> There are many implementation that doesn't follow the spec strictly. And
> when I tested in past, Windows also allowed to read the directory beyond
> that limit. I can't recall though if there is in real case or just test
> case though.
>>> Thanks Ogawa, yes there are many implementations,
rror reported on our side.
We had to trace to check the point of stuck in simple 'ls -lR'.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
- Original Message -
Sender : OGAWA Hirofumi
Date : 2020-06-30 16:38 (GMT+5:30)
Title : Re: [PATCH] fs: fat: add check for dir size in fat_calc_
but since ftrace_module_init()
>> is not return with minimum changes it should be in ddebug_cleanup label.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Namit Gupta <gupta.na...@samsung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahra...@samsung.com>
>
>Linus really l
but since ftrace_module_init()
>> is not return with minimum changes it should be in ddebug_cleanup label.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Namit Gupta
>> Reviewed-by: Amit Sahrawat
>
>Linus really looks down on this type of "Reviewed-by" tags. They are
&g
Hi Darrick,
Thanks for the reply, sorry for responding late.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Darrick J. Wong
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 01:21:34PM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
>> Sorry Ted, if it caused the confusion.
>>
>> There were actually 2 parts to
Hi Darrick,
Thanks for the reply, sorry for responding late.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:16 PM, Darrick J. Wong
darrick.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 01:21:34PM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
Sorry Ted, if it caused the confusion.
There were actually 2 parts to the problem
Sorry for the confusion. But the intention was just to show the
original problem and what we did in order to replicate the problem.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:30:10AM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
>
for the confusion. But the intention was just to show the
original problem and what we did in order to replicate the problem.
Thanks Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 10:30:10AM +0530, Amit Sahrawat wrote:
4
on as there is corruption – the FS is
marked RO and all pending DIRTY writes are cleared. So, the hang is
not seen.
But we have a doubt about the possible side-effects of this code. Can
you please provide your inputs on this? It will be of immense help.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
On Tu
Initially in normal write path, when the disk was almost full – we got
hung for the ‘sync’ because the flusher (which is busy in the
writepages is not responding). Before the hung task, we also found the
logs like:
EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:742: group 1493, 0
clusters in
Initially in normal write path, when the disk was almost full – we got
hung for the ‘sync’ because the flusher (which is busy in the
writepages is not responding). Before the hung task, we also found the
logs like:
EXT4-fs error (device sda1): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:742: group 1493, 0
clusters in
, the hang is
not seen.
But we have a doubt about the possible side-effects of this code. Can
you please provide your inputs on this? It will be of immense help.
Thanks Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 6:17 PM, Theodore Ts'o ty...@mit.edu wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 01:24:26PM
Hi James,
Please have a look at the patchset and share your opinion.
If there is anything more to it - please let us know.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> From: Namjae Jeon
>
> Update information of Seagate Portable HDD and W
Hi James,
Please have a look at the patchset and share your opinion.
If there is anything more to it - please let us know.
Thanks Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Namjae Jeon linkinj...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Namjae Jeon namjae.j...@samsung.com
Update information
14 matches
Mail list logo
