Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-08-26 Thread Andreas John
tware - and it works without lockups. Is that simply luck? According to dmesg NCQ is activated on the ICH7. Is it currently only possible to ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ generally? Or can that be done per chipset? Best Regards, Andreas @Ulrich: On what kind of chipset did you observe the horkage? Andreas John

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-08-23 Thread Andreas John
ross:1951800k [ 17.15] EXT3 FS on md0, internal journal [ 17.67] NET: Registered protocol family 10 [ 17.67] lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions [ 17.79] AppArmor: Unregistered secondary security module: capability [ 28.39] eth0: no IPv6 routers present Andreas John schrie

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-08-22 Thread Andreas John
Hm, I should add that on 2.6.22-amd64 (ubuntu gutsy) the log entry is as follows: 8<-- ata2.00 excetion Emask 0x40 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x800 action 0x2 frozen ata2.00 tag 0 cmd 0xea Emask 0x44 stat 0x40 err 0x0 timeout 1st FIS failed 8<-- rgds, Andreas Andreas John schrieb

Re: [PATCH] ahci.c: fix ati sb600 sata IRQ_TF_ERR

2007-08-22 Thread Andreas John
Hi SB600-folks, we bought some AMD690/sb600 based mobos and try go get them working. I followed the patches on LKML and switched from Debian Etch 2.6.18-x kernel to 2.6.22, just to ensure that all patches are already applied. But we still have strange errors/lockups and we found a way to reproduce