mode (poll vs. interrupt
driven).
You see it oscillating between modes because it receives interrupts just after it
stops waiting for them.
Please open new bug entry at bugzilla.kernel.org.
Your .config might be usefull.
Thanks,
Hi Romano,
EC was changed to automatically choose it's working mode (poll vs. interrupt
driven).
You see it oscillating between modes because it receives interrupts just after it
stops waiting for them.
Please open new bug entry at bugzilla.kernel.org.
Your .config might be usefull.
Thanks,
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, 8 of November 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote:
Hi,
is there any reason, why acpi_battery_get_property() should call
acpi_battery_update() at all?
Alex?
If someone wants to read stale values, he could comment out acpi_battery_update.
Regards,
Alex.
-
To
to not get stale data.
Regards,
Alex.
ACPI: Battery: remove cycle from battery removal.
From: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
get_property() should not call battery_update() on absent battery to
avoid cycle and oops.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tested-by: Rolf Eike Beer
adapter register/unregister at on/off.
Acked-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read
adapter register/unregister at on/off.
Acked-by: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Hi,
this happened while I removed my battery on bootup. Complete dmesg is
attached. Kernel is 2.6.24-rc1-git of yesterday (last commit
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Hi,
this happened while I removed my battery on bootup. Complete dmesg is
attached. Kernel is 2.6.24-rc1-git of yesterday (last commit was
d919fd433b5823d1cf9d0688eb2eec183de9b74c).
Ok, I found out
d oops.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/acpi/battery.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index c2ce0ad..50cdf6f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/ac
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Hi,
this happened while I removed my battery on bootup. Complete dmesg is
attached. Kernel is 2.6.24-rc1-git of yesterday (last commit
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
Hi,
this happened while I removed my battery on bootup. Complete dmesg is
attached. Kernel is 2.6.24-rc1-git of yesterday (last commit was
d919fd433b5823d1cf9d0688eb2eec183de9b74c).
Ok, I found out
.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/battery.c |7 ---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index c2ce0ad..50cdf6f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> I suspect new ACPI AC adapter code but have to add some printk's to be
>>> sure.
>>>
>>> To reproduce - plug in AC cord, suspend, unplug,
patch helps.
Regards,
Alex.
ACPI: AC: Update AC state on sysfs read
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
drivers/acpi/ac.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ac
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> I suspect new ACPI AC adapter code but have to add some printk's to be sure.
>
> To reproduce - plug in AC cord, suspend, unplug, resume - kpowersave and
> sysfs
> still show AC adapter online. Or other way round.
>
> -andrey
The only change to drivers/acpi/ac.c after
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I suspect new ACPI AC adapter code but have to add some printk's to be sure.
To reproduce - plug in AC cord, suspend, unplug, resume - kpowersave and
sysfs
still show AC adapter online. Or other way round.
-andrey
The only change to drivers/acpi/ac.c after .23
.
ACPI: AC: Update AC state on sysfs read
From: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/acpi/ac.c |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ac.c b/drivers/acpi/ac.c
index e03de37..bb618c8
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I suspect new ACPI AC adapter code but have to add some printk's to be
sure.
To reproduce - plug in AC cord, suspend, unplug, resume - kpowersave and
sysfs still show AC adapter online
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Saturday 27 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> I am not exactly sure about this one ... what other power_supply class
>>> drivers do? Should I fix HAL instead (but then, I do not know whether HAL
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> I am not exactly sure about this one ... what other power_supply class
> drivers
> do? Should I fix HAL instead (but then, I do not know whether HAL is the only
> application that is using this interface).
>
>
Hm, do you need separate set of properties for that? You
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Saturday 27 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> As you wish... :) Please check the attached patch.
>>
>
> Not sure why you need to reimplement acpi_extract_package, but ...
Take a look on memory allocations around it... :)
>
>
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Saturday 27 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Andrey,
>> Please try the attached patch. I choose to do snprintf() instead of direct
>> copy, as your previous message showed empty OEM type.
>>
>
> Not quite. Now I get
>
Andrey,
Please try the attached patch. I choose to do snprintf() instead of direct copy,
as your previous message showed empty OEM type.
Thanks,
Alex.
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Your cat's "Bad address" means -EFAULT, acco
Andrey,
Please try the attached patch. I choose to do snprintf() instead of direct copy,
as your previous message showed empty OEM type.
Thanks,
Alex.
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Your cat's Bad address means -EFAULT, according to man errno
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Saturday 27 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey,
Please try the attached patch. I choose to do snprintf() instead of direct
copy, as your previous message showed empty OEM type.
Not quite. Now I get
OEM info:0
Ok, I was hoping
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Saturday 27 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
As you wish... :) Please check the attached patch.
Not sure why you need to reimplement acpi_extract_package, but ...
Take a look on memory allocations around it... :)
Tested-by: Andrey Borzenkov [EMAIL
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I am not exactly sure about this one ... what other power_supply class
drivers
do? Should I fix HAL instead (but then, I do not know whether HAL is the only
application that is using this interface).
Hm, do you need separate set of properties for that? You could
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Saturday 27 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I am not exactly sure about this one ... what other power_supply class
drivers do? Should I fix HAL instead (but then, I do not know whether HAL
is the only application that is using
Frans Pop wrote:
> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> is it in -rc1 or can you point me to the patch (I'd rather avoid having
>>> to pull from different git trees). Thank you.
>> No, it should be rc1.
>>> And what about ACPI_PROCF
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>>>> I have lost battery in 2.6.24-rc1. Without CONFIG_A
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
> On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
>>> I have lost battery in 2.6.24-rc1. Without CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS I have
>>> no /proc/acpi/battery and cannot test netlink interface because right n
ebug_layer (/sys/module/acpi/parameters/debug_layer)
> /proc/acpi/debug_level (/sys/module/acpi/parameters/debug_level)
>
> neither does it mention /proc/acpi/battery not do I actually have any battery
> information in /sys.
>
> Personally I do not like it (if it is intenti
on restart ...
-andrey
ACPI: use select POWER_SUPPLY for AC, BATTERY and SBS
From: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POWER_SUPPLY is needed for AC, battery, and SBS sysfs support.
Use 'select' instead of 'depends on', as it is will not be selected
by anything else, leading to confusion
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I have lost battery in 2.6.24-rc1. Without CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS I have
no /proc/acpi/battery and cannot test netlink interface because right now
there is no consumer of this.
for /sysfs
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
On Friday 26 October 2007, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
I have lost battery in 2.6.24-rc1. Without CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS I have
no /proc/acpi/battery and cannot test
Frans Pop wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
is it in -rc1 or can you point me to the patch (I'd rather avoid having
to pull from different git trees). Thank you.
No, it should be rc1.
And what about ACPI_PROCFS case? It still needs attention I believe.
As you can see
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:15:18PM +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Adrian,
>>
>> commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7 can not introduce
>> use-after-free.
>>
>> Please check...
>
>
> Commit 30c08574da0e
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> After commit f1d4661abe05d0a2c014166042d15ed8b69ae8f2 this was dead
> code.
>
> Spotted by the Coverity checker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked. Thanks.
>
> ---
> --- linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/battery.c.old 2007-10-23 18:44:13.0
> +0200
Adrian,
commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7 can not introduce
use-after-free.
Please check...
Regards,
Alex.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch fixes a use-after-free introduced by
> commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7.
>
> Spotted by the Coverity checker.
>
>
Adrian,
commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7 can not introduce
use-after-free.
Please check...
Regards,
Alex.
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch fixes a use-after-free introduced by
commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7.
Spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
After commit f1d4661abe05d0a2c014166042d15ed8b69ae8f2 this was dead
code.
Spotted by the Coverity checker.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked. Thanks.
---
--- linux-2.6/drivers/acpi/battery.c.old 2007-10-23 18:44:13.0
+0200
+++
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:15:18PM +0400, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Adrian,
commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7 can not introduce
use-after-free.
Please check...
Commit 30c08574da0ead1a47797ce028218ce5b2de61c7 did:
-- snip
bscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
ACPI: use select POWER_SUPPLY for AC, BATTERY and SBS
From: Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
POWER_SUPPLY is needed for AC, batte
://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
ACPI: use select POWER_SUPPLY for AC, BATTERY and SBS
From: Alexey Starikovskiy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
POWER_SUPPLY is needed for AC, battery, and SBS sysfs support.
Use 'select' instead of 'depends on', as it is will not be selected
by anything else, leading
John Sigler wrote:
> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>
>> John Sigler wrote:
>>
>>> +===+
>>> | Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN |
>>> |
John Sigler wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
+===+
| Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN |
|---|
| Instant-Off . [v]|
| Delay 4 Sec
John Sigler wrote:
> +===+
> | Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN |
> |---|
> | Instant-Off . [v]|
> | Delay 4 Sec. . [ ]|
> |
John Sigler wrote:
+===+
| Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN |
|---|
| Instant-Off . [v]|
| Delay 4 Sec. . [ ]|
|
John Sigler wrote:
> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>
>> John Sigler wrote:
>>
>>> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could you please open bug at bugzilla.kernel.org and put all
>>>> these files there?
>>>
>>> http
John Sigler wrote:
> John Sigler wrote:
>
>> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>
>>> Could you please open bug at bugzilla.kernel.org and put all these
>>> files there?
>>
>> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9148
>
> Writing 15361 (i.e. 0
John Sigler wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Could you please open bug at bugzilla.kernel.org and put all these
files there?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9148
Writing 15361 (i.e. 0x3C01) to ACPI_REGISTER_PM1A_CONTROL appears to
hang my system
John Sigler wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
Could you please open bug at bugzilla.kernel.org and put all
these files there?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9148
Writing 15361 (i.e. 0x3C01) to ACPI_REGISTER_PM1A_CONTROL appears
Could you please open bug at bugzilla.kernel.org and put all these files there?
Thanks,
Alex.
John Sigler wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
When I run 'halt' the kernel prints:
Halting.
Shutdown: hdc
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :01:05.0 disabled
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :01:04.0
Could you please open bug at bugzilla.kernel.org and put all these files there?
Thanks,
Alex.
John Sigler wrote:
John Sigler wrote:
When I run 'halt' the kernel prints:
Halting.
Shutdown: hdc
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :01:05.0 disabled
ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :01:04.0
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 29 September 2007 22:47, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
-static void
-acpi_power_off (void)
-{
- printk("%s called\n",__FUNCTION__);
- /* Some SMP machines only can poweroff in boot CPU */
- set_cpus_allow
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 29 September 2007 22:47, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
-static void
-acpi_power_off (void)
-{
- printk(%s called\n,__FUNCTION__);
- /* Some SMP machines only can poweroff in boot CPU */
- set_cpus_allowed(current
Mark Lord wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:30:33AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.
$ git bisect good Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
Hi,
This is known issue.
Please try latest rc8-git2, it should contain the fix.
Regards,
Alex.
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my system.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
Hi,
This is known issue.
Please try latest rc8-git2, it should contain the fix.
Regards,
Alex.
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my system.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
Mark Lord wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:30:33AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.
$ git bisect good Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> Back to debugging this:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi=119052970904643=4
> fails to apply against 2.6.23-rc7-mm1, but moving that function by
> hand was not to difficult. ;)
> (With only the second patch I got a link error...)
>
>
Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Torsten Kaiser wrote:
>>> No, I do not have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP set,
>>> because I do not have CONFIG_PM_SLEEP set,
>>> because I do not want SUSPEND and/or HIBER
Andrew,
There are 2 patches, this is the second.
Above, Rafael gave link to first. Here it is again:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel=119052978117735=4
Sorry for confusion,
Alex.
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 18:45:15 +0400 Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 16:19, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:15, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 25 Se
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 15:15, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:53, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 25 Se
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:53, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:05, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, 25
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 14:05, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 13:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, 25 September 2007 11:58, Damien Wyart wrote:
>>>>&
>
> Greetings,
> Rafael
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
ACPI: suspend: fix ACPI_SLEEP states
From:
Daniel, thanks for the patch, but patch for solving your issue is already done.
And it is different from one we having here.
If you feel "patchy" today you may try to remove ACPI_SLEEP from
drivers/acpi/sleep/Makefile in the raw of main.o
Regards,
Alex.
Daniel Ritz wrote:
> does that one help?
Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Alexey Starikovskiy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do you have CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP enabled in your .config?
>
> I'm answering that too, because I suspect that my "2.6.23-rc7-mm1 does
> not power off"-error might have the
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
