Hello,
I see this message in dmesg(full dmesg in attach):
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd ec/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 512 in
res 40/00:01:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
ata1: soft resetting port
Hello,
I see this message in dmesg(full dmesg in attach):
ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen
ata1.00: cmd ec/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 0 cdb 0x0 data 512 in
res 40/00:01:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
ata1: soft resetting port
Sorry now it's ok...
I've do an mkfs.vfat and it's good now.
Sorry for this "stupid" post ;-)
On 5/24/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
> It's the same with sdc1
exactly the same error ? (th
It's the same with sdc1
Note: I'm on a 64-bit machine.
here is my dmesg (nls_cp437 loaded after I see this error on dmesg)
On 5/24/07, Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:53:31AM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since 2.6.21 I can't m
Hi,
Since 2.6.21 I can't mount my usb key (vfat).
I don't know if it's related to the vfat patch in 2.6.21.2
Here is the dmesg error parts:
FAT: invalid media value (0xb9)
VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev sdc.
Tell me if you need more infos.
Amaury
-
To unsubscribe from
Hi,
Since 2.6.21 I can't mount my usb key (vfat).
I don't know if it's related to the vfat patch in 2.6.21.2
Here is the dmesg error parts:
FAT: invalid media value (0xb9)
VFS: Can't find a valid FAT filesystem on dev sdc.
Tell me if you need more infos.
Amaury
-
To unsubscribe from
It's the same with sdc1
Note: I'm on a 64-bit machine.
here is my dmesg (nls_cp437 loaded after I see this error on dmesg)
On 5/24/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:53:31AM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
Hi,
Since 2.6.21 I can't mount my usb key (vfat
Sorry now it's ok...
I've do an mkfs.vfat and it's good now.
Sorry for this stupid post ;-)
On 5/24/07, Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:56:04PM +0200, Amaury De Ganseman wrote:
It's the same with sdc1
exactly the same error ? (the dmesg only listed the sdc
8 matches
Mail list logo