Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: blacklist Host Notify on HP EliteBook G3 850

My boot issue happens right after the BIOS when the initrd should be loaded and then no grub (v2.0) menu appears. It seems I could fix it for me disabling Host Notify + Interrupts with options i2c_i801 disable_features=0x30 and then rebuilding initrd. The touchpad is still working. Still testing

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: blacklist Host Notify on HP EliteBook G3 850

My boot issue happens right after the BIOS when the initrd should be loaded and then no grub (v2.0) menu appears. It seems I could fix it for me disabling Host Notify + Interrupts with options i2c_i801 disable_features=0x30 and then rebuilding initrd. The touchpad is still working. Still testing

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: blacklist Host Notify on HP EliteBook G3 850

Am Mon, 2 Apr 2018 08:34:35 -0400 schrieb Jason Andryuk : > The HP EliteBook G3 850 has a weird bug where a subsequent cold boot > hangs while plugged in if Linux enables the Host Notify features of > i2c-i801. The cold boot hang depends on how the system boots. It > does

Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: i801: blacklist Host Notify on HP EliteBook G3 850

Am Mon, 2 Apr 2018 08:34:35 -0400 schrieb Jason Andryuk : > The HP EliteBook G3 850 has a weird bug where a subsequent cold boot > hangs while plugged in if Linux enables the Host Notify features of > i2c-i801. The cold boot hang depends on how the system boots. It > does not hang on UEFI Grub

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/105] 4.9.55-stable review

Building the 4.9.x kernel package for Arch Linux 4.9.55 gives this IPv4 error here: Job for dhcpd4.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status dhcpd4.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. root@server64:/root # systemctl status dhcpd4.service

Re: [PATCH 4.9 000/105] 4.9.55-stable review

Building the 4.9.x kernel package for Arch Linux 4.9.55 gives this IPv4 error here: Job for dhcpd4.service failed because the control process exited with error code. See "systemctl status dhcpd4.service" and "journalctl -xe" for details. root@server64:/root # systemctl status dhcpd4.service

Re: sata drive loosing connection/resetting port

Am Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:53:35 +0900 schrieb Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't think this is driver issue. I have the same controller and > I've never seen similar thing happening and I have plenty of drives > and test them often. Error reports also point to transmission > problems. Your

Re: sata drive loosing connection/resetting port

Am Thu, 16 Aug 2007 19:53:35 +0900 schrieb Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I don't think this is driver issue. I have the same controller and I've never seen similar thing happening and I have plenty of drives and test them often. Error reports also point to transmission problems. Your drive

Re: sata drive loosing connection/resetting port

Am Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:15:52 +0900 schrieb Tejun Heo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Most likely a hardware issue. > > * Please try a different harddrive/cable and connect to a different > port. > > * Get a different power supply and see whether that changes anything. > already tried different ports,

Re: sata drive loosing connection/resetting port

Am Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:15:52 +0900 schrieb Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Most likely a hardware issue. * Please try a different harddrive/cable and connect to a different port. * Get a different power supply and see whether that changes anything. already tried different ports, several

sata drive loosing connection/resetting port

119440 2 pata_jmicron,ahci i've tried changing the SATA cables and also the power wire to the disc without success. i checked the disc successfully with Hitachi drive fitness test. it has worked without any trouble so far in a Intel P965 ICH8 based mainboard. any idea how to find the reason? Andreas

sata drive loosing connection/resetting port

119440 2 pata_jmicron,ahci i've tried changing the SATA cables and also the power wire to the disc without success. i checked the disc successfully with Hitachi drive fitness test. it has worked without any trouble so far in a Intel P965 ICH8 based mainboard. any idea how to find the reason? Andreas

Re: [2.6.20.16 review 00/28] 2.6.20.16 -stable review

patches will be posted for review in response to this message. hm. i'm a bit confused about your intention. will you keep maintaining 2.6.20.x for longer? should this one replace or live along the 2.6.16.xx long life series? Andreas Radke ArchLinux x86_64 developer/maintainer - To unsubscribe from this

Re: [2.6.20.16 review 00/28] 2.6.20.16 -stable review

to this message. hm. i'm a bit confused about your intention. will you keep maintaining 2.6.20.x for longer? should this one replace or live along the 2.6.16.xx long life series? Andreas Radke ArchLinux x86_64 developer/maintainer - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel