dcn10_get_dig_frontend problem like this fixed in "drm/amd/display: Add get_dig_frontend implementation for DCEx"

2021-01-13 Thread Andreas Hartmann
fx Could you please fix this problem, too? Please CC me for any answer because I'm not regularly reading the kernel mailing list. Thanks Andreas Hartmann 2021-01-13T10:52:02.135202+01:00 localhost kernel: [ 155.645178] [ cut here ] 2021-01-13T10:52:02.135204+01:00 localh

Re: [PATCH 4.19 13/99] netfilter: nf_conncount: fix argument order to find_next_bit

2019-04-22 Thread Andreas Hartmann
On 22.04.19 at 20:57 Florian Westphal wrote: > Andreas Hartmann wrote: >>> Could you at least tell us how you're using nf_conncount (nf/iptables >>> rules)? >> >> # Generated by iptables-save v1.6.2 on Mon Apr 22 20:19:30 2019 >> *filter >> :IN

Re: [PATCH 4.19 13/99] netfilter: nf_conncount: fix argument order to find_next_bit

2019-04-22 Thread Andreas Hartmann
On 22.04.19 at 19:27 Florian Westphal wrote: > Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Since 4.19.17, I'm facing problems during streaming of videos I've never >> seen before. This means: >> >> - video from internet stutters although enough data flow can be seen in bmon.

Re: [PATCH 4.19 13/99] netfilter: nf_conncount: fix argument order to find_next_bit

2019-04-22 Thread Andreas Hartmann
or 4.19.17 regarding netfilter: nf_conncount makes the problem disappear. Please remove / fix this patchset! Thanks Andreas Hartmann On 21.01.19 at 14:48 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > 4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > &g

Re: Spectre mitigation doesn't seem to work at all?!

2018-06-04 Thread Andreas Hartmann
On 06/04/2018 at 04:12 PM Alan Cox wrote: >> A malicious program most probably won't care about that. Therefore, my >> next question is: which memory regions can be exploited by a malicious >> program? The complete physical memory or only the memory provided to the >> malicious program? Should be t

Re: Spectre mitigation doesn't seem to work at all?!

2018-06-04 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello Mark, On 06/04/2018 at 11:19 AM Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 10:50:07AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Hello Peter, >> >> thanks for your answer! I appreciate it! >> >> On 06/04/2018 at 10:15 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: >>> On Fri,

Re: Spectre mitigation doesn't seem to work at all?!

2018-06-04 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello Peter, thanks for your answer! I appreciate it! On 06/04/2018 at 10:15 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:19:38PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >> I tested the spectre mitigation of different machines and kernels with >> https://github.com/

Re: Spectre mitigation doesn't seem to work at all?!

2018-06-04 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello! Sorry for a ping - but I think the behavior shown below should really be investigated! Thanks, Andreas On 06/01/2018 at 02:19 PM Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Hello! > > I tested the spectre mitigation of different machines and kernels with > https://github.com/crozon

Spectre mitigation doesn't seem to work at all?!

2018-06-01 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello! I tested the spectre mitigation of different machines and kernels with https://github.com/crozone/SpectrePoC You can see the results below. My question: Did I miss something? My expectation was, that on base of the output of /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/spectre_v* as shown be

Re: [FYI] GCC segfaults under heavy multithreaded compilation with AMD Ryzen

2017-07-31 Thread Andreas Hartmann
On 07/31/2017 at 02:10 PM Alan Cox wrote: > On Wed, 26 Jul 2017 06:54:01 +0900 > Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > >> # I'm a LKML subscriber, but not a x86 list subscriber >> >> I found the following new linux kernel bugzilla about Ryzen related problem. >> Since many developers don't check this bugzilla

Re: [FYI] GCC segfaults under heavy multithreaded compilation with AMD Ryzen

2017-07-25 Thread Andreas Hartmann
On 07/26/2017 at 12:00 AM Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > # I'm a LKML subscriber, but not a x86 list subscriber > > I found the following new linux kernel bugzilla about Ryzen related problem. > Since many developers don't check this bugzilla and I've also > encountered this problem, > I decided to intr

Regression - Linux 4.9: ums_eneub6250 broken: transfer buffer not dma capable - Trace

2017-04-15 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello! Since Linux 4.9, ums_eneub6250 is broken. It's working fine if CONFIG_VMAP_STACK is disabled. I would be glad if it would be fixed. Thanks, kind regards, Andreas Apr 15 17:58:54 notebook2 kernel: usb 1-1.1: new high-speed USB device number 3 using ehci-pci Apr 15 17:58:54 notebook2 ke

ata3.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED since Linux 4.1

2015-07-24 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello! Since Linux 4.1, there are often ata erros like these here: [1.154572] libata version 3.00 loaded. [1.787436] ahci :00:11.0: AHCI 0001.0200 32 slots 6 ports 6 Gbps 0x3f impl SATA mode [1.788731] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 abar m1024@0xfdfff000 port 0xfdfff100 irq 19 [1.788

Since Linux 4.1: A lot of AMD-Vi IO_PAGE_FAULTs

2015-07-21 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello! Since Linux 4.1, I'm getting a lot of IO_PAGE_FAULT like this one [ 17.048609] AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT device=00:11.0 domain=0x0008 address=0x40ebaaab00618000 flags=0x0010] with different addresses: 0x40ebaaab00618000 0x40ebaaab00618040 0x 0x0180

Re: f_op->read seems to be always NULL since Linux 4.1

2015-06-27 Thread Andreas Hartmann
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote: On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 7:32 PM, Andreas Hartmann wrote: [...] See __vfs_read(). Your module most not rely on such internals. Thanks for your hint to the function which exists since 3.19. Is there a site out there which lists all

f_op->read seems to be always NULL since Linux 4.1

2015-06-27 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello! Given is a module like the following snippet running fine w/ Linux 4.0 and ext4 fs - but doesn't work w/ Linux 4.1 because f->f_op->read is not defined any more (= NULL). Is this the intended behavior now? vfs_read(f, buf, 128, &f->f_pos) works fine. module.c

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: quirk Atheros AR93xx to avoid bus reset

2015-01-12 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello Alex! Alex Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:20 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Alex Williamson wrote: >>> On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 09:07 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 11:24:27AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: quirk Atheros AR93xx to avoid bus reset

2015-01-12 Thread Andreas Hartmann
resets. I've also >>> been able to confirm this behavior on multiple systems. The device >>> never returns from reset and attempts to access config space of the >>> device after reset result in hangs. Blacklist bus reset for the >>> device to avoid this i

Re: [PATCH] Revert "cfg80211: make WEXT compatibility unselectable"

2015-01-01 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 12/31/14 16:14, Andreas Hartmann wrote: [...] >> All in all: >> If you want to get rid of wext, you still have to go a *very* long way >> to get the same *stable* and high throughput quality with *all* chips >> depending on mac80211 and not

Re: [PATCH] Revert "cfg80211: make WEXT compatibility unselectable"

2014-12-31 Thread Andreas Hartmann
versions. All in all: If you want to get rid of wext, you still have to go a *very* long way to get the same *stable* and high throughput quality with *all* chips depending on mac80211 and not just a few flagship drivers like Atheros. Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann -- To unsubscribe from th

Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: quirk Atheros AR93xx to avoid bus reset

2014-12-26 Thread Andreas Hartmann
3.14? Thanks. kind regards, Andreas Hartmann Alex Williamson wrote: > Reports against the TL-WDN4800 card indicate that PCI bus reset of > this Atheros device cause system lock-ups and resets. I've also > been able to confirm this behavior on multiple systems. The device > nev

Re: Strange problem with vxlan!

2014-01-08 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hi! For all others, having problems w/ broken multicast: See the solution here: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1625590 Regards, Andreas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo in

Out of the box (ootb) multicast broken since Linux 3.5 until min. 3.12.

2014-01-08 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello! This patch: commit c5c23260594c5701af66ef754916775ba6a46bbc Author: Herbert Xu Date: Fri Apr 13 02:37:42 2012 + bridge: Add multicast_querier toggle and disable queries by default Sending general queries was implemented as an optimisation to speed up convergence on sta

Re: Strange problem with vxlan!

2014-01-05 Thread Andreas Hartmann
On Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:27:19 +0100 Andreas Hartmann wrote: [...] > Now the problem: > > If the VM (=AP) runs e.g. Linux 3.4.x, all is working fine as expected. > If the VM runs 3.12.x or even 3.10.x, the tunnel works fine a few minutes > after creation. Afterwards it is brok

Strange problem with vxlan!

2014-01-03 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Given is the following network architecture: connection of a virtual bridge br0 and a remote ethernet-switch through vxlan tunnel via WLAN: host[br0: tap0,vxlan0] ||| |===

Re: [ 102/127] iommu/amd: Workaround for ERBT1312

2013-06-29 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Joerg Roedel schrieb: On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 07:54:20AM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: Sorry, but it doesn't work for me at all :-(. Behaviour is unchanged. It is exactly as described in the other mail: at the moment of binding vfio to 14.0, the fire begins. Hmm, VFIO attaches the devi

Re: [ 102/127] iommu/amd: Workaround for ERBT1312

2013-06-28 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Joerg Roedel wrote: > Alex, Andreas, > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 08:42:05PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> You're right, there is exactly one entry directly after loading of vfio. >> I can see this message, too, with linux 3.4.43. > > Can you please test this p

Re: [ 102/127] iommu/amd: Workaround for ERBT1312

2013-06-28 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Alex Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 18:11 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Hello Joerg, hello Alex, >> >> the subsequent patch and the patch "iommu/amd: Re-enable IOMMU event log >> interrupt after handling." 925fe08bce38d1ff052fe2209b9e2b8d5fbb7f98

Re: [ 102/127] iommu/amd: Workaround for ERBT1312

2013-06-28 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello Joerg, Joerg Roedel wrote: > Hi Andreas, > > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 06:11:36PM +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Hello Joerg, hello Alex, >> >> the subsequent patch and the patch "iommu/amd: Re-enable IOMMU event log >> interrupt after handling.&quo

Re: [ 102/127] iommu/amd: Workaround for ERBT1312

2013-06-28 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello Joerg, hello Alex, the subsequent patch and the patch "iommu/amd: Re-enable IOMMU event log interrupt after handling." 925fe08bce38d1ff052fe2209b9e2b8d5fbb7f98 spread /var/log/messages with the following line (> 700 lines/second) right after loading vfio: AMD-Vi: Event logged [IO_PAGE_FAULT

Re: [PATCH RFC] pci: ACS quirk for AMD southbridge

2013-06-26 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Alex Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2013-06-26 at 17:14 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>> [fix Joerg's email address] >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Al

Re: [PATCH RFC] pci: ACS quirk for AMD southbridge

2013-06-26 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [fix Joerg's email address] > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Alex Williamson >> wrote: >>> We've confirmed that peer-to-peer between these devices is >>> not possible. We can therefore claim that they support

Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails

2013-01-07 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello Stanislaw! Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:38:35PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:04:01PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >>>> Ben Hutchings wrote: >>>>> On Mon,

Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails

2013-01-07 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello Helmut! Helmut Schaa wrote: > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Andreas Hartmann > wrote: >> The solution would be IMHO, to implement an own aggregation handling, >> maybe the same way as it was done for carl9170, which had the same problem: >> &g

Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails

2013-01-07 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 04:04:01PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:10 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:05:32AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >>>

Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails

2013-01-07 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2013-01-07 at 09:10 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 09:05:32AM +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: To be clear, I have all of these in the queue: be03d4a45c09 rt2x00: Don't let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fail

Re: [ 104/173] rt2x00: Dont let mac80211 send a BAR when an AMPDU subframe fails

2012-12-29 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Ben Hutchings wrote: > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > -- > > From: Andreas Hartmann > > commit be03d4a45c09ee5100d3aaaedd087f19bc20d01f upstream. [...] This patch is a workaround for mac80211: retry send

Re: [PATCH RFC] pci: ACS quirk for AMD southbridge

2012-07-12 Thread Andreas Hartmann
gt; not possible. We can therefore claim that they support a > subset of ACS. > > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson Tested-by: Andreas Hartmann > Cc: Joerg Roedel > --- > > Two things about this patch make me a little nervous. The > first is that I'd really like to

crash with linux 2.6.16 under high network traffic

2007-06-06 Thread Andreas Hartmann
he network driver module needs? Background: I'm suspecting the cassini driver to be the problem (memory leak?), because I didn't have this problem without the cassini driver while using another nic and driver. Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the l

Re: [2.6.18.2] ide_core bug: kobject_add failed for ide ... - with vanilla kernel

2007-01-08 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hello Lee, Lee Revell wrote: > On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 18:44 +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Hello, >> >> ide_core is loaded (while putting in an USB stick) as module the first >> time after reboot - all works fine. The USB stick got mounted and a ls >> is done

[2.6.18.2] ide_core bug: kobject_add failed for ide ...

2007-01-07 Thread Andreas Hartmann
76 4 scsi_mod 136712 5 sr_mod,sg,ahci,libata,sd_mod Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please

[2.6.18.2] ide_core oops

2007-01-07 Thread Andreas Hartmann
25860 0 libata119188 2 ata_piix,ahci thermal18568 1 processor 34664 1 thermal sd_mod 24576 4 scsi_mod 136712 6 usb_storage,sr_mod,sg,ahci,libata,sd_mod Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe f

Re: forbid to strace a program

2005-09-04 Thread Andreas Hartmann
asily strace for information, they shouldn't could do it. The password they could see, isn't just used for the DB, but for some other applications, too. That's the disadvantage of general (single sign on) passwords. Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list:

Re: forbid to strace a program

2005-09-03 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Alex Riesen wrote: > On 9/3/05, Andreas Hartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Is it possible to prevent a program to be straced on x86? >> What do I have to do, eg., to prevent a perl-program to be straced? >> > > So that none can see w

Re: More performance for the TCP stack by using additional hardware chip on NIC

2005-04-17 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Willy Tarreau schrieb: > Hello ! > > On Sun, Apr 17, 2005 at 01:29:14PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 12:07, Arjan van de Ven wrote: >> > On Sun, 2005-04-17 at 10:17 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> > > Hello! >> > >

More performance for the TCP stack by using additional hardware chip on NIC

2005-04-17 Thread Andreas Hartmann
hardware. What do you think about that? Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

crypting filesystems

2005-04-04 Thread Andreas Hartmann
e there any master keys existing, which could be used to open every encrypted filesystem? 5. I read about problems (corrupted filesystem) with reiserfs (I'm using V 3.6). Are they fixed in 2.6.11.6? Would it be better to use XFS? I would be very glad, if somebody could give me some adv

Re: 2.4.x oops with X

2005-02-05 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Andreas Hartmann wrote: > Andreas Hartmann wrote: > [...] >> But now, the question is: >> Why does X crash running kernel 2.4.x with glibc 2.3.4 and not with kernel >> 2.6.10? Why does X run fine using kernel 2.4

Re: Software Suspend for 2.4 Final Release

2005-01-30 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Nigel Cunningham schrieb: > Hi everyone. > > SoftwareSuspend 2.1.5.7B for the 2.4.28 kernel is now available from > softwaresuspend.berlios.de. > > Bug fixes and forward ports to 2.4.29 and later kernels notwithstanding, > it is intended to be the last release of SoftwareSuspend for the 2.4 > ser

Re: Software Suspend for 2.4 Final Release

2005-01-30 Thread Andreas Hartmann
preemption patch. The other patches could be applied with a view changes. 2.1.5.7B is working fine afterwards - even without restarting sleeping hd's during hibernation! Thank you very much for fixing this problem! Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line &

Re: 2.6.10 dies when X uses PCI radeon 9200 SE, binary search result

2005-01-22 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Helge Hafting schrieb: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:05:12PM +0100, Andreas Hartmann wrote: >> Hello Helge, >> >> Helge Hafting schrieb: >> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 10:41:23PM +1100, Dave Airlie wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I'm f

Re: 2.6.10 dies when X uses PCI radeon 9200 SE, binary search result

2005-01-21 Thread Andreas Hartmann
3.3 and kernel 2.4.x. It's new for me, that there could be problems with kernelversions of 2.6, too. Therefore, it would be really interessting to know, which glibc version you are using. Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ke

[2.4.5ac19] reproduceable Kernel crashes

2001-06-30 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Qual 0x10 (vendor unique sense code 0xA1) [No matching qualifier] Fru 0x0 Sense flags: Blk 0 (valid) error refers to data part, bit ptr 0 (not valid) field ptr 0 cmd finished after 900.423s timeout 9600s cdrecord: Cannot blank disk, aborting. -------

[2.4.5] Mysterious behaviour of pppd at 56K modem

2001-06-05 Thread Andreas Hartmann
n 5 08:55:27 pppd[1559]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 ] Jun 5 08:55:27 pppd[1559]: local IP address 213.7.17.225 Jun 5 08:55:27 pppd[1559]: remote IP address 62.104.220.42 I tried to switch off all softwarecompression. But it doesn't matter. Do you have any advice for me? Rega

Re: [2.4.5 and all ac-Patches] massive file corruption with reiser or NFS

2001-06-02 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 20:33 schrieb Chris Mason: > On Saturday, June 02, 2001 08:13:44 PM +0200 Andreas Hartmann > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 18:42 schrieben Sie: > >> On Saturday, June 02, 2001 02:41:04 PM +0200 Andreas Hartmann

Re: [2.4.5 and all ac-Patches] massive file corruption with reiser or NFS

2001-06-02 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 18:42 schrieben Sie: > On Saturday, June 02, 2001 02:41:04 PM +0200 Andreas Hartmann > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 12:52 schrieb Rasmus Bøg Hansen: > >> On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > >>

Re: [2.4.5 and all ac-Patches] massive file corruption with reiser or NFS

2001-06-02 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 18:19 schrieben Sie: > > I got massive file corruptions with the kernels mentioned in the subject. > > I can reproduce it every time. > > Which other 2.4 trees have you tried ? I had the following situations: NFS server: linux 2.2.19 NFS Client: linux 2.4.[32]ac[...],

Re: [2.4.5 and all ac-Patches] massive file corruption with reiser or NFS

2001-06-02 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 12:52 schrieb Rasmus Bøg Hansen: > On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Andreas Hartmann wrote: > > I got massive file corruptions with the kernels mentioned in the subject. > > I can reproduce it every time. > > You cannot use NFS on reiserfs unless you apply the

[2.4.5 and all ac-Patches] massive file corruption with reiser or NFS

2001-06-02 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hallo all, I got massive file corruptions with the kernels mentioned in the subject. I can reproduce it every time. What did I do? The kernel can't find files or directories which have been created seconds before. If I start configure of some program for example, the conftest-Directory can't

Re: [2.4.4ac11 - 2.4.5 and 2.4.5ac5] problems with stat continue (ln -s broken ...?)

2001-05-30 Thread Andreas Hartmann
Hallo all! I know that I'm repeating myself - but the problem is still the same. It's impossible for me to use these kernels mentioned in the subject. I think there is a parallelism to the mail "ln -s broken on 2.4.5" or am I the problem? Who can help me? Regards, Andrea

[2.4.4ac11-17] lasting problems with stat or link

2001-05-26 Thread Andreas Hartmann
32, IRQ 10 Memory at d000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=64M] I/O ports at c000 [size=256] Memory at d500 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Expansion ROM at [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: Regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list

[2.4.4ac15/16] problems with stat or link

2001-05-24 Thread Andreas Hartmann
partition. The problem is on local filesystems as well as on nfs-mounted filesystems (which resides on the server on reiserfs too). If the problem is on a nfs-mounted FS, you can see, that in the original FS the file can be stat'ed without any problem (using telnet or ssh e.g.). I

Re: [2.4.4ac4] Kernel crash while unmounting CD: cause and solution

2001-05-11 Thread Andreas Hartmann
ich it doesn't want to burn and which causes the crash before! Regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[2.4.4ac4] Kernel crash while unmounting CD

2001-05-10 Thread Andreas Hartmann
n that might be relevant to the problem (please look in /proc and include all information that you think to be relevant): Please ask, if you want to know some more things! [X.] Other notes, patches, fixes, workarounds: dito. Regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list

Re: [2.4.3ac11] clock timer configuration lost - probably a VIA686a motherboard

2001-04-22 Thread Andreas Hartmann
ith a VIA-chipset, but with a GA-5AX with Ali V Chipsatz + iP 200 MMX. Unfortunately he didn't tell, which kernel he's using and at which situation the message occurs. Regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the

[2.4.3ac11] clock timer configuration lost - probably a VIA686a motherboard

2001-04-22 Thread Andreas Hartmann
2 bit memory at 0xd000 [0xd3ff]. I/O at 0xc000 [0xc0ff]. Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0xd500 [0xd5003fff] Regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More ma

2.4.3ac11: [drm:r128_do_wait_for_idle] *ERROR* r128_do_wait_for_idle failed!

2001-04-21 Thread Andreas Hartmann
e problem still exists. Is the problem sitting 50 cm before the screen - or is it a bug? Thank you very much for your great work and your advice Regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE

Problem with DMA or agpgart on VIA686a-boards consists with kernel 2.4.2?

2001-02-25 Thread Andreas Hartmann
. I couldn't find any problem with these patches. I would be very appreciated if the related patches of Alan Cox could find there way in the official kernel! Kind regards, Andreas Hartmann - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a me