Clem Taylor wrote: [Wed Feb 06 2008, 02:40:58PM EST]
> > Good bug report, thanks. That code was significantly altered in June 2006
> > and perhaps something broke.
>
> I also tested on a 2.6.20 x86 desktop machine. It took ~8k iterations
> to fail, which matched max_user_watches. Once the
Clem Taylor wrote: [Wed Feb 06 2008, 02:40:58PM EST]
Good bug report, thanks. That code was significantly altered in June 2006
and perhaps something broke.
I also tested on a 2.6.20 x86 desktop machine. It took ~8k iterations
to fail, which matched max_user_watches. Once the program
2 matches
Mail list logo