On Tue, Feb 26 2008 Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:20:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:26:15 +0100 Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I'm currently stuck
On Tue, Feb 26 2008 Jens Axboe wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26 2008, Alasdair G Kergon wrote:
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 03:20:50PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:26:15 +0100 Anders Henke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm currently stuck between Kernel LVM and DRBD, as I'm using Kernel
Hi,
I'm currently stuck between Kernel LVM and DRBD, as I'm using Kernel
2.6.24.2 with DRBD 8.2.5 on top of an LVM2 device (LV).
-LVM2/device mapper doesn't support write barriers
-DRBD uses blkdev_issue_flush() to flush its metadata to disk.
On a no-barrier-device, DRBD should receive
Hi,
I'm currently stuck between Kernel LVM and DRBD, as I'm using Kernel
2.6.24.2 with DRBD 8.2.5 on top of an LVM2 device (LV).
-LVM2/device mapper doesn't support write barriers
-DRBD uses blkdev_issue_flush() to flush its metadata to disk.
On a no-barrier-device, DRBD should receive
Am 12.12.2007 schrieb Andrew Morton:
> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:58:41 +0100 Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to let you now that my boxes are running a 32-bit kernel, so
> > the 64-bit-uncleanliness shouldn't apply
Am 12.12.2007 schrieb Miquel van Smoorenburg:
> On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 03:38 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:58:41 +0100 Anders Henke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'd like to let you now that my boxes
Hi,
I'd like to let you now that my boxes are running a 32-bit kernel, so
the 64-bit-uncleanliness shouldn't apply to my boxes; however,
http://www.miquels.cistron.nl/linux/dpt_i2o-64bit-2.6.23.patch
fixed the issue on my testbox.
I took a clean 2.6.23, applied patch, recompiled the kernel,
Hi,
I'd like to let you now that my boxes are running a 32-bit kernel, so
the 64-bit-uncleanliness shouldn't apply to my boxes; however,
http://www.miquels.cistron.nl/linux/dpt_i2o-64bit-2.6.23.patch
fixed the issue on my testbox.
I took a clean 2.6.23, applied patch, recompiled the kernel,
Am 12.12.2007 schrieb Miquel van Smoorenburg:
On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 03:38 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:58:41 +0100 Anders Henke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to let you now that my boxes are running a 32-bit kernel, so
the 64-bit-uncleanliness
Am 12.12.2007 schrieb Andrew Morton:
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:58:41 +0100 Anders Henke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to let you now that my boxes are running a 32-bit kernel, so
the 64-bit-uncleanliness shouldn't apply to my boxes; however,
http://www.miquels.cistron.nl
+0900
> > > FUJITA Tomonori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800
> > > > Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100
> > > &
Dec 2007 16:57:38 -0800
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:31:50 +0100
Anders Henke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote:
As everything is reported as being zero is quite odd an Jan
took
Am 29.11.2007 schrieb Matthew Wilcox:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Anders Henke wrote:
> > On Nov 29 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > > @@ -3295,7 +3295,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template adpt_template = {
> > > .this_id= 7,
> >
Am 30.11.2007 schrieb FUJITA Tomonori:
> > > > According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is
> > > > one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver:
> > > >
> > > > FUJITA Tomonori
> > > >
> > > > [SCSI] dpt_i2o: convert to use the data buffer accessors
> > > >
> > > > Stephen
Am 29.11.2007 schrieb Matthew Wilcox:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:45:57PM +0100, Anders Henke wrote:
On Nov 29 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
@@ -3295,7 +3295,7 @@ static struct scsi_host_template adpt_template = {
.this_id= 7,
.cmd_per_lun= 1
Am 30.11.2007 schrieb FUJITA Tomonori:
According to the 2.6.23-rc1 short-form changelog, there is
one major edit on the dpt_i2o driver:
FUJITA Tomonori
[SCSI] dpt_i2o: convert to use the data buffer accessors
Stephen Rothwell
dpt_i2o depends on
On Nov 29 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:03:19 +0100
> Jan Kara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Adding relevant people and lists to CC...
> >
> > Honza
> >
> &
On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote:
> As "everything is reported as being zero" is quite odd an Jan took a
> guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed
> that the driver is responsible for this; just out of the curiousity,
> I've manually repla
On November 28 2007, Anders Henke wrote:
As everything is reported as being zero is quite odd an Jan took a
guess that it might be block-layer or driver-related, I've assumed
that the driver is responsible for this; just out of the curiousity,
I've manually replaced the dpt_i2o driver
On Nov 29 2007, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:03:19 +0100
Jan Kara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adding relevant people and lists to CC...
Honza
- Forwarded message from Anders Henke [EMAIL
Hi,
I've been bitten by the problem noted in the lkml message of rougly the same
subject, dated back on Oct/24/2007.
My boxes were running 2.6.19 and have been upgraded to 2.6.23.1, but their
bootup failed when trying to mount the root (ext2) filesystem:
---cut
serial8250: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8
Hi,
I've been bitten by the problem noted in the lkml message of rougly the same
subject, dated back on Oct/24/2007.
My boxes were running 2.6.19 and have been upgraded to 2.6.23.1, but their
bootup failed when trying to mount the root (ext2) filesystem:
---cut
serial8250: ttyS1 at I/O 0x2f8
22 matches
Mail list logo
