Martin Wilck wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
wrong in setting the SActive bit.
I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
original posts about this in the NCQ thread.
Have you (or has anybody else)
Martin Wilck wrote:
Jens Axboe wrote:
If I am reading the specs correctly, that'd mean the ahci driver is
wrong in setting the SActive bit.
I completely agree, that was my reading of the spec as well and hence my
original posts about this in the NCQ thread.
Have you (or has anybody else)
Al Boldi wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda > /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda > /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT
The
Al Boldi wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: {
On 7/4/05, Al Boldi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hdparm -tT gives 38mb/s in 2.4.31
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 33% sys 65% idle
Hdparm -tT gives 28mb/s in 2.6.12
Cat /dev/hda /dev/null gives 2% user 25% sys 0% idle 73% IOWAIT
The
4 matches
Mail list logo
